Distraction by auditory novelty: The course and aftermath of novelty and semantic effects

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 92-101

  Parmentier, Fabrice B R ^a,b   Turner, Jacqueline ^c   Elsley, Jane V ^d  

^a UNIVERSITAT DE LES ILLES BALEARS   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^d BOURNEMOUTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attention capture; Cross modal oddball task; Novelty distraction; Oddball detection

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 79952148083     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000072     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Alho, K., Winkler, I., Escera, C, Huotilainen, M., Virtanen, J., Jääskeläinen, I., et al. (1998). Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex: Magne-toencephalographic recordings. Psychophysiology, 35, 211-224. (Pubitemid 28113705)
2. Allport, A., & Wylie, G. (2000). Task-switching, stimulus-response bindings, and negative priming. In S. Monsell & J. S. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes. Attention and performance XVIII. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Andrés, P., Parmentier, F. B. R., & Escera, C. (2006). The effect of age on the involuntary capture of attention by irrelevant sounds: A test of the frontal hypothesis of aging. Neuro-psychologia, 44, 2564-2568. (Pubitemid 44062586)
4. Arbuthnott, K., & Frank, J. (2000). Executive control in set switching: Residual switch cost and task-set inhibition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 33-41.
5. Barceló, F., Escera, C., Corral, M. J., & Perianez, J. A. (2006). Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1734-1748. (Pubitemid 44511738)
6. Berti, S. (2008). Cognitive control after distraction: Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) dissociate between different processes of attentional allocation. Psychophysiology, 45, 608-620. (Pubitemid 351832091)
7. Berti, S., Roeber, U., & Schröger, E. (2004). Bottom-up influences on working memory: Behavioral and electrophys- iological distraction varies with distractor strength. Experimental Psychology, 51, 249-257. (Pubitemid 39636753)
8. Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2001). A comparison of auditory and visual distraction: Behavioral and event-related indices. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 265-273. (Pubitemid 32146583)
9. Buchner, A., Zabal, A., & Mayr, S. (2003). Auditory, visual, and cross-modal negative priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 917-923. (Pubitemid 38483387)
10. Bush, G., Whalen, P. J., Rosen, B. R., Jenike, M. A., McInerney, S. C., & Rauch, S. L. (1998). The counting stroop: An interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging - validation study with functional MRI. Human Brain Mapping, 6, 270-282. (Pubitemid 28364523)
11. Elliott, E. M., & Cowan, N. (2001). Habituation to auditory distractors in a cross-modal, color-word interference task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 654-667. (Pubitemid 33685029)
12. Elliott, E. M., Cowan, N., & Valle-Inclan, F. (1998). The nature of cross-modal color-word interference effects. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 761-767. (Pubitemid 128461656)
13. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
14. Escera, C., Alho, K., Winkler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1998). Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 590-604. (Pubitemid 28484754)
15. Escera, C., Corral, M. J., & Yago, E. (2002). An electrophys- iological and behavioral investigation of involuntary attention towards auditory frequency, duration and intensity changes. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 325-332. (Pubitemid 35283784)
16. Fan, J., Flombaum, J. J., McCandliss, B. D., Thomas, K. M., & Posner, M. I. (2003). Cognitive and brain consequences of conflict. Neuroimage, 18, 42-57. (Pubitemid 36062746)
17. Fan, J., Kolster, R., Ghajar, J., Suh, M., Knight, R. T., Sarkar, R., & McCandliss, B. D. (2007). Response anticipation and response conflict: An event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 2272-2282. (Pubitemid 46340965)
18. Fox, E. (1995). Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 145-173.
19. Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y. M., & Gaeta, H. (2001). The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 355-373. (Pubitemid 32624376)
20. Hanauer, J. B., & Brooks, P. J. (2003). Developmental change in the cross-modal Stroop effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 359-366. (Pubitemid 37544871)
21. Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53-112). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
22. Jääskeläinen, I. P., Alho, K., Escera, C., Winkler, I., Sillanaukee, P., & Näätänen, R. (1996). Effects of ethanol and auditory distraction on forced choice reaction time. Alcohol, 13, 153-156. (Pubitemid 26102096)
23. Jentzsch, I., & Dudschig, C. (2009). Why do we slow down after an error? Mechanisms underlying the effects of posterior slowing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 209-218.
24. Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., & Hoffman, J. (2006). Evidence of task-specific resolution of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 800-806.
25. Kleinsorge, T. (1999). Response repetition benefits and costs. Acta Psychologica, 103, 295-310.
26. Kornblum, S., & Lee, J.-W. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 855-875.
27. Kunde, W. (2003). Sequential modulations of stimulus-response correspondence effects depend on awareness of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 198-205. (Pubitemid 37544998)
28. Laming, D. R. J. (1968). Information theory of choice reaction times. London: Academic Press.
29. Macdonald, A. W. III, Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulated cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835-1838. (Pubitemid 30399023)
30. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
31. May, C. P., Kane, J. M., & Hasher, L. (1995). Determinants of negative priming. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 35-54.
32. Mayr, S., & Buchner, A. (2007). Negative priming as a memory phenomenon. Journal of Psychology, 215, 35-51.
33. Mayr, U., & Keele, S. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26.
34. Melcher, T., & Gruber, O. (2008). Decomposing interference during Stroop performance into different conflict factors: An event-related fMRI study. Cortex, 45, 189-200.
35. Munka, L., & Berti, S. (2006). Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential. Neuroscience Letters, 396, 177-181. (Pubitemid 43331026)
36. Näätänen, R. (1990). The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behavioral and Brain Science, 13, 201-288.
37. Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., & Terry, K. M. (1995). Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. In F. M. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference ad inhibition in cognition (pp. 207-162). San Diego: Academic Press.
38. Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., Terry, K. M., & Gorfein, D. S. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 993-1000.
39. Notebaert, W., Houtman, F., Van Opstal, F., Gevers, W., Fias, W., & Verguts, T. (2009). Post-error slowing: An orienting account. Cognition, 111, 275-279.
40. Opitz, B., Rinne, T., Mecklinger, A., von Cramon, D. Y., & Schroager, E. (2002). Differential contribution of frontal and temporal cortices to auditory change detection: fMRI and ERP results. NeuroImage, 15, 165-174.
41. Parmentier, F. B. R. (2008). Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novels: The role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing. Cognition, 109, 345-362.
42. Parmentier, F. B. R., & Andrés, P. (2010). The involuntary capture of attention by sound: Novelty and post-novelty distraction in young and older adults. Experimental Psychology, 57, 68-76.
43. Parmentier, F. B. R., Elford, G., Escera, C., Andrés, P., & San Miguel, I. (2008). The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task. Cognition, 106, 408-432. (Pubitemid 350236140)
44. Parmentier, F. B. R., Elsley, J. V., & Ljungberg, J. K. (2010). Behavioral distraction by auditory novelty is not only about novelty: The role of the distractor's informational value. Cognition, doi:10.1016/j.cognition. 2010.03.002.
45. Parmentier, F. B. R., Maybery, M. T., & Elsley, J. V. (2010). The involuntary capture of attention by novel feature pairings: A study of voice-location integration in auditory sensory memory. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72, 279-284.
46. Pulvermüller, F. (2001). Brain reflections of words and their meaning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 517-524. (Pubitemid 33109077)
47. Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1966). Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 264-272.
48. Roeber, U., Berti, S., & Schröager, E. (2003). Auditory distraction with different presentation rates: An even-related potential and behavioral study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 341-349. (Pubitemid 36136107)
49. Roeber, U., Berti, S., Widmann, A., & Schröager, E. (2005). Response repetition vs. response change modulates behavioral and electrophysiological effects ofdistraction. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 451-456. (Pubitemid 40269249)
50. Roelofs, A. (2005). The visual-auditory color-word Stroop asymmetry and its time course. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1325-1336. (Pubitemid 46207048)
51. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). The cost of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
52. Schröager, E. (1997). On the detection of auditory deviations: A pre-attentive activation model. Psychophysiology, 34, 245-257.
53. Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1998). Attentional orienting and reorienting is indicated by human event-related brain potentials. NeuroReport, 9, 3355-3358. (Pubitemid 28566110)
54. Shtyrov, Y., Hauk, O., & Pulvermüaller, F. (2004). Distributed neuronal networks for encoding category-specific semantic information: The mismatch negativity to action words. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 1083-1092. (Pubitemid 38297046)
55. Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174-176.
56. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
57. Tipper, S. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 321-343. (Pubitemid 33654049)
58. Ullsperger, M., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2001). Subprocesses of performance monitoring: A dissociation of error processing and response competition revealed by event-related fMRI and ERPs. Neuroimage, 14, 1387-1401. (Pubitemid 33124186)
59. van Veen, V., & Carter, C. S. (2005). Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: A functional MRI study. Neuroimage, 27, 497-504. (Pubitemid 41139922)
60. Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361-413. (Pubitemid 36880986)
61. Woods, D. L. (1992). Auditory selective attention in middleaged and elderly subjects: An event-related brain potential study. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 84, 456-468.
62. Yeung, N., Cohen, J. D., & Botvinick, M. M. (2004). The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the errorrelated negativity. Psychological Review, 111, 939-959.