When loading working memory reduces distraction: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1131-1145

  SanMiguel, Iria ^a   Corral, María José ^a   Escera, Carles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULATION; WORKING MEMORY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 44649145945     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20078     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Alho, K., Escera, C., D?́az, R., Yago, E., & Serra, J. M. (1997). Effects of involuntary auditory attention on visual task performance and brain activity. NeuroReport, 8, 3233-3237.
2. Alho, K., Winkler, I., Escera, C., Huotilainen, M., Virtanen, J., Jääskeläinen, I. P., et al. (1998). Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex: Magnetoencephalographic recordings. Psychophysiology, 35, 211-224.
3. Alho, K., Woods, D. L., Algazi, A., & Näätänen, R. (1992). Intermodal selective attention: II. Effects of attentional load on processing auditory and visual stimuli in central space. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 82, 356-368.
4. Arnott, S. R., Pratt, J., Shore, D. I., & Alain, C. (2001). Attentional set modulates visual areas: An event-related potential study of attention capture. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 383-395.
5. Awh, E., Anllo-Vento, L., & Hillyard, S. A. (2000). The role of spatial selective attention in working memory for locations: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 840-847.
6. Awh, E., & Jonides, J. (2001). Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 119-126.
7. Awh, E., Vogel, E. K., & Oh, S.-H. (2006). Interactions between attention and working memory. Neuroscience, 139, 201-208.
8. Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829-839.
9. Barceló, F., Escera, C., Corral, M. J., & Periáñ ez, J. A. (2006). Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1734-1748.
10. Berti, S., Roeber, U., & Schröger, E. (2004). Bottom-up influences on working memory: Behavioral and electrophysiological distraction varies with distractor strength. Experimental Psychology, 51, 249-257.
11. Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2001). A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects: Behavioral and event-related indices. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 265-273.
12. Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2003). Working memory control involuntary attention switching: Evidence from an auditory distraction paradigm. European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1119-1122.
13. Bosch, V., Mecklinger, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Slow cortical potentials during retention of object, spatial, and verbal information. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 219-237.
14. Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201-215.
15. De Fockert, J. W., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., & Lavie, N. (2001). The role of working memory in visual selective attention. Science, 291, 1803-1806.
16. Di Russo, F., Martinez, A., & Hillyard, S. A. (2003). Source analysis of event-related cortical activity during visuo-spatial attention. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 486-499.
17. Di Russo, F., Martinez, A., Sereno, M., Pitzalis, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (2001). The cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Human Brain Mapping, 15, 95-111.
18. Downing, P. E. (2000). Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention. Psychological Science, 11, 467-473.
19. Duncan, J. (2001). An adaptive coding model of neural function in prefrontal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 820-829.
20. Escera, C., Alho, K., Schröger, E., & Winkler, I. (2000). Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiology & Neuro-Otology, 5, 151-166.
21. Escera, C., Alho, K., Winkler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1998). Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 590-604.
22. Escera, C., & Corral, M. J. (2003). The distraction potential (DP), an electrophysiological tracer of involuntary attention control and its dysfunction. In I. Reinvang, M. W. Greenlee, & M. Herrmann (Eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of individual differences (pp. 63-76). Oldenburg: Bibliotheks -und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg.
23. Escera, C., Corral, M. J., & Yago, E. (2002). An electrophysiological and behavioral investigation of involuntary attention towards auditory frequency, duration and intensity changes. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 325-333.
24. Escera, C., Yago, E., & Alho, K. (2001). Electrical responses reveal the temporal dynamics of brain events during involuntary attention switching. European Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 877-883.
25. Escera, C., Yago, E., Corral, M. J., Corbera, S., & Nuñez, M. I. (2003). Attention capture by auditory significant stimuli: Semantic analysis follows attention switching. European Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 2408-2412.
26. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant feature singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 847-858.
27. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. (1999). Can new objects override attentional control settings? Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 727-739.
28. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
29. Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y. M., & Gaeta, H. (2001). The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 355-373.
30. Fuster, J. M. (2001). The prefrontal cortex - An update: Time is of essence. Neuron, 30, 319-333.
31. Gazzaley, A., Cooney, J. W., McEvoy, K., Knight, R. T., & D'Esposito, M. (2005). Top-down suppression deficit underlies working memory impairment in normal aging. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1298-1300.
32. Gumenyuk, V., Korzyukov, O., Alho, K., Escera, C., Schröger, E., Ilmoniemi, R. J., et al. (2001). Brain activity indices of distractibility in healthy children of school age. Neuroscience Letters, 314, 147-150.
33. Harmony, T., Bernal, J., Fernandez, T., Silvia-Pereyra, J., Fernandez-Bouzas, A., Marosi, E., et al. (2000). Primary task demands modulate P3a amplitude. Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 53-60.
34. Heinze, H. J., Mangun, G. R., Burchert, W., Hinrichs, H., Sholz, M., Munte, T. F., et al. (1994). Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during selective attention in humans. Nature, 372, 543-546.
35. Hester, R., & Garavan, H. (2005). Working memory and executive function: The influence of content and load on the control of attention. Memory & Cognition, 33, 221-233.
36. Hillyard, S. A., & Anllo-Vento, L. (1998). Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 781-787.
37. Hopfinger, J. B., & West, V. M. (2006). Interactions between endogenous and exogenous attention on cortical visual processing. Neuroimage, 31, 774-789.
38. Jarrold, C., & Towse, J. N. (2006). Individual differences in working memory. Neuroscience, 139, 39-50.
39. Jensen, O., Gelfand, J., Kounios, J., & Lisman, J. E. (2002). Oscillations in the alpha band (9-12 Hz) increase with memory load during retention in short-term memory task. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 877-882.
40. Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2002). The role of prefrontal cortex in working memory capacity, executive attention, and general f luid intelligence: An individual differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 637-671.
41. Kim, S.-Y., Kim, M.-S., & Chun, M. M. (2005). Concurrent working memory load can reduce distraction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 16524-16529.
42. Klaver, P., Smid, H. G. O. M., & Heinze, H.-J. (1999). Representations in human visual short-term memory: An event-related brain potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 268, 65-68.
43. Klimesch, W., Doppelmayr, M., Schwaiger, J., Auinger, P., & Winkler, Th. (1999). "Paradoxical" alpha synchronization in a memory task. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 493-501.
44. Knight, R. T. (1997). Distributed cortical networks for visual hippocampal region to novelty detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 75-91.
45. Kok, A. (2001). On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology, 38, 557-577.
46. Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 75-82.
47. Lavie, N., & De Fockert, J. (2005). The role of working memory in attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 669-674.
48. Lavie, N., Hirst, A., De Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 133, 339-354.
49. Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (2000). The operation of selective attention at multiple stages of processing: Evidence from human and monkey electrophysiology. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (pp. 687-700). Cambridge: MIT Press.
50. Mangun, G. R., Hopfinger, J. B., Kussmaul, C., Fletcher, E., & Heinze, H. J. (1997). Covariations in PET and ERP measures of spatial selective attention in human extrastriate visual cortex. Human Brain Mapping, 5, 1-7.
51. Martinez, A. L., Anllo-Vento, L., Sereno, M. I., Frank, L. R., Buxton, R. B., Dubowitz, D. J., et al. (1999). Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 364-369.
52. McCarthy, G., & Wood, C. C. (1985). Scalp distribution of event-related potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 62, 203-208.
53. McEvoy, L. K., Smith, M. E., & Gevins, A. (1998). Dynamic cortical networks of verbal and spatial working memory: Effects of memory load and task practice. Cerebral Cortex, 8, 563-574.
54. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1124-1140.
55. Miller, E. K. (2000). The prefrontal cortex and cognitive control. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 1, 59-65.
56. Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167-202.
57. Muller-Gass, A., & Schröger, E. (2007). Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction. Brain Research, 1136, 169-177.
58. Muller-Gass, A., Stelmack, R. M., & Campbell, K. B. (2006). The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the mismatch negativity. Brain Research, 1078, 112-130.
59. Munka, L., & Berti, S. (2006). Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human eventrelated brain potential. Neuroscience Letters, 396, 177-181.
60. Nätäänen, R. (1992). Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Nätäänen, R., & Winkler, I. (1999). The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 826-859.
62. Otten, L. J., Alain, C., & Picton, T. W. (2000). Effects of visual attentional load on auditory processing. NeuroReport, 11, 875-880.
63. Pashler, H. (1993). Doing two things at the same time. American Scientist, 81, 48-55.
64. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
65. Pashler, H., Johnston, J. C., & Ruthruff, E. (2001). Attention and performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 629-651.
66. Pinsk, M. A., Doniger, G. M., & Kastner, S. (2004). Push-pull mechanism of selective attention in human extrastriate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 622-629.
67. Polich, J., & Criado, J. R. (2006). Neuropsychology and neuropharmacology of P3a and P3b. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60, 172-185.
68. Polo, M. D., Escera, C., Yago, E., Alho, K., Gual, A., & Grau, C. (2003). Electrophysiological evidence of abnormal activation of the cerebral network of involuntary attention in alcoholism. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 134-146.
69. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of attention. In H. Bouman & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
70. Postle, B. R. (2005). Delay-period activity in prefrontal cortex: One function is sensory gating. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1679-1690.
71. Postle, B. R. (2006). Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain. Neuroscience, 139, 23-38.
72. Postle, B. R., Awh, E., Jonides, J., Smith, E. E., & D'Esposito, M. (2004). The where and how of attention-based rehearsal in spatial working memory. Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 194-205.
73. Rainer, G., Asaad, W. F., & Miller, E. K. (1998). Selective representation of relevant information by neurons in the primate prefrontal cortex. Nature, 393, 577-579.
74. Rämä, P., Paavilainen, L., Anourova, I., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K., Sipilä, S., et al. (2000). Modulations of slow brain potentials by working memory load in spatial and nonspatial auditory tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38, 913-922.
75. Restuccia, D., Della Marca, G., Marra, C., Rubino, M., & Valeriani, M. (2005). Attentional load of the primary task influences the frontal but not the temporal generators of mismatch negativity. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 891-899.
76. Rinne, T., Antila, S., & Winkler, I. (2001). Mismatch negativity is unaffected by top-down predictive information. NeuroReport, 12, 2209-2213.
77. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
78. Sakai, K., Rowe, J. B., & Passingham, R. E. (2002). Active maintenance in prefrontal area 46 creates distractor-resistant memory. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 479-484.
79. Schröger, E., & Berti, S. (2000). Distracting working memory by automatic deviance-detection in audition and vision. In E. Schröger, A. Mecklinger, & A. Friederici (Eds.), Working on working memory. Leipzig: Universitätsverlag.
80. Schröger, E., Giard, M.-H., & Wolff, C. (2000). Event-related potential and behavioural indices of auditory distraction. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 1450-1460.
81. Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1998a). Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: A new distraction paradigm. Cognitive Brain Research, 71, 71-87.
82. Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1998b). Attentional orienting and re-orienting is indicated by human event-related brain potentials. NeuroReport, 9, 3355-3358.
83. Smith, E. E., & Jonides, J. (1998). Neuroimaging analyses of human working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 12061-12068.
84. Spinks, J. A., Zhang, J. X., Fox, P. T., Gao, J., & Tan, L. H. (2004). More workload on the central executive of working memory, less attention capture by novel visual distractors: Evidence from an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 23, 517-524.
85. Sussman, E., Winkler, I., & Schröger, E. (2003). Top-down control over involuntary attention switching in the auditory modality. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 603-637.
86. Vogel, E. K., & Machizawa, M. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428, 748-751.
87. Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2005). Pushing around the locus of selection: Evidence for the flexible-selection hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1907-1922.
88. Walter, W. G., Cooper, R., Aldridge, V. J., McCallum, W. C., & Winter, A. L. (1964). Contingent negative variation: An electric sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature, 203, 380-384.
89. Watter, S., Geffen, G. M., & Geffen, L. B. (2001). The n-back task as a dual-task: P300 morphology under divided attention. Psychophysiology, 38, 998-1003.
90. Worden, M. S., Foxe, J. J., Wang, N., & Simpson, G. V. (2000). Anticipatory biasing of visuospatial attention indexed by retinotopically specific alpha-band electroencephalography increases over occipital cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 1-6.
91. Yago, E., Corral, M. J., & Escera, C. (2001). Activation of the brain network of involuntary attention as a function of auditory frequency change. NeuroReport, 12, 4093-4097.
92. Yago, E., Escera, C., Alho, K., & Giard, M. H. (2001). Cerebral mechanisms underlying orienting of attention towards auditory frequency changes. NeuroReport, 12, 2583-2587.
93. Yago, E., Escera, E., Alho, K., Giard, M.-H., & Serra-Grabulosa, J. M. (2003). Spatiotemporal dynamics of the auditory novelty-P3 event-related brain potential. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 383-390.
94. Yamaguchi, S., & Knight, R. T. (1991). Anterior and posterior association cortex contributions to the somatosensory P300. Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 2039-2054.
95. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 121-134.
96. Yi, D.-J., Woodman, G. F., Widders, D., Marois, R., & Chun, M. M. (2004). Neural fate of ignored stimuli: Dissociable effects of perceptual and working memory load. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 992-996.
97. Yucel, G., Petty, C., McCarthy, G., & Belger, A. (2005a). Visual task complexity modulated the brain's response to unattended auditory novelty. NeuroReport, 16, 1031-1036.
98. Yucel, G., Petty, C., McCarthy, G., & Belger, A. (2005b). Graded visual attention modulates brain responses evoked by task-irrelevant auditory pitch change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1819-1828.