The role of environmental variables on the efficiency of water and sewerage companies: a case study of Chile

Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Volumn 22, Issue 13, 2015, Pages 10242-10253

  Molinos Senante, María ^a,b   Sala Garrido, Ramón ^c   Lafuente, Matilde ^d  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b Centro de Desarrollo Urbano Sustentable CONICYT FONDAP 15110020   (Chile)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis; Operational environment; Performance; Returns to scale; Water and sewerage industry

Indexed keywords

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE; RETURNS TO SCALE; SERVICE SECTOR; URBAN POPULATION; WATER DEMAND; WATER INDUSTRY;

CHILE;

CHILE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRODUCTIVITY; SEWAGE; THEORETICAL MODEL; WATER MANAGEMENT;

CHILE; EFFICIENCY; EFFICIENCY, ORGANIZATIONAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WATER PURIFICATION;

EID: 84933181744     PISSN: 09441344     EISSN: 16147499     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4225-0     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Antonioli B, Filippini M (2001) The use of a variable cost function in the regulation of the Italian water industry. Util Policy 10(4):181–187
2. Aubert C, Reynaud A (2005) The impact of regulation on cost efficiency: an empirical analysis of Wisconsin water utilities. J Prod Anal 23:383–409
3. Badin L, Daraio C, Simar L (2014) Explaining inefficiency in nonparametric production models: the state of the art. Ann Oper Res 214(1):5–30
4. Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 30(9):1078–1092
5. Baranzini A, Faust AK (2009) The cost structure of water utilities in Switzerland. Working Paper Cahier de recherche No HES-SO/HEG-GE/C–10/5/1–CH, Haute école de gestion de Genève CRAG, Switzerland
6. Barros CP, Managi S, Matousek R (2012) The technical efficiency of the Japanese banks: non-radial directional performance measurement with undesirable output. Omega 40(1):1–8
7. Berg S, Lin C (2008) Consistency in performance rankings: the Peru water sector. Appl Econ 40(6):793–805
8. Berg S, Marques R (2011) Quantitative studies of water and sanitation utilities: a benchmarking literature survey. Water Policy 13(5):591–606
9. Byrnes J, Crase L, Dollery B, Villano R (2010) The relative economic efficiency of urban water utilities in regional New South Wales and Victoria. Resour Energy Econ 32(3):439–455
10. Camioto FDC, Mariano EB, Rebelatto DADN (2014) Efficiency in Brazil’s industrial sectors in terms of energy and sustainable development. Environ Sci Pol 37:50–60
11. Carvalho P, Marques RC (2011) The influence of the operational environment on the efficiency of water utilities. J Environ Manag 92(10):2698–2707
12. Carvalho P, Marques RC (2012) Using non-parametric technologies to estimate returns to scale in the Iberian and international seaports. Int J Shipp Transp Logist 4(3):286–302
13. Carvalho P, Marques RC (2014) Computing economies of vertical integration, economies of scope and economies of scale using partial frontier nonparametric methods. Eur J Oper Res 234(1):292–307
14. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444
15. Cheng G, Zervopoulos PD (2014) Estimating the technical efficiency of health care systems: a cross-country comparison using the directional distance function. Eur J Oper Res 238(3):899–910
16. Chung YH, Färe R, Grosskopf S (1997) Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. J Environ Manag 51(3):229–240
17. Coelli TJ, Prasada Rao DS, O'Donnell CJ, Battese GE (2005) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Springer, USA
18. Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2006) Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses. Springer, USA
19. Corton ML, Berg SV (2009) Benchmarking Central American water utilities. Util Policy 17(3–4):267–275
20. Daraio C, Simar L (2007) Advanced robust and nonparametric methods in efficiency analysis, Methodology and applications. Springer, New York
21. De Witte K, Marques RC (2010) Influential observations in frontier models, a robust non-oriented approach to the water sector. Ann Oper Res 181(1):377–392
22. De Witte K, Marques RC (2011) Big and beautiful? On non-parametrically measuring scale economies in nonconvex technologies. J Prod Anal 35:213–226
23. Egilmez G, Kucukvar M, Tatari O (2013) Sustainability assessment of U.S. manufacturing sectors: and economic input output-based frontier approach. J Clean Prod 53:91–102
24. Epure M, Kerstens K, Prior D (2011) Bank productivity and performance groups: a decomposition approach based upon the Luenberger productivity indicator. Eur J Oper Res 211(3):630–641
25. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK, Pasurka C (1989) Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach. Rev Econ Stat 71:90–98
26. Färe R, Grosskopft S, Lovell CAK (1994) Production frontiers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
27. Filippini M, Hrovatin N, Zoric J (2008) Cost efficiency of Slovenian water distribution utilities: an application of stochastic frontier methods. J Prod Anal 29:169–182
28. Garcia S, Thomas A (2001) The structure of municipal water supply costs: application to a panel of French local communities. J Prod Anal 16:5–29
29. Grosskopf S (1996) The role of the reference technology in measuring production efficiency. Econ J 96:499–513
30. Guerrini A, Romano G, Campedelli B (2011) Factors affecting the performance of water utility companies. Int J Public Sect Manag 24(6):543–566
31. Guerrini A, Romano G, Campedelli B (2013) Economies of scale, scope, and density in the Italian water sector: a two-stage data envelopment analysis approach. Water Resour Manag 27(13):4559–4578
32. Gupta S, Kumar S, Sarangi GK (2012) Measuring the performance of water service providers in urban India: implications for managing water utilities. Water Policy 14(3):391–408
33. Hailu A, Veeman TS (2001) Non-parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: an application to the Canadian pulp and paper industry. Am J Agric Econ 83(3):605–616
34. Hernández-Sancho F, Molinos-Senante M, Sala-Garrido R, Del Saz-Salazar S (2012) Tariffs and efficient performance by water suppliers: an empirical approach. Water Policy 14(5):854–864
35. Horn T (2011) Incorporating water purification in efficiency evaluation: evidence from Japanese water utilities. Appl Econ Lett 18(18):1789–1794
36. Kanakoudis V, Tsitsifli S, Samaras P, Zouboulis A, Banovec P (2013) A new set of water losses-related performance indicators focused on areas facing water scarcity conditions. Desalin Water Treat 51(13–15):2994–3010
37. Kumar S, Managi S (2010) Service quality and performance measurement: evidence from the Indian water sector. Int J Water Resour Dev 26(2):173–191
38. Lannier AL, Porcher S (2014) Efficiency in the public and private French water utilities: prospects for benchmarking. Appl Econ 46(5):556–572
39. Lin C (2005) Service quality and prospects for benchmarking: evidence from the Peru water sector. Util Policy 13(3):230–239
40. Lozano S, Gutiérrez E, Moreno P (2013) Network DEA approach to airports performance assessment considering undesirable outputs. Appl Math Model 37(4):1665–1676
41. Marques RC, De Witte K (2011) Is big better? On scale and scope economies in the Portuguese water sector. Econ Model 28(3):1009–1016
42. Marques R, Monteiro A (2004) Benchmarking the economic performance of Portuguese water and sewerage services. In: Emrouznejad A, Podinovski V (eds) Data envelopment analysis and performance measurement. Warwick Print, Coventry, pp 65–72
43. Marques RC, Simões P, Pires JS (2011) Performance benchmarking in utility regulation: the worldwide experience. Pol J Environ Stud 20(1):125–132
44. Marques R, Berg S, Yane S (2014) Nonparametric benchmarking of Japanese water utilities: institutional and environmental factors affecting efficiency. J Water Resour Plan Manag 140(5):562–571
45. Mbuvi D, De Witte K, Perelman S (2012) Urban water sector performance in Africa: a step-wise bias-corrected efficiency and effectiveness analysis. Util Policy 22:31–40
46. Molinos-Senante M, Hernandez-Sancho F, Sala-Garrido R (2014a) Benchmarking in wastewater treatment plants: a tool to save operational costs. Clean Techn Environ Policy 16(1):149–161
47. Molinos-Senante M, Maziotis A, Sala-Garrido R (2014b) The Luenberger productivity indicator in the water industry: an empirical analysis for England and Wales. Util Policy 30:18–28
48. Molinos-Senante M, Hernandez-Sancho F, Mocholí-Arce M, Sala-Garrido R (2014c) Economic and environmental performance of wastewater treatment plants: potential reductions in greenhouse gases emissions. Resour Energy Econ 38:125–140
49. Oum TH, Pathomsiri S, Yoshida Y (2013) Limitations of DEA-based approach and alternative methods in the measurement and comparison of social efficiency across firms in different transport modes: an empirical study in Japan. Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev 57:16–26
50. Picazo-Tadeo AJ, Sáez-Fernández FJ, González-Gómez F (2008) Does service quality matter in measuring the performance of water utilities? Util Policy 16(1):30–38
51. Picazo-Tadeo AJ, González-Gómez F, Sáez-Fernández FJ (2009) Accounting for operating environments in measuring water utilities’ managerial efficiency. Serv Ind J 29(6):761–773
52. Saal DS, Parker D (2001) Productivity and price performance in the privatized water and sewerage companies of England and Wales. J Regul Econ 20(1):61–90
53. Saal DS, Parker D, Weyman-Jones T (2007) Determining the contribution of technical change, efficiency change and scale change to productivity growth in the privatized English and Welsh water and sewerage industry: 1985-2000. J Prod Anal 28(1–2):127–139
54. Sala-Garrido R, Molinos-Senante M, Hernández-Sancho F (2011) Comparing the efficiency of wastewater treatment technologies through a DEA metafrontier model. Chem Eng J 173:766–772
55. Sala-Garrido R, Hernández-Sancho F, Molinos-Senante M (2012) Assessing the efficiency of wastewater treatment plants in an uncertain context: a DEA with tolerances approach. Environ Sci Pol 18:34–44
56. Seiford LM, Zhu J (2002) Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. Eur J Oper Res 142(1):16–20
57. Shih J, Harrington W, Pizer W, Gillington K (2006) Economies of scale in community water systems. J Am Water Works Assoc 98:100–108
58. Simar L, Wilson P (2000) A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier models. J Appl Stat 27(6):779–802
59. Simar L, Wilson PW (2007) Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of productivity processes. J Econ 136:31–64
60. Simar L, Wilson P (2008) Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: recent developments and perspectives. In: Fried H, Lovell CAK, Schmidt S (eds) The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity change. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 421–521
61. Simoes P, Marques RC (2012) Influence of regulation on the productivity of waste utilities. What can we learn with the Portuguese experience? Waste Manag 32(6):1266–1275
62. SISS (Superintendencia de Servicios Sanitarios) (2012) Water and sewerage services in 2012. Available from: http://www.siss.gob.cl/577/w3-propertyvalue-3443.html. 19 Feb 2015 (In Spanish)
63. Torres M, Morrison-Paul CJ (2006) Driving forces for consolidation or fragmentation of the US water utility industry: a cost function approach with endogenous output. J Urban Econ 59:104–120
64. Tupper HC, Resende M (2004) Efficiency and regulatory issues in the Brazilian water and sewage sector: an empirical study. Util Policy 12(1):29–40
65. Woodbury K, Dollery B (2004) Efficiency measurement in Australian local government: the case of New South Wales municipal water utilities. Rev Policy Res 21:615–636
66. Worthington AC (2014) A review of frontier approaches to efficiency and productivity measurement in urban water utilities. Urban Water J 11(1):55–73
67. Yang C-C (2014) An enhanced DEA model for decomposition of technical efficiency in banking. Ann Oper Res 214(1):167–185
68. Yu M-M (2010) Capacity efficiency measurement using a three-stage DEA approach: evidence from domestic airports in Taiwan. Transp Plan Technol 33(2):221–235
69. Zanella A, Camanho AS, Dias TG (2013) Benchmarking countries’ environmental performance. J Oper Res Soc 64(3):426–438
70. Zhou G, Chung W, Zhang Y (2014) Measuring energy efficiency performance of China's transport sector: a data envelopment analysis approach. Expert Syst Appl 41(2):709–722