A is for Apple: Mnemonic Symbols Hinder the Interpretation of Algebraic Expressions

Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 102, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 625-634

  McNeil, Nicole M ^a   Weinberg, Aaron ^b   Hattikudur, Shanta ^c   Stephens, Ana C ^c   Asquith, Pamela ^c   Knuth, Eric J ^c   Alibali, Martha W ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^b ITHACA COLLEGE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Algebra; Cognitive development; Mathematics; Problem solving; Symbols

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955722538     PISSN: 00220663     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0019105     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Asquith P., Stephens A.C., Knuth E.J., Alibali M.W. Middle school mathematics teachers' knowledge of students' understanding of core algebraic concepts: Equal sign and variable. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 2007, 9:249-272.
2. Baroody A.J., Ginsburg H.P. The effects of instruction on children's understanding of the " equals" sign. Elementary School Journal 1983, 84:199-212.
3. Barsalou L.W. Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts. Memory & Cognition 1982, 10:82-93.
4. Bassok M., Holyoak K.J. Interdomain transfer between isomorphic topics in algebra and physics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1989, 15:153-166.
5. Bell A. Purpose in school algebra. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 1995, 14:41-73.
6. Blanton M.L., Kaput J.J. Developing elementary teachers' " algebra eyes and ears." Teaching Children Mathematics 2003, 10:70-77.
7. Blanton M.L., Kaput J.J. Characterizing a classroom practice that promotes algebraic reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 2005, 36:412-446.
8. Booth L.R. Children's difficulties in beginning algebra. The ideas of algebra, K-12 1988, 20-32. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA. A.F. Coxford, A.P. Schulte (Eds.).
9. Braddon K.L., Hall N.J., Taylor D. Math through children's literature: Making the NCTM standards come alive 1993, Teacher Ideas Press, Englewood, CO.
10. Brizuela B., Schliemann A. Ten-year-old students solving linear equations. For the Learning of Mathematics 2004, 24:33-40.
11. Burns M. How to make the most of math manipulatives. Instructor 1996, 105:45-51.
12. Carpenter T.P., Franke M.L., Levi L. Thinking mathematically: Integrating arithmetic and algebra in elementary school 2003, Heinemann, Portsmouth, NH.
13. Carraher D.W., Schliemann A.D., Brizuela B.M. Arithmetic and algebra in early mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 2006, 37:87-115.
14. Clement J. Algebra word problem solutions: Thought processes underlying a common misconception. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 1982, 13:16-30.
15. Clement J., Lochhead J., Monk G.S. Translation difficulties in learning mathematics. American Mathematical Monthly 1981, 88:286-290.
16. Dubinsky E. Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking. Advanced mathematical thinking 1992, 95-126. Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands. D. Tall (Ed.).
17. Duke R., Graham A. Matchbox Algebra. Mathematics Teaching Incorporating Micromath 2007, 200:42-45.
18. Filloy E., Rojano T. Solving equations: The transition from arithmetic to algebra. For the Learning of Mathematics 1989, 9:19-25.
19. Fisher K.M. The students-and-professors problem revisited. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 1988, 19:260-262.
20. Goldstone R.L., Sakamoto Y. The transfer of abstract principles governing complex adaptive systems. Cognitive Psychology 2003, 46:414-466.
21. Gray E.M., Tall D.O. Duality, ambiguity, and flexibility: A " proceptual" view of simple arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 1994, 25:116-140.
22. Halford G.S. An approach to the definition of cognitive developmental stages in school mathematics. British Journal of Educational Psychology 1978, 48:298-314.
23. Herscovics, N., & Chalouh, L. (1985). Conflicting frames of reference in the learning of algebra. In S. K. Damarin & M. Shelton (Eds.), Proceedings of the annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 123-131). Columbus, OH: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education-North America.
24. Herscovics N., Linchevski L. A cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics 1994, 27:59-78.
25. Kaminski J.A., Sloutsky V.M., Heckler A.F. The advantage of abstract examples in learning math. Science 2008, 320:454-455.
26. Kaput J.J. Teaching and learning a new algebra with understanding 2000, National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science, Dartmouth, MA.
27. Kaput J.J., Sims-Knight J. Errors in translations to algebraic equations: Roots and implications. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics 1983, 5:63-78.
28. Kieran C. The early learning of algebra: A structural perspective. Research issues in the learning and teaching of algebra 1992, 33-56. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. S. Wagner, C. Kieran (Eds.).
29. Kinzel M.T. Understanding algebraic notation from the students' perspective. Mathematics Teacher 1999, 92:436-442.
30. Knuth E.J., Alibali M.W., McNeil N.M., Weinberg A., Stephens A.C. Middle school students' understanding of core algebraic concepts: Equality and variable. International Reviews on Mathematical Education 2005, 37:1-9.
31. Koedinger K.R., Nathan M.J. The real story behind story problems: Effects of representations on quantitative reasoning. Journal of the Learning Sciences 2004, 13:129-164.
32. Küchemann D. Children's understanding of numerical variables. Mathematics in School 1978, 7:23-26.
33. Küchemann D. Cognitive demand of secondary school mathematics items. Educational Studies in Mathematics 1981, 12:301-316.
34. Lappan G., Fey J.T., Fitzgerald W.M., Friel S.N., Phillips E.D. Connected Mathematics 1998, Seymour, White Plains, NY.
35. Lucariello, J., & Tine, M. (in press). Algebraic misconceptions: A teacher-use test for diagnosing student misconceptions of the variable. In N. L. Stein & S. Raudenbush (Eds.), Developmental science goes to school. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
36. Luchins A.S. Mechanization in problem solving-The effect of Einstellung. Psychological Monographs 1942, 54(6, Whole No. 248).
37. MacGregor M., Stacey K. Students' understanding of algebraic notation: 11-15. Educational Studies in Mathematics 1997, 33:1-19.
38. McNeil N.M., Alibali M.W. Knowledge change as a function of mathematics experience: All contexts are not created equal. Journal of Cognition and Development 2005, 6:285-306.
39. McNeil N.M., Alibali M.W. Why won't you change your mind? Knowledge of operational patterns hinders learning and performance on equations. Child Development 2005, 76:883-899.
40. McNeil N.M., Grandau L., Knuth E.J., Alibali M.W., Stephens A.C., Hattikudur S., Krill D.E. Middle-school students' understanding of the equal sign: The books they read can't help. Cognition and Instruction 2006, 24:367-385.
41. McNeil N.M., Uttal D.H., Jarvin L., Sternberg R.J. Should you show me the money? Concrete objects both hurt and help performance on mathematics problems. Learning and Instruction 2009, 19:171-184.
42. Munakata Y., McClelland J.L., Johnson M.H., Siegler R.S. Rethinking infant knowledge: Toward an adaptive process account of successes and failures in object permanence tasks. Psychological Review 1997, 104:686-713.
43. Nathan M.J., Koedinger K.R. Moving beyond teachers' intuitive beliefs about algebra learning. Mathematics Teacher 2000, 93:218-223.
44. Nathan M.J., Long S.D., Alibali M.W. The symbol precedence view of mathematical development: A corpus analysis of the rhetorical structure of textbooks. Discourse Processes 2002, 33:1-21.
45. Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics 1989, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Author, Reston, VA.
46. Principles and standards for school mathematics 2000, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Author, Reston, VA.
47. Paige J.M., Simon H.A. Cognitive processes in solving algebra word problems. Problem solving: Research, method, and theory 1966, 119-151. Wiley, New York, NY. B. Kleinmuntz (Ed.).
48. Rittle-Johnson B., Star J.R. Compared with what? The effects of different comparisons on conceptual knowledge and procedural flexibility for equation solving. Journal of Educational Psychology 2009, 101:529-544.
49. Rittle-Johnson B., Star J.R., Durkin K. The importance of prior knowledge when comparing examples: Influences on conceptual and procedural knowledge of equation solving. Journal of Educational Psychology 2009, 101:836-852.
50. Rosnick P. Some misconceptions concerning the concept of variable. Mathematics Teacher 1981, 74:418-420.
51. Rosnick P. Students' symbolization processes in algebra 1982, National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.
52. Schauble L. Belief revision in children: The role of prior knowledge and strategies for generating evidence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1990, 49:31-57.
53. Schoenfeld A.H. When good teaching leads to bad results: The disasters of " well-taught" mathematics courses. Educational Psychologist 1988, 23:145-166.
54. Schoenfeld A.H., Arcavi A. On the meaning of variable. Mathematics Teacher 1988, 81:420-427.
55. Seo K.-H., Ginsburg H.P. " You've got to carefully read the math sentence...": Classroom context and children's interpretations of the equals sign. The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise 2003, 161-186. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. A.J. Baroody, A. Dowker (Eds.).
56. Sfard A. On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics 1991, 22:1-36.
57. Sfard A., Linchevski L. The gains and the pitfalls of reification-The case of algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics 1994, 26:191-228.
58. Siegler R.S. Emerging minds: The process of change in children's thinking 1996, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
59. Siegler R.S., Stern E. Conscious and unconscious strategy discoveries: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1998, 127:377-397.
60. Stacey K., MacGregor M. Building foundations for algebra. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School 1997, 2:252-260.
61. Stephens A.C. Another look at word problems. Mathematics Teacher 2003, 96:63-66.
62. Stephens A.C. Developing students' understandings of variable. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School 2005, 11:96-100.
63. Strohner H., Nelson K.E. The young child's development of sentence comprehension: Influence of probability, nonverbal context, syntactic form, and strategies. Child Development 1974, 45:567-576.
64. Tall D. School algebra and the computer. Micromath 1993, 9:38-41.
65. Usiskin Z. Conceptions of school algebra and uses of variables. The ideas of algebra, K-12 1988, 8-19. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA. A.F. Coxford (Ed.).
66. Uttal D.H., Scudder K.V., DeLoache J.S. Manipulatives as symbols: A new perspective on the use of concrete objects to teach mathematics. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 1997, 18:37-54.