Expecting the unexpected: The effects of deviance on novelty processing

Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 128, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 146-160

  Schomaker, Judith ^a   Roos, Rinske ^a   Meeter, Martijn ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Anterior N2; Deviance; Event related potentials; Novelty; Novelty P3; Psychophysiology; Stimulus context

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; ORIENTING RESPONSE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL THRESHOLD; ADOLESCENT; ATTENTION; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84921438787     PISSN: 07357044     EISSN: 19390084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0036289     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Barkaszi, I., Czigler, I., & Balazs, L. (2013). Stimulus complexity effects on the event-related potentials to task-irrelevant stimuli. Biological Psychology, 94, 82-89.
2. Bell, A. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1995). An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Computation, 7, 1129-1159. doi:10.1162/neco.1995.7.6.1129
3. Bendixen, A., Grimm, S., Deouell, L. Y., Wetzel, N., Madebach, A., & Schroger, E. (2010). The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2130-2139.
4. Cattell, R. B. (1966). Scree test for number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
5. Chong, H., Riis, J. L., McGinnis, S. M., Williams, D. M., Holcomb, P. J., & Daffner, K. R. (2008). To ignore or explore: Top-down modulation of novelty processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 120-134. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20003
6. Combs, L. A., & Polich, J. (2006). P3a from auditory white noise stimuli. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117, 1106-1112.
7. Comerchero, M. D., & Polich, J. (1998). P3a, perceptual distinctiveness, and stimulus modality. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 41-48.
8. Comerchero, M. D., & Polich, J. (1999). P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 24-30.
9. Courchesne, E., Hillyard, S. A., & Galambos, R. (1975). Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 39, 131-143.
10. Cycowicz, Y. M., & Friedman, D. (2007). Visual novel stimuli in an ERP novelty oddball paradigm: Effects of familiarity on repetition and recognition memory. Psychophysiology, 44, 11-29.
11. Czigler, I., Balazs, L., & Winkler, I. (2002). Memory-based detection of task-irrelevant visual changes. Psychophysiology, 39, 869-873. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3960869S0048577202020218[pii]
12. Daffner, K. R., Mesulam, M. M., Holcomb, P. J., Calvo, V., Acar, D., Chabrerie, A.,... Scinto, L. F. (2000). Disruption of attention to novel events after frontal lobe injury in humans. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 68, 18-24. doi:10.1136/jnnp.68.1.18
13. Daffner, K. R., Mesulam, M. M., Scinto, L. F., Acar, D., Calvo, V., Faust, R.,... Holcomb, P. (2000). The central role of the prefrontal cortex in directing attention to novel events. Brain, 123, 927-939. doi:10.1093/brain/123.5.927
14. Daffner, K. R., Mesulam, M. M., Scinto, L. F., Calvo, V., Faust, R., & Holcomb, P. J. (2000). An electrophysiological index of stimulus unfamiliarity. Psychophysiology, 37, 737-747. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3760737
15. Daffner, K. R., Scinto, L. F., Calvo, V., Faust, R., Mesulam, M. M., West, W. C., & Holcomb, P. J. (2000). The influence of stimulus deviance on electrophysiologic and behavioral responses to novel events. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 393-406. doi:10.1162/089892900562219
16. Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9-21. doi:10.1016/j .jneumeth.2003.10.009S0165027003003479[pii]
17. Demiralp, T., Ademoglu, A., Comerchero, M., & Polich, J. (2001). Wavelet analysis of P3a and P3b. Brain Topography, 13, 251-267. doi:10.1023/A:1011102628306
18. Dien, J. (1998). Addressing misallocation of variance in principal components analysis of event-related potentials. Brain Topography, 11, 43-55.
19. Dien, J. (2010). The ERP PCA Toolkit: An open source program for advanced statistical analysis of event-related potential data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 187, 138-145.
20. Dien, J. (2012). Applying principal components analysis to event-related potentials: A tutorial. Developmental Neuropsychology, 37, 497-517. doi:10.1080/87565641.2012.697503
21. Dien, J., Khoe, W., & Mangun, G. R. (2007). Evaluation of PCA and ICA of simulated ERPs: Promax vs. infomax rotations. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 742-763. doi:10.1002/hbm.20304
22. Dien, J., Spencer, K. M., & Donchin, E. (2003). Localization of the event-related potential novelty response as defined by principal components analysis. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 637-650.
23. Dien, J., Spencer, K. M., & Donchin, E. (2004). Parsing the late positive complex: Mental chronometry and the ERP components that inhabit the neighborhood of the P300. Psychophysiology, 41, 665-678. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00193.x
24. Donchin, E. (1981). Society for Psychophysiological Research -Presidential-Address, 1980 - Surprise... Surprise. Psychophysiology, 18, 493-513. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb01815.x
25. Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 357-374. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00058027
26. Duncan-Johnson, C. C., & Donchin, E. (1977). On quantifying surprise:The variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology, 14, 456-467. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1977.tb01312.x
27. Escera, C., Alho, K., Schroger, E., & Winkler, I. (2000). Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 5, 151-166.
28. Escera, C., Alho, K., Winkler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1998). Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 590-604. doi:10.1162/089892998562997
29. Folstein, J. R., & Van Petten, C. (2008). Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review. Psychophysiology, 45, 152-170.
30. Frank, D. W., Yee, R. B., & Polich, J. (2012). P3a from white noise. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 85, 236-241.
31. Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y. M., & Gaeta, H. (2001). The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 355-373.
32. Goldstein, A., Spencer, K. M., & Donchin, E. (2002). The influence of stimulus deviance and novelty on the P300 and Novelty P3. Psychophysiology, 39, 781-790. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3960781
33. Hagen, G. F., Gatherwright, J. R., Lopez, B. A., & Polich, J. (2006). P3a from visual stimuli: Task difficulty effects. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 59, 8-14.
34. He, B., Lian, J., Spencer, K. M., Dien, J., & Donchin, E. (2001). A cortical potential imaging analysis of the P300 and novelty P3 components. Human Brain Mapping, 12, 120-130. doi:10.1002/ 1097-0193(200102)12:2_120::AID-HBM1009_3.0.CO;2-V[pii]
35. Hendrickson, A. E., & White, P. O. (1964). Promax - a quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 17, 65-70. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1964.tb00244.x
36. Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor-analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185. doi:10.1007/BF02289447
37. Iwanaga, M., & Nittono, H. (2010). Unexpected action effects elicit deviance-related brain potentials and cause behavioral delay. Psychophysiology, 47, 281-288.
38. Jeon, Y. W., & Polich, J. (2001). P3a from a passive visual stimulus task. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, 2202-2208.
39. Katayama, J., & Polich, J. (1998). Stimulus context determines P3a and P3b. Psychophysiology, 35, 23-33. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3510023
40. Kayser, J., & Tenke, C. E. (2003). Optimizing PCA methodology for ERP component identification and measurement: Theoretical rationale and empirical evaluation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 2307-2325.
41. Kosslyn, S. M., Alpert, N. M., Thompson, W. L., Chabris, C. F., Rauch, S. L., & Anderson, A. K. (1994). Identifying objects seen from different viewpoints. A PET investigation. Brain, 117(Pt 5), 1055-1071. doi:10.1093/brain/117.5.1055
42. Kroll, J. F., & Potter, M. C. (1984). Recognizing words, pictures, and concepts: A comparison of lexical, object, and reality decisions. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 39-66. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90499-7
43. Liu, T., & Shi, J. (2008). Event-related potentials during preattentional processing of color stimuli. NeuroReport, 19, 1221-1225. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e328309a0dd00001756-200808060-00011[pii]
44. Luck, S. J. (2005). An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
45. Näätänen, R., & Picton, T. W. (1986). N2 and automatic versus controlled processes. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology Supplement, 38, 169-186.
46. Nittono, H., & Ullsperger, P. (2000). Event-related potentials in a selfpaced novelty oddball task. NeuroReport, 11, 1861-1864. doi:10.1097/ 00001756-200006260-00012
47. Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
48. Polich, J. (1990a). P300, probability, and interstimulus interval. Psychophysiology, 27, 396-403. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb02333.x
49. Polich, J. (1990b). Probability and inter-stimulus interval effects on the P300 from auditory stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 10, 163-170.
50. Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2128-2148.
51. Polich, J., & Bondurant, T. (1997). P300 sequence effects, probability, and interstimulus interval. Physiology and Behavior, 61, 843-849.
52. Polich, J., & Comerchero, M. D. (2003). P3a from visual stimuli: Typicality, task, and topography. Brain Topography, 15, 141-152. doi:10.1023/A:1022637732495
53. Rigau, J., Feixas, M., & Sbert, M. (2005). An information-theoretic framework for image complexity. Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization and Imaging, 177-184.
54. Sawaki, R., & Katayama, J. (2006). Stimulus context determines whether non-target stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117, 2532-2539.
55. Schomaker, J., & Meeter, M. (2012). Novelty enhances visual perception. PLoS One, 7, e50599. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050599[pii]
56. Schomaker, J., & Meeter, M. (2014). Novelty detection is enhanced when attention is otherwise engaged: an event-related potential study. Experimental Brain Research, 232, 995-1011. doi:10.1007/s00221-013-3811-y
57. Schroger, E., Giard, M. H., & Wolff, C. (2000). Auditory distraction:Event-related potential and behavioral indices. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 1450-1460.
58. Simons, R. F., Graham, F. K., Miles, M. A., & Chen, X. (2001). On the relationship of P3a and the Novelty-P3. Biological Psychology, 56, 207-218.
59. Sokolov, E. N. (1963). Higher nervous functions; the orienting reflex. Annual Review of Physiology, 25, 545-580. doi:10.1146/annurev.ph.25.030163.002553
60. Soltani, M., & Knight, R. T. (2000). Neural origins of the P300. Critical Reviews in Neurobiology, 14, 199-224. doi:10.1615/CritRevNeurobiol .v14.i3-4.20
61. Spencer, K. M., Dien, J., & Donchin, E. (1999). A componential analysis of the ERP elicited by novel events using a dense electrode array. Psychophysiology, 36, 409-414. doi:10.1017/S0048577299981180
62. Spencer, K. M., Dien, J., & Donchin, E. (2001). Spatiotemporal analysis of the late ERP responses to deviant stimuli. Psychophysiology, 38, 343-358. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3820343
63. Squires, K. C., Donchin, E., Herning, R. I., & McCarthy, G. (1977). On the influence of task relevance and stimulus probability on event-relatedpotential components. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 42, 1-14. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(77)90146-8
64. Squires, K. C., Wickens, C., Squires, N. K., & Donchin, E. (1976). The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related potential. Science, 193, 1142-1146. doi:10.1126/science.959831
65. Squires, N. K., Squires, K. C., & Hillyard, S. A. (1975). Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 38, 387-401. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(75)90263-1
66. Stoppel, C. M., Boehler, C. N., Strumpf, H., Heinze, H. J., Hopf, J. M., Duzel, E., & Schoenfeld, M. A. (2009). Neural correlates of exemplar novelty processing under different spatial attention conditions. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 3759-3771. doi:10.1002/hbm.20804
67. Szucs, D., Soltesz, F., Czigler, I., & Csepe, V. (2007). Electroencephalography effects to semantic and non-semantic mismatch in properties of visually presented single-characters: The N2b and the N400. Neuroscience Letters, 412, 18-23.
68. Tarbi, E. C., Sun, X., Holcomb, P. J., & Daffner, K. R. (2011). Surprise? Early visual novelty processing is not modulated by attention. Psychophysiology, 48, 624-632. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01129.x
69. Verbaten, M. N., Huyben, M. A., & Kemner, C. (1997). Processing capacity and the frontal P3. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 25, 237-248.
70. Verleger, R. (2008). P3b: Towards some decision about memory. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119, 968-970.
71. Waszak, F., & Herwig, A. (2007). Effect anticipation modulates deviance processing in the brain. Brain Research, 1183, 74-82.