Emotions during learning with AutoTutor

Adaptive Technologies for Training and Education

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 117-139

  D’Mello, Sidney ^a   Graesser, Art ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; DEEP LEARNING; STUDENTS;

AUTOTUTOR; CAUSAL REASONING; COGNITIVE PROCESS; EMOTIONAL EXPERIENCES; LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; MEMORY ENCODING; POSITIVE SIDES;

EDUCATION;

EID: 84931837143     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139049580.010     Document Type: Chapter

References (128)

1. Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: Learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science, 26 (2), 147-179.
2. Anderson, J., Douglass, S., & Qin, Y. (2005). How should a theory of learning and cognition inform instruction? In A. Healy (Ed.), Experimental cognitive psychology and its applications (pp. 47-58). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3. Arroyo, I., Woolf, B., Cooper, D., Burleson, W., Muldner, K., & Christopherson, R. (2009). Emotion sensors go to school. In V. Dimitrova, R. Mizoguchi, B. Du Boulay, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
4. Aviezer, H., Hassin, R., Ryan, J., Grady, C., Susskind, J., Anderson, A., et al. (2008). Angry, disgusted, or afraid? Studies on the malleability of emotion perception. Psychological Science, 19 (7), 724-732.
5. Baker, R., D’Mello, S., Rodrigo, M., & Graesser, A. (2010). Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence and persistence of affect during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments. Inter national Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68 (4), 223-241.
6. Barrett, L. (2006). Are emotions natural kinds? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 28-58.
7. Barrett, L., Mesquita, B., Ochsner, K., & Gross, J. (2007). The experience of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 373-403.
8. Batson, C., Turk, C., Shaw, L., & Klein, T. (1995). Information function of empathic emotion-learning that we value the others’ welfare. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68 (2), 300-313.
9. Beilock, S. L., & DeCaro, M. S. (2007). From poor performance to success under stress: Working memory, strategy selection, and mathematical problem solving under pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 33 (6), 983-998.
10. Biggs, J. (1995). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Paper presented at the 20th International Conference on Improving University Teaching, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, July.
11. Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. A. Gernsbacher, R. W. Pew, L. M. Hough, & J. R. Pomeranz (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp. 56-64). New York: Worth Publishers.
12. Bless, H., & Fielder, K. (1995). Affective states and the influence of activated general knowledge. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 766-778.
13. Boekaerts, M. (1993). Being concerned with well-being and with learning. Educational Psychologist, 28 (2), 149-167.
14. Bower, G. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129-148.
15. Bower, G. (1992). How might emotions affect learning. In S. A. Christianson (Ed.), The handbook of emotion and memory: Research and theory (pp. 3-31). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Brown, A., Ellery, S., & Campione, J. (1998). Creating zones of proximal development electronically in thinking practices in mathematics and science learning. In J. Greeno & S. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 341-368). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Brown, J., & VanLehn, K. (1980). Repair theory: A generative theory of bugs in procedural skills. Cognitive Science, 4, 379-426.
18. Burleson, W., & Picard, R. (2004). Affective agents: Sustaining motivation to learn through failure and a state of “stuck. ” Paper presented at the ITS 2004 Workshop Proceedings on Social and Emotional, Maceio, Brazil.
19. Burleson, W., & Picard, R. (2007). Evidence for gender specific approaches to the development of emotionally intelligent learning companions. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22 (4), 62-69.
20. Chaffar, S., Derbali, L., & Frasson, C. (2009). Inducing positive emotional state in intelligent tutoring systems. Paper presented at the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Brighton, U. K.
21. Chi, M., Roy, M., & Hausmann, R. (2008). Observing tutorial dialogues collaboratively: Insights about human tutoring effectiveness from vicarious learning. Cognitive Science, 32 (2), 301-341.
22. Clifford, M. (1988). Failure tolerance and academic risk-taking in ten-to twelve-yearold students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 15-27.
23. Conati, C. (2002). Probabilistic assessment of user's emotions in educational games. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 16 (7-8), 555-575.
24. Conati, C., & Maclaren, H. (2009). Empirically building and evaluating a probabilistic model of user affect. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 19 (3), 267-303.
25. Craig, S., Graesser, A., Sullins, J., & Gholson, B. (2004). Affect and learning: An exploratory look into the role of affect in learning. Journal of Educational Media, 29, 241-250.
26. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.
27. D’Mello, S., Craig, S., Fike, K., & Graesser, A. (2009). Responding to learners’ cognitiveaffective states with supportive and shakeup dialogues. In J. Jacko (Ed.), Human-computer interaction. Ambient, ubiquitous and intelligent interaction (pp. 595-604). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
28. D’Mello, S., Craig, S., Gholson, B., Franklin, S., Picard, R., & Graesser, A. (2005). Integrating affect sensors in an intelligent tutoring system. In The Computer In The Affective Loop Workshop At 2005 International Conference On Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 7-13), San Diego, CA.
29. D’Mello, S., Craig, S., Sullins, J., & Graesser, A. (2006). Predicting affective states expressed through an emote-aloud procedure from AutoTutor's mixed-initiative dialogue. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16 (1), 3-28.
30. D’Mello, S., Craig, S., Witherspoon, A., McDaniel, B., & Graesser, A. (2008). Automatic detection of learner's affect from conversational cues. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 18 (1-2), 45-80.
31. D’Mello, S., Dale, R., & Graesser, A. (in press). Disequilibrium in the mind, disharmony in the body. Cognition and Emotion. Online version available at: http://www.tandfonline. com/doi/abs/10. 1080/02699931. 2011. 575767.
32. D’Mello, S., Dowell, N., & Graesser, A. (2009). Cohesion relationships in tutorial dialogue as predictors of affective states. In V. Dimitrova, R. Mizoguchi, B. du Boulay, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence In Education (pp. 9-16). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
33. D’Mello, S., & Graesser, A. (2009). Automatic detection of learners’ affect from gross body language. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 23 (2), 123-150.
34. D’Mello, S., & Graesser, A. (2010). Modeling cognitive-affective dynamics with hidden Markov models. In R. Catrambone & S. Ohlsson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2721-2726). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
35. D’Mello, S., & Graesser, A. (in review). The halflife of emotions.
36. D’Mello, S., Jackson, G., Craig, S., Morgan, B., Chipman, P., White, H., et al. (2008). AutoTutor detects and responds to learners affective and cognitive states. Paper presented at the Workshop on Emotional and Cognitive issues in ITS held in conjunction with the Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Montreal, Canada.
37. D’Mello, S., King, B., Entezari, O., Chipman, P., & Graesser, A. (2008). The impact of automatic speech recognition errors on learning gains with AutoTutor. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, New York, March.
38. D’Mello, S., Lehman, B., & Person, N. (in review). Monitoring affect states during effortful problem solving activities. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
39. D’Mello, S., Lehman, B., Sullins, J., Daigle, R., Combs, R., Vogt, K., et al. (2010). A time for emoting: When affect-sensitivity is and isn’t effective at promoting deep learning. In J. Kay & V. Aleven (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 245-254). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
40. D’Mello, S., Picard, R., & Graesser, A. (2007). Towards an affect-sensitive AutoTutor. Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 22 (4), 53-61.
41. D’Mello, S., Taylor, R., Davidson, K., & Graesser, A. (2008). Self versus teacher judgments of learner emotions during a tutoring session with AutoTutor. In B. Woolf, E. Aimeur, R. Nkambou, & S. Lajoie (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
42. D’Mello, S., Taylor, R., & Graesser, A. (2007). Monitoring affective trajectories during complex learning. In D. McNamara & G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society (pp. 203-208). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
43. Damasio, A. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. New York: Harcourt.
44. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2002). The paradox of achievement: The harder you push, the worse it gets. In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education (pp. 61-87). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
45. Dragon, T., Arroyo, I., Woolf, B. P., Burleson, W., el Kaliouby, R., & Eydgahi, H. (2008). Viewing student affect and learning through classroom observation and physical sensors. In B. Woolf, A. E. N. R., & L. S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Tutorin Systems (pp. 29-39). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
46. Dweck, C. (2002). Messages that motivate: How praise molds students’ beliefs, motivation, and performance (in surprising ways). In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education (pp. 61-87). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
47. Ekman, P. (1984). Expression and the nature of emotion. In K. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 319-344). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 6 (3-4), 169-200.
49. Ekman, P. (2003). Emotions revealed: Recognizing faces and feelings to improve communication and emotional life. New York: Henry Holt.
50. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1978). The facial action coding system: A technique for the measurement of facial movement. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
51. Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
52. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
53. Fielder, K. (2001). Affective states trigger processes of assimilation and accommodation. In K. Martin & G. Clore (Eds.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user's guidebook (pp. 85-98). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. Forbes-Riley, K., & Litman, D. (2009). Adapting to student uncertainty improves tutoring dialogues. In V. Dimitrova, R. Mizoguchi, & B. Du Boulay (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 33-40). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
55. Forbes-Riley, K., Rotaru, M., & Litman, D. (2008). The relative impact of student affect on performance models in a spoken dialogue tutoring system. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 18 (1-2), 11-43.
56. Forgas, J. (1991). Affect and cognition in close relationships. In J. Fletcher & J. Fincham (Eds.), Cognition in close relationships (pp. 151-174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. Gertner, A., & VanLehn, K. (2000). Andes: A coached problem solving environment for physics. In G. Gauthier, C. Frasson & K. VanLehn (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 133-142). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
58. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.
59. Gotlib, I., & Abramson, L. (1999). Attributional theories of emotion. In T. Dalgleish & M. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion. Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
60. Graesser, A., Chipman, P., Haynes, B., & Olney, A. (2005). AutoTutor: An intelligent tutoring system with mixed-initiative dialogue. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48 (4), 612-618.
61. Graesser, A., Chipman, P., King, B., McDaniel, B., & D’Mello, S. (2007). Emotions and learning with AutoTutor. In R. Luckin, K. Koedinger, & J. Greer (Eds.), 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 569-571). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
62. Graesser, A., Lu, S., Olde, B., Cooper-Pye, E., & Whitten, S. (2005). Question asking and eye tracking during cognitive disequilibrium: Comprehending illustrated texts on devices when the devices break down. Memory and Cognition, 33, 1235-1247.
63. Graesser, A., Lu, S. L., Jackson, G., Mitchell, H., Ventura, M., Olney, A., et al. (2004). AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 180-193.
64. Graesser, A., McDaniel, B., Chipman, P., Witherspoon, A., D’Mello, S., & Gholson, B. (2006). Detection of emotions during learning with AutoTutor. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver, Canada.
65. Graesser, A., & Olde, B. (2003). How does one know whether a person understands a device? The quality of the questions the person asks when the device breaks down. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95 (3), 524-536.
66. Graesser, A., Penumatsa, P., Ventura, M., Cai, Z., & Hu, X. (2007). Using LSA in AutoTutor: Learning through mixed-initiative dialogue in natural language. In T. Landauer, D. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 243-262). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
67. Graesser, A., Wiemer-Hastings, P., Wiemer-Hastings, K., Harter, D., Person, N., & TRG. (2000). Using latent semantic analysis to evaluate the contributions of students in AutoTutor. Interactive Learning Environments, 8 (2), 129-147.
68. Harter, S. (1992). The relationship between perceived competence, affect, and motivational orientation within the classroom: process and patterns of change. In A. Boggiano & T. Pittman (Eds.), Achievement and motivation: A social-developmental perspective (pp. 77-114). New York: Cambridge University Press.
69. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
70. Hertel, G., Neuhof, J., Theuer, T., & Kerr, N. (2000). Mood effect on cooperation in small groups: Does positive mood simply lead to more cooperation? Cognition and Emotion, 14, 441-472.
71. Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. R. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain and Education, 1 (1), 3-10.
72. Isen, A. (2001). An influence of positive affect on decision making in complex situations: Theoretical issues with practical implications. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11, 75-85.
73. Isen, A., Daubman, K., & Nowicki, G. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122-1131.
74. Issroff, K., & del Soldato, T. (1996). Incorporating motivation into computer-supported collaborative learning. In Proceedings of European conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Ficha Tecnica, Lisbon.
75. Izard, C. (1971). The face of emotion. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
76. Izard, C., & Ackerman, B. (2000). Motivational, organizational, and regulatory functions of discrete emotions. In M. Lewis & J. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
77. Johnstone, T., & Scherer, K. (2000). Vocal communication of emotion. In M. Lewis & J. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd ed., pp. 220-235). New York: Guilford Press.
78. Jonassen, D., Peck, K., & Wilson, B. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
79. Keltner, D., & Ekman, P. (2000). Facial expression of emotion. In R. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd ed., pp. 236-264). New York: Guilford.
80. Keltner, D., & Shiota, M. (2003). New displays and new emotions: A commentary on Rozin and Cohen (2003). Emotion, 3, 86-91.
81. Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., & Raney, G. (2001). An eye movement study of insight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 29 (7), 1000-1009.
82. Koedinger, K., Anderson, J., Hadley, W., & Mark, M. (1997). Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8, 30-43.
83. Koedinger, K., & Corbett, A. (2006). Cognitive tutors: Technology bringing learning sciences to the classroom. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 61-78). New York: Cambridge University Press.
84. Kort, B., Reilly, R., & Picard, R. (2001). An affective model of interplay between emotions and learning: Reengineering educational pedagogy-building a learning companion. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. Madison, WI, (U. S).
85. Lazarus, R. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
86. Lazarus, R. (2000). The cognition-emotion debate: A bit of history. In M. Lewis & J. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd ed., pp. 1-20). New York: Guilford Press.
87. Lehman, B., D’Mello, S., & Person, N. (2008). All alone with your emotions: An analysis of student emotions during effortful problem solving activities. Paper presented at the Workshop on Emotional and Cognitive issues in ITS at the Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Montreal, Canada.
88. Lehman, B., Matthews, M., D’Mello, S., & Person, N. (2008). What are you feeling? Investigating student affective states during expert human tutoring sessions. In B. Woolf, E. Aimeur, R. Nkambou, & S. Lajoie (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 50-59). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
89. Lepper, M., & Chabay, R. (1988). Socializing the intelligent tutor: Bringing empathy to computer tutors. In H. Mandl & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Learning issues for intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 242-257). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
90. Lepper, M., & Woolverton, M. (2002). The wisdom of practice: Lessons learned from the study of highly effective tutors. In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education (pp. 135-158). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
91. Lesgold, A., Lajoie, S., Bunzo, M., & Eggan, G. (1992). SHERLOCK: A coached practice environment for an electronics troubleshooting job. In J. H. Larkin & R. W. Chabay (Eds.), Computer-assisted instruction and intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 201-238). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
92. Linnenbrink, E., & Pintrich, P. (2002). The role of motivational beliefs in conceptual change. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 115-135). Dordretch: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
93. Mandler, G. (1976). Mind and emotion. New York: Wiley.
94. Mandler, G. (1984). Mind and body: Psychology of emotion and stress. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
95. Mandler, G. (1999). Emotion. In B. M. Bly & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Cognitive science. Handbook of perception and cognition (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
96. McDaniel, B., D’Mello, S., King, B., Chipman, P., Tapp, K., & Graesser, A. (2007). Facial features for affective state detection in learning environments. In D. McNamara & G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 467-472). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
97. Meyer, D., & Turner, J. (2006). Re-conceptualizing emotion and motivation to learn in classroom contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 18 (4), 377-390.
98. Miserandino, M. (1996). Children who do well in school: Individual differences in perceived competence and autonomy in above-average children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88 (2), 203-214.
99. Moshman, D. (1982). Exogenous, endogenous, and dialectical constructivism. Developmental Review, 2 (4), 371-384.
100. Ortony, A., Clore, G., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
101. Otero, J., & Graesser, A. (2001). PREG: Elements of a model of question asking. Cognition and Instruction, 19 (2), 143-175.
102. Patrick, B., Skinner, E., & Connell, J. (1993). What motivates children's behavior and emotion-joint effects of perceived control and autonomy in the academic domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65 (4), 781-791.
103. Pekrun, R., Elliot, A., & Maier, M. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98 (3), 583-597.
104. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence. New York: International University Press.
105. Picard, R. (1997). Affective computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
106. Robison, J., McQuiggan, S., & Lester, J. (2009). Evaluating the consequences of affective feedback in intelligent tutoring systems. Paper presented at the International Conference on Affective Computing & Intelligent Interaction, Amsterdam.
107. Rosenberg, E. (1998). Levels of analysis and the organization of affect. Review of General Psychology, 2 (3), 247-270.
108. Rozin, P., & Cohen, A. (2003). High frequency of facial expressions corresponding to confusion, concentration, and worry in an analysis of naturally occurring facial expressions of Americans. Emotion, 3, 68-75.
109. Russell, J. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145-172.
110. Scherer, K. (2003). Vocal communication of emotion: A review of research paradigms. Speech Communication, 40 (1-2), 227-256.
111. Scherer, K., Schorr, A., & Johnstone, T. (Eds.). (2001). Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research. London: London University Press.
112. Schultz, P., & Pekrun, R. (Eds.). (2007). Emotion in education. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
113. Schwartz, D., & Bransford, D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16 (4), 475-522.
114. Schwarz, N. (2000). Emotion, cognition, and decision making. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 433-440.
115. Schwarz, N., & Skurnik, I. (2003). Feeling and thinking: Implications for problem solving. In J. Davidson & R. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of problem solving (pp. 263-290). New York: Cambridge University Press.
116. Sleeman, D., & Brown, J. (Eds.). (1982). Intelligent tutoring systems. New York: Academic Press.
117. Smith, C., & Ellsworth, P. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48 (4), 813-838.
118. Stein, N., Hernandez, M., & Trabasso, T. (2008). Advances in modeling emotions and thought: The importance of developmental, online, and multilevel analysis. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 574-586). New York: Guilford Press.
119. Stein, N., & Levine, L. (1991). Making sense out of emotion. In A. O. W. Kessen, & F. Kraik (Eds.), Memories, thoughts, and emotions: Essays in honor of George Mandler (pp. 295-322). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
120. Stemmler, G., Heldmann, M., Pauls, C., & Scherer, T. (2001). Constraints for emotion specificity in fear and anger: The context counts. Psychophysiology, 38 (2), 275-291.
121. Stipek, D. (1988). Motivation to learn: From theory to practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
122. Tobias, S. (1994). Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 64, 37-54.
123. VanLehn, K., Graesser, A., Jackson, G., Jordan, P., Olney, A., & Rose, C. P. (2007). When are tutorial dialogues more effective than reading? Cognitive Science, 31 (1), 3-62.
124. VanLehn, K., Lynch, C., Schulze, K., Shapiro, J., Shelby, R., Taylor, L., et al. (2005). The Andes physics tutoring system: Five years of evaluations. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15, 147-204.
125. VanLehn, K., Siler, S., Murray, C., Yamauchi, T., & Baggett, W. (2003). Why do only some events cause learning during human tutoring? Cognition and Instruction, 21 (3), 209-249.
126. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
127. Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.
128. Woolf, B. (2009). Building intelligent interactive tutors. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.