Postoral glucose sensing, not caloric content, determines sugar reward in C57BL/6J mice

Chemical Senses

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 245-258

  Sclafani, Anthony ^a   Zukerman, Steven ^a   Ackroff, Karen ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Fructose; Postoral conditioning; Progressive ratio test; Sucralose; Sucrose

Indexed keywords

FRUCTOSE; GLUCOSE; SACCHARIN; SUCRALOSE; SUCROSE; SWEETENING AGENT; TRICHLOROSUCROSE;

ADULT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; C57BL 6 MOUSE; CALORIE; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOOD DEPRIVATION; LICKING; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REWARD; SUCROSE PREFERENCE TEST; SWEETNESS; ANALOGS AND DERIVATIVES; ANIMAL; C57BL MOUSE; CALORIC INTAKE; DECISION MAKING; FOOD PREFERENCE; METABOLISM; ORAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TASTE; TIME FACTOR;

MUS;

ADMINISTRATION, ORAL; ANIMALS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; ENERGY INTAKE; FOOD DEPRIVATION; FOOD PREFERENCES; FRUCTOSE; GLUCOSE; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; REWARD; SACCHARIN; SUCROSE; SWEETENING AGENTS; TASTE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84929408933     PISSN: 0379864X     EISSN: 14643553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjv002     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ackroff K, Sclafani A. 1994. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric infusions of dilute polycose solutions. Physiol Behav. 55(5):957-962.
2. Ackroff K, Touzani K, Peets TK, Sclafani A. 2001. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric fructose and glucose: differences in reinforcement potency. Physiol Behav. 72(5):691-703.
3. Bachmanov AA, Beauchamp GK. 2007. Taste receptor genes. Annu Rev Nutr. 27:389-414.
4. Bachmanov AA, Tordoff MG, Beauchamp GK. 2001. Sweetener preference of C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice. Chem Senses. 26(7):905-913.
5. Beeler JA, McCutcheon JE, Cao ZF, Murakami M, Alexander E, Roitman MF, Zhuang X. 2012. Taste uncoupled from nutrition fails to sustain the reinforcing properties of food. Eur J Neurosci. 36(4):2533-2546.
6. Bello NT, Hajnal A. 2005. Male rats show an indifference-avoidance response for increasing concentrations of the artificial sweetener sucralose. Nutr Res. 25(7):693-699.
7. Davidson TL, Swithers SE. 2004. A Pavlovian approach to the problem of obesity. Int J Obes. 28(7):933-935.
8. de Araujo IE, Oliveira-Maia AJ, Sotnikova TD, Gainetdinov RR, Caron MG, Nicolelis MA, Simon SA. 2008. Food reward in the absence of taste receptor signaling. Neuron. 57(6):930-941.
9. Dess NK, Chapman CD, Monroe D. 2009. Consumption of SC45647 and sucralose by rats selectively bred for high and low saccharin intake. Chem Senses. 34(3):211-220.
10. Domingos AI, Sordillo A, Dietrich MO, Liu ZW, Tellez LA, Vaynshteyn J, Ferreira JG, Ekstrand MI, Horvath TL, de Araujo IE, et al. 2013. Hypothalamic melanin concentrating hormone neurons communicate the nutrient value of sugar. eLife Sciences. 2:e01462.
11. Domingos AI, Vaynshteyn J, Voss HU, Ren X, Gradinaru V, Zang F, Deisseroth K, de Araujo IE, Friedman J. 2011. Leptin regulates the reward value of nutrient. Nat Neurosci. 14(12):1562-1568.
12. Franz M. 2010. Diet soft drinks: how safe are they? Diabetes Self Manag. 27(2):8, 11-13.
13. Gannon KS, Smith JC, Henderson R, Hendrick P. 1992. A system for studying the microstructure of ingestive behavior in mice. Physiol Behav. 51(3):515-521.
14. Glendinning JI, Breinager L, Kyrillou E, Lacuna K, Rocha R, Sclafani A. 2010. Differential effects of sucrose and fructose on dietary obesity in four mouse strains. Physiol Behav. 101(3):331-343.
15. Hausmann MF. 1933. The behavior of albino rats in choosing foods: II. Differentiation between sugar and saccharin. J Comp Psychol. 15:419- 428.
16. Loney GC, Torregrossa AM, Smith JC, Sclafani A, Eckel LA. 2011. Rats display a robust bimodal preference profile for sucralose. Chem Senses. 36(8):733-745.
17. Messier C, White NM. 1984. Contingent and non-contingent actions of sucrose and saccharin reinforcers: effects on taste preference and memory. Physiol Behav. 32(2):195-203.
18. Morini G, Bassoli A, Temussi PA. 2008. Multiple receptors or multiple sites? Modeling the human T1R2-T1R3 sweet taste receptor. In: Weerasinghe DL and DuBois GE, editors. Sweetness and sweeteners. Washington (DC): American Chemical Society. p. 147-161.
19. Oliveira-Maia AJ, Roberts CD, Walker QD, Luo B, Kuhn C, Simon SA, Nicolelis MA. 2011. Intravascular food reward. PLoS One. 6(9):e24992.
20. Page KA, Chan O, Arora J, Belfort-Deaguiar R, Dzuira J, Roehmholdt B, Cline GW, Naik S, Sinha R, Constable RT, et al. 2013. Effects of fructose vs glucose on regional cerebral blood flow in brain regions involved with appetite and reward pathways. JAMA. 309(1):63-70.
21. Powers MA. 1994. Sweetening our foods: blending sweeteners. Diabetes Educ. 20(3):243-244.
22. Ramirez I. 1994. Stimulation of fluid intake by carbohydrates: interaction between taste and calories. Am J Physiol. 266:R682-R687.
23. Scheggi S, Secci ME, Marchese G, De Montis MG, Gambarana C. 2013. Influence of palatability on motivation to operate for caloric and non-caloric food in non food-deprived and food-deprived rats. Neuroscience. 236:320-331.
24. Schiffman SS, Booth BJ, Carr BT, Losee ML, Sattely-Miller EA, Graham BG. 1995. Investigation of synergism in binary mixtures of sweeteners. Brain Res Bull. 38(2):105-120.
25. Sclafani A. 2006. Sucrose motivation in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice measured by progressive ratio licking. Physiol Behav. 87(4):734-744.
26. Sclafani A. 2013. Gut-brain nutrient signaling. Appetition vs. satiation. Appetite. 71:454-458.
27. Sclafani A, Abrams M. 1986. Rats show only a weak preference for the artificial sweetener aspartame. Physiol Behav. 37(2):253-256.
28. Sclafani A, Ackroff K. 2006. Nutrient-conditioned flavor preference and incentive value measured by progressive ratio licking in rats. Physiol Behav. 88(1-2):88-94.
29. Sclafani A, Ackroff K. 2012a. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric glucose but not fructose or galactose in C57BL/6J mice. Physiol Behav. 106(4):457-461.
30. Sclafani A, Ackroff K. 2012b. Role of gut nutrient sensing in stimulating appetite and conditioning food preferences. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 302(10):R1119-R1133.
31. Sclafani A, Bahrani M, Zukerman S, Ackroff K. 2010a. Stevia and saccharin preferences in rats and mice. Chem Senses. 35(5):433-443.
32. Sclafani A, Cardieri C, Tucker K, Blusk D, Ackroff K. 1993. Intragastric glucose but not fructose conditions robust flavor preferences in rats. Am J Physiol. 265:R320-R325.
33. Sclafani A, Clare RA. 2004. Female rats show a bimodal preference response to the artificial sweetener sucralose. Chem Senses. 29(6):523-528.
34. Sclafani A, Fanizza LJ, Azzara AV. 1999. Conditioned flavor avoidance, preference, and indifference produced by intragastric infusions of galactose, glucose, and fructose in rats. Physiol Behav. 67(2):227-234.
35. Sclafani A, Glass DS, Margolskee RF, Glendinning JI. 2010b. Gut T1R3 sweet taste receptors do not mediate sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 299(6):R1643-R1650.
36. Sclafani A, Glendinning JI. 2005. Sugar and fat conditioned flavor preferences in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: oral and postoral interactions. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 289(3):R712-R720.
37. Sclafani A, Marambaud P, Ackroff K. 2014a. Sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in sweet ageusic T1r3 and Calhm1 knockout mice. Physiol Behav. 126:25-29.
38. Sclafani A, Zukerman S, Ackroff K. 2014b. Fructose- and glucose-conditioned preferences in FVB mice: strain differences in post-oral sugar appetition. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 307(12):R1448-R1457.
39. Smith JC, Sclafani A. 2002. Saccharin as a sugar surrogate revisited. Appetite. 38(2):155-160.
40. Stephens DN, Brown G. 1999. Disruption of operant oral self-administration of ethanol, sucrose, and saccharin by the AMPA/kainate antagonist, NBQX, but not the AMPA antagonist, GYKI 52466. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 23(12):1914-1920.
41. Tellez LA, Ren X, Han W, Medina S, Ferreira JG, Yeckel CW, de Araujo IE. 2013. Glucose utilization rates regulate intake levels of artificial sweeteners. J Physiol. 591:5727-5744.
42. Tsurugizawa T, Uematsu A, Nakamura E, Hasumura M, Hirota M, Kondoh T, Uneyama H, Torii K. 2009. Mechanisms of neural response to gastrointestinal nutritive stimuli: the gut-brain axis. Gastroenterology. 137(1):262- 273.
43. Tsurugizawa T, Uneyama H. 2014. Differences in BOLD responses to intragastrically infused glucose and saccharin in rats. Chem Senses. 39(8):683-691.
44. Wagner MW. 1971. Comparative rodent preferences for artificial sweeteners. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 75(3):483-490.
45. Warwick ZS, Weingarten HP. 1994. Dissociation of palatability and calorie effects in learned flavor preferences. Physiol Behav. 55(3):501-504.
46. Young PT, Madsen CH Jr. 1963. Individual isohedons in sucrose-sodium chloride and sucrose-saccharin gustatory areas. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 56:903-909.
47. Zukerman S, Ackroff K, Sclafani A. 2011. Rapid post-oral stimulation of intake and flavor conditioning by glucose and fat in the mouse. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 301(6):R1635-R1647.
48. Zukerman S, Ackroff K, Sclafani A. 2013a. Post-oral appetite stimulation by sugars and nonmetabolizable sugar analogs. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 305(7):R840-R853.
49. Zukerman S, Ackroff K, Sclafani A. 2013b. Post-oral glucose stimulation of intake and conditioned flavor preference in C57BL/6J mice: a concentration-response study. Physiol Behav. 109:33-41.
50. Zukerman S, Glendinning JI, Margolskee RF, Sclafani A. 2009. T1R3 taste receptor is critical for sucrose but not Polycose taste. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 296(4):R866-R876.
51. Zukerman S, Glendinning JI, Margolskee RF, Sclafani A. 2013c. Impact of T1r3 and Trpm5 on carbohydrate preference and acceptance in C57BL/6 mice. Chem Senses. 38(5):421-437.