Seafood traceability: Current needs, available tools, and biotechnological challenges for origin certification

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 331-336

  Leal, Miguel Costa ^a   Pimentel, Tânia ^a   Ricardo, Fernando ^a   Rosa, Rui ^b   Calado, Ricardo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Biochemistry; Certificate of origin; Food safety; Geochemistry; Molecular biology; Supply chain

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMISTRY; GEOCHEMISTRY; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; MEATS; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; SUPPLY CHAINS;

CERTIFICATE OF ORIGIN; CONSUMER AWARENESS; FOOD SAFETY REGULATIONS; FOOD TRACEABILITYS; MARKET GLOBALIZATION; MOLECULAR TOOLS; PROTEIN SOURCES;

FOOD SAFETY;

AQUACULTURE; BIOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CATERING SERVICE; CONSUMER; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; DNA BARCODING; FISH STOCK; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; FOOD AVAILABILITY; FOOD BIOTECHNOLOGY; FOOD CONTROL; FOOD PROCESSING; FOOD SAFETY; GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS; LIPID ANALYSIS; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCT SAFETY; REVIEW; SEA FOOD; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; ANALYSIS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CERTIFICATION; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; CERTIFICATION; FOOD SAFETY; HUMANS; SEAFOOD;

EID: 84929516184     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.03.003     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. FAO The State of World Fisheris and Aquaculture: Opportunities and Challenges 2014, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
2. Cao L., et al. China's aquaculture and the world's wild fisheries. Science 2015, 347:133-135.
3. Asche F. Exchange Rates and the Seafood Trade 2014, FAO/GLOBEFISH.
4. Parreño-Marchante A., et al. Advanced traceability system in aquaculture supply chain. J. Food Eng. 2014, 122:99-109.
5. Aung M.M., Chang Y.S. Traceability in a food supply chain: safety and quality perspectives. Food Control 2014, 39:172-184.
6. Stringer C., et al. Shifting post production patterns: exploring changes in New Zealand's seafood processing industry. N. Z. Geog. 2011, 67:161-173.
7. Fleming A., et al. Climate change risks and adaptation options across Australian seafood supply chains - a preleminary assessment. Climate Risk Manag. 2014, 1:39-50.
8. Lazarda J., et al. Assessing aquaculture sustainability: a comparative methodology. Int. J. Sustainable Dev. World Ecol. 2014, 21:503-511.
9. Pieniak Z., et al. Consumer knwoledge and use of information about fish and aquaculture. Food Policy 2013, 40:25-30.
10. Helyar S.J., et al. Fish product mislabelling: failings of traceability in the production chain and implications for illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing. PLoS ONE 2014, 9:e98691.
11. Worm B., et al. Rebuilding global fisheries. Science 2009, 325:578-585.
12. McCauley D.J., et al. Marine defaunation: animal loss in the global ocean. Science 2015, 347:1255641.
13. Galimberti A., et al. DNA barcoding as a new tool for food traceability. Food Res. Int. 2013, 50:55-63.
14. Teletchea F. Molecular identification methods of fish species: reassessment and possible applications. Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 2009, 19:265-293.
15. Armani A., et al. Fish fraud: The DNA challenge. Anim. Sci. Rev. 2012, 227:227-239.
16. Rasmussen R.S., Morrissey M.T. DNA-based methods for the identification of commercial fish and seafood species. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2008, 7:280-295.
17. European Comission Regulation (EC) No. 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council. pp. L31/31 - L31/24 2002, Official Journal of the European Communities.
18. FDA The U.S. Bioterroristm Act of 2002 2002, US FDA.
19. Pramod G., et al. Estimates of illegal and unreported fish in seafood imports to the USA. Mar. Policy 2014, 48:102-113.
20. Charlebois S., et al. Comparison of global food traceabiilty regulations and requirements. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2014, 13:1104-1123.
21. Ayala-Zavala J.F., et al. Nanotechnology tools to achieve food safety. Practical Food Safety: Contemporary Issues and Future Directions 2014, 341-353. John Wiley & Sons. V. Bhat, V.M. Gómez-López (Eds.).
22. Carson H.S., et al. Temporal, spatial, and interspecific variation in geochemical signatures within gish otoliths, bivalve larval shells, and crustacean larvae. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2013, 473:133-148.
23. Reis-Santos P., et al. Temporal variability in estuarine fish otolith elemental fingerprints: implications for connectivity assessments. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2012, 112:216-224.
24. Sorte C.J.B., et al. Elemental fingerprinting of mussel shells to predict population sources and redistribution potential in the Gulf of Maine. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e80868.
25. D'Avignon G., Rose G.A. Otolith elemental fingerprints distinguish Atlantic cod spawning areas in Newfoundland and Labrador. Fish. Res. 2013, 147:1-9.
26. Broadaway B.J., Hannigan R.E. Elemental fingerprints used to identify essential habitats: Nantucket Bay Scallop. J. Shellfish Res. 2012, 31:671-676.
27. Arts M., et al. Lipids in Aquatic Ecosystems 2009, Springer.
28. Bergé J-P., Barnathan G. Fatty acids from lipids of marine organisms: molecular biodiversity, roles as biomarkers, biologically active compounds, and economical aspects. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 2005, 96:49-125.
29. Hall J.M., et al. Eicosapentaenoic acid regulates scallop (Placopecten magellanicus) membrane fluidity in response to cold. Biol. Bull. 2002, 202:201-203.
30. Gonzalez L., et al. Bioenergetics of small pelagics in upwelling systems: relationship between fish condition, coastal ecosystem dynamics and fisheries. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2010, 410:205-218.
31. Kelly J., Scheibling R. Fatty acids as dietary tracers in benthic food webs. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2012, 446:1-22.
32. Ezgeta-Balić D., et al. Seasonal fatty acid profile analysis to trace origin of food sources of four commercially important bivalves. Aquaculture 2012, 334-337:89-100.
33. Grahl-Nielsen O., et al. Fatty acid composition in adductor muscle of juvenil scallops (Pecten maximus) from five Norwegian populations reared in the same environment. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2010, 38:478-488.
34. Olsen B.R., et al. Population study of Astarte sulcata, da Costa, 1778 (Mollusca, Bivalvia) from two Norwegian fjords based on the fatty acid composition of the adductor muscle. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2009, 37:662-669.
35. Herrero B., et al. Rapid identification of seaweeds in food products by PCR combined with ALF-RFLP and FINS methodologies. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58:11586-11592.
36. Tatsadjieu N.L., et al. Study of the microbial diversity of Oreochromis niloticus of three lakes of Cameroon by PCR-DGGE: application to the determination of the geographical origin. Food Control 2010, 21:673-678.
37. Montet D., et al. Application of PCR-DGGE in determining food origin: cases studies of fish and fruits. Asp. Appl. Biol. 2008, 87:11-22.
38. Le Nguyen D.D., et al. Determination of fish origin by using 16S rDNA fingerprinting of bacterial communities by PCR-DGGE: an application on Pangasius fish from Viet Nam. Food Control 2008, 19:454-460.
39. Hovda M.B., et al. Characterization of the dominant bacterial population in modified atmosphere packaged farmed halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) based on 16S rDNA-DGGE. Food Microbiol. 2007, 24:362-371.
40. Di Pinto A., et al. DNA barcoding for detecting market substitution in salted cod fillets and battered cod chunks. Food Chem. 2013, 141:1757-1762.
41. Armani A., et al. DNA and Mini-DNA barcoding for the identification of Porgies species (family Sparidae) of commercial interest on the international market. Food Control 2015, 50:589-596.
42. Carvalho D.C., et al. DNA Barcoding identification of commercialized seafood in South Brazil: a governamental regulatory forensic program. Food Control 2015, 50:784-788.
43. Calvès I., et al. Genetic structure of European flounder Platichthys flesus: effect of both the southern limit of the species' range and chemical stress. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2013, 472:257-273.
44. Coscia I., et al. Modelled larval dispersal and measured gene flow: seascape genetics of the common cockle Cerastoderma edule in the southern Irish Sea. Conserv. Genet. 2013, 14:451-466.
45. Ulrich R.M., et al. A handheld sensor assay for the identification of grouper as a safeguard against seafood mislabelling fraud. Food Control 2015, 53:81-90.
46. Donnelly K.A-M., Olsen P. Catch to landing traceability and the effects of implementation - a case study from the Norwegian white fish sector. Food Control 2012, 27:228-233.
47. Turchini G.M., et al. Traceability and discriminating among differently farmed fish: a case study on Australian murray cod. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57:274-281.
48. Griffiths A.M., et al. Current methods for seafood authenticity testing in Europe: is there a need for harmonisation?. Food Control 2014, 45:1-6.