Economic and environmental performance of wastewater treatment plants: Potential reductions in greenhouse gases emissions

Resource and Energy Economics

Volumn 38, Issue , 2014, Pages 125-140

  Molinos Senante, María ^a   Hernández Sancho, Francesc ^a   Mocholí Arce, Manuel ^a   Sala Garrido, Ramón ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Efficiency; Environmental performance index; Greenhouse gases (GHG); Undesirable outputs; Wastewater treatment

Indexed keywords

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; EFFICIENCY; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; GREENHOUSE GASES; SEWAGE PUMPING PLANTS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT; WATER TREATMENT PLANTS;

ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE INDICES; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; GREENHOUSE GASES (GHG); GREENHOUSE GASES EMISSIONS; UNDESIRABLE OUTPUTS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS; POTENTIAL REDUCTION;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS;

CARBON EMISSION; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GREENHOUSE GAS; SANITATION; SUSTAINABILITY; WASTE FACILITY; WASTE TREATMENT; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT;

SPAIN;

EID: 84907329644     PISSN: 09287655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2014.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abbott M., Cohen B., Wang W.C. The performance of the urban water and wastewater sectors in Australia. Utilities Policy 2012, 20(1):52-63.
2. Barba-Gutierrez Y., Adenso-Díaz B., Lozano S. Eco-efficiency of electric and electronic appliances: a data envelopment analysis (DEA). Environ. Model Assess. 2009, 14:439-447.
3. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Lewin A.Y., Seiford L.M. Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Application 1996, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
4. Chen C.M., Delmas M.A. Measuring eco-inefficiency: a new frontier approach. Oper. Res. 2012, 60(5):1064-1079.
5. Chung Y.H., Färe R., Grosskopf S. Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. J. Environ. Manage. 1997, 51(3):229-240.
6. Cooper W.W., Seiford L.M., Tone K. Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses 2006, Springer, New York.
7. Da Cruz N.F., Marques R.C., Romano G., Guerrini A. Measuring the efficiency of water utilities: a cross-national comparison between Portugal and Italy. Water Policy 2012, 14(5):841-853.
8. Dejardins R.L., Flesch T.K., Worth R.L., Gao Z., Li X., Martin T. Quantifying fugitive methane emissions from digesters. Methane to Markets Conference 2010.
9. De Witte K., Marques R.C. Gaming in a benchmarking environment. A non-parametric analysis of benchmarking in the water sector. Water Policy 2012, 14(1):45-66.
10. Dogot T., Xanthoulis Y., Fonder N., Xanthoulis D. Estimating the costs of collective treatment of wastewater: the case of Walloon Region (Belgium). Water Sci. Technol. 2010, 62(3):640-648.
11. Egilmez G., Kucukvar M., Tatari O. Sustainability assessment of U.S. manufacturing sectors: and economic input output-based frontier approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 53:91-102.
12. Färe R., Grosskopf S. Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: comment. J. Oper. Res. 2004, 157:242-245.
13. Färe R., Grosskopf S., Hernández-Sancho F. Environmental performance: an index number approach. Resour. Energy Econ. 2004, 26:343-352.
14. Färe R., Grosskopf S., Lovell C.A.K., Pasurka C. Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1989, 71:90-98.
15. Färe R., Grosskopf S., Lovell C.A.K., Yaisawarng S. Derivation of shadow prices for undesirable outputs: a distance function approach. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1993, 75:374-380.
16. Flesch T.K., Desjardins R.L., Worth D. Fugitive methane emissions from an agricultural biodigester. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35(9):3927-3935.
17. Foley J., de Haas D., Yuan Z., Lant P. Nitrous oxide generation in full-scale biological nutrient removal wastewater treatment plants. Water Res. 2010, 44(3):831-844.
18. Friedrich E., Pillay S., Buckley C.A. Environmental life cycle assessments for water treatment processes - A South African case study of an urban water cycle. Water SA 2009, 35(1):73-84.
19. Hailu A., Veeman T.S. Non-parametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: an application to the Canadian pulp and paper industry. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2001, 83(3):605-616.
20. Hernández-Sancho F., Molinos-Senante M., Sala-Garrido R. Energy efficiency in Spanish wastewater treatment plants: a non-radial DEA approach. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409(14):2693-2699.
21. Hernández-Sancho F., Molinos-Senante M., Sala-Garrido R. Techno-economical efficiency and productivity change of wastewater treatment plants: the role of internal and external factors. J. Environ. Monit. 2011, 13(12):3448-3459.
22. Hernández-Sancho F., Sala-Garrido R. Technical efficiency and cost analysis in wastewater treatment processes: a DEA approach. Desalination 2009, 249(1):230-234.
23. Hetemäki L. The impact of pollution control on firm production technology and efficiency: a stochastic distance function approach. Paper Presented at the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economics 4th Annual Conference 1993.
24. Hospido A., Moreira T., Martín M., Rigola M., Feijoo G. Environmental evaluation of different treatment processes for sludge from urban wastewater treatments: anaerobic digestion versus thermal processes. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2005, 10(5):336-345.
25. IOC/UNESCO A Blueprint for Ocean and Coastal Sustainability 2011, IOC/UNESCO, Paris.
26. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) Summary for policy makers. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York. S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, H.L. Miller (Eds.).
27. Jayasundara S., vander Zaag A., Crolla A., Wagner-Riddle C. Potential of Anaerobic Digestion for Mitigating Methane Emissions from Manure Management in Ontario Dairy Sector 2011, University of Guelph, Available from: http://www.gtmconference.ca/site/index.php/component/docman/doc_download/342-2011-g3e-jayasundara.
28. Kalmar P.P., Karmakar S., Asolekar S.R. Assessment of wastewater treatment technologies: life cycle approach. Water Environ. J. 2013, 27(2):261-268.
29. Korhonen P.J., Luptacik M. Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: an extension of data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2004, 154(2):437-446.
30. Kortelainen M. Dynamic environmental performance analysis: a Malmquist index approach. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 64:701-715.
31. Kuosmanen T., Kortelainen M. Measuring eco-efficiency of production with data envelopment analysis. J. Ind. Ecol. 2013, 9(4). (in press).
32. Lassaux S., Renzoni R., Germain A. Life cycle assessment of water from the pumping station to the wastewater treatment plant. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2007, 12:118-126.
33. Lozano S., Iribarren D., Moreira M.T., Feijoo G. The link between operational efficiency and environmental impacts. A joint application of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407(5):1744-1754.
34. Lozano-Oyola M., Blancas F.J., González M., Caballero R. Sustainable tourism indicators as planning tools in cultural destinations. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 18:659-675.
35. MacLeod S.P., Filion Y.R. Issues and implications of carbon-abatement discounting and pricing for drinking water system design in Canada. Water Resour. Manage. 2012, 26(1):43-61.
36. Molinos-Senante M., Hernandez-Sancho F., Sala-Garrido R. Benchmarking in wastewater treatment plants: a tool to save operational costs. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2014, 16(1):149-161.
37. Molinos-Senante M., Hernandez-Sancho F., Sala-Garrido R., Cirelli G. Economic feasibility study for intensive and extensive wastewater treatment considering greenhouse gases emissions. J. Environ. Manage. 2013, 123:98-104.
38. Picazo-Tadeo A.J., Sáez-Fernández F.J., González-Gómez F. Assessing performance in the management of the urban water cycle. Water Policy 2011, 13:782-796.
39. Rodriguez-Garcia G., Hospido A., Bagley D.M., Moreira M.T., Feijoo G. A methodology to estimate greenhouse gases emissions in Life Cycle Inventories of wastewater treatment plants. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2012, 37:37-46.
40. Rodriguez-Garcia G., Molinos-Senante M., Hospido A., Hernández-Sancho F., Moreira M.T., Feijoo G. Environmental and economic profile of six typologies of wastewater treatment plants. Water Res. 2011, 45(18):5997-6010.
41. Sala-Garrido R., Molinos-Senante M., Hernández-Sancho F. Comparing the efficiency of wastewater treatment technologies through a DEA metafrontier model. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 173(3):766-772.
42. Sala-Garrido R., Hernández-Sancho F., Molinos-Senante M. Assessing the efficiency of wastewater treatment plants in an uncertain context: a DEA with tolerances approach. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 18:34-44.
43. Sanjuan N., Ribal J., Clemente G., Fenollosa M.L. Measuring and improving eco-efficiency using data envelopment analysis: a case study of Mahón-Menorca cheese. J. Ind. Ecol. 2011, 15(4):614-628.
44. Seiford L.M., Zhu J. Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2002, 142(1):16-20.
45. Tsagarakis K.P. Does size matter? Operating cost coverage for water utilities. Water Resour. Manage. 2013, 27(5):1551-1562.
46. Townsend-Small A., Pataki D.E., Tseng L.Y., Tsai C.-Y., Rosso D. Nitrous oxide emissions from wastewater treatment and water reclamation plants in Southern California. J. Environ. Qual. 2011, 40(5):1542-1550.
47. Tyteca D. On the measurement of the environmental performance of firms - a literature review and a productive efficiency perspective. J. Environ. Manage. 1996, 46:281-308.
48. Tyteca D. Linear programming models for the measurement of environmental performance of firms - concepts and empirical results. J. Product. Anal. 1997, 8:183-197.
49. Tupper H.C., Resende M. Efficiency and regulatory issues in the Brazilian water and sewage sector: an empirical study. Util. Policy 2004, 12(1):29-40.
50. Zaim O. Measuring environmental performance of state manufacturing through changes in pollution intensities: a DEA framework. Ecol. Econ. 2004, 48(1):37-47.
51. Zhou P., Poh K.L., Ang B.W. A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2007, 178(1):1-9.
52. Zhou P., Ang B.W., Poh K.L. Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies. Energy Econ. 2008, 30:1-14.
53. 2 emission performance in electricity generation: a non-radial directional distance function approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2012, 221(3):625-635.
54. Zhou P., Ang B.W., Han J.Y. Total factor carbon emissions performance: a Malmquist index analysis. Energy Econ. 2010, 32:194-201.