Novel Popout: An Enigma for Conventional Theories of Attention

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 622-631

  Johnston, William A ^a   Schwarting, Irene S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031483204     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.23.3.622     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon Press.
2. Christie, J., & Klein, R. (1994, November). Novel popout: The true story. Paper presented at the 35th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, MO.
3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.
5. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1993). Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 676-681.
6. Grossberg, S. (1987). Competitive learning: From interactive activation to adaptive resonance. Cognitive Science, 11, 23-63.
7. Hawley, K. J., Johnston, W. A., & Farnham, J. M. (1994). Novel popout with nonsense strings: Effects of object length and spatial predictability. Perception and Psychophysics, 55, 261-268.
8. James, W. (1950). The principles of psychology. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1890)
9. Johnston, W. A., & Hawley, K. J. (1994). Perceptual inhibition of expected inputs: The key that opens closed minds. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 56-72.
10. Johnston, W. A., Hawley, K. J., & Farnham, J. M. (1993). Novel popout: Empirical boundaries and tentative theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 140-153.
11. Johnston, W. A., Hawley, K. J., Plewe, S. H., Elliott, J. M. G., & DeWitt, M. J. (1990). Attention capture by novel stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 397-411.
12. Johnston, W. A., & Schwarting, I. S. (1995, November). Interpretations of novel popout de-Kleined. Paper presented at the 36th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles, CA.
13. Johnston, W. A., & Schwarting, I. S. (1996). Reassessing the evidence for novel popout. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 208-212.
14. Johnston,W. A., Schwarting, I. S., & Hawley, K. J. (1996). Novel-popout, perceptual inhibition, and the stability-plasticity dilemma. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pp. 315-335). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University.
16. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
18. Palmer, J. (1995). Attention in visual search: Distinguishing four causes of a set-size effect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 118-123.
19. Schwarting, I. S., Wilson-Leff, C., Malley, G. B., Strayer, D. L., & Johnston, W. A. (1994, May). ERP indices of novel popout. Poster session presented at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
20. Shiffrin, M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
21. Todd, S., & Kramer, A. F. (1994). Attentional misguidance in visual search. Perception and Psychophysics, 56, 198-210.
22. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
23. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202-238.
24. Yantis, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 682-685.