Big and beautiful? On non-parametrically measuring scale economies in non-convex technologies

Journal of Productivity Analysis

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 213-226

  Witte, Kristof De ^a,b   Marques, Rui C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Economies of scale; Free Disposal Hull; Optimal size; Water sector

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955484595     PISSN: 0895562X     EISSN: 15730441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11123-010-0191-1     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Antonioli B, Filippini M (2001) The use of a variable cost function in the regulation of the Italian water industry. Util Policy 10: 181-187.
2. Arocena P (2005) The measurement of scope, scale and diversification economies: how (in)efficient is electricity restructuring and unbundling? Institut d'Economia de Barcelona, Document de treball 1: 1-28.
3. Ashton J (2000) Cost efficiency in the UK water and sewerage industry. Appl Econ Lett 7(7): 455-458.
4. Banker R (1984) Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 17(1): 35-44.
5. Banker R, Chang H, Cooper W (1996) Equivalence and implementations of alternative methods for determining returns to scale in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 89(3): 473-481.
6. Banker R, Charnes A, Cooper W (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 30(9): 1078-1092.
7. Banker R, Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Thrall RM, Zhu J (2004) Returns to scale in different DEA models. Eur J Oper Res 154(2): 345-362.
8. Banker R, Thrall R (1992) Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 62: 74-84.
9. Baumol WJ, Panzar JC, Willig RD (1988) Contestable markets and the theory of industry structure. Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich, New York.
10. Briec W, Kerstens K, Vanden Eeckaut P (2004) Non-convex technologies and cost functions: definitions, duality and nonparametric tests of convexity. J Econ 81(2): 155-192.
11. Cazals C, Florens JP, Simar L (2002) Nonparametric frontier estimation: a robust approach. J Econom 106(1): 1-25.
12. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6): 429-444.
13. Cherchye L, Kuosmanen T, Post T (2000a) What is the economic meaning of FDH? A reply to Thrall. J Prod Anal 13: 263-267.
14. Cherchye L, Kuosmanen T, Post T (2000b) Why convexify? An assessment of convexity axioms in DEA. Helsinki school of economics and business administration-working papers W-270.
15. Cubbin J, Tzanidakis G (1998) Regression versus data envelopment analysis for efficiency measurement: an application to the England and Wales regulated water sector. Util Policy 7(1): 75-85.
16. Daraio C, Simar L (2005) Introducing environmental variables in nonparametric frontier models: a probabilistic approach. J Prod Anal 24(1): 93-121.
17. Daraio C, Simar L (2007) Advanced robust and nonparametric methods in efficiency analysis: methodology and applications, series: studies in productivity and efficiency. Springer.
18. Deprins D, Simar L, Tulkens H (1984) Measuring labor-efficiency in post offices. In: Marchand M, Pestieau P, Tulkens H (eds) The performance of public enterprises: concepts and measurement. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 243-267.
19. Destefanis S, Storti G (2002) Measuring cross-country technological catch-up through variable-parameter FDH. Stat Methods Appl 11: 109-125.
20. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK (1983) The structure of technical efficiency. Scand J Econ 85(2): 181-190.
21. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK (1994) Production frontiers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
22. Garcia S, Moreaux M, Reynaud A (2004) Measuring economies of vertical integration in network industries: an application to the water sector. Int J Ind Organ 25(4): 791-820.
23. Garcia S, Thomas A (2001) The structure of municipal water supply costs: application to a panel of French local communities. J Prod Anal 16: 5-29.
24. Kerstens K, Vanden Eeckaut P (1999) Estimating returns to scale using non-parametric deterministic technologies: a new method based on goodness-of-fit. Eur J Oper Res 113: 206-214.
25. Kittelsen SA, Magnussen J (2003) Economies of scope in Norwegian hospital production-a DEA analysis. Health Economics Research Programme. Working Paper 2003/8, pp 1-30.
26. Koopmans T (1951) Analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In: Koopmans T (eds) Activity analysis of production and allocation. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 33-97.
27. Leleu H (2006) A linear programming framework for free disposal hull technologies and cost functions: primal and dual models. Eur J Oper Res 168: 340-344.
28. Martins R, Coelho F, Fortunato A (2006) Evaluating cost structure of Portuguese water utilities: economies of scale and water losses. In: RESER 2006-XVIth international conference of services governance and public policies, the European research network on services and space, Lisbon, pp 729-748.
29. Mizutani F, Urakami T (2001) Identifying network density and scale economies for Japanese water supply organizations. Reg Sci 80: 211-230.
30. Ohira TH, Shirota R (2005) Eficiência econômica: uma aplicação do modelo de fronteira estocástica em empresas de saneamento. Anais do XXXIII Encontro Nacional de Economia-ANPEC.
31. Podinovski VV (2004a) On the linearization of reference technologies for testing returns to scale in FDH models. Eur J Oper Res 152: 800-802.
32. Podinovski VV (2004b) Local and global returns to scale in performance measurement. J Oper Res Soc 55: 170-178.
33. Podinovski VV (2004c) Efficiency and global scale characteristics on the "No Free Lunch" assumption only. J Prod Anal 22(3): 227-257.
34. Renzetti S (1999) Municipal water supply and sewage treatment: costs, prices and distortions. Can J Econ 32(3): 688-704.
35. Saal D, Parker D (2005) Assessing the performance of water operations in the English and Welsh Water industry: a panel input distance function approach. Aston Business School Working Paper RP0502.
36. Sabbioni G (2007) Efficiency in the Brazilian sanitation sector. Util Policy 16(1): 11-20.
37. Seiford LM, Zhu J (1999) An investigation of returns to scale in data envelopment analysis. Omega Int J Manag Sci 27(1): 1-11.
38. Soleimani-damaneh M, Reshadi M (2007) A polynomial-time algorithm to estimate returns to scale in FDH models. Comput Oper Res 34(7): 2168-2176.
39. Torres M, Morrison PC (2006) Driving forces for consolidation or fragmentation of the US water utility industry: a cost function approach with endogenous output. J Urban Econ 59: 104-120.