Arithmetic practice can be modified to promote understanding of mathematical equivalence

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 107, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 423-436

  McNeil, Nicole M ^a   Fyfe, Emily R ^a,b   Dunwiddie, April E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Arithmetic practice; Conceptual understanding; Early algebra; Mathematics learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930364420     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: 19392176     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0037687     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Alibali, M. W. (1999). How children change their minds: Strategy change can be gradual or abrupt. Developmental Psychology, 35, 127-145. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.127
2. Alibali, M. W., & Meredith, L. (2009, October). Sources of change in children's encoding of mathematics problems. In B. Rittle-Johnson (Organizer), Understanding knowledge change: Investigations on how children learn mathematics and literacy skills. Symposium presented at the biennial meeting of the Cognitive Development Society, San Antonio, TX.
3. Anderson, J. R. (2002). Spanning seven orders of magnitude: A challenge for cognitive modeling. Cognitive Science, 26, 85-112. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2601_3
4. Barnett, W., Jung, K., Yarosz, D., Thomas, J., Hornbeck, A., Stechuk, R., & Burns, S. (2008). Educational effects of the Tools of the Mind curriculum: A randomized trial. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 299-313. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.03.001
5. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
6. Baroody, A. J., & Ginsburg, H. P. (1983). The effects of instruction on children's understanding of the "equals" sign. The Elementary School Journal, 84, 198-212. doi:10.1086/461356
7. Behr, M., Erlwanger, S., & Nichols, E. (1980). How children view the equal sign. Mathematics Teaching, 92, 13-15.
8. Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123-152. doi:10.1037/h0043805
9. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasiexperimental designs for research. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
10. Campuzano, L., Dynarski, M., Agodini, R., & Rall, K. (2009). Effectiveness of reading and mathematics software products: Findings from two student cohorts (NCEE 2009-4041). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
11. Carnine, D. (1980). Three procedures for presenting minimally different positive and negative instances. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 452-456. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.72.4.452
12. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., & Chiang, C. (1989). Using knowledge of children's mathematics thinking in classroom teaching:An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 499-531. doi:10.3102/00028312026004499
13. Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. (2003). Thinking mathematically:Integrating arithmetic and algebra in elementary school. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
14. Carpenter, T. P., & Levi, L. (2000). Developing conceptions of algebraic reasoning in the primary grades. Madison, WI: National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science.
15. Carraher, T. N., Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (1985). Mathematics in the streets and in schools. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 21-29. doi:10.1111/j.2044-835X.1985.tb00951.x
16. Charles, R. I. (2005). Big ideas and understandings as the foundation for elementary and middle school mathematics. National Council for Supervisors of Mathematics: Journal of Mathematics Education Leadership, 8(2), 9-24.
17. Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55-81. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90004-2
18. Chen, Z. (1999). Schema induction in children's analogical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 703-715. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.703
19. Chesney, D. L., McNeil, N. M., Matthews, P. G., Byrd, C. E., Petersen, L. A., Wheeler, M. C.,... Dunwiddie, A. E. (2014). Organization matters: Mental organization of addition knowledge relates to understanding math equivalence in symbolic form. Cognitive Development, 30, 30-46. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.01.001
20. Chesney, D. L., McNeil, N. M., Petersen, L. A., & Dunwiddie, A. E. (2012). Arithmetic practice that includes relational words promotes conceptual understanding and computational fluency. Poster presented at the annual convention for the Association for Psychological Sciences, Chicago, IL.
21. Cobb, P. (1987). An investigation of young children's academic arithmetic contexts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18, 109-124. doi:10.1007/BF00314722
22. Constas, M. A., & Sternberg, R. J. (2006). Translating theory and research into educational practice: Developments in content domains, large-scale reform, and intellectual capacity. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. de Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1981). Children's solution processes in elementary arithmetic problems: Analysis and improvement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 765-779. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.73.6.765
24. Falkner, K. P., Levi, L., & Carpenter, T. P. (1999). Children's understanding of equality: A foundation for algebra. Teaching Children Mathematics, 6, 232-236.
25. Geary, D. C., Bow Thomas, C. C., Liu, F., & Siegler, R. S. (1996). Development of arithmetical competencies in Chinese and American children: Influence of age, language, and schooling. Child Development, 67, 2022-2044. doi:10.2307/1131607
26. Hattikudur, S., & Alibali, M. W. (2010). Learning about the equal sign:Does comparing with inequality symbols help? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107, 15-30. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2010.03.004
27. Hoover, H. D., Dunbar, S. B., & Frisbie, D. A. (2003). Iowa Tests of Basic Skills. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.
28. Jacobs, V. R., Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Battey, D. (2007). Professional development focused on children's algebraic reasoning in elementary school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 258-288.
29. Jones, I., Inglis, M., Gilmore, C., & Dowens, M. (2012). Substitution and sameness: Two components of a relational conception of the equals sign. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 166-176. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.05.003
30. Kaye, D. B. (1986). The development of mathematical cognition. Cognitive Development, 1, 157-170. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(86)80017-X
31. Kelley, K., & Maxwell, S. E. (in press). Multiple regression. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Quantitative methods in the social and behavioral sciences: A guide for researchers and reviewers. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-404-8_4
32. Kieran, C. (1981). Concepts associated with the equality symbol. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 317-326. doi:10.1007/BF00311062
33. Knuth, E. J., Stephens, A. C., McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2006). Does understanding the equal sign matter? Evidence from solving equations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37, 297-312.
34. Koedinger, K. R., & Nathan, M. J. (2004). The real story behind story problems: Effects of representations on quantitative reasoning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 129-164. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1302_1
35. Lillard, A. S. (2005). Montessori: The science behind the genius. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
36. Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 54(6, Whole No. 248). doi:10.1037/h0093502
37. Marum, T., Isler, I., Stephens, A., Gardiner, A., Blanton, M., & Knuth, E. (2011, October). From specific value to variable: Developing students' abilities to represent unknowns. Paper presented at the thirty-third annual conference of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Reno, NV.
38. Matthews, P., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2009). In pursuit of knowledge:Comparing self-explanations, concepts, and procedures as pedagogical tools. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104, 1-21. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.08.004
39. McNeil, N. M. (2007). U-shaped development in math: 7-year-olds outperform 9-year-olds on equivalence problems. Developmental Psychology, 43, 687-695. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.687
40. McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2004). You'll see what you mean:Students encode equations based on their knowledge of arithmetic. Cognitive Science, 28, 451-466.
41. McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2005a). Knowledge change as a function of mathematics experience: All contexts are not created equal. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6, 285-306. doi:10.1207/s15327647jcd0602_6
42. McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2005b). Why won't you change your mind? Knowledge of operational patterns hinders learning and performance on equations. Child Development, 76, 883-899. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00884.x
43. McNeil, N. M., Chesney, D. L., Matthews, P. G., Fyfe, E. R., Petersen, L. A., Dunwiddie, A. E., & Wheeler, M. C. (2012). It pays to be organized: Organizing arithmetic practice around equivalent values facilitates understanding of math equivalence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1109-1121. doi:10.1037/a0028997
44. McNeil, N. M., Fyfe, E. R., Petersen, L. A., Dunwiddie, A. E., & Brletic-Shipley, H. (2011). Benefits of practicing 4 = 2 + 2: Nontraditional problem formats facilitate children's understanding of mathematical equivalence. Child Development, 82, 1620-1633. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01622.x
45. McNeil, N. M., Grandau, L., Knuth, E. J., Alibali, M. W., Stephens, A. C., Hattikudur, S., & Krill, D. E. (2006). Middle-school students' understanding of the equal sign: The books they read can't help. Cognition and Instruction, 24, 367-385. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2403_3
46. McNeil, N. M., Weinberg, A., Hattikudur, S., Stephens, A. C., Asquith, P., Knuth, E. J., & Alibali, M. W. (2010). A is for "apple": Mnemonic symbols hinder the interpretation of algebraic expressions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 625-634. doi:10.1037/a0019105
47. Montessori, M. (1917). The advanced Montessori method. New York, NY:Frederick A. Stokes.
48. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
49. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & the Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math\%20Standards.pdf
50. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success:The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education.
51. National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
52. Newcombe, N. S., Ambady, N., Eccles, J., Gomez, L., Klahr, D., Linn, M.,... Mix, K. (2009). Psychology's role in mathematics and science education. American Psychologist, 64, 538-550. doi:10.1037/a0014813
53. Perry, M. (1991). Learning and transfer: Instructional conditions and conceptual change. Cognitive Development, 6, 449-468. doi:10.1016/0885-2014(91)90049-J
54. Perry, M., Church, R. B., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1988). Transitional knowledge in the acquisition of concepts. Cognitive Development, 3, 359-400. doi:10.1016/0885-2014(88)90021-4
55. Piaget, J., & Szeminska, A. (1995). The child's conception of number (C. Gattegno & F. M. Hadgson, Trans.) In H. E. Gruber & J. J. Voneche (Eds.), The essential Piaget (pp. 298-341). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson. (Original work published 1941)
56. Quilici, J. L., & Mayer, R. E. (1996). Role of examples in how students learn to categorize statistics word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 144-161. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.144
57. Quirk, W. G. (2002). Understanding the revised NCTM standards: Arithmetic is still missing! Retrieved from http://www.wgquirk.com/NCTM2000.html
58. Rittle-Johnson, B. (2006). Promoting transfer: Effects of self-explanation and direct instruction. Child Development, 77, 1-15.
59. Rittle-Johnson, B., & Alibali, M. W. (1999). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to the other? Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 175-189. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.175
60. Rogers, T. T., Rakison, D. H., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). U-shaped curves in development: A PDP approach. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5, 137-145. doi:10.1207/s15327647jcd0501_14
61. Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building block of cognition. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. Sáenz-Ludlow, A., & Walgamuth, C. (1998). Third graders' interpretations of equality and the equal symbol. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35, 153-187. doi:10.1023/A:1003086304201
63. Saffran, J. R. (2003). Statistical language learning: Mechanisms and constraints. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 110-114. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.01243
64. Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Concrete computer manipulatives in mathematics education. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 145-150. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00095.x
65. Schliemann, A., Carraher, D., & Brizuela, B. (2007). Bringing out the algebraic character of arithmetic: From children's ideas to classroom practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
66. Seo, K.-H., & Ginsburg, H. P. (2003). "You've got to carefully read the math sentence...": Classroom context and children's interpretations of the equals sign. In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills (pp. 161-187). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
67. Siegler, R. S. (1976). Three aspects of cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 481-520. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90016-5
68. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-312.
69. Stacey, K., & MacGregor, M. (1997). Building foundations for algebra. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 2, 252-260.
70. Stephens, A., Blanton, M., Knuth, E. J., Isler, I., & Gardiner, A. M. (in press). Just say YES to early algebra! Teaching Children Mathematics.
71. Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55, 189-208. doi:10.1037/h0061626