Comparing the efficiency of wastewater treatment technologies through a DEA metafrontier model

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 173, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 766-772

  Sala Garrido, R ^a   Molinos Senante, M ^a   Hernandez Sancho F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Metafrontier; Non homogeneous technology; Technical efficiency; Technological gap ratio (TGR); Wastewater treatment

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; AERATED LAGOONS; ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGIES; APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGIES; GAP RATIO; INFORMED DECISION; METAFRONTIER; NON-HOMOGENEOUS; ROTATING BIOLOGICAL CONTACTOR; TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY; TECHNO-ECONOMICS; TRICKLING FILTER; WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES;

BIOLOGICAL WATER TREATMENT; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; EFFICIENCY; RECLAMATION; WASTEWATER; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 80053241884     PISSN: 13858947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.08.047     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. WISE, Water information system for Europe, 2010. Available from:. http://water.europa.eu/.
2. Cheremisinoff N.P. Handbook of Water and Wastewater Treatment Technologies 2001, Butterworth Heinemann.
3. NREL, US Life Cycle Inventory Database Roadmap, 2009.
4. Pasqualino J.C., Meneses M., Abella M., Castells F. LCA as a decision support tool for the environmental improvement of the operation of a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Environmental Science Technology 2009, 43(9):3300-3307.
5. Tangsubkul N., Beavis P., Moore S.J., Lundie S., Waite T.D. Life cycle assessment of recycling technology. Water Resources Management 2005, 19(5):521-537.
6. Suh Y.J., Rousseaux P. Considerations in life cycle inventory analysis of municipal wastewater treatment systems. COST 624 WG Meeting 2001.
7. Hernández-Sancho F., Molinos-Senante M., Sala-Garrido R. Economic valuation of environmental benefits from wastewater processes: an empirical approach for Spain. Science of the Total Environment 2010, 408:953-957.
8. Molinos-Senante M., Hernández-Sancho F., Sala-Garrido R. Economic feasibility study for wastewater treatment: a cost-benefit analysis. Science of the Total Environment 2010, 408:4396-4402.
9. Urkiaga A., de las Fuentes L., Bis B., Chiru E., Bodo B., Hernández F., Wintgens T. Methodologies for feasibility studies related to wastewater reclamation and reuse projects. Desalination. 2006, 187(1-3):263-269.
10. Chen Y., Randall A.A., McCue T. The efficiency of enhanced biological phosphorus removal from real wastewater affected by different ratios of acetic to propionic acid. Water Research 2004, 38:27-36.
11. Baeza J.A., Gabriel D., Lafuente J. Effect of internal recycle on the nitrogen removal efficiency of an anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (A2/O) wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). Process Biochemistry 2004, 39(11):1615-1624.
12. Maine M.A., Suñe N., Hadad H., Sánchez G., Bonetto C. Removal efficiency of a constructed wetland for wastewater treatment according to vegetation dominance. Chemosphere 2007, 68(6):1105-1113.
13. Zhou H.D., Huang X., Wang X., Ga M.J., Wen X.H. Removal efficiencies of organic micropollutants in wastewater-based reclaimed water by two different treatment processes. China Environmental Science 2009, 29(8):816-821.
14. Xue T., Xue Y., Yang F.L., Fu Z.M., Liu L.F., Wang C.C. Nitrogen removal efficiency of a shortcut nitrification-denitrification process integrated with sludge anaerobicengineering of hydrolysis for treating low C/N ratio municipal wastewater. Journal of Chemical Chinese Universities 2010, 24(1):150-155.
15. Mufioz I., Malato S., Rodríguez A., Domenech X. Integration of environmental and economic performance of processes. Case study on advanced oxidation processes for wastewater treatment. Journal of Advanced Oxidation Technologies 2008, 11(2):2159-2165.
16. Oa S.W., Choi E., Kim S.W., Kwon K.H., Min K.S. Economical and technical efficiencies evaluation of full scale piggery wastewater treatment BNR plants. Water Science and Technology 2009, 59(11):2159-2165.
17. Galleti S., Landon D. Benchmarking: water and wastewater energy efficiency. Water and Wastewater International 2009, 24(6):20-21.
18. Benedetti L., De Keyser W., Nopens I., Vanrolleghem P.A. Probabilistic modelling and evaluation of wastewater treatment plants upgrades in a water quality based evaluation context. Journal of Hydroinformatics 2010, 12(4):380-398.
19. Molinos-Senante M., Hernández-Sancho F., Sala-Garrido R., Garrido-Baserba M. Economic feasibility study for phosphorus recovery processes. AMBIO 2011, 40(4):408-416.
20. Hsiao C.K., Yang C.C. Performance measurement in wastewater control? Pig farms in Taiwan. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment 2007, 103:467-474.
21. Hernández-Sancho F., Sala-Garrido R. Technical efficiency and cost analysis in wastewater treatment processes: a DEA approach. Desalination 2009, 249(1):230-234.
22. Yang C.H., Chen K.H. Are smalls firms less efficient?. Small Bus Economy 2009, 32:375-395.
23. Lozano-Vivas A., Pastor J.M. En efficiency comparison of european banking systems operating under different environmental conditions. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2002, 18(1):59-77.
24. R. Sala-Garrido, M. Molinos-Senante and F. Hernández-Sancho, How seasonal tourism affects to economic efficiency of wastewater treatment plants, Working Paper, April 2011, University of Valencia.
25. O'Donell C.J., Rao D.S.P., Battese G.E. Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technologies ratios. Empirical Economics 2008, 34:231-255.
26. Hayami Y. Sources of agricultural productivity gap among selected countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1969, 51:564-575.
27. Battese G.E., Rao D.S.P. Technology gap, efficiency and a stochastic metafrontier function. International Journal of Bussiness and Economics 2002, 1(2):87-93.
28. Battese G.E, Rao D.S.P., O'Donell C.J. A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2004, 21:91-103.
29. Assaf A., Matawie K.M. A bootstrapped metafrontier model. Applied Economics Letter 2010, 17:613-617.
30. D.S.P. Rao, C.J. O'Donell, G.E. Battese, Metafrontier functions for the study of inter-regional productivity differences, CEPA Working Paper No. 01/2003.
31. Boshrabadi H.M., Villano R., Fleming E. Technical efficiency and environmental-technological gaps in wheat production in Kerman province of Iran. Agricultural Economics 2008, 38:67-76.
32. Chen Z., Song S. Efficiency and technological gap in China agriculture: a regional meta-frontier analysis. China Economic Review 2008, 19:287-296.
33. Wang X., Rungsuriyawiboon S. Agricultural efficiency, technical change and productivity in China. Post-Communist Economies 2010, 22(2):207-227.
34. Assaf A., Barros C.P., Josiassen A. Hotel efficiency: a bootstrapped metafrontier approach. International Journal of Hospitality Management 2010, 29:468-475.
35. T. Tiedemann, T. Francksen, U. Latacz-Lohmann, Assessing the performance of German Bundesliga football players: a non-parametric metafrontier approach, Central European Journal of Operations Research, in press. doi:10.1007/s10100-010-0146-7.
36. Assaf A. Accounting for size in efficiency comparisons of airports. Journal of Air Transport Management 2009, 15:256-258.
37. Bos J.W.B., Schmiedel H. Is there a single frontier in a single European banking market?. Journal of Banking & Finance 2007, 31:2081-2102.
38. Kontolaimou A., Tsekouras K. Are cooperatives the wakest link in European banking? A non-parametric metafrontier approach. Journal of Banking & Finance 2010, 34:1946-1957.
39. Zibaei M., Kafi M., Bakhshoodeh M. The effects of veterinary services on technical efficiency of dairy farms in Iran: a DEA approach. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research, Shiraz University 2008, 9(4):371-377.
40. Moreira V.H., Bravo-Ureta B.E. Technical efficiency and metatechnologies ratios for dairy farms in three southern cone countries: a stochastic meta-frontier model. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2010, 33(1):33-45.
41. Bosca J.E., Liern V., Martinez A., Sala R. Increassing offensive or defensive efficiency? An analysis of Italian and Spanish football. OMEGA 2009, 37(1):63-78.
42. G. Hong, L. Shan-Shan, H. Yi, Measurement of technology heterogeneity by Metafronter, International Conference on Management Science & Engineering, 2008, Long Beach, USA.
43. Kruskal W.H., Wallis W.A. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of American Statistics Association 1952, 47(260):583-621.
44. Hanhan O., Insel G., Yagci N.O., Artan N., Orhon D. Mechanism and design of intermittent aeration activated sludge process for nitrogen removal. Journal of Environmental Science and Health. Part A. Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering 2011, 46(1):9-16.
45. PSARU, Program Urban Wastewater Treatment (In Catalan), 2005. Available from: https://aca-web.gencat.cat/.
46. Brindle K., Stephenson T. The application of membrane biological reactors for the treatment of wastewaters. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 1996, 49(6):601-610.
47. Côte P., Masini M., Mourato D. Comparison of membrane options for water reuse and reclamation. Desalination 2004, 167:1-11.