Semi-adaptive response and noise attenuation in bone morphogenetic protein signalling

Journal of the Royal Society Interface

Volumn 12, Issue 107, 2015, Pages

  Hong, Tian ^a   Fung, Ernest S ^a,b   Zhang, Lei ^c   Huynh, Grace ^b   Monuki, Edwin S ^a,b   Nie, Qing ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Activation time; Adaptive response; Negative feedback; Noise attenuation; Response speed; Smad phosphorylation

Indexed keywords

BONE; CHEMICAL ACTIVATION; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ENZYME ACTIVITY; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEINS;

ACTIVATION TIME; ADAPTIVE RESPONSE; BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEINS; CONCENTRATION-DEPENDENT MANNERS; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHES; NOISE ATTENUATION; RESPONSE SPEED;

FEEDBACK;

BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN; BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN RECEPTOR; SMAD PROTEIN;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; ATTENUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMICS; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; NOISE; RESPONSE TIME; VELOCITY; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL CULTURE; CYTOLOGY; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYOLOGY; MAMMALIAN EMBRYO; METABOLISM; MOUSE; NEURAL STEM CELL; PHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALS; BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN RECEPTORS; BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEINS; CELLS, CULTURED; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; MICE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEURAL STEM CELLS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; SMAD PROTEINS;

EID: 84930707383     PISSN: 17425689     EISSN: 17425662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0258     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Hogan BL. 1996 Bone morphogenetic proteins: multifunctional regulators of vertebrate development. Genes Dev. 10, 1580-1594. (doi:10.1101/gad.10.13.1580)
2. Mehler MF, Mabie PC, Zhang D, Kessler JA. 1997 Bone morphogenetic proteins in the nervous system. Trends Neurosci. 20, 309-317. (doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(96)01046-6)
3. Schier AF, Talbot WS. 2005 Molecular genetics of axis formation in zebrafish. Annu. Rev. Genet. 39, 561-613. (doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.143752)
4. Ferguson EL, Anderson KV. 1992 Decapentaplegic acts as a morphogen to organize dorsal-ventral pattern in the Drosophila embryo. Cell 71, 451-461. (doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90514-D)
5. Shi Y, Massague J. 2003 Mechanisms of TGF-β signaling from cell membrane to the nucleus. Cell 113, 685-700. (doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00432-X)
6. Massague J, Seoane J, Wotton D. 2005 Smad transcription factors. Genes Dev. 19, 2783-2810. (doi:10.1101/gad.1350705)
7. Xu L. 2006 Regulation of Smad activities. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1759, 503-513. (doi:10.1016/j.bbaexp.2006.11.001)
8. Feng X-H, Derynck R. 2005 Specificity and versatility in TGF-β signaling through Smads. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 21, 659-693. (doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.022404.142018)
9. Sapkota G, Alarcon C, Spagnoli FM, Brivanlou AH, Massague J. 2007 Balancing BMP signaling through integrated inputs into the Smad1 linker. Mol. Cell 25, 441-454. (doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2007.01.006)
10. Knockaert M, Sapkota G, Alarcon C, Massague J, Brivanlou AH. 2006 Unique players in the BMP pathway: small C-terminal domain phosphatases dephosphorylate Smad1 to attenuate BMP signaling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 11 940-11 945. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0605133103)
11. Cheng X, Hsu C-M, Currle DS, Hu JS, Barkovich AJ, Monuki ES. 2006 Central roles of the roof plate in telencephalic development and holoprosencephaly. J. Neurosci. 26, 7640-7649. (doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0714-06.2006)
12. Hu JS, Doan LT, Currle DS, Paff M, Rheem JY, Schreyer R, Robert B, Monuki ES. 2008 Border formation in a Bmp gradient reduced to single dissociated cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 3398-3403. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0709100105)
13. Balaskas N, Ribeiro A, Panovska J, Dessaud E, Sasai N, Page KM, Briscoe J, Ribes V. 2012 Gene regulatory logic for reading the Sonic Hedgehog signaling gradient in the vertebrate neural tube. Cell 148, 273-284. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.047)
14. Shimozono S, Iimura T, Kitaguchi T, Higashijima S-I, Miyawaki A. 2013 Visualization of an endogenous retinoic acid gradient across embryonic development. Nature 496, 363-366. (doi:10.1038/nature12037)
15. Schilling TF, Nie Q, Lander AD. 2012 Dynamics and precision in retinoic acid morphogen gradients. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 22, 562-569. (doi:10.1016/j.gde.2012.11.012.Dynamics)
16. Zhang L, Radtke K, Zheng L, Cai AQ, Schilling TF, Nie Q. 2012 Noise drives sharpening of gene expression boundaries in the zebrafish hindbrain. Mol. Syst. Biol. 8, 613. (doi:10.1038/msb.2012.45)
17. Onichtchouk D, Chen YG, Dosch R, Gawantka V, Delius H, Massagué J, Niehrs C. 1999 Silencing of TGF-β signalling by the pseudoreceptor BAMBI. Nature 401, 480-485. (doi:10.1038/46794)
18. Massague J, Chen YG. 2000 Controlling TGF-βsignaling. Genes Dev. 14, 627-644. (doi:10.1101/gad.14.6.627)
19. Nicklas D, Saiz L. 2013 Characterization of negative feedback network motifs in the TGF-β signaling pathway. PLoS ONE 8, e83531. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083531)
20. Sun Q, Mao S, Li H, Zen K, Zhang C-Y, Li L. 2013 Role of miR-17 family in the negative feedback loop of bone morphogenetic protein signaling in neuron. PLoS ONE 8, e83067. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083067)
21. Thomas R, Thieffry D, Kaufman M. 1995 Dynamical behaviour of biological regulatory networks - I. Biological role of feedback loops and practical use of the concept of the loop-characteristic state. Bull. Math. Biol. 57, 247-276. (doi:10.1007/BF02460618)
22. Dublanche Y, Michalodimitrakis K, Kümmerer N, Foglierini M, Serrano L. 2006 Noise in transcription negative feedback loops: simulation and experimental analysis. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2, 41. (doi:10.1038/msb4100081)
23. Srinivasan S, Hu JS, Currle DS, Fung ES, Hayes WB, Lander AD, Monuki ES. 2014 A BMP-FGF morphogen toggle switch drives the ultrasensitive expression of multiple genes in the developing forebrain. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003463. (doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003463)
24. Wang L, Xin J, Nie Q. 2010 A critical quantity for noise attenuation in feedback systems. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6, e1000764. (doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000764)
25. Chen M, Wang L, Liu CC, Nie Q. 2013 Noise attenuation in the ON and OFF states of biological switches. ACS Synth. Biol. 2, 587-593. (doi:10.1021/sb400044g)
26. Alarcon C et al. 2009 Nuclear CDKs drive Smad transcriptional activation and turnover in BMP and TGF-β pathways. Cell 139, 757-769. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.09.035)
27. Chung S-W, Miles FL, Sikes RA, Cooper CR, Farach-Carson MC, Ogunnaike BA. 2009 Quantitative modeling and analysis of the transforming growth factor β signaling pathway. Biophys. J. 96, 1733-1750. (doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2008.11.050)
28. Nakabayashi J, Sasaki A. 2009 A mathematical model of the stoichiometric control of Smad complex formation in TGF-β signal transduction pathway. J. Theor. Biol. 259, 389-403. (doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.03.036)
29. Schmierer B, Tournier AL, Bates PA, Hill CS. 2008 Mathematical modeling identifies Smad nucleocytoplasmic shuttling as a dynamic signal-interpreting system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 6608-6613. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0710134105)
30. Karim MS, Buzzard GT, Umulis DM. 2012 Secreted, receptor-associated bone morphogenetic protein regulators reduce stochastic noise intrinsic to many extracellular morphogen distributions. J. R. Soc. Interface 9, 1073-1083. (doi:10.1098/rsif.2011.0547)
31. Vilar JMG, Jansen R, Sander C. 2006 Signal processing in the TGF-β superfamily ligand-receptor network. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2, e3. (doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020003)
32. Behar M, Hoffmann A. 2013 Tunable signal processing through a kinase control cycle: the IKK signaling node. Biophys. J. 105, 231-241. (doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2013.05.013)
33. Behar M, Barken D, Werner SL, Hoffmann A. 2013 The dynamics of signaling as a pharmacological target. Cell 155, 448-461. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.018)
34. Rosenfeld N, Elowitz MB, Alon U. 2002 Negative autoregulation speeds the response times of transcription networks. J. Mol. Biol. 323, 785-793. (doi:10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00994-4)
35. Tyson JJ, Chen KC, Novak B. 2003 Sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15, 221-231. (doi:10.1016/S0955-0674(03)00017-6)
36. Savageau MA. 1974 Comparison of classical and autogenous systems of regulation in inducible operons. Nature 252, 546-549. (doi:10.1038/252546a0)
37. Rosenfeld N, Alon U. 2003 Response delays and the structure of transcription networks. J. Mol. Biol. 329, 645-654. (doi:10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00506-0)
38. Gurdon JB, Mitchell A, Mahony D. 1995 Direct and continuous assessment by cells of their position in a morphogen gradient. Nature 376, 520-521. (doi:10.1038/376520a0)
39. Dyson S, Gurdon JB. 1998 The interpretation of position in a morphogen gradient as revealed by occupancy of activin receptors. Cell 93, 557-568. (doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81185-X)
40. Jullien J, Gurdon J. 2005 Morphogen gradient interpretation by a regulated trafficking step during ligand-receptor transduction. Genes Dev. 19, 2682-2694. (doi:10.1101/gad.341605)