The relative economic efficiency of urban water utilities in regional New South Wales and Victoria

Resource and Energy Economics

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 439-455

  Byrnes, Joel ^a   Crase, Lin ^b   Dollery, Brian ^c   Villano, Renato ^c  

^a KPMG Australia   (Australia)

^b LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Relative efficiency; Urban water utilities; Water policy

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY; HIGHER-DEGREE; NEW SOUTH WALES; POLICY MAKERS; RELATIVE EFFICIENCY; TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY; URBAN WATER SUPPLY; URBAN WATERS; WATER POLICIES; WATER RESTRICTIONS;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; WATER MANAGEMENT;

WATER SUPPLY;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY; URBAN POLICY; WATER ECONOMICS; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER SUPPLY;

AUSTRALIA; NEW SOUTH WALES; VICTORIA [AUSTRALIA];

EID: 77952883004     PISSN: 09287655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. ACIL Tasman Institutional Arrangements in the Australian Water Sector: Information Paper 2005, Prepared for the National Water Commission, ACIL Tasman, Melbourne.
2. Allan P. Are Councils Sustainable? Final Report: Findings and Recommendations. Independent Inquiry into Local Government Inquiry (LGI) 2006, NSW Local Government and Shires Association, Sydney.
3. Anwandter L., Ozuna T.J. Can public sector reforms improve the efficiency of public water utilities?. Environment and Development Economics 2002, 7:687-700.
4. Aubert C., Reynaud A. The impact of regulation on cost efficiency: an empirical analysis of Wisconsin water utilities. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2005, 23(3):383-409.
5. Bhattacharyya A., Harris R., Narayanan R., Raffie K. Specification and estimation of the effect of ownership on the economic efficiency of the water utilities. Regional Science and Urban Economics 1995, 25:759-784.
6. Bhattacharyya A., Harris R., Narayanan R., Kambiz K. Allocative efficiency of rural Nevada water systems: a hedonic shadow cost function approach. Journal of Regional Science 1995, 35(3):485-502.
7. Bhattacharyya A., Parker E., Raffie K. An examination of the effect of ownership on the relative efficiency of public and private water utilities. Land Economics 1994, 70:197-209.
8. Brennan D., Tapsuwan S., Ingram G. The welfare costs of urban outdoor water restrictions. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2007, 51(3):243-261.
9. Bottasso, A., Conti, M., 2003. Cost efficiency in the English and Welsh water industry: A heteroskedastic stochastic cost frontier approach. Economics Discussion Papers. Essex, University of Essex.
10. Byrnes P. Estimation of cost frontier in the presence of selectivity bias: Ownership and efficiency of water utilities. Advances in Economics 1991, 121-137. JAI Press, London. G.F. Rhodes (Ed.).
11. Byrnes J.D., Crase L., Dollery B.E. Regulation versus pricing in urban water policy: the case of the Australian National Water Initiative. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 2006, 50(3):437-449.
12. Byrnes P., Grosskopf S., Hayes K. Efficiency and ownership: further evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1986, 68:337-341.
13. Casu, B., Gerardone, C., Molyneux, P., 2004. Productivity Change in European Banking: a Comparison of Parametric and Nonparametric Approaches, Essex Finance Centre Discussion Paper 04-01.
14. Caves D.W., Christensen L.R., Diewert W.E. Multilateral comparisons of output, input and productivity using superlative index numbers. Economic Journal 1982, 92:73-86.
15. Caves D.W., Christensen L.R., Diewert W.E. The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity. Econometrica 1982, 50:1393-1414.
16. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Lewin A.Y., Seiford L.M. Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Application 1994, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
17. CoAG (Council of Australian Governments), 1994. Attachment A-Water Resource Policy. (viewed 15.02.05). http://www.coag.gov.au/meetings/250294/attachment_a.htm.
18. CoAG (Council of Australian Governments), 2004. Intergovernmental Agreement on A National Water Initiative. (viewed 15.02.05). http://www.coag.gov.au/meetings/250604/iga_national_water_initiative.pdf.
19. Coelli T., Walding S. Performance Measurement in the Australian Water Supply Industry 2005, Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, St. Lucia, Qld.
20. Coelli T., Prasada Rao D.S., O'Donnell C.J., Battese G. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis 2005, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Massachusetts.
21. Crase L., Dollery B.E. The inter-sectoral implications of " securing our water future together. International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability 2006, 1(5):13-22.
22. Cubbin J., Tzanidakis G. Regression versus data envelopment analysis for efficiency measurement: an application to the England and Wales regulated water industry. Utilities Policy 1998, 7:75-85.
23. DEUS (Department of Energy, Utilities and Sustainability), 2005. 2003/04 Water Supply and Sewerage Benchmarking Report. DEUS, Sydney.
24. Dollery B.E., Crase L., Johnson A. Australian Local Government Economics 2006, UNSW Press, Sydney.
25. Estache, A., Kouassi, E., 2002. Sector-organization, governance, and the inefficiency of African water utilities, Policy Research Working Paper 2890, The World Bank Institute, Governance, Regulation, and Finance Division, The World Bank.
26. Estache A., Rossi M.A. How different is the efficiency of public and private water companies in Asia?. The World Bank Economic Review 2002, 16(1):139-148.
27. Färe R., Grosskopf S., Lovell C.A.K. Production Frontiers 1994, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
28. Faria, C.R., Souza, G., Moreira, T., 2005. Public versus private water utilities: Empirical evidence for Brazilian companies, Economics Bulletin, (viewed 14.06.06). http://www.economicsbulletin.uiuc.edu/2005/volume8/EB-05H00001A.pdf.
29. Fox W.F., Hofler R.A. Using homothetic composed error frontiers to measure water utility efficiency. Southern Economic Journal 1986, 53(2):461-477.
30. Friedman L.S. The Microeconomics of Public Policy Analysis 2002, Princeton University Press, Oxfordshire.
31. Garcia-Sanchez Efficiency measurement in Spanish local government: The case of municipal water services. Review of Policy Research 2006, 23(2):355-371.
32. Garcia S., Thomas A. The structure of municipal water supply costs: application to a panel of French local communities. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2001, 16:5-29.
33. García-Valiñas M.A., Muñiz M.A. Is DEA useful in the regulation of water utilities? A dynamic efficiency evaluation (a dynamic efficiency evaluation of water utilities). Applied Economics 2007, 39(2):245-252.
34. Grafton, Q., Kompas, T., 2006. Sydney water: Pricing for sustainability, Crawford School of Economics and Government Working Paper 06-10, Australian National University, Canberra.
35. Heiner C. North East Water. Personal conversation with Dr. Joel Byrnes on 21 May, 2007 2007, Albury, Victoria.
36. Johnes, J., 2006. Efficiency and productivity change in the English higher education sector from 1996/97 to 2002/03, Lancaster University Management School Working Paper 2006/17.
37. Jones M., French R. Local Government Engineering in Australia 1999, Federation Press, Leichhardt.
38. Kennedy P. A Guide to Econometrics 2003, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 5th ed.
39. Lambert D.K., Dichev D., Raffiee K. Ownership and sources of inefficiency in the provision of water services. Water Resources Research 1993, 29(6):1573-1578.
40. Land, K.C., Lovell, C.A.K., Thorne, S., 1988. Chance-Constrained Data Envelopment Analysis, Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
41. Lynk E.L. Privatisation, joint production and the comparative efficiencies of private and public ownership: the UK water industry case. Fiscal Studies 1993, 14(2):98-116.
42. Mizutani F., Urakami T. Indentifying network density and scale economies for Japanese water supply organizations. Papers in Regional Science 2001, 80:211-230.
43. NWC (National Water Commission), 2006. Australian Water Resources 2005: A baseline assessment of water resources for the National Water Initiative-Level 1 assessment key findings. National Water Commission, Canberra.
44. NWC (National Water Commission), 2007a. National Performance Report 2005-06: Major Urban Water Utilities. Water Services Association of Australia, Melbourne.
45. NWC (National Water Commission), 2007b. National Performance Report 2005-06: Non-Major Urban Water Utilities. Water Services Association of Australia, Melbourne.
46. Picazo-Tadeo A.J., Sáez-Fernández F.J., González-Gómez F. Does service quality matter in measuring the performance of water utilities?. Utilities Policy 2007, 16(1):30-38.
47. Sadler R. The Australian experience: managing a non-metropolitan urban water utility-paradigm shifting towards a new mindset. International Journal of Public Sector Management 1998, 11(7):596-610.
48. Sengupta J.K. Dynamics of Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory of Efficiency 1995, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
49. Sengupta J.K. Stochastic data envelopment analysis: a new approach. Applied Economic Letters 1998, 5:287-290.
50. Sheil C. Running the risks: the rationalisation of Australia's water. Australian Journal of Public Administration 2000, 59(3):11-21.
51. Tupper H.C., Resende M. Efficiency and regulatory issues in the Brazilian water and sewage sector: an empirical study. Utilities Policy 2004, 12:29-40.
52. VicWater Victorian Water Review 2003-04 2005, Victorian Water Industry Association Inc., Melbourne.
53. Watson, A., 2007. A National Plan for Water Security: Pluses and Minuses, (viewed 04.08.07). http://www.agrifood.info/connections/2007/Watson.html.
54. WGCS (2006) Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists, Australia's Climate is Changing Australia: The state of Australia's Water, Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists, November 2006.
55. Woodbury K., Dollery B.E. Efficiency measurement in Australian local government: the case of New South Wales municipal water services. Review of Policy Research 2004, 21(5):615-636.
56. Young, M.D., Proctor, W., Ejaz Qureshi, M., Wittwer, G., 2006. Without water: the economics of supplying water to 5 million more Australians, Water for a Healthy Country Flagship report, CSIRO Land and Water and Monash University.
57. Zhu J. Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver 2003, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Massachusetts.