Content and language integrated learning: A research agenda

Language Teaching

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 545-559

  Dalton Puffer, Christiane ^a   Smit, Ute ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884872134     PISSN: 02614448     EISSN: 14753049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0261444813000256     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Airey, J. (2009). Estimating undergraduate bilingual scientific literacy in Sweden. International CLIL Research Journal 1, 26-35.
2. Badertscher, H. & T. Bieri (2009). Wissenserwerb im content and language integrated learning.Bern, Wien: Haupt.
3. Barcelos, A. M. F. (2003). Researching beliefs about SLA: A critical review. In P. Kalaja & A. M. F. Barcelos (eds.), Beliefs about SLA. New research approaches. New York: Springer, 7-33.
4. Barcelos, A. M. F. & P. Kalaja (2011). Introduction to beliefs about SLA revisited. System 39, 281-289.
5. BMBWK(2003).Gesetzliche Grundlagen schulischer Maßnahmen f̈ur ScḧulerInnenmit einer anderen Erstsprache als Deutsch. Gesetze und Verordnungen (=Informationsbl̈atter des Referats f̈ur Interkulturelles Lernen Nr. 1/2003).
6. Brinton, D. M., M. A. Snow & M. B.Wesche (2008) [1989]. Content-based second language instruction. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
7. Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. New York: Routledge.
8. CLIL Cascade Network (no date). www.ccn-clil.eu
9. CLIL Compendium (no date). www.clilcompendium.com/clilcompendium.htm
10. CLIL Consortium (no date). www.clilviu.es
11. Cohen, L., L.Manion & K. Morrison (2011). Research methods in education (7th edn). London: Routledge.
12. Comunidad, de Madrid (2010). Los programas de enseñanza biling̈ue de la comunidad de Madrid. Un estudio comparado. www.madrid.org/cs/Satellitec=CM-InfPractica-FA&cid= 1142623372595& idTema=1109265604897&language=es&pagename=ComunidadMadrid% 2FEstructura&perfil=1273044216036&pid=1273078188154
13. Coyle,D., P.Hood&D.Marsh (2010) CLIL: Content and language integrated learning.New York:Cambridge University Press.
14. Dafouz, E., B. Nuñez, C. Sancho & D. Foran (2007). Integrating CLIL at the tertiary level: Teachers' and students' reactions. In D. Marsh & D.Wolff (eds.) Diverse contexts-converging goals: CLIL in Europe. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 91-102.
15. Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007a). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
16. Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007b). Academic language functions in a CLIL environment. In D. Marsh & D. Wolff (eds.), Diverse contexts-converging goals: CLIL in Europe. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 201-210.
17. Dalton-Puffer,C. (2011).Content and language integrated learning: Frompractice to principles. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31, 182-204.
18. Dalton-Puffer, C., J. Ḧuttner, S. Jexenflicker, V. Schindelegger & U. Smit (2008). Content and language integrated learning an Österreichs Höheren Technischen Lehranstalten. Forschungsbericht. Bundesministerium für Unterricht, Kultur und Kunst, Abt. II/2.
19. Dalton-Puffer, C., T. Nikula & U. Smit (eds.) (2010). Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
20. de Graaff, R., G. J. Koopman, Y. Anikina & G. Westhoff (2007). An observation tool for effective L2 pedagogy in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 10.5, 603-624.
21. D̈ornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. European Commission (1995). White paper on education and training. Teaching and learning: towards the learning society, 1-66. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/documents/comm/white-papers/pdf/com95-590-en.pdf
23. European Commission (2003). Promoting language learning and linguistic diversity: an action plan 2004-2006, 1-29.http://ec.europa.eu/education/doc/ official/keydoc/actlang/act-lang-en.pdf
24. European Commission (2008). Multilingualism: An asset for Europe and a shared commitment. Communication of the European Commission, 1-15. http://ec.europa.eu/education/languages/pdf/com/2008-0566-en.pdf
25. European Framework for CLIL Teacher Education (no date). http://clil.uni.lu/CLIL/Home-files/1-Project-Presentation-en.pdf
26. Europees Platform-internationaliseeren in onderwijs (no date). www.europeesplatform.nl
27. Eurydice Network (2006). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at school in Europe. Brussels. http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/ thematic-studies-archives-en.php
28. Fazio, L. & R. Lyster (1998). Immersion and submersion classrooms: A comparison of instructional practices in language arts. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 19, 303-317.
29. Grin, F. (2001). English as economic value: Facts and fallacies. World Englishes 20.1, 65-78.
30. Hatch, E. M. (1992). Discourse and language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Ḧuttner, J., C. Dalton-Puffer & U. Smit (2013). The power of beliefs: Lay theories and their influence on the implementation of CLIL programmes. International Journal of Bilingualism and Bilingual Education 16:3, 267-284.
32. Hynninen, N. (2012). ICL at the micro level: L2 speakers taking on the role of language experts. In U. Smit & M. Dafouz (eds.), Integrating content and language in higher education: Gaining insights into English-medium instruction at European universities. AILA Review 25, 13-29.
33. Kidd, R. (1996).Teaching academic language functions at the secondary level. Canadian Modern Language Review 52, 285-307.
34. Lasagabaster, D. (2009). The implementation of CLIL and attitudes towards trilingualism. ITLInternational Journal of Applied Linguistics 157, 23-43.
35. Lasagabaster, D. & J. M. Sierra (2009). Language attitudes in CLIL and traditional EFL classes. International Journal of CLIL Research 1.2, 4-17.
36. Lilley, T. (2011). Bloom's taxonomy. In B. Hoffman (ed.), Encyclopedia of educational technology. http://eet.sdsu.edu/eetwiki/index.php/Blooms-taxonomy
37. Little, D. (2006).The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Content, purpose, origin, reception and impact. Language Teaching 39.3, 167-190.
38. Llinares, A., T. Morton & R. Whittaker (2012). The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Lorenzo, F. & P. Moore (2010). On the natural emergence of language structures in CLIL: Towards a theory of European educational bilingualism. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula & U. Smit (eds.), 23-38.
40. Lose, J. (2007). The language of scientific discourse: Ergebnisse einer empirischdeskriptiven Interaktionsanalyse zur Verwendung fachbezogener Diskursfunktionen im bilingualen Biologieunterricht. In D. Caspari, W. Hallet, A. Wegner & W. Zydatiß (eds.), Bilingualer Unterricht macht Schule: Beitr̈age aus der Praxisforschung. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 97-107.
41. Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
42. Massler, U. (2012). Primary CLIL and its stakeholders: What children, parents and teachers think of the potential merits and pitfalls of CLIL modules in primary teaching. International CLIL Research Journal 4, 36-46.
43. Negueruela-Azarola, E. (2011). Beliefs as conceptualizing activity: A dialectical approach for the second language classroom. System 39, 359-369.
44. Nikula, T. (2010). On effects of CLIL on a teacher's language use. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula & U. Smit (eds.), 105-123.
45. Norton, L. S. (2009). Action research in teaching and learning: A practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities. London: Routledge.
46. Norton, B. & K. Toohey (2011). Identity, language learning and social change. Language Teaching 44, 412-446.
47. OECD-PISA. OECD Programme for International Student Assessment. www.oecd.org/pisa/
48. Pavlenko, A. & B. Norton (2007). Imagined communities, identity, and English language teaching. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (eds.), International handbook of English language teaching. New York: Springer, 669-680.
49. Pearson, P. D. E., E. Moje & C. Greenleaf (2010). Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other. Science 328, 459-463.
50. Ṕerez Vidal, C. (2011). Language acquisition in three different contexts of learning: Formal instruction, stay abroad, and semi-immersion (CLIL). In Y.Ruiz de Zarobe, J.M. Sierra & F. Gallardo del Puerto (eds.), Contributions to multilingualism in European contexts. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 103-128.
51. Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2008). CLIL and foreign language learning: A longitudinal study in the Basque Country. International CLIL Research Journal 1.1, 60-73.
52. Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. London: Blackwell.
53. Smit, U. (2010). English as a lingua franca in higher education: A longitudinal study of classroom discourse. Berlin: Mouton.
54. Spada,N. &M. Fr̈ohlich (1995). COLT: Communicative orientation of language teaching observation scheme. Coding conventions and applications. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
55. Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Spolsky, B. (2009). Language management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Stoller, F. L. (2004). Content-based instruction: Perspectives on curriculum planning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24, 264-283.
58. Ting, T. (2011). CLIL.. not only not immersion but also more than the sum of its parts. ELT Journal 65.3, 314-317.
59. Van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston;Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
60. Vollmer, H. J., L.Heine,R. Troschke,D. Coetzee V.K̈uttel (2006). Subject-specific competence and language use of CLIL learners: The case of geography in grade 10 of secondary schools in Germany. Paper presented at the ESSE8 Conference, London, UK.
61. Wegner,A. (2012). Seeing the bigger picture:What students and teachers think about CLIL. International CLIL Research Journal 4, 29-35.
62. Wolff, D. (2007). CLIL: Bridging the gap between school and working life. In D. Marsh & D. Wolff (eds.), Diverse contexts-converging goals. CLIL in Europe. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 15-25.