Legitimacy Struggles and Political Corporate Social Responsibility in International Settings: A Comparative Discursive Analysis of a Contested Investment in Latin America

Organization Studies

Volumn 36, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 741-777

  Joutsenvirta, Maria ^a   Vaara, Eero ^a,b,c  

^a HELSINKI SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Finland)

^b EMLYON BUSINESS SCHOOL   (France)

^c LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

corporate social responsibility; discourse; international relations; legitimacy; legitimation; power

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930401472     PISSN: 01708406     EISSN: 17413044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0170840615571958     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Aguilera R. V.,Rupp D. E.,Williams C. A.,Ganapathi J.Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations.Academy of Management Review. 2007;32:836-863
2. Banerjee S. B.Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature.Organization Studies. 2003;24:143-180
3. Banerjee S. B.Necrocapitalism.Organization Studies. 2008;29:1541-1563
4. Banerjee S. B.Governing the global corporation: A critical perspective.Business Ethics Quarterly. 2010;20:265-274
5. Banerjee S. B.,Linstead S.Globalization, multiculturalism and other fictions: Colonialism for the new millennium?.Organization. 2001;8:683-722
6. Barley S. R.Building an institutional field to corral a government: A case to set an agenda for organization studies.Organization Studies. 2010;31:777-805
7. Beck UWhat is globalization?. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2000:
8. Blowfield M.,Frynas J. G.Setting new agendas: Critical perspectives on corporate social responsibility in the developing world.International Affairs. 2005;81:499-513
9. Brammer S.,Jackson G.,Matten D.Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance.Socio-Economic Review. 2012;10:3-28
10. Campbell J. L.Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility.Academy of Management Review. 2007;32:946-967
11. Carroll A. B.A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance.Academy of Management Review. 1979;4:497-505
12. Crane A.,Matten D.Corporate citizenship: Missing the point or missing the boat? A response to van Oosterhout.Academy of Management Review. 2005;30:681-684
13. Crane A.,Matten D.,Moon J.Corporations and citizenship. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2008:
14. Deetz S.,Mumby D. K.Power, discourse and the workplace: Reclaiming the critical tradition.Communication Yearbook. 1990;13:18-47
15. Detomasi D. A.The political roots of corporate social responsibility.Journal of Business Ethics. 2008;82:807-819
16. Devinney T. M.Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility.Academy of Management Perspectives. 2009;23:44-56
17. Doh J. P.,Guay T. R.Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional-stakeholder perspective.Journal of Management Studies. 2006;43:47-73
18. Doh J.,Lawton T.,Rajwani T.Advancing nonmarket strategy research: Institutional perspectives in a changing world.Academy of Management Perspectives. 2012;26:22-39
19. Edward P.,Willmott H.Corporate citizenship: Rise or demise of a myth?.Academy of Management Review. 2008;33:771-773
20. Escobar L. F.,Vredenburg H.Multinational oil companies and the adoption of sustainable development: A resource-based and institutional theory interpretation of adoption heterogeneity.Journal of Business Ethics. 2011;98:39-65
21. Fairclough NCritical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London, UK: Longman; 1995a:
22. Fairclough NMedia discourse. London, UK: Edward Arnold; 1995b:
23. Fairclough NAnalysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London, UK: Longman; 2003:
24. Fairclough NLanguage and globalization. London, UK: Routledge; 2006:
25. Fairclough N.,Wodak R.Discourse as social interaction. Van Dijk T., ed. London, UK: SAGE Publications; 1997:258-284.
26. Frenkel M.The multinational corporation as a third space: Rethinking international management discourse on knowledge transfer through Homi Bhabha.Academy of Management Review. 2008;33:924-942
27. Frenkel M.,Shenhav Y.From binarism back to hybridity: A postcolonial reading of management and management studies.Organization Studies. 2006;27:855-876
28. Frynas J. G.The false developmental promise of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from multinational oil companies.International Affairs. 2005;81:581-598
29. Gilbert D. U.,Rasche A.,Waddock S.Accountability in a global economy: The emergence of international accountability standards.Business Ethics Quarterly. 2011;21:23-44
30. Golant B. D.,Sillince J. A. A.The constitution of organizational legitimacy: A narrative perspective.Organization Studies. 2007;28:1149-1167
31. Goodstein J. D.,Velamuri S. R.States, power, legitimacy, and maintaining institutional control: The battle for private sector telecommunication services in Zimbabwe.Organization Studies. 2009;30:489-508
32. Hall SCulture, society and the media. Gurevitch M.Bennett T.Curran J.Woollacott J., ed. London, UK: Methuen; 1982:56-90.
33. Hardy C.,Phillips N.No joking matter: Discursive struggle in the Canadian refugee system.Organization Studies. 1999;20:1-24
34. Helfen M.,Sydow J.Negotiation as institutional work: The case of labour standards and international framework agreements.Organization Studies. 2013;34:1073-1098
35. Hillman A.,Hitt M.Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions.Academy of Management Review. 1999;24:825-842
36. Hillman A. J.,Keim G. D.,Schuler D.Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda.Journal of Management. 2004;30:837-857
37. Hoffman A. J.Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry.Academy of Management Journal. 1999;42:351-371
38. Joutsenvirta M.Setting boundaries for corporate social responsibility: Firm-NGO relationship as discursive legitimation struggle.Journal of Business Ethics. 2011;102:57-75
39. Joutsenvirta M.,Vaara E.Discursive (de)legitimation of a contested Finnish greenfield investment project in Latin America.Scandinavian Journal of Management. 2009;25:85-96
40. Kang N.,Moon J.Institutional complementarity between corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: A comparative institutional analysis of three capitalisms.Socio-Economic Review. 2012;10:85-108
41. Khan F. R.,Munir K. A.,Willmott H.A dark side of institutional entrepreneurship: Soccer balls, child labour and postcolonial impoverishment.Organization Studies. 2007;28:1055-1077
42. Kinderman D.‘Free us up so we can be responsible!’ The co-evolution of corporate social responsibility and neo-liberalism in the UK, 1977–2010.Socio-Economic Review. 2012;10:29-57
43. Kolk A.Corporate social responsibility in the coffee sector: The dynamics of MNC responses and code development.European Management Journal. 2005;23:228-236
44. Koos S.The institutional embeddedness of social responsibility: A multilevel analysis of smaller firms’ civic engagement in Western Europe.Socio-Economic Review. 2012;10:135-162
45. KosonenG. (2008). Pulp and friction: Engaging with stakeholders. Master’s Thesis of the Faculty of International Business. Helsinki: Publications of the Helsinki School of Economics.
46. Kostova T.,Zaheer S.Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise.Academy of Management Review. 1999;24:64-81
47. Kostova T.,Roth K.,Dacin T.Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions.Academy of Management Review. 2008;33:994-1006
48. Langley A.Strategies for theorizing from process data.Academy of Management Review. 1999;24:691-710
49. Lawton T.,McGuire S.,Rajwani T.Corporate political activity: A literature review and research agenda.International Journal of Management Reviews. 2013;15:86-105
50. Lefsrud L. M.,Meyer R. E.Science or science fiction? Professionals’ discursive construction of climate change.Organization Studies. 2012;33:1477-1506
51. Levy D. L.Offshoring in the new global political economy.Journal of Management Studies. 2005;42:685-693
52. Levy D. L.Political contestation in global production networks.Academy of Management Review. 2008;33:943-963
53. Locke K.,Golden-Biddle K.,Feldman M. S.Making doubt generative: Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process.Organization Science. 2008;19:907-918
54. Lucea R.,Doh J.International strategy for the nonmarket context: Stakeholders, issues, networks, and geography.Business and Politics. 2012;14:1-30
55. Mahoney J. T.,McGahan A. M.,Pitelis C. N.The interpedendence of private and public interests.Organization Science. 2009;20:1034-1052
56. Mäkinen J.,Kourula A.Pluralism in political corporate social responsibility.Business Ethics Quarterly. 2012;22:649-678
57. Margolis J. D.,Walsh J. P.Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business.Administrative Science Quarterly. 2003;48:268-305
58. Matten D.,Crane A.Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization.Academy of Management Review. 2005;30:166-179
59. Matten D.,Moon J.‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility.Academy of Management Review. 2008;33:404-424
60. Matten D.,Crane A.,Chapple W.Behind the mask: Revealing the true face of corporate citizenship.Journal of Business Ethics. 2003;45:109-120
61. McWilliams A.,Siegel D.Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective.Academy of Management Review. 2001;26:117-127
62. McWilliams A.,Siegel D.,Wright P.Review article: Guest editors’ introduction corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications.Journal of Management Studies. 2006;43:1-18
63. McWilliams A.,Van Fleet D.,Cory K.Raising rivals’ costs through political strategy: An extension of resource-based theory.Journal of Management Studies. 2002;39:707-723
64. Meyer R. E.,Höllerer M. A.Meaning structures in a contested issue field: A topographic map of shareholder value in Austria.Academy of Management Journal. 2010;53:1241-1262
65. Meyer R. E.,Höllerer M. A.,Jancsary D.,Van Leeuwen T.The visual dimension in organizing, organization, and organization research.Academy of Management Annals. 2013;7 (1): 487-553
66. Misangyi V. F.,Weaver G. R.,Elms H.Ending corruption: The interplay among institutional logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs.Academy of Management Review. 2008;33:750-770
67. Muthuri J. N.,Gilbert V.An institutional analysis of corporate social responsibility in Kenya.Journal of Business Ethics. 2010;98:467-483
68. Orlitzky MThe Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Crane A.McWilliams A.Matten D.Moon J.Siegel D., ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2008:
69. Orlitzky M.,Schmidt F. L.,Rynes S. L.Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis.Organization Studies. 2003;24:403-441
70. Pakkasvirta J.From pulp to fiction? Fray Bentos pulp investment conflict through the Finnish Media.Cooperation and Conflict: Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association. 2008;43:421-446
71. Palazzo G.,Scherer A. G.Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework.Journal of Business Ethics. 2006;66:71-88
72. Patriotta G.,Gond J.-P.,Schultz F.Maintaining legitimacy: Controversies, orders of worth, and public justifications.Journal of Management Studies. 2011;48:1804-1836
73. Phillips N.,Hardy C.Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2002:
74. Prakash A.,Griffin J.Corporate responsibility, multinational corporations, and nation states: An introduction.Business and Politics. 2012;14:1-10
75. Postcolonial theory and organizational analysis: A critical engagement. Prasad A, ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2003:
76. Rasche A.,Kell G.The United Nations Global Compact: Achievements, trends and challenges. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2010:
77. Riad S.,Vaara E.Varieties of metonymy in media accounts of mergers and acquisitions.Journal of Management Studies. 2011;48:737-771
78. Rojo L. M.,Van Dijk T.‘There was a problem, and it was solved!’: Legitimating the expulsion of ‘illegal’ migrants in Spanish parliamentary discourse.Discourse & Society. 1997;8:523-566
79. Scherer A. G.,Palazzo G.Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective.Academy of Management Review. 2007;32:1096-1120
80. Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship. Scherer A. G.Palazzo G., ed. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2008:
81. Scherer A. G.,Palazzo G.The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy.Journal of Management Studies. 2011;48:899-931
82. Scherer A. G.,Palazzo G.,Baumann D.Global rules and private actors: Toward a new role of the transnational corporation in global governance.Business Ethics Quarterly. 2006;16:505-532
83. Scherer A. G.,Palazzo G.,Matten D.Introduction to the special issue: Globalization as a challenge for business responsibilities.Business Ethics Quarterly. 2009;19:327-347
84. Scherer A. G.,Palazzo G.,Seidl D.Managing legitimacy in complex and heterogeneous environments: Sustainable development in a globalized world.Journal of Management Studies. 2013;50:259-284
85. Slager R.,Gond J-P.,Moon J.Standardization as institutional work: The regulatory power of a responsible investment standard.Organization Studies. 2012;33:763-790
86. Srinivas N.Could a subaltern manage? Identity work and habitus in a colonial workplace.Organization Studies. 2013;34:1655-1674
87. Suddaby R.,Greenwood R.Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy.Administrative Science Quarterly. 2005;50:35-67
88. Sundaram A. K.,Inkpen A. C.The corporate objective revisited.Organization Science. 2004;15:350-363
89. Surroca J.,Tribó J. A.,Zahra S. A.Stakeholder pressure on MNEs and the transfer of socially irresponsible practices to subsidiaries.Academy of Management Journal. 2013;56:549-572
90. Teubal M.Rise and collapse of neo-liberalism in Argentina: The role of economic groups.Journal of Developing Societies. 2004;20 (3–4): 173-188
91. Vaara E.Struggles over legitimacy in the Eurozone crisis: Discursive legitimation strategies and their ideological underpinnings.Discourse & Society. 2014;:1-19
92. Vaara E.,Tienari J.A discursive perspective on legitimation strategies in MNCs.Academy of Management Review. 2008;33:985-993
93. Vaara E.,Tienari J.,Laurila J.Pulp and paper fiction: On the discursive legitimation of global industrial restructuring.Organization Studies. 2006;27:789-810
94. Vaara E.,Tienari J.,Piekkari R.,Säntti R.Language and the circuits of power in a merging multinational corporation.Journal of Management Studies. 2005;16:333-347
95. Van Bommel K.,Spicer A.Hail the snail: Hegemonic struggles in the slow food movement.Organization Studies. 2011;32:1717-1744
96. Van Dijk TNews as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1990:
97. Van Dijk T. AIdeology: A multidisciplinary analysis. London, UK: SAGE Publications; 1998:
98. Van Leeuwen T.JDiscourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2008:
99. Van Leeuwen T.,Wodak R.Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis.Discourse Studies. 1999;1:83-118
100. Van Maanen J.,Sørensen J.,Mitchell T. R.The interplay between theory and method.Academy of Management Review. 2007;32:1145-1154
101. Waddock S.Building a new institutional infrastructure for corporate responsibility.Academy of Management Perspectives. 2008;22:87-108
102. Witt M. A.,Redding G.The spirits of corporate social responsibility: Senior executive perceptions of the role of the firm in society in Germany, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea and the United States.Socio-Economic Review. 2012;10:109-134
103. Wittneben B. B. F.,Okereke C.,Banerjee S. B.,Levy D. L.Climate change and the emergence of new organizational landscapes.Organization Studies. 2012;33:1431-1450
104. Wodak R.,De Cillia R.,Reisigl M.,Liebhart K.The discursive construction of national identity. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press; 1999:
105. Zyglidopoulos S.,Fleming P.Corporate accountability and the politics of visibility in ‘late modernity’.Organization. 2011;18:691-706