Content-based instruction and content and language integrated learning: the same or different?

Language, Culture and Curriculum

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 8-24

  Cenoz, Jasone ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

Basque; CLIL; content based instruction; English; language teaching; multilingual education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937232401     PISSN: 07908318     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07908318.2014.1000922     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. H.Baetens Beardsmore, (1993). The European school model. In H.Baetens Beardsmore (Ed.), European models of bilingual education (pp. 121–154). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
2. C.Baker, (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (5th ed.). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
3. Basque Government. (2011). V Mapa Sociolinguistikoa. Retrieved from http://www.euskara.euskadi.net/contenidos/noticia/v_mapa_soziolinguistikoa/eu_def/adjuntos/V%20%20Mapa%20EU.pdf
4. D.Brinton,, M.A.Snow,, & M.Wesche, (1989). Content-based second language instruction. New York: Newbury House.
5. J.Cenoz, (2009). Towards multilingual education: Basque educational research from an international perspective. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
6. J.Cenoz, (2013). Discussion: Towards an educational perspective in CLIL language policy and pedagogical practice. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16, 389–394.doi:10.1080/13670050.2013.777392
7. J.Cenoz, F.Genesee,, & D.Gorter, (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35, 243–262.doi:10.1093/applin/amt011
8. J.Cenoz,, & D.Gorter, (2011). Focus on multilingualism: A study of trilingual writing. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 356–369.doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01206.x
9. D.Coyle, (2008). CLIL – A pedagogical approach from the European perspective. In N.Van Dusen-Scholl & N.H.Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 97–111). Berlin: Springer.
10. D.Coyle,, P.Hood,, & D.Marsh, (2010). Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. C.Dalton-Puffer, (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
12. C.Dalton-Puffer,, A.Llinares,, F.Lorenzo,, & T.Nikula, (2014). You can stand under my umbrella: Immersion, CLIL and bilingual education. A response to Cenoz, Genesee & Gorter. Applied Linguistics, 35, 213–218.doi:10.1093/applin/amu010
13. C.Dalton-Puffer,, T.Nikula,, & U.Smit, (2010). Language use and language learning in CLIL: Current findings and contentious issues. In C.Dalton-Puffer, T.Nikula, & U.Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp. 279–291). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14. C.Dalton-Puffer,, & U.Smit, (2013). Content and language integrated learning: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 46, 545–559.doi:10.1017/S0261444813000256
15. Eurobarometer. (2012). Europeans and their languages: Eurobarometer 386 report. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_386_en.pdfec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_386_en.pdf
16. Eurydice. (2006). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at school in Europe. Retrieved from http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/content-and-language-integrated-learning-clic-at-school-in-europe-pbNCX106001/
17. F.Gallagher,, & A.Leahy, (2014). The feel good factor: Comparing immersion by design and immersion by default models. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 27, 58–71.doi:10.1080/07908318.2013.877476
18. F.Genesee, (1998). A case study of multilingual education in Canada. In J.Cenoz & F.Genesee (Eds.), Beyond bilingualism: Multilingualism and multilingual education (pp. 243–258). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
19. F.Genesee,, & K.Lindholm-Leary, (2013). Two case studies of content-based language education. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1, 3–33.doi:10.1075/jicb.1.1.02gen
20. D.Gorter,, V.Zenotz,, & J.Cenoz, (Eds.). (2014). Minority languages and multilingual education. Berlin: Springer.
21. N.Hornberger, (2007). Continua of biliteracy. In A.Creese, P.Martin, & N.Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education. Vol. 9: Ecology of language (pp. 275–290). Berlin: Springer.
22. D.Lasagabaster,, & J.M.Sierra, (2010). Immersion and CLIL in English: More differences than similarities. ELT Journal, 64, 367–375.doi:10.1093/elt/ccp082
23. J.S.Lee,, & E.Jeong, (2013). Korean–English dual language immersion: Perspectives of students, parents and teachers. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 26, 89–107.doi:10.1080/07908318.2013.765890
24. A.Lin, (2015). Conceptualising the potential role of L1 in CLIL. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28, 74–89.
25. A.Llinares,, T.Morton,, & R.Whittaker, (2012). The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. R.Lyster, (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
27. D.Marsh, (Ed.). (2002). CLIL/EMILE: The European dimension. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
28. U.Massler, D.Stotz,, & C.Queisser, (2014). Assessment instruments for primary CLIL: The conceptualisation and evaluation of test tasks. The Language Learning Journal, 42, 137–150.doi:10.1080/09571736.2014.891371
29. P.Mehisto,, D.Marsh,, & M.J.Frigols, (2008). Uncovering CLIL. London: Macmillan Education.
30. M.Met, (1998). Curriculum decision-making in content-based language teaching. In J.Cenoz & F.Genesee (Eds.), Beyond bilingualism: Multilingualism and multilingual education (pp. 35–63). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
31. B.Mohan,, & T.Slater, (2005). A functional perspective on the critical theory/practice relation in teaching language and science. Linguistics and Education, 16, 151–172.doi: 10.1016/j.linged.2006.01.008
32. T.Nikula,, C.Dalton-Puffer,, & A.Llinares García, (2013). European research on CLIL classroom discourse. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1, 70–100.doi:10.1075/jicb.1.1.04nik
33. A.Paran, (2013). Content and language integrated learning: Panacea or policy borrowing myth? Applied Linguistics Review, 4, 317–342.doi:10.1515/applirev-2013-0014
34. M.L.Pérez-Cañado, (2012). CLIL research in Europe: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15, 315–341.doi: 10.1080/13670050.2011.630064
35. Y.Ruiz de Zarobe, (2008). CLIL and foreign language learning: A longitudinal study in the Basque Country. International Journal of CLIL Research, 1, 60–73.
36. S.Smala, (2014). Sole fighter mentality: Stakeholder agency in CLIL programmes in Queensland. The Language Learning Journal, 42, 195–208.doi:10.1080/09571736.2014.889510
37. F.Stoller, (2002). Promoting the acquisition of knowledge in a content based course. In J.Crandall & D.Kaufman (Eds.), Content-based instruction in higher education settings (pp. 109–123). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
38. F.L.Stoller, (2008). Content-based instruction. In N.Van Deusen-Scholl & N.H.Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education. Vol. 4: Second and foreign language education (pp. 59–70). New York: Springer.
39. M.Swain,, & R.K.Johnson, (1997). Immersion education: A category within bilingual education. In R.K.Johnson & M.Swain (Eds.), Immersion education: International perspectives (pp. 1–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. M.Swain,, & S.Lapkin, (2005). The evolving sociopolitical context of immersion education in Canada: Some implications for program development. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 169, 169–186.doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2005.00086.x
41. M.Swain,, & S.Lapkin, (2013). A Vygotskian sociocultural perspective on immersion education: The L1/L2 debate. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1, 101–129.doi:10.1075/jicb.1.1.05swa
42. D.J.Tedick,, D.Christian,, & T.W.Fortune, (2011). The future of immersion education: An invitation to ‘dwell in possibility’. In D.J.Tedick, D.Christian, & T.W.Fortune (Eds.), Immersion education: Practices, policies, possibilities (pp. 1–12). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
43. D.Tedick,, & P.Wesley, (2015). A review of research on content-based foreign/second language education in US K-12 contexts. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28, 25–40.
44. P.Van de Craen,, E.Ceuleers,, & K.Mondt, (2007). Cognitive development and bilingualism in primary schools: Teaching maths in a CLIL environment. In D.Marsh & D.Wolff (Eds.), Diverse contexts-converging goals: CLIL in Europe (pp. 185–200). New York: Peter Lang.