Attention induces conservative subjective biases in visual perception

Nature Neuroscience

Volumn 14, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1513-1515

  Rahnev, Dobromir ^a,b   Maniscalco, Brian ^a   Graves, Tashina ^a,c   Huang, Elliott ^a   De Lange, Floris P ^b   Lau, Hakwan ^a,b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ATTENTION; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 82255162549     PISSN: 10976256     EISSN: 15461726     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nn.2948     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Carrasco, M. Vision Res. 51, 1484-1525 (2011).
2. Kim, C.Y. & Blake, R. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 381-388 (2005).
3. Azzopardi, P. & Cowey, A. Nature 361, 719-721 (1993).
4. Gordon, J. & Abramov, I. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67, 202-207 (1977).
5. Green, D.M. & Swets, J.A. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1966).
6. Lu, Z.L. & Dosher, B.A. Vision Res. 38, 1183-1198 (1998).
7. Gorea, A. & Sagi, D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 12380-12384 (2000).
8. Lau, H. & Rosenthal, D. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15, 365-373 (2011).
9. McDonnell, M.D. & Abbott, D. PLOS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000348 (2009).
10. Dosher, B.A. & Lu, Z.L. Psychol. Sci. 11, 139-146 (2000).
11. Cohen, M.R. & Maunsell, J.H. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 1594-1600 (2009).
12. Mitchell, J.F., Sundberg, K.A. & Reynolds, J.H. Neuron 63, 879-888 (2009).
13. Maier, A. et al. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 1193-1200 (2008).
14. Desimone, R. & Duncan, J. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 193-222 (1995).
15. Reynolds, J.H. & Heeger, D.J. Neuron 61, 168-185 (2009).