The effect of shared versus individual reflection on team outcomes

Business Communication Quarterly

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 5-32

  Domke Damonte, Darla J ^a   Keels, J Kay ^a  

^a Department of Public Health   (United States)

Author keywords

Project team outcomes; Shared reflection; Strategic management; Team contract; Team shared behavioral norms

Indexed keywords

EID: 84934991115     PISSN: 10805699     EISSN: 15524191     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2329490614562950     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Bacon, D. R., Stewart, K. A., & Silver, W. S. (1999). Lessons from the best and worst student team experiences: How a teacher can make a difference. Journal of Management Education, 23, 467-488.
2. Berg, R. W. (2012). The anonymity factor in making multicultural teams work: Virtual and real teams. Business Communication Quarterly, 75, 404-424.
3. Bettenhausen, K. L., & Murnighan, J. K. (1985). The emergence of norms in competitive decision making groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 350-372.
4. Bolton, M. K. (1999). The role of coaching in student teams: A "just-in-time" approach to learning. Journal of Management Education, 23, 233-250.
5. Boyd, E. M., & Fales, A. W. (1983). Reflective learning: Key to learning through experience. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 23, 99-117.
6. Byrd, J. T., & Luthy, M. R. (2010). Improving group dynamics: Creating a team charter. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 14, 13-26.
7. Candy, P., Crebert, G., & O'Leary, A. (1994). Developing lifelong learners through undergraduate education (NBEET Commissioned Report Number 28). Canberra, ACT: Government Publishing Service.
8. Chapman, K. J., Meuter, M. L., Toy, D., & Wright, L. K. (2010). Are student groups dysfunctional? Perspectives from both sides of the classroom. Journal of Marketing, 32(1), 39-49.
9. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scale. Educational Psychology Measures, 20, 37-46.
10. Cox, P. L., & Bobrowski, P. E. (2000). The team charter assignment: Improving the effectiveness of classroom teams. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 1, 92-103.
11. Cox, P. L., & Friedman, B. A. (2009). The team boat exercise: Enhancing team communication midsemester. Business Communication Quarterly, 72, 230-236.
12. Dayaram, K., & Fung, L. (2012). Team performance: Where learning makes the greatest impact. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 20, 28-39.
13. Druskat, V. U., & Kayes, D. C. (2000). Learning versus performance in short-term project teams. Small Group Research, 31, 328-353.
14. Dyer, W. (1995). Team building: Current issues and new alternatives. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1985). Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Management Science, 31, 134-150.
16. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14, 57-74.
17. Eppler, M. J., & Sukowski, O. (2000). Managing team knowledge: Core processes, tools and enabling factors. European Management Journal, 18, 334-341.
18. Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70, 287-322.
19. Flynn, F. J., & Chatman, J. A. (2001). Innovation and social control: Oxymoron or opportunity. In C. Cooper, S. Cartwright, & P. C. Earley (Eds.), The international handbook of organizational culture and climate (pp. 263-287). New York, NY: Wiley.
20. Flynn, F. J., & Chatman, J. A. (2002). What's the norm here? Social categorization as a basis for group norm development (Working paper 02-089). Retrieved from http://faculty. haas. berkeley. edu/chatman/papers/21_SCTNormDevelopment. pdf.
21. Forrester, W. R., & Tashchian, A. (2006). Modeling the relationship between cohesion and performance in student work groups. International Journal of Management, 23, 458-464.
22. Furst, S., Blackburn, R., & Rosen, B. (1999). Virtual team effectiveness: A proposed research agenda. Information Systems Journal, 9, 249-269.
23. Gatfield, T. (1999). Examining student satisfaction with group projects and peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, 365-378.
24. Gosling, M., & Huang, H. (2009). The fit between integrity and integrative social contracts theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 407-417.
25. Gueldenzoph, L. E., & May, G. L. (2002). Collaborative peer evaluation: Best practices for group member assessments. Business Communication Quarterly, 65(1), 9-20.
26. Gurtner, A., Tschan, F., Semmer, N. K., & Nagele, C. (2007). Getting groups to develop good strategies: Effects of reflexivity interventions on team process, team performance, and shared mental models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 127-142.
27. Hansen, R. S. (2006). Benefits and problems with student teams: Suggestions for improving team projects. Journal of Education for Business, 82, 11-19.
28. Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96-107.
29. Hayward, A. (2010). Team cognition in technology-mediated virtual teams. In Proceedings for The Northeast Region Decision Sciences Institute (pp. 259-265). Alexandria, VA: Northeast Region Decision Sciences Institute. Retrieved from http://www. nedsi. org/proc/2010/pdf/2010nedsiproceedingscombined. pdf.
30. Hirsch, P., Shwom, B., & McKenna, A. (2003). Teaching and assessing teamwork: Implementing continuous quality improvement. In Proceedings of the 2003 Association for Business Communication Annual Convention. Blacksburg, VA: Association for Business Communication.
31. Hunsaker, P. L., & Hunsaker, J. S. (2010, March). Can team charters increase learning team performance and satisfaction? Results of a survey of management students. Paper presented at the Western Academy of Management, Kona, Hawaii.
32. Hunsaker, P. L., Pavett, C., & Hunsaker, J. S. (2011). Increasing student-learning team effectiveness with team charters. Journal of Education for Business, 86, 127-139.
33. Jaworski, B. J. (1988). Toward a theory of marketing control: Environmental context, control types, and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 52, 23-39.
34. Jindal-Snape, D., & Holmes, E. A. (2009). A longitudinal study exploring perspectives of participants regarding reflective practice during their transition from higher education to professional practice. Reflective Practice, 10, 219-232.
35. Kirsch, L. J. (1997). Portfolios of control modes and IS project management. Information Systems Research, 8, 215-239.
36. Koch, G. G. (1982). Intraclass correlation coefficient. In S. Kotz & N. L. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (Vol. 4, pp. 213-217). New York, NY: Wiley.
37. Lee, H., & Lim, C. (2012). Peer evaluation in blended team project-based learning: What do students find important? Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15, 214-224.
38. Li-Fang, C., An-Chih, W., Ting-Yu, W., Min-Ping, H., & Bor-Shiuan, C. (2008). Shared work values and team member effectiveness: The mediation of trustfulness and trustworthiness. Human Relations, 61, 1713-1742.
39. Mathieu, J. E., Goodwin, G. F., Heffner, T. S., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273-283.
40. Mathieu, J. E., & Rapp, T. L. (2009). Laying the foundation for successful team performance trajectories: The roles of team charters and performance strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 90-103.
41. May, G. L., & Gueldenzoph, L. E. (2003). The impact of social style on student peer evaluation ratings in group projects. In Proceedings of the 2003 Association for Business Communication Annual Convention. Blacksburg, VA: Association for Business Communication.
42. May, G. L., & Gueldenzoph, L. E. (2006). The effect of social style on peer evaluation ratings in project teams. Journal of Business Communication, 43, 4-20.
43. Mayers, A. (2013). Introduction to statistics and SPSS in psychology. London, England: Pearson.
44. McDowell, W. C., Herdman, A. O., & Aaron, J. (2011). Charting the course: The effects of team charters on emergent behavioral norms. Organization Development Journal, 29, 79-88.
45. Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G. C., & Guarino, A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Navarro, P. (2008). The MBA core curricula of top-ranked U. S. business schools: A study in failure? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7, 108-123.
47. Ohland, M. W., Loughry, M. L., Woehr, D. J., Bullard, L. G., Felder, R. M., Finelli, C. J., & Schmucker, D. G. (2012). The comprehensive assessment of team member effectiveness: Development of a behaviorally anchored rating scale for self-and peer evaluation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 609-630.
48. Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25, 833-848.
49. Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London, England: Temple Smith.
50. Searby, M., & Ewers, T. (1997). An evaluation of the use of peer assessment in higher education: A case study in the School of Music, Kingston University. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22, 371-383.
51. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. London, England: Random House.
52. Shui, A., Chan, C., Lam, P., Lee, J., & Kwong, A. (2012). Baccalaureate nursing students' perceptions of peer assessment of individual contributions to a group project: A case study. Nurse Education Today, 32, 214-218.
53. Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text, and interaction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
54. Sundstrom, E. (1999). Supporting work team effectiveness: Best management practices for fostering high performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
55. Tesluk, P. E., & Mathieu, J. E. (1999). Overcoming roadblocks to effectiveness: Incorporating management of performance barriers into models of work group effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 200-217.
56. Vik, G. N. (2001). Doing more to teach teamwork than telling students to sink or swim. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(4), 112-119.
57. Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. In M. S. Lewis-Beck (Ed.), Sage University papers: Series on quantitative applications in the social sciences (2nd ed. pp. 7-49). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
58. Wills, K. V., & Clerkin, T. A. (2009). Incorporating reflective practice into team simulation projects for improved learning outcomes. Business Communication Quarterly, 72, 221-227.