Short- and long-lasting consequences of novelty, deviance and surprise on brain and cognition

Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

Volumn 55, Issue , 2015, Pages 268-279

  Schomaker, J ^a   Meeter, M ^b  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Arousal; Attention; Deviance; Dopamine; Facilitation; LC NE; Learning; Memory; Motivation; Novelty; Perception; SN VTA; Surprise

Indexed keywords

DOPAMINE;

AMYGDALOID NUCLEUS; ATTENTION; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DOPAMINE RELEASE; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMAN; LEARNING; LOCUS CERULEUS; MEMORY; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MESOLIMBIC DOPAMINERGIC SYSTEM; MOTIVATION; NEUROMODULATION; NONHUMAN; NORADRENERGIC SYSTEM; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; RESPONSE TIME; REVIEW; TASK PERFORMANCE; BRAIN; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME FACTOR;

ATTENTION; BRAIN; COGNITION; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; LEARNING; MOTIVATION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84929581248     PISSN: 01497634     EISSN: 18737528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.05.002     Document Type: Review

References (207)

1. Anderson A.K., Phelps E.A. Lesions of the human amygdala impair enhanced perception of emotionally salient events. Nature 2001, 411(6835):305-309.
2. Apitz T., Bunzeck N. Dopamine controls the neural dynamics of memory signals and retrieval accuracy. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013, 38(12):2409-2417.
3. Aston-Jones G., Cohen J.D. Adaptive gain and the role of the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system in optimal performance. J. Comp. Neurol. 2005, 493(1):99-110.
4. Aston-Jones G., Cohen J.D. An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2005, 28:403-450.
5. Barkaszi I., Czigler I., Balazs L. Stimulus complexity effects on the event-related potentials to task-irrelevant stimuli. Biol. Psychol. 2013, 94(1):82-89.
6. Barry C., Heys J.G., Hasselmo M.E. Possible role of acetylcholine in regulating spatial novelty effects on theta rhythm and grid cells. Front. Neural Circuits 2012, 6:5.
7. Bast T., Wilson I.A., Witter M.P., Morris R.G. From rapid place learning to behavioral performance: a key role for the intermediate hippocampus. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7:e1000089.
8. Bendixen A., Grimm S., Deouell L.Y., Wetzel N., Madebach A., Schroger E. The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(7):2130-2139.
9. Bergado J.A., Frey S., Lopez J., Almaguer-Melian W., Frey J.U. Cholinergic afferents to the locus coeruleus and noradrenergic afferents to the medial septum mediate LTP-reinforcement in the dentate gyrus by stimulation of the amygdala. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 2007, 88(3):331-341.
10. Berti S. Object switching within working memory is reflected in the human event-related brain potential. Neurosci. Lett. 2008, 434(2):200-205.
11. Berti S., Roeber U., Schroger E. Bottom-up influences on working memory: behavioral and electrophysiological distraction varies with distractor strength. Exp. Psychol. 2004, 51(4):249-257.
12. Berti S., Schroger E. A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects: behavioral and event-related indices. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain. Res. 2001, 10(3):265-273.
13. Berti S., Schroger E. Distraction effects in vision: behavioral and event-related potential indices. NeuroReport 2004, 15(4):665-669.
14. Berti S., Schroger E. Visual distraction: a behavioral and event-related brain potential study in humans. NeuroReport 2006, 17(2):151-155.
15. Blackford J.U., Buckholtz J.W., Avery S.N., Zald D.H. A unique role for the human amygdala in novelty detection. NeuroImage 2010, 50(3):1188-1193.
16. Blumenfeld B., Preminger S., Sagi D., Tsodyks M. Dynamics of memory representations in networks with novelty-facilitated synaptic plasticity. Neuron 2006, 52(2):383-394.
17. Bogacz R., Brown M.W. Comparison of computational models of familiarity discrimination in the perirhinal cortex. Hippocampus 2003, 13:494-524.
18. Bouret S., Richmond B.J. Relation of locus coeruleus neurons in monkeys to Pavlovian and operant behaviors. J. Neurophysiol. 2009, 101(2):898-911.
19. Bradley M.M. Natural selective attention: orienting and emotion. Psychophysiology 2009, 46(1):1-11.
20. Briand L.A., Gritton H., Howe W.M., Young D.A., Sarter M. Modulators in concert for cognition: modulator interactions in the prefrontal cortex. Prog. Neurobiol. 2007, 83(2):69-91.
21. Bruce D., Gaines M.T. Tests of an organizational hypothesis of isolation effects in free-recall. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 1976, 15(1):59-72.
22. Bruder G.E., Kayser J., Tenke C.E., Friedman M., Malaspina D., Gorman J.M. Eventrelated potentials in schizophrenia during tonal and phonetic oddball tasks: relations to diagnostic subtype, symptom features and verbal memory. Biol. Psychiatry 2001, 50(6):447-452.
23. Bunzeck N., Doeller C.F., Dolan R.J., Düzel E. Contextual interaction between novelty and reward processing within the mesolimbic system. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2012, 33(6):1309-1324.
24. Bunzeck N., Doeller C.F., Fuentemilla L., Dolan R.J., Düzel E. Reward motivation accelerates the onset of neural novelty signals in humans to 85 milliseconds. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19(15):1294-1300.
25. Bunzeck N., Düzel E. Absolute coding of stimulus novelty in the human Substantia nigra/VTA. Neuron 2006, 51:369-379.
26. Bunzeck N., Schutze H., Stallforth S., Kaufmann J., Düzel S., Heinze H.J., et al. Mesolimbic novelty processing in older adults. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17(12):2940-2948.
27. Cahill L., McGaugh J.L. Mechanisms of emotional arousal and lasting declarative memory. Trends Neurosci. 1998, 21:294-299.
28. Chong H., Riis J.L., McGinnis S.M., Williams D.M., Holcomb P.J., Daffner K.R. To ignore or explore: top-down modulation of novelty processing. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20(1):120-134.
29. Christie J., Klein R.M. Assessing the evidence for novel popout. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 1996, 125(2):201-207.
30. Conroy M.A., Polich J. Normative variation of P3a and P3b from a large sample: gender, topography, and response time. J. Psychophysiol. 2007, 21:22-32.
31. Cooke S.F., Bliss T.V. Plasticity in the human central nervous system. Brain 2006, 129(7):1659-1673.
32. Cortinas M., Corral M.J., Garrido G., Garolera M., Pajares M., Escera C. Reduced novelty-P3 associated with increased distractibility in schizophrenia. Biological Psychology 2008, 78(3):253-260.
33. Courchesne E., Hillyard S.A., Galambos R. Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1975, 39:131-143.
34. Czigler I., Balazs L., Winkler I. Memory-based detection of task-irrelevant visual changes. Psychophysiology 2002, 39(6):869-873.
35. Daffner K.R., Mesulam M.M., Scinto L.F., Calvo V., Faust R., Holcomb P.J. An electrophysiological index of stimulus unfamiliarity. Psychophysiology 2000, 37(6):737-747.
36. Daffner K.R., Scinto L.F., Calvo V., Faust R., Mesulam M.M., West W.C., Holcomb P.J. The influence of stimulus deviance on electrophysiologic and behavioral responses to novel events. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12(3):393-406.
37. Davis C.D., Jones F.L., Derrick B.E. Novel environments enhance the induction and maintenance of long-term potentiation in the dentate gyrus. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24(29):6497-6506.
38. de Gee J.W., Knapen T., Donner T.H. Decision-related pupil dilation reflects upcoming choice and individual bias. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014, 111(5):E618-E625.
39. Dien J., Spencer K.M., Donchin E. Localization of the event-related potential novelty response as defined by principal components analysis. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 2003, 17(3):637-650.
40. DiGirolamo G.J. Costs and Benefits of Novelty on Attention and Object Processing 1998, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).
41. Devrim-Ucok M., Keskin-Ergen H.Y., Ucok A. Novelty P3 and P3b in first-episode schizophrenia and chronic schizophrenia (2006). Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2006, 30(8):1426-1434.
42. Diliberto K.A., Altarriba J., Neill W.T. Novel popout without novelty. Mem. Cognit. 1998, 26(3):429-434.
43. Dobbins I.G., Kroll N.E.A., Yonelinas A.P., Liu Q. Distinctiveness in recognition and free recall: the role of recollection in the rejection of the familiar. J. Mem. Lang. 1998, 38(4):381-400.
44. Donchin E. Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!... Surprise?. Psychophysiology 1981, 18(5):493-513.
45. Duan X., Dai Q., Gong Q., Chen H. Neural mechanism of unconscious perception of surprised facial expression. NeuroImage 2010, 52(1):401-407.
46. Dunlosky J., Hunt R.R., Clark E. Is perceptual salience needed in explanations of the isolation effect?. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2000, 26(3):649-657.
47. Düzel E., Bunzeck N., Guitart-Masip M., Düzel S. NOvelty-related motivation of anticipation and exploration by dopamine (NOMAD): implications for healthy aging. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2010, 34(5):660-669.
48. Eckart C., Bunzeck N. Dopamine modulates processing speed in the human mesolimbic system. NeuroImage 2013, 66:293-300.
49. Escera C., Alho K., Schroger E., Winkler I. Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiol. Neurootol. 2000, 5(3-4):151-166.
50. Escera C., Yago E., Alho K. Electrical responses reveal the temporal dynamics of brain events during involuntary attention switching. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2001, 14(5):877-883.
51. Fenker D.B., Frey J.U., Schuetze H., Heipertz D., Heinze H.J., Düzel E. Novel scenes improve recollection and recall of words. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20(7):1250-1265.
52. Filion D.L., Dawson M.E., Schell A.M., Hazlett E.A. The relationship between skin-conductance orienting and the allocation of processing resources. Psychophysiology 1991, 28(4):410-424.
53. Ford J.M., Mathalon D.H. Anticipating the future: automatic prediction failures in schizophrenia. Int J Psychophysiol 2012, 83(2):232-239.
54. Forster S., Lavie N. Harnessing the wandering mind: the role of perceptual load. Cognition 2009, 111(3):345-355.
55. Friedman D., Cycowicz Y.M., Gaeta H. The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2001, 25(4):355-373.
56. Frith C.D., Blakemore S.J., Wolpert D.M. Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2000, 355(1404):1771-1788.
57. Geraci L., Manzano I. Distinctive items are salient during encoding: delayed judgements of learning predict the isolation effect. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. (Hove) 2010, 63(1):50-64.
58. Gilzenrat M.S., Nieuwenhuis S., Jepma M., Cohen J.D. Pupil diameter tracks changes in control state predicted by the adaptive gain theory of locus coeruleus function. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2010, 10(2):252-269.
59. Giovannini M.G., Rakovska A., Benton R.S., Pazzagli M., Bianchi L., Pepeu G. Effects of novelty and habituation on acetylcholine, GABA, and glutamate release from the frontal cortex and hippocampus of freely moving rats. Neuroscience 2001, 106(1):43-53.
60. Gonsalvez C.L., Polich J. P300 amplitude is determined by target-to-target interval. Psychophysiology 2002, 39(3):388-396.
61. Grant S.J., Aston-Jones G., Redmond D.E. Responses of primate locus coeruleus neurons to simple and complex sensory stimuli. Brain Res. Bull. 1988, 21(3):401-410.
62. Guitart-Masip M., Bunzeck N., Stephan K.E., Dolan R.J., Düzel E. Contextual novelty changes reward representations in the striatum. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30(5):1721-1726.
63. Harley C. A role for norepinephrine in arousal, emotion and learning? Limbic modulation by norepinephrine and the Kety hypothesis. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 1987, 11(4):419-458.
64. Harley C.W. Norepinephrine and dopamine as learning signals. Neural Plast. 2004, 11(3-4):191-204.
65. Harley C.W. Norepinephrine and the dentate gyrus. Prog. Brain Res. 2007, 163:299-318.
66. Hasselmo M.E. The role of acetylcholine in learning and memory. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2006, 16(6):710-715.
67. Hasselmo M.E. Neuromodulation and cortical function: modeling the physiological basis of behavior. Behav. Brain Res. 1995, 67:1-27.
68. Hasselmo M.E. Neuromodulation: acetylcholine and memory consolidation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1999, 3:351-359.
69. Hasselmo M.E., Bradley P., Wyble B.P., Wallenstein G.V. Encoding and retrieval of episodic memories: role of cholinergic and GABAergic modulation in the hippocampus. Hippocampus 1996, 6(6):693-708.
70. Hasselmo M.E., Fehlau P. Differences in time course of ACh and GABA modulation of excitatory synaptic potentials in slices of rat hippocampus. J. Neurophysiol. 2001, 86:1792-1802.
71. Hawco C., Lepage M. Overlapping patterns of neural activity for different forms of novelty in fMRI. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014, 8:699.
72. He B., Lian J., Spencer K.M., Dien J., Donchin E. A cortical potential imaging analysis of the P300 and novelty P3 components. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2001, 12(2):120-130.
73. Iwanaga M., Nittono H. Unexpected action effects elicit deviance-related brain potentials and cause behavioral delay. Psychophysiology 2010, 47(2):281-288.
74. Jay T.M. Dopamine: a potential substrate for synaptic plasticity and memory mechanisms. Prog. Neurobiol. 2003, 69(6):375-390.
75. Jeewajee A., Lever C., Burton S., O'Keefe J., Burgess N. Environmental novelty is signaled by reduction of the hippocampal theta frequency. Hippocampus 2008, 18(4):340-348.
76. Jepma M., Nieuwenhuis S. Pupil diameter predicts changes in the exploration-exploitation trade-off: evidence for the adaptive gain theory. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23(7):1587-1596.
77. Johnston W.A., Schwarting I.S. Novel popout: an enigma for conventional theories of attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1997, 23(3):622-631.
78. Jonassaint C.R., Boyle S.H., Williams R.B., Mark D.B., Siegler I.C., Barefoot J.C. Facets of openness predict mortality in patients with cardiac disease. Psychosom. Med. 2007, 69(4):319-322.
79. Jutras M.J., Buffalo E.A. Recognition memory signals in the macaque hippocampus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107(1):401-406.
80. Kahneman D. Remarks on attention control. Acta Psychol. 1970, 33:118-131.
81. Kahneman D. Attention and Effort 1973, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
82. Kakade S., Dayan P. Dopamine: generalization and bonuses. Neural Netw. 2002, 15(4-6):549-559.
83. Kaplan R., Doeller C.F., Barnes G.R., Litvak V., Duzel E., Bandettini P.A., et al. Movement-related theta rhythm in humans: coordinating self-directed hippocampal learning. PLoS Biol. 2012, 10:e1001267.
84. Kaplan R., Horner A.J., Bandettini P.A., Doeller C.F., Burgess N. Human hippocampal processing of environmental novelty during spatial navigation. Hippocampus 2014, 24(7):740-750.
85. Kemp A., Manahan-Vaughan D. Beta-adrenoreceptors comprise a critical element in learning-facilitated long-term plasticity. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18(6):1326-1334.
86. Kemp A., Manahan-Vaughn D. The hippocampal CA1 region and the dentate gyrus differentiate between environmental and spatial feature encoding through long-term depression. Cereb. Cortex 2008, 18:969-977.
87. Kiehl K.A., Stevens M.C., Laurens K.R., Pearlson G., Calhoun V.D., Liddle P.F. An adaptive reflexive processing model of neurocognitive function: supporting evidence from a large scale (n=100) fMRI study of an auditory oddball task. NeuroImage 2005, 25(3):899-915.
88. Kishiyama M.M., Yonelinas A.P., Knight R.T. Novelty enhancements in memory are dependent on lateral prefrontal cortex. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29(25):8114-8118.
89. Kishiyama M.M., Yonelinas A.P., Lazzara M.M. The von Restorff effect in amnesia: the contribution of the hippocampal system to novelty-related memory enhancements. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2004, 16(1):15-23.
90. Kitchigina V., Vankov A., Harley C., Sara S.J. Novelty-elicited, noradrenaline-dependent enhancement of excitability in the dentate gyrus. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1997, 9(1):41-47.
91. Klukowski G., Harley C. Locus coeruleus activation induces perforant path-evoked population spike potentiation in the dentate gyrus of awake rat. Exp. Brain Res. 1994, 102:165-170.
92. Knight R.T. Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1984, 59(1):9-20.
93. Knight R.T. Contribution of human hippocampal region to novelty detection. Nature 1996, 383:256-259.
94. Knutson B., Cooper J.C. The lure of the unknown. Neuron 2006, 51(3):280-282.
95. Kormi-Nouri R., Nilsson L.G., Ohta N. The novelty effect: support for the novelty-encoding hypothesis. Scand. J. Psychol. 2005, 46(2):133-143.
96. Krebs R.M., Heipertz D., Schuetze H., Düzel E. Novelty increases the mesolimbic functional connectivity of the substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area (SN/VTA) during reward anticipation: evidence from high-resolution fMRI. NeuroImage 2011, 58(2):647-655.
97. Krebs R.M., Schott B.H., Schutze H., Düzel E. The novelty exploration bonus and its attentional modulation. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47(11):2272-2281.
98. Lavie N. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 1995, 21:451-468.
99. Lemon N., Manahan-Vaughan D. Dopamine D1/D5 receptors gate the acquisition of novel information through hippocampal long-term potentiation and long-term depression. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26(29):7723-7729.
100. Li L., Miller E.K., Desimone R. The representation of stimulus familiarity in anterior inferior temporal cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 1993, 13:1918-1929.
101. Li S., Cullen W.K., Anwyl R., Rowan M.J. Dopamine-dependent facilitation of LTP induction in hippocampal CA1 by exposure to spatial novelty. Nat. Neurosci. 2003, 6(5):526-531.
102. Liu T., Shi J. Event-related potentials during preattentional processing of color stimuli. NeuroReport 2008, 19(12):1221-1225.
103. Lisman J.E., Grace A.A. The hippocampal-VTA loop: controlling the entry of information into long-term memory. Neuron 2005, 46(5):703-713.
104. Liu J., Kiehl K.A., Pearlson G., Perrone-Bizzozero N.I., Eichele T., Calhoun V.D. Genetic determinants of target and novelty-related event-related potentials in the auditory oddball response. NeuroImage 2009, 46(3):809-816.
105. Ljungberg J.K., Parmentier F.B. Cross-modal distraction by deviance: functional similarities between the auditory and tactile modalities. Exp. Psychol. 2012, 59(6):355-363.
106. Lovstad M., Funderud I., Lindgren M., Endestad T., Due-Tonnessen P., Meling T., et al. Contribution of subregions of human frontal cortex to novelty processing. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2012, 24(2):378-395.
107. Lv J.Y., Wang T., Qiu J., Feng S.H., Tu S., Wei D.T. The electrophysiological effect of working memory load on involuntary attention in an auditory-visual distraction paradigm: an ERP study. Exp. Brain Res. 2010, 205(1):81-86.
108. Madison D.V., Nicoll R.A. Actions of noradrenaline recorded intracellularly in rat hippocampal Ca1 pyramidal neurons, invitro. J. Physiol.-London 1986, 372:221-244.
109. Mayer J.S., Kim J., Park S. Enhancing visual working memory encoding: the role of target novelty. Vis. Cogn. 2011, 19(7):863-885.
110. Mayer J.S., Kim J., Park S. Failure to benefit from target novelty during encoding contributes to working memory deficits in schizophrenia. Cogn. Neuropsychiatry 2014, 19(3):268-279.
111. McGaugh J.L. Emotional arousal and enhanced amygdala activity: new evidence for the old perseveration-consolidation hypothesis. Learn. Mem. 2005, 12(2):77-79.
112. Meeter M., Myers C.E., Gluck M.A. Integrating incremental learning and episodic memory models of the hippocampal region. Psychol. Rev. 2005, 112:560-585.
113. Meeter M., Talamini L.M., Murre J.M.J. Mode shifting between storage and recall based on novelty detection in oscillating hippocampal circuits. Hippocampus 2004, 14:722-741.
114. Merhav M., Rosenblum K. Facilitation of taste memory acquisition by experiencing previous novel taste is protein-synthesis dependent. Learn. Mem. 2008, 15(7):501-507.
115. Meeter M., Schomaker J., Rangel-Gomez M. Reacting to novelty: effects on learning, and the role of expectations. Society for Neuroscience Annual Meeting 2014.
116. Mongeau R., Blier P., de Montigny C. The serotonergic and noradrenergic systems of the hippocampus: their interactions and the effects of antidepressant treatments. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 1997, 23(3):145-195.
117. Morris J.S., Friston K.J., Buchel C., Frith C.D., Young A.W., Calder A.J., et al. A neuromodulatory role for the human amygdala in processing emotional facial expressions. Brain 1998, 121(Pt 1):47-57.
118. Moser E.L., Moser M.B., Andersen P. Potentiation of dentate synapses initiated by exploratory learning in rats: dissociation from brain temperature, motor activity, and arousal. Learn. Mem. 1994, 1:55-73.
119. Munka L., Berti S. Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential. Neurosci. Lett. 2006, 396(3):177-181.
120. Murphy P.R., O'Connell R.G., O'Sullivan M., Robertson I.H., Balsters J.H. Pupil diameter covaries with BOLD activity in human locus coeruleus. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2014, 35(8).
121. Murphy P.R., Robertson I.H., Balsters J.H., O'Connell R.G. Pupillometry and P3 index the locus coeruleus-noradrenergic arousal function in humans. Psychophysiology 2011, 48(11):1532-1543.
122. Murty V.P., Adcock R.A. Enriched encoding: reward motivation organizes cortical networks for hippocampal detection of unexpected events. Cereb. Cortex 2014, 24(8):2160-2168.
123. Naatanen Risto Attention and Brain Function 1992, L. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
124. Naber M., Frassle S., Rutishauser U., Einhauser W. Pupil size signals novelty and predicts later retrieval success for declarative memories of natural scenes. J. Vis. 2013, 13(2):11.
125. Nieuwenhuis S., Aston-Jones G., Cohen J.D. Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. Psychol. Bull. 2005, 131(4):510-532.
126. Nieuwenhuis S., De Geus E.J., Aston-Jones G. The anatomical and functional relationship between the P3 and autonomic components of the orienting response. Psychophysiology 2010, 48(2):162-175.
127. Panksepp Jaak Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions 1998, Oxford University Press, New York; Oxford.
128. Parmentier F.B., Andres P. The involuntary capture of attention by sound: novelty and postnovelty distraction in young and older adults. Exp. Psychol. 2010, 57(1):68-76.
129. Parmentier F.B., Elsley J.V., Andres P., Barcelo F. Why are auditory novels distracting? Contrasting the roles of novelty, violation of expectation and stimulus change. Cognition 2011, 119(3):374-380.
130. Parmentier F.B., Elsley J.V., Ljungberg J.K. Behavioral distraction by auditory novelty is not only about novelty: the role of the distracter's informational value. Cognition 2010, 115(3):504-511.
131. Parmentier F.B., Ljungberg J.K., Elsley J.V., Lindkvist M. A behavioral study of distraction by vibrotactile novelty. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2011, 37(4):1134-1139.
132. Parmentier F.B., Turner J., Elsley J.V. Distraction by auditory novelty. The course and aftermath of novelty and semantic effects. Exp. Psychol. 2011, 58(2):92-101.
133. Pavlov Ivan Petrovich, Anrep G.V. Conditioned Reflexes: An Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex 1927, Oxford University Press, London.
134. Phelps E.A. Emotion and cognition: Insights from studies of the human amygdala. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2006, 57:27-53.
135. Phillips M.A., Szabadi E., Bradshaw C.M. Comparison of the effects of clonidine and yohimbine on pupillary diameter at different illumination levels. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2000, 50(1):65-68.
136. Pineda J.A., Foote S.L., Neville H.J. Effects of locus coeruleus lesions on auditory, long-latency, event-related potentials in monkey. J. Neurosci. 1989, 9(1):81-93.
137. Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2007, 118(10):2128-2148.
138. Polich J., Comerchero M.D. P3a from visual stimuli: typicality, task, and topography. Brain Topogr. 2003, 15(3):141-152.
139. Polich J., Criado J.R. Neuropsychology and neuropharmacology of P3a and P3b. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2006, 60(2):172-185.
140. Posner M.I., Boies S.J. Components of attention. Psychol. Rev. 1971, 78(5):391-408.
141. Rahnev D., Maniscalco B., Graves T., Huang E., de Lange F.P., Lau H. Attention induces conservative subjective biases in visual perception. Nat. Neurosci. 2011, 14(12):1513-1515.
142. Rangel-Gomez M., Hickey C., van Amelsvoort T., Bet P., Meeter M. The detection of novelty relies on dopaminergic signaling: evidence from apomorphine's impact on the novelty N2. PLoS ONE 2013, 8(6):e66469.
143. Rangel-Gomez M., Meeter M. Electrophysiological analysis of the role of novelty in the von Restorff effect. Brain Behav. 2013, 3(2):159-170.
144. Rasmussen K., Morilak D.A., Jacobs B.L. Single unit activity of locus coeruleus neurons in the freely moving cat. I. During naturalistic behaviors and in response to simple and complex stimuli. Brain Res. 1986, 371(2):324-334.
145. Recce Michael, Harris Kenneth Memory for places: a navigational model in support of Marr's theory of hippocampal function. Hippocampus 1996, 6:735-748.
146. Reicher G.M., Snyder C.R.R., Richards J.T. Familiarity of background characters in visual scanning. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1976, 2(4):522-530.
147. Rigau J., Feixas M., Sbert M. An information-theoretic framework for image complexity. Comput. Aestethet. Graph. Vis. Imaging 2005, 177-184.
148. Roggenhofer E., Fidzinski P., Bartsch J., Kurz F., Shor O., Behr J. Activation of dopamine D1/D5 receptors facilitates the induction of presynaptic long-term potentiation at hippocampal output synapses. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2010, 32(4):598-605.
149. Sajikumar S., Frey J.U. Late-associativity, synaptic tagging, and the role of dopamine during LTP and LTD. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 2004, 82(1):12-25.
150. SanMiguel I., Corral M.J., Escera C. When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20(7):1131-1145.
151. SanMiguel I., Linden D., Escera C. Attention capture by novel sounds: distraction versus facilitation. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 2010, 22(4):481-515.
152. SanMiguel I., Morgan H.M., Klein C., Linden D., Escera C. On the functional significance of Novelty-P3: facilitation by unexpected novel sounds. Biol. Psychol. 2010, 83(2):143-152.
153. Sara S.J. The locus coeruleus and noradrenergic modulation of cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 10(3):211-223.
154. Sara S.J., Vankov A., Herve A. Locus coeruleus-evoked responses in behaving rats: a clue to the role of noradrenaline in memory. Brain Res. Bull. 1994, 35(5-6):457-465.
155. Schmidt S.R. Encoding and retrieval-processes in the memory for conceptually distinctive events. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 1985, 11(3):565-578.
156. Schomaker J., Berendse H.W., Foncke E.M., van der Werf Y.D., van den Heuvel O.A., Theeuwes J., Meeter M. Novelty processing and memory formation in Parkinson's Disease. Neuropsychologia 2014, 62:124-136.
157. Schomaker J., van Bronkhorst M.L.V., Meeter M. Exploring a novel environment improves motivation and promotes recall of words. Front. Psychol. 2014, 5:918.
158. Schomaker J., Meeter M. Novelty enhances visual perception. PLoS ONE 2012, 7(12):e50599.
159. Schomaker J., Meeter M. Facilitation of responses by task-irrelevant complex deviant stimuli. Acta Psychol. (Amst) 2014, 148C:74-80.
160. Schomaker J., Meeter M. Novelty detection is enhanced when attention is otherwise engaged: an event-related potential study. Exp. Brain Res. 2014, 232(3):995-1011.
161. Schomaker J., Rangel-Gomez M., Meeter M. Happier, faster: developmental changes in the effects of mood and novelty on responses. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2015, 1-11.
162. Schomaker J., Roos R., Meeter M. Expecting the unexpected: the effects of deviance on novelty processing. Behav. Neurosci. 2014, 128(2):146-160.
163. Schroger E., Giard M.H., Wolff C. Auditory distraction: event-related potential and behavioral indices. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2000, 111(8):1450-1460.
164. Schroger E., Wolff C. Attentional orienting and reorienting is indicated by human event-related brain potentials. NeuroReport 1998, 9(15):3355-3358.
165. Schwartz C.E., Wright C.I., Shin L.M., Kagan J., Whalen P.J., McMullin K.G., et al. Differential amygdalar response to novel versus newly familiar neutral faces: a functional MRI probe developed for studying inhibited temperament. Biol. Psychiatry 2003, 53(10):854-862.
166. Segaert K., Weber K., de Lange F.P., Petersson K.M., Hagoort P. The suppression of repetition enhancement: a review of fMRI studies. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51(1):59-66.
167. Selinger L., Dominguez-Borras J., Escera C. Phasic boosting of auditory perception by visual emotion. Biol. Psychol. 2013, 94(3):471-478.
168. Shohamy D., Adcock R.A. Dopamine and adaptive memory. Trends Cognit. Sci. 2010, 14(10):464-472.
169. Sierra-Mercado D., Dieguez D., Barea-Rodriguez E.J. Brief novelty exposure facilitates dentate gyrus LTP in aged rats. Hippocampus 2008, 18(8):835-843.
170. Simons R.F., Graham F.K., Miles M.A., Chen X. On the relationship of P3a and the Novelty-P3. Biol. Psychol. 2001, 56(3):207-218.
171. Sokolov E.N. Higher nervous functions: the orienting reflex. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 1963, 25:545-580.
172. Sokolov E.N. The orienting response, and future directions of its development. Pavlov. J. Biol. Sci. 1990, 25(3):142-150.
173. Spencer K.M., Dien J., Donchin E. A componential analysis of the ERP elicited by novel events using a dense electrode array. Psychophysiology 1999, 36(3):409-414.
174. Spencer K.M., Dien J., Donchin E. Spatiotemporal analysis of the late ERP responses to deviant stimuli. Psychophysiology 2001, 38(2):343-358.
175. Squires N.K., Squires K.C., Hillyard S.A. Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1975, 38(4):387-401.
176. Staresina B.P., Fell J., Do Lam A.T., Axmacher N., Henson R.N. Memory signals are temporally dissociated in and across human hippocampus and perirhinal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 15(8):1167-1173.
177. Stevens M.C., Pearlson G.D., Kiehl K.A. An FMRI auditory oddball study of combined subtype attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am. J. Psychiatry 2007, 164(11):1737-1749.
178. Stoppel C.M., Boehler C.N., Strumpf H., Heinze H.J., Hopf J.M., Düzel E., et al. Neural correlates of exemplar novelty processing under different spatial attention conditions. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2009, 30(11):3759-3771.
179. Straube T., Korz V., Balschun D., Frey J.U. Requirement of beta-adrenergic receptor activation and protein synthesis for LTP-reinforcement by novelty in rat dentate gyrus. J. Physiol. 2003, 552(Pt 3):953L 960.
180. Straube T., Korz V., Frey J.U. Bidirectional modulation of long-term potentiation by novelty-exploration in rat dentate gyrus. Neurosci. Lett. 2003, 344(1):5-8.
181. Strayer D.L., Johnston W.A. Novel popout is an attention-based phenomenon: an ERP analysis. Percept. Psychophys. 2000, 62(3):459-470.
182. Swan G.E., Carmelli D. Curiosity and mortality in aging adults: a 5-year follow-up of the Western Collaborative Group Study. Psychol. Aging 1996, 11(3):449-453.
183. Swick D., Pineda J.A., Foote S.L. Effects of systemic clonidine on auditory event-related potentials in squirrel monkeys. Brain Res. Bull. 1994, 33(1):79-86.
184. Swick D., Pineda J.A., Schacher S., Foote S.L. Locus coeruleus neuronal activity in awake monkeys: relationship to auditory P300-like potentials and spontaneous EEG. Exp. Brain Res. 1994, 101(1):86-92.
185. Tarbi E.C., Sun X., Holcomb P.J., Daffner K.R. Surprise? Early visual novelty processing is not modulated by attention. Psychophysiology 2011, 48(5):624-632.
186. Tulving E., Kapur S., Craik F.I., Moscovitch M., Houle S. Hemispheric encoding/retrieval asymmetry in episodic memory: positron emission tomography findings. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994, 91(6):2016-2020.
187. Tulvin E., Markowitsch H.J., Craik F.E., Habib R., Houle S. Novelty and familiarity activations in PET studies of memory encoding and retrieval. Cereb. Cortex 1996, 6(7):71-79.
188. Tulving E., Kroll N. Novelty assessment in the brain and long-term memory encoding. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 1995, 2(3):387-390.
189. Uzakov S., Frey J.U., Korz V. Reinforcement of rat hippocampal LTP by holeboard training. Learn. Mem. 2005, 12(2):165-171.
190. van Mourik R., Oosterlaan J., Heslenfeld D.J., Konig C.E., Sergeant J.A. When distraction is not distracting: a behavioral and ERP study on distraction in ADHD. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2007, 118(8):1855-1865.
191. Vankov A., Herve-Minvielle A., Sara S.J. Response to novelty and its rapid habituation in locus coeruleus neurons of the freely exploring rat. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1995, 7(6):1180-1187.
192. Verleger R. P3b: towards some decision about memory. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2008, 119(4):968-970.
193. Vuilleumier P. How brains beware: neural mechanisms of emotional attention. Trends. Cogn. Sci. 2005, 9(12):585-594.
194. Von Restorff H. Über die Wirkung von Bereichsbildungen im Spurenfeld. Psychol. Forsch. 1933, 18:234-299.
195. Waszak F., Herwig A. Effect anticipation modulates deviance processing in the brain. Brain Res. 2007, 1183:74-82.
196. Weierich M.R., Wright C.I., Negreira A., Dickerson B.C., Barrett L.F. Novelty as a dimension in the affective brain. NeuroImage 2010, 49(3):2871-2878.
197. Wessel J.R., Danielmeier C., Morton J.B., Ullsperger M. Surprise and error: common neuronal architecture for the processing of errors and novelty. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32:7528-7537.
198. Wessel J.R., Klein T.A., Ott D.V., Ullsperger M. Lesions to the prefrontal performance-monitoring network disrupt neural processing and adaptive behaviors after both errors and novelty. Cortex 2014, 50:45-54.
199. Wetzel N., Schroger E., Widmann A. The dissociation between the P3a event-related potential and behavioral distraction. Psychophysiology 2013, 50(9):920-930.
200. Wetzel N., Widmann A., Berti S., Schroger E. The development of involuntary and voluntary attention from childhood to adulthood: a combined behavioral and event-related potential study. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2006, 117(10):2191-2203.
201. Wetzel N., Widmann A., Schroger E. Distraction and facilitation-two faces of the same coin?. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2012, 38(3):664-674.
202. Wittmann B.C., Bunzeck N., Dolan R.J., Düzel E. Anticipation of novelty recruits reward system and hippocampus while promoting recollection. NeuroImage 2007, 38(1):194-202.
203. Wright C.I., Martis B., Schwartz C.E., Shin L.M., Fischer H.H., McMullin K., et al. Novelty responses and differential effects of order in the amygdala, substantia innominata, and inferior temporal cortex. NeuroImage 2003, 18(3):660-669.
204. Xiang J.Z., Brown M.W. Differential neuronal encoding of novelty, familiarity, and recency in regions of the anterior temporal lobe. Neuropharmacology 1998, 37:657-676.
205. Yamaguchi S., Hale L.A., D'Esposito M., Knight R.T. Rapid prefrontal-hippocampal habituation to novel events. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24:5356-5363.
206. Zald D.H. The human amygdala and the emotional evaluation of sensory stimuli. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 2003, 41(1):88-123.
207. Zimmer H. Change in the event-related skin conductivity: an indicator of the immediate importance of elaborate information processing?. Z. Exp. Angew. Psychol. 1992, 39(3):493-513.