Prosthesis-user-in-the-loop: User-centered design parameters and visual simulation

Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1929-1932

  Christ, O ^a   Wojtusch, J ^a   Beckerle, P ^a   Wolff, K ^a   Vogt, J ^a   Von Stryk, O ^a   Rinderknecht, S ^a  

^a DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BASIC CONCEPTS; BODY IMAGE; HARDWARE SIMULATORS; USER CENTERED DESIGNS; USER-CENTERED; VISUAL FEEDBACK; VISUAL SIMULATION;

PATIENT REHABILITATION; VISUAL COMMUNICATION; VISUALIZATION;

PROSTHETICS;

ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; ORTHOSIS; PROSTHESIS; SENSORY FEEDBACK;

BODY IMAGE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; HUMANS; ORTHOTIC DEVICES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84880801608     PISSN: 1557170X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346331     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. H. Senra, R. A. Oliveira, I. Leal and C. Vieira, "Beyond the body image: a qualitative study on how adults experience lower limb amputation," Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 180-191, Feb. 2012.
2. M. Botvinick and J. Cohen, "Rubber hands feel touch that eyes see," Nature, vol. 391, p. 756, Feb. 1998.
3. A. I. Goller, K. Richards, S. Novak and J. Ward, "Mirror-touch Synaesthesia in the Phantom Limbs of Amputees," Cortex, June 2011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.05.002.
4. S. Gallagher and J. Cole, "Body Schema and Body Image in a Deafferented Subject," Journal of Mind and Behavior, vol. 16, pp. 369-390, Autumn 1995.
5. P. de Souto Barreto, A. M. Ferrandez and A. M. Guihard-Costa, "Predictors of Body Satisfaction: Differences Between Older Men and Women's Perceptions of Their Body Functioning and Appearance," Journal of Aging and Health, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 505-528, April 2011.
6. O. Christ, M. Jokisch, J. Preller, P. Beckerle, S. Rinderknecht and Vogt, J. "Persistence of the rubber hand illusion and maintaining factors during active or passive movements: new indicators for rehabilitation?," European Psychiatry, vol.27, no. S1, p.224, 2012
7. O. Christ, C. Weber, I. Borchert and H. Sorgatz, "Dissonance between visual and proprioceptive information as a moderator in experimental pain," Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 43, no. 9, p.836, Sep. 2011.
8. O. Christ, P. Beckerle, S. Rinderknecht and J. Vogt, "Usability, satisfaction and appearance while using lower limb prostheses: Implications for the future," Neuroscience Letters, vol. 500, no. S1, p. e50, July 2011.
9. S. J. Blakemore, C. D. Frith and D. Wolpert, "Spatio temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli," Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 551-559, Sep. 1999.
10. N. Franck, C. Farrer, N. Georgieff, M. Marie-Cardine, J. Dalery, T. d Amato and M. Jeannerod, "Defective recognition of one's own actions in patients with schizophrenia," American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 158, no. 3, pp. 454-459. Mar. 2001.
11. S. Shimada, Y. Qi and K. Hiraki, "Detection of visual feedback delay in active and passive self-body movements," Experimental Brain Research, vol. 201, no. 2, pp. 359-364, Mar. 2010.
12. C. Murray and J. Fox, "Body image and prosthesis satisfaction in the lower limb amputee," Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 24, no. 17, pp. 925-931, Nov. 2002.
13. A. Mayer, K. Kudar, K. Bretz and J. Tihanyi, "Body schema and body awareness of amputees," Prosthetics and Orthotics International, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 363-382, Sep. 2008.
14. J. Unwin, L. Kacperek and C. Clarke, "A prospective study of positive adjustment to lower limb amputation," Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1044-1050, Nov. 2009.
15. O. Horgan and M. MacLachlan, "Psychosocial adjustment to lower-limb amputation: A review," Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 26, No. 14, pp. 837-850, July 2004.
16. M. Tsakiris, M. R Longo and P. Haggard, "Having a body versus moving your body: Neural signatures of agency and body-ownership," Neuropsychologia, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 2740-2749. July 2010.
17. T. Dummer, A Picot-Annand, T. Neal and C. Moore, "Movement and the rubber hand illusion," Perception, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 271-280, 2009.
18. M. R. Longo and P. Haggard, "Sense of agency primes manual motor responses," Perception, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 69-78, 2009
19. M. Tsakiris, G Prabhu and P. Haggard, "Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership," Consciousness and Cognition, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 423 - 432, Jun. 2006.
20. th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS (accepted), 2012.
21. M. Bastioni, M. Flerackers, and J. Capco. (2012) Makehuman. [Online]. Available: http://www.makehuman.org/