Can nutrient profiling help to identify foods which diet variety should be encouraged? Results from the Whitehall II cohort

British Journal of Nutrition

Volumn 113, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 1800-1809

  Masset, Gabriel ^a,b   Scarborough, Peter ^c   Rayner, Mike ^c   Mishra, Gita ^d   Brunner, Eric J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Food variety; Nutrient profiling; Proportional hazards regression; Whitehall II cohort

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CAUSE OF DEATH; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CHRONIC DISEASE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONGESTIVE CARDIOMYOPATHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIETARY REFERENCE INTAKE; FEMALE; FOOD ANALYSIS; FOOD COMPOSITION; FOOD FREQUENCY QUESTIONNAIRE; FOOD INTAKE; FOOD VARIETY; HEALTH FOOD; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT; NUTRITIONAL REQUIREMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; RISK REDUCTION; SCORING SYSTEM; UNITED KINGDOM; BODY MASS; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; DIET; FOLLOW UP; FRUIT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; NUTRITIONAL VALUE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIOECONOMICS; VEGETABLE;

ADULT; BODY MASS INDEX; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CHRONIC DISEASE; COHORT STUDIES; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIET; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FRUIT; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; NUTRITION POLICY; NUTRITIVE VALUE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; VEGETABLES;

EID: 84930927777     PISSN: 00071145     EISSN: 14752662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S000711451500094X     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Kant AK (2004) Dietary patterns and health outcomes. J Am Diet Assoc 104, 615-635.
2. Hoffmann K, Schulze MB, Schienkiewitz A, et al. (2004) Application of a new statistical method to derive dietary patterns in nutritional epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 159, 935-944.
3. Kant AK, Graubard BI & Schatzkin A (2004) Dietary patterns predict mortality in a national cohort: the National Health Interview Surveys, 1987 and 1992. J Nutr 134, 1793-1799.
4. Brunner EJ, Mosdol A, Witte DR, et al. (2008) Dietary patterns and 15-y risks of major coronary events, diabetes, and mortality. Am J Clin Nutr 87, 1414-1421.
5. Drewnowski A, Henderson SA, Shore AB, et al. (1996) Diet quality and dietary diversity in France: implications for the French paradox. J Am Diet Assoc 96, 663-669.
6. Hatloy A, Torheim LE & Oshaug A (1998) Food variety-a good indicator of nutritional adequacy of the diet? A case study from an urban area in Mali, West Africa. Eur J Clin Nutr 52, 891-898.
7. Savy M, Martin-Prevel Y, Sawadogo P, et al. (2005) Use of variety/diversity scores for diet quality measurement: relation with nutritional status of women in a rural area in Burkina Faso. Eur J Clin Nutr 59, 703-716.
8. Oldewage-Theron WH & Kruger R (2008) Food variety and dietary diversity as indicators of the dietary adequacy and health status of an elderly population in Sharpeville, South Africa. J Nutr Elder 27, 101-133.
9. Steyn N, Nel J, Nantel G, et al. (2007) Food variety and dietary diversity scores in children: are they good indicators of dietary adequacy? Public Health Nutr 9, 644-650.
10. Fernandez E, Negri E, La Vecchia C, et al. (2000) Diet diversity and colorectal cancer. Prev Med 31, 11-14.
11. Fernandez E, D'Avanzo B, Negri E, et al. (1996) Diet diversity and the risk of colorectal cancer in northern Italy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 5, 433-436.
12. Wahlqvist ML, Lo CS & Myers KA (1989) Food variety is associated with less macrovascular disease in those with type II diabetes and their healthy controls. J Am Coll Nutr 8, 515-523.
13. Kant AK, Schatzkin A, Graubard BI, et al. (2000) A prospective study of diet quality and mortality in women. Jama 283, 2109-2115.
14. Michels KB & Wolk A (2002) A prospective study of variety of healthy foods and mortality in women. Int J Epidemiol 31, 847-854.
15. McCullough ML, Feskanich D, Stampfer MJ, et al. (2002) Diet quality and major chronic disease risk in men and women: moving toward improved dietary guidance. Am J Clin Nutr 76, 1261-1271.
16. Kaluza J, Hakansson N, Brzozowska A, et al. (2009) Diet quality and mortality: a population-based prospective study of men. Eur J Clin Nutr 63, 451-457.
17. US Department of Agriculture (2012) ChooseMyPlate. gov. http://www.choosemyplate.gov/about.html (accessed March 2015).
18. National Health Service (2011) The eatwell plate http://www.nhs.uk/Livewell/Goodfood/Pages/eatwell-plate.aspx (accessed November 2013).
19. Ministère du travail de l'emploi et de la santé (French Department of Work and Health) (2011) Programme national nutrition santé-2011-2015 (National Health and Nutrition Program 2011-2015). Paris: French Department of Work and Health. http://www.sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/PNNS-2011-2015.pdf (accessed March 2014).
20. US Department of Agriculture & US Department of Health and Human Services (2010) Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2010, 7th ed. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.
21. World Health Organization (2011) Nutrient Profiling-Report of a WHO/IASO Technical Meeting-London, United Kingdom, 4-6 October 2010. Geneva: WHO.
22. Office of Communications (2007) Television Advertising of Food and Drink Products to Children-Final statement. London: Ofcom.
23. Broadcasting Authority of Ireland (2013) Revised General and Children's Commercial Communications Codes-June 2013. Dublin: Broadcasting Authority of Ireland. http://www.bai.ie/?page-id3364 (accessed October 2013).
24. Food Standards Australia New Zealand (2013) Standard 1.2.7-Nutrition, Health and Related Claims. Australian Federal Register of Legislative Instruments F2014C01191. http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2013L00054 (accessed October 2013).
25. Agence francąise de sécurité sanitaire des aliments (2008) Définition de profils nutritionnels pour l'accès aux allé-gations nutritionnelles et de santé: propositions et arguments (The Setting of Nutrient Profiles for Access to Nutrition and Health: Proposals and Arguments). Paris: Agence francąise de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé.
26. Darmon N, Vieux F, Maillot M, et al. (2009) Nutrient profiles discriminate between foods according to their contribution to nutritionally adequate diets: a validation study using linear programming and the SAIN, LIM system. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 1227-1236.
27. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (2006) Regulation (EC) no. 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on food. Off J Eur Union L404, 9-25.
28. Rayner M, Scarborough P & Kaur A (2013) Nutrient profiling and the regulation of marketing to children. Possibilities and pitfalls. Appetite 62, 232-235.
29. Marmot M & Brunner E (2005) Cohort Profile: the Whitehall II study. Int J Epidemiol 34, 251-256.
30. Willett WC, Sampson L, Stampfer MJ, et al. (1985) Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol 122, 51-65.
31. Brunner E, Stallone D, Juneja M, et al. (2001) Dietary assessment in Whitehall II: comparison of 7 d diet diary and food-frequency questionnaire and validity against biomarkers. Br J Nutr 86, 405-414.
32. Brunner EJ, Marmot MG, White IR, et al. (1993) Gender and employment grade differences in blood cholesterol, apolipoproteins and haemostatic factors in the Whitehall II study. Atherosclerosis 102, 195-207.
33. Whitworth JA (2003) 2003 World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on management of hypertension. J Hypertens 21, 1983-1992.
34. French Medicine Agency (Afssaps) (2005) Prise en charge thérapeutique du patient dyslipidémique (Getting Patient Therapeutic Dyslipidemic), vol. 33, Saint-Denis, FR: Agence francąise de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé.
35. Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ (1998)Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med 15, 539-553.
36. Rose G (1982) Incubation period of coronary heart disease. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 284, 1600-1601.
37. World Health Organization (1999) Definition, Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus and its Complications. Report of a WHO Consultation, Part 1: Diagnosis and Classificationof DiabetesMellitus.Geneva:WorldHealthOrganization.
38. Rayner M, Scarborough P & Lobstein T (2009) The UK Ofcom Nutrient Profiling Model. Oxford: British Heart Foundation Health Promotion Research Group.
39. Madden JP, Goodman SJ & Guthrie HA (1976) Validity of the 24-hr. recall. Analysis of data obtained from elderly subjects. J Am Diet Assoc 68, 143-147.
40. Department of Health (1991) Dietary reference values for food energy and nutrients for the United Kingdom. Report of the Panel on Dietary Reference Values of the Committee on Medical Aspects of Food Policy. Rep Health Soc Subj 41, 1-210.
41. Vieux F, Soler L-G, Touazi D, et al. (2013) High nutritional quality is not associated with low greenhouse gas emissions in self-selected diets of French adults. Am J Clin Nutr 97, 569-583.
42. Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc B 34, 187-220.
43. Schoenfeld D (1982) Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression model. Biometrika 69, 239-241.
44. Black AE (2000) The sensitivity and specificity of the Goldberg cut-off for EI:BMR for identifying diet reports of poor validity. Eur J Clin Nutr 54, 395-404.
45. Sutton R (2012) Adult anthropometric measures, overweight and obesity. In Health Survey for England-2011, Health, Social Care and Lifestyles, pp. 325-362 [R Craig and J Mindell, editors]. Leeds: Health and Social Care Information Centre.
46. Akbaraly TN, Ferrie JE, Berr C, et al. (2011) Alternative Healthy Eating Index and mortality over 18 y of follow-up: results from the Whitehall II cohort. Am J Clin Nutr 94, 247-253.
47. Department of Health & Food Standards Agency (2011) National Diet and Nutrition Survey. In Headline Results from Years 1 and 2 (Combined) of the Rolling Programme (2008/2009-2009/2010), [B Bates, A Lennox and C Bates, et al., editorss]. London: Department of Health.
48. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention & National Center for Health Statistics (2012) National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services.
49. Unité de Surveillance et d'Épidémiologie Nutritionnelle (2007) É tude nationale nutrition santé-ENNS, 2006 (National Nutritional Health Study-ENNS 2006). Saint-Maurice, FR: Institut de veille sanitaire.
50. US Department of Agriculture & US Department of Health and Human Services (1995) Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 4th ed. Home and Garden Bulletin no. 232. http://www.health.gov/dietaryguidelines/dga95/(accessed March 2015).
51. Macdiarmid JI, Loe J, Kyle J, et al. (2013) It was an education in portion size. Experience of eating a healthy diet and barriers to long term dietary change. Appetite 71, 411-419.
52. Larsson SC, Akesson A & Wolk A (2014) Overall diet quality and risk of stroke: a prospective cohort study in women. Atherosclerosis 233, 27-29.
53. Scarborough P, Arambepola C, Kaur A, et al. (2010) Should nutrient profile models be category specific or acrossthe-board? A comparison of the two systems using diets of British adults. Eur J Clin Nutr 64, 553-560.
54. McCrory Ma, Fuss PJ, McCallum JE, et al. (1999) Dietary variety within food groups: association with energy intake and body fatness in men and women. Am J Clin Nutr 69, 440-447.
55. Chiuve SE, Sampson L & Willett WC (2011) The association between a nutritional quality index and risk of chronic disease. Am J Prev Med 40, 505-513.