Electrophysiological analysis of the role of novelty in the von Restorff effect

Brain and Behavior

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 159-170

  Rangel Gomez, Mauricio ^a   Meeter, Martijn ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

ERPs; N2; Novelty; P3; Von Restorff effect

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL FUNCTION; NERVOUS SYSTEM ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; RECOGNITION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; VON RESTORFF EFFECT;

EID: 84879256952     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21623279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.112     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Alho, K., D. L. Woods, and A. Algazi, 1994. Processing of auditory stimuli during auditory and visual attention as revealed by event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 31:469-479.
2. Arbel, Y., K. M. Spencer, and E. Donchin, 2010. The N400 and the P300 are not all that independent. Psychophysiology 48:861-875.
3. Bireta, T. J., A. M. Surprenant, and I. Neath, 2008. Age-related differences in the von Restorff isolation effect. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. (Colchester) 61:345-352.
4. Ceponiene, R., A. Shestakova, P. Balan, P. Alku, K. Yiaguchi, and R. Naatanen, 2001. Children's auditory event-related potentials index sound complexity and "speechness". Int. J. Neurosci. 109:245-260.
5. Ceponiene, R., P. Alku, M. Westerfield, M. Torki, and J. Townsend, 2005. ERPs differentiate syllable and nonphonetic sound processing in children and adults. Psychophysiology 42:391-406.
6. Chwilla, D. J., C. M. Brown, and P. Hagoort, 1995. The N400 as a function of the level of processing. Psychophysiology 32:274-285.
7. Chwilla, D. J., H. H. Kolk, and C. T. Vissers, 2007. Immediate integration of novel meanings: N400 support for an embodied view of language comprehension. Brain Res. 1183:109-123.
8. Cimbalo, R. S., B. I. Nowak, and J. A. Soderstrom, 1981. The isolation effect in childrens short-term-memory. J. Gen. Psychol. 105:215-223.
9. Courchesne, E., S. A. Hillyard, and R. Galambos, 1975. Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 39:131-143.
10. Crottaz-Herbette, S., and V. Menon, 2006. Where and when the anterior cingulate cortex modulates attentional response: combined fMRI and ERP evidence. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18:766-780.
11. Daffner, K. R., M. M. Mesulam, L. F. Scinto, V. Calvo, R. Faust, and P. J. Holcomb, 2000. An electrophysiological index of stimulus unfamiliarity. Psychophysiology 37:737-747.
12. Delorme, A., and S. Makeig, 2004. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 134:9-21.
13. Delorme, A., T. Sejnowski, and S. Makeig, 2007. Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis. Neuroimage 34:1443-1449.
14. Donchin, E. 1981. Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!...Surprise? Psychophysiology 18:493-513.
15. Dunlosky, J., R. R. Hunt, and E. Clark, 2000. Is perceptual salience needed in explanations of the isolation effect? J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 26:649-657.
16. Fabiani, M., and E. Donchin, 1995. Encoding processes and memory organization: a model of the von Restorff effect. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 21:224-240.
17. Fabiani, M., D. Karis, and E. Donchin, 1990. Effects of mnemonic strategy manipulation in a von Restorff paradigm. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 75:22-35.
18. Ferrari, V., M. M. Bradley, M. Codispoti, and P. J. Lang, 2010. Detecting novelty and significance. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22:404-411.
19. Folstein, J. R., and C. Van Petten, 2008. Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. Psychophysiology 45:152-170.
20. Friedman, D., Y. M. Cycowicz, and H. Gaeta, 2001. The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 25:355-373.
21. Geraci, L., and I. Manzano, 2010. Distinctive items are salient during encoding: delayed judgements of learning predict the isolation effect. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 63:50-64.
22. Goldstein, A., K. M. Spencer, and E. Donchin, 2002. The influence of stimulus deviance and novelty on the P300 and novelty P3. Psychophysiology 39:781-790.
23. Hasselmo, M. E., P. Bradley, B. P. Wyble, and G. V. Wallenstein, 1996. Encoding and retrieval of episodic memories: role of cholinergic and GABAergic modulation in the hippocampus. Hippocampus 6:693-708.
24. He, B., J. Lian, K. M. Spencer, J. Dien, and E. Donchin, 2001. A cortical potential imaging analysis of the P300 and novelty P3 components. Hum. Brain Mapp. 12:120-130.
25. Hunt, R. R., and C. A. Lamb, 2001. What causes the isolation effect? J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 27:1359-1366.
26. Johansson, B. S. 1970. Attention and the von Restorff effect. Br. J. Psychiatry 61:163-170.
27. Jung, T. P., S. Makeig, C. Humphries, T. W. Lee, M. J. McKeown, V. Iragui, et al. 2000a. Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology 37:163-178.
28. Jung, T. P., S. Makeig, M. Westerfield, J. Townsend, E. Courchesne, and T. J. Sejnowski, 2000b. Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects. Clin. Neurophysiol. 111:1745-1758.
29. Karis, D., M. Fabiani, and E. Donchin, 1984. P300 and memory - individual-differences in the von Restorff effect. Cogn. Psychol. 16:177-216.
30. Kihara, M., A. M. Hogan, C. R. Newton, H. H. Garrashi, B. R. Neville, and M. de Haan, 2010. Auditory and visual novelty processing in normally-developing Kenyan children. Clin. Neurophysiol. 121:564-576.
31. Kishiyama, M. M., A. P. Yonelinas, and M. M. Lazzara, 2004. The von Restorff effect in amnesia: the contribution of the hippocampal system to novelty-related memory enhancements. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16:15-23.
32. Knight, R. T., and D. Scabini, 1998. Anatomic bases of event-related potentials and their relationship to novelty detection in humans. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 15:3-13.
33. Kopp, B., and K. Wessel, 2010. Event-related brain potentials and cognitive processes related to perceptual-motor information transmission. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 10:316-327.
34. Kujala, T., J. Kallio, M. Tervaniemi, and R. Naatanen, 2001. The mismatch negativity as an index of temporal processing in audition. Clin. Neurophysiol. 112:1712-1719.
35. Lisman, J. E., and A. A. Grace, 2005. The hippocampal-VTA loop: controlling the entry of information into long-term memory. Neuron 46:703-713.
36. McDaniel, M. A., C. C. Dornburg, and M. J. Guynn, 2005. Disentangling encoding versus retrieval explanations of the bizarreness effect: implications for distinctiveness. Mem. Cogn. 33:270-279.
37. Meeter, M., L. M. Talamini, and J. M. J. Murre, 2004. Mode shifting between storage and recall based on novelty detection in oscillating hippocampal circuits. Hippocampus 14:722-741.
38. Nyman, G., K. Alho, P. Laurinen, P. Paavilainen, T. Radil, K. Reinikainen, et al. 1990. Mismatch negativity (MMN) for sequences of auditory and visual stimuli: evidence for a mechanism specific to the auditory modality. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 77:436-444.
39. Otten, L. J., and E. Donchin, 2000. Relationship between P300 amplitude and subsequent recall for distinctive events: dependence on type of distinctiveness attribute. Psychophysiology 37:644-661.
40. Pegado, F., T. Bekinschtein, N. Chausson, S. Dehaene, L. Cohen, and L. Naccache, 2010. Probing the lifetimes of auditory novelty detection processes. Neuropsychologia 48:3145-3154.
41. Perrault, N., and T. W. Picton, 1984a. Event-related potentials recorded from the scalp and nasopharynx. I. N1 and P2. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 59:177-194.
42. Perrault, N., and T. W. Picton, 1984b. Event-related potentials recorded from the scalp and nasopharynx. II. N2, P3 and slow wave. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 59:261-278.
43. Polich, J. 2007. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin. Neurophysiol. 118:2128-2148.
44. Polich, J., and J. R. Criado, 2006. Neuropsychology and neuropharmacology of P3a and P3b. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 60:172-185.
45. Pritchard, W., S. Shappell, and M. Brandt, 1991. Psychophysiology of N200/N400: a review and classification scheme. Pp. 43-106 in J. Jennings and P. Ackles, eds. Advances in psychophysiology: a research annual. Vol. 4. Jessica Kingsley, London.
46. Rundus, D. 1971. Analysis of rehearsal processes in free recall. J. Exp. Psychol. 89:63-77.
47. Sambeth, A., M. Huotilainen, E. Kushnerenko, V. Fellman, and E. Pihko, 2006. Newborns discriminate novel from harmonic sounds: a study using magnetoencephalography. Clin. Neurophysiol. 117:496-503.
48. SanMiguel, I., H. M. Morgan, C. Klein, D. Linden, and C. Escera, 2010. On the functional significance of novelty-P3: facilitation by unexpected novel sounds. Biol. Psychol. 83:143-152.
49. Sokolov, E. N. 1963. Higher nervous functions; the orienting reflex. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 25:545-580.
50. Squires, N. K., K. C. Squires, and S. A. Hillyard, 1975. Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 38:387-401.
51. Szucs, D., F. Soltesz, I. Czigler, and V. Csepe, 2007. Electroencephalography effects to semantic and non-semantic mismatch in properties of visually presented single-characters: the N2b and the N400. Neurosci. Lett. 412:18-23.
52. Tarbi, E. C., X. Sun, P. J. Holcomb, and K. R. Daffner, 2010. Surprise? Early visual novelty processing is not modulated by attention. Psychophysiology 48:624-632.
53. Van Overschelde, J. P., K. A. Rawson, and J. Dunlosky, 2004. Category norms: an updated and expanded version of the Battig and Montague (1969) norms. J. Mem. Lang. 50:289-335.
54. Von Restorff, H. 1933. Über die wirkung von bereichsbildungen im spurenfeld [The effects of field formation in the trace field]. Psychol. Forsch. 18:299-334.
55. Wiswede, D., J. Russeler, S. Hasselbach, and T. F. Munte, 2006. Memory recall in arousing situations - an emotional von Restorff effect? BMC Neurosci. 7:57.
56. Yuan, J., Y. He, Z. Qinglin, A. Chen, and H. Li, 2008. Gender differences in behavioral inhibitory control: ERP evidence from a two-choice oddball task. Psychophysiology 45:986-993.