Is big better? On scale and scope economies in the Portuguese water sector

Economic Modelling

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 1009-1016

  Marques, Rui Cunha ^a   De Witte, Kristof ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

C1; C14; L95; Performance; Portugal; Scale economies; Scope economies; Water and wastewater utilities

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953059555     PISSN: 02649993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2010.11.014     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Balance T., Taylor A. Competition and Economic Regulation in Water. The Future of the European Water Industry 2005, IWA Publishing.
2. Banker R. Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1984, 17:35-44.
3. Banker R., Thrall R. Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1992, 62:74-84.
4. Banker R., Charnes A., Cooper W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag. Sci. 1984, 30:1078-1092.
5. Baumol W. On the proper cost tests for natural monopoly in a multiproduct industry. Am. Econ. Rev. 1977, 67:809-822.
6. Baumol W., Panzar J., Willig R. Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure 1988, Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich, New York.
7. Berg, S., Marques, R., 2010. Quantitative Studies of Water and Sanitation Utilities: a Benchmarking Literature Survey. PURC Working Paper 2, University of Florida. Forthcoming in Water Policy.
8. Berg S., Tschirhart J. Natural Monopoly. Regulation: Principles and Practice 1988, Cambridge University Press.
9. Braadbaart O. Collaborative benchmarking, transparency and performance: evidence from the Netherlands water supply industry. Benchmarking Int. J. 2007, 14:677-692.
10. Briec W., Kerstens K., Vanden Eeckaut P. Non-convex technologies and cost functions: definitions, duality and nonparametric tests of convexity. J. Econ. 2004, 81:155-192.
11. Caves D., Christensen L., Swanson J. Productivity growth, scale economies, and capacity utilization in US railroads, 1955-74. Am. Econ. Rev. 1981, 71:994-1002.
12. Caves D., Christensen L., Tretheway M. Economies of density versus economies of scale: why trunk and local service airline costs differ. Rand J. Econ. 1984, 15:471-489.
13. Cazals C., Florens J., Simar L. Nonparametric frontier estimation: a conditional quantile-based approach. J. Econometrics 2002, 106:1-25.
14. Coelli T., Estache A., Perelman S., Trujillo L. A Primer on Efficiency Measurement for Utilities and Transport Regulators 2003, World Bank Publications.
15. Cherchye L., Kuosmanen T., Post T. What is the economic meaning of FDH?. A reply to Thrall. J. Prod. Anal. 2000, 13:263-267.
16. Cubbin J., Tzanidakis G. Regression versus data envelopment analysis for efficiency measurement: an application to the England and Wales regulated water sector. Utilities Policy 1998, 7:75-85.
17. Daraio C., Simar L. Advanced robust and nonparametric methods in efficiency analysis: methodology and applications. Studies in Productivity and Efficiency 2007, Springer.
18. De Witte K., Marques R. Designing incentives in local public utilities, an international comparison of the drinking water sector. Cent. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2010, 18:189-220.
19. Deprins D., Simar L., Tulkens H. Measuring labor efficiency in post offices. The Performance of Public Enterprises Concepts and Measurements 1984, 247-263. Elsevier, Amsterdam. M. Marchand, P. Pestieau, H. Tulkens (Eds.).
20. Dollery B., Fleming E. A conceptual note on scale economies, size economies and scope economies in Australian local government. Urban Policy Res. 2006, 24:271-282.
21. Fabbri P., Fraquelli G. Costs and structure of technology in the Italian water industry. Empirica 2000, 27:65-82.
22. Färe R., Grosskopf S., Lovell K. The structure of technical efficiency. Scand. J. Econ. 1983, 85:181-190.
23. Fraquelli G., Moiso V. Cost Efficiency and Economies of Scale in the Italian Water Industry 2005, Università del Piemonte Orientale.
24. Fried H., Lovell K., Schmidt S. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Change 2008, Oxford University Press, New York.
25. Garcia S., Moreaux M., Reynaud A. Measuring economies of vertical integration in network industries: an application to the water sector. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 2004, 25:791-820.
26. Hunt L., Link E. Privatisation and efficiency in the UK water industry: an empirical analysis. Oxf. B. Econ. Stat. 1995, 57:371-388.
27. ICA Water merger policy: time for review. Report, Severn Trent, South East Water, Swan Group and United Utilities water companies, Indepen Consulting and Accenture 2002.
28. Jeong S., Park B., Simar L. Nonparametric conditional efficiency measures: asymptotic properties. Ann. Oper. Res. 2010, 173:105-122.
29. Kerstens K., Vanden Eeckaut P. Estimating returns to scale using non-parametric deterministic technologies: a new method based on goodness-of-fit. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1999, 113:206-214.
30. Kuosmanen T. Data envelopment analysis with missing data. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2009, 60:1767-1774.
31. Link E. Privatisation, joint production and the comparative efficiencies of private and public ownership: the UK water industry case. Fiscal Stud. 1993, 14:98-116.
32. Marques R. Comparing private and public performance of Portuguese water services. Water Policy 2008, 10:25-42.
33. Marques R., Monteiro A. Application of performance indicators in water utilities management - a case-study in Portugal. Water Sci. Technol. 2001, 44:95-102.
34. Martins R., Coelho F., Fortunato A. Evaluating cost structure of Portuguese water utilities: economies of scale and water losses. RESER 2006, The European Research Network on Services and Space 2006, 729-748.
35. Mizutani F., Urakami T. Identifying network density and scale economies for Japanese water supply organizations. Pap. Reg. Sci. 2001, 80:211-230.
36. Panzar J., Willig R. Economies of scale and economies of scope in multi-output production. Economic Discussion Paper 1975, 33. Bell Laboratories.
37. Podinovski V. On the linearization of reference technologies for testing returns to scale in FDH models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2004, 152:800-802.
38. Saal D., Parker D. The impact of privatisation and regulation on the water and sewerage industry in England and Wales: a Translog cost function model. Managerial Decis. Econ. 2000, 21:253-268.
39. Tasman A.C.I.L. Size and scope economies in water and wastewater services. Investigation Report, Economic Regulatory Authority, Perth 2007.
40. Tauchmann H., Clausen H. Do organizational forms matter? - an econometric analysis of innovativeness in the German wastewater sector. RWI Discussion Papers, 22, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung 2004.
41. Torres M., Morrison P. Driving forces for consolidation or fragmentation of the US water utility industry: a cost function approach with endogenous output. J. Urban Econ. 2006, 59:104-120.
42. Zamorano L. Economic efficiency and frontier techniques. J. Econ. Surv. 2004, 18:33-77.