The potential of nanocellulose in the packaging field: A review

Packaging Technology and Science

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 475-508

  Li, Fei ^a   Mascheroni, Erika ^a   Piergiovanni, Luciano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

coating; nanocellulose; nanocomposites; packaging materials; safety

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; BIODEGRADABILITY; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE NANOCRYSTALS; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; COATINGS; MATERIALS PROPERTIES; MORPHOLOGY; NANOCELLULOSE; NANOCOMPOSITE FILMS; NANOCOMPOSITES; PACKAGING;

CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; CONVENTIONAL MATERIALS; FOOD-PACKAGING MATERIALS; INDUSTRIAL SECTOR; INNOVATIVE MATERIALS; PREPARATION METHOD; PROCESS METHODS; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;

PACKAGING MATERIALS;

EID: 84929030368     PISSN: 08943214     EISSN: 10991522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pts.2121     Document Type: Review

References (267)

1. French AD, Bertoniere NR, Brown RM, Chanzy H, Gray D, Hattori K, Glasser W,. In Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Vol. 5, 5th edn., A Seidel, (ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, 2004.
2. Habibi Y,. Key advances in the chemical modification of nanocelluloses. Chemical Society Reviews 2014; 43 (5): 1519-1542. DOI: 10.1039/C3CS60204D.
3. Keijsers ERP, Ybox drawings light down and leftlmaz G, van Dam JEG,. The cellulose resource matrix. Carbohydrate Polymers 2013; 93 (1): 9-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.110.
4. Lee DS, Yam KL, Piergiovanni L,. Food packaging science and technology. CRC Press: Boca Raton: New York, 2008; 243-274.
5. Piergiovanni L,. European Union (EU) packaging. In The Wiley Encyclopedia of Packaging Technology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, 2009; 883-884.
6. Azizi Samir MAS, Alloin F, Dufresne A,. Review of recent research into cellulosic whiskers, their properties and their application in nanocomposite field. Biomacromolecules 2005; 6 (2): 612-626. DOI: 10.1021/bm0493685.
7. Lin N, Huang J, Dufresne A,. Preparation, properties and applications of polysaccharide nanocrystals in advanced functional nanomaterials: a review. Nanoscale 2012; 4 (11): 3274-3294. DOI: 10.1039/C2nr30260h.
8. Lam E, Male KB, Chong JH, Leung AC, Luong JH,. Applications of functionalized and nanoparticle-modified nanocrystalline cellulose. Trends in Biotechnology 2012; 30 (5): 283-290. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.02.001.
9. de Souza Lima MM, Borsali R,. Rodlike cellulose microcrystals: structure, properties, and applications. Macromolecular Rapid Communications 2004; 25 (7): 771-787. DOI: 10.1002/marc.200300268.
10. Phoopuritham P, Thongngam M, Yoksan R, Suppakul P,. Antioxidant properties of selected plant extracts and application in packaging as antioxidant cellulose-based films for vegetable Oil. Packaging Technology and Science 2012; 25 (3): 125-136. DOI: 10.1002/Pts.963.
11. Singh S, Ray SS,. Polylactide based nanostructured biomaterials and their applications. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 2007; 7 (8): 2596-2615.
12. Chivrac F, Pollet E, Avérous L,. Progress in nano-biocomposites based on polysaccharides and nanoclays. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports 2009; 67 (1): 1-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.mser.2009.09.002.
13. Abdel-Mottaleb MM, Neumann D, Lamprecht A,. Lipid nanocapsules for dermal application: a comparative study of lipid-based versus polymer-based nanocarriers. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 2011; 79 (1): 36-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2011.04.009.
14. Gardner DJ, Oporto GS, Mills R, Samir MASA,. Adhesion and surface issues in cellulose and nanocellulose. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology 2008; 22 (5-6): 545-567. DOI: 10.1163/156856108x295509.
15. Berglund LA, Peijs T,. Cellulose biocomposites-from bulk moldings to nanostructured systems. MRS Bulletin 2010; 35 (3): 201-207.
16. Duran N, Lemes AP, Duran M, Freer J, Baeza J,. A minireview of cellulose nanocrystals and its potential integration as co-product in bioethanol production. Journal of the Chilean Chemical Society 2011; 56 (2): 672-677.
17. Charreau H, Foresti ML, Vazquez A,. Nanocellulose patents trends: a comprehensive review on patents on cellulose nanocrystals, microfibrillated and bacterial cellulose. Recent Patents on Nanotechnology 2012. NANOTEC-EPUB-20120626-3 [pii]pp.
18. Duran N, Lemes AP, Seabra AB,. Review of cellulose nanocrystals patents: preparation, composites and general applications. Recent Patents on Nanotechnology 2012; 6 (1): 16-28.
19. Johansson C, Bras J, Mondragon I, Nechita P, Plackett D, Simon P, Svetec DG, Virtanen S, Baschetti MG, Breen C, Clegg F, Aucejo S,. Renewable fibers and bio-based materials for packaging applications-a review of recent developments. Bioresources 2012; 7 (2): 2506-2552.
20. Knoshaug E, Shi B, Shannon T, Mleziva M, Pienkos P,. The potential of photosynthetic aquatic species as sources of useful cellulose fibers-a review. Journal of Applied Phycology 2012; 1-12. DOI: 10.1007/s10811-012-9958-2.
21. Jonas R, Farah LF,. Production and application of microbial cellulose. Polymer Degradation and Stability 1998; 59 (1-3): 101-106. DOI: 10.1016/S0141-3910(97)00197-3.
22. Shoda M, Sugano Y,. Recent advances in bacterial cellulose production. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering 2005; 10 (1): 1-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF02931175.
23. Ross P, Mayer R, Benziman M,. Cellulose biosynthesis and function in bacteria. Microbiological Reviews 1991; 55 (1): 35-58.
24. Chawla PR, Bajaj IB, Survase SA, Singhal RS,. Microbial cellulose: fermentative production and applications. Food Technology and Biotechnology 2009; 47 (2): 107-124.
25. Wan WK, Hutter JL, Milton L, Guhados G,. Bacterial cellulose and its nanocomposites for biomedical applications. In Cellulose Nanocomposites. American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2006; 221-241. DOI: 10.1021/bk-2006-0938.ch015.
26. Kalia S, Dufresne A, Cherian BM, Kaith BS, Averous L, Njuguna J, Nassiopoulos E,. International Journal of Polymer Science 2011. DOI: 10.1155/2011/837875.
27. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J,. Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chemical Society Reviews 2011; 40 (7): 3941-3994. DOI: 10.1039/c0cs00108b.
28. Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ,. Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chemical Reviews 2010; 110 (6): 3479-3500. DOI: 10.1021/Cr900339w.
29. Braconnot H, Sur la conversion du corps ligneux en gomme, en sucre, et en un acide d'une nature particuliere por le moyen de l'acide sulfurique; conversion de la meme substance ligneux en ulmine por la potasse. Annales de Chimie et de Physique 1819; (12): 172-195.
30. Payen A,. Memoire sur la composition du tissu propre des plantes er du ligneux. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences 1838; Vol. 7: 1052-1056.
31. Staudinger H,. Die Chemie der organischen hochmolekularen Stoffe im Sinne der Kekuléschen Strukturlehre. Berichte der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft 1926; 59 (12): 3019-3043.
32. Willför S, Alén R, van Dam J, Liu ZM, Tähtinen M,. Raw materials. In Paper Making Science and Technology Book 6 (Part 1) Chemical Pulping Fibre Chemistry and Technology, P Fardim, (ed.), Paperi ja Puu: Helsinki, 2011.
33. van Dam JEG, Gorshkova TA,. Plant growth and development: plant fiber formation. In Encyclopedia of Applied Plant Sciences, B Thomas, DJ Murphy, BG Murray, (Eds). E.L.A. Press: Amsterdam, 2003; 87-96.
34. Rowland SP, Roberts EJ,. The nature of accessible surfaces in the microstructure of cotton cellulose. Journal of Polymer Science, Part A-1: Polymer Chemistry 1972; 10 (8): 2447-2461. DOI: 10.1002/pol.1972.150100819.
35. Nishiyama Y, Kim UJ, Kim DY, Katsumata KS, May RP, Langan P,. Periodic disorder along ramie cellulose microfibrils. Biomacromolecules 2003; 4 (4): 1013-1017.
36. Atalla RH, Vanderhart DL,. Native cellulose: a composite of two distinct crystalline forms. Science 1984; 223 (4633): 283-285. DOI: 10.1126/science.223.4633.283.
37. VanderHart DL, Atalla R,. Studies of microstructure in native celluloses using solid-state 13C NMR. Macromolecules 1984; 17 (8): 1465-1972. DOI: 10.1021/ma00138a009.
38. Kolpak FJ, Blackwell J,. Mercerization of cellulose: 2. The morphology of mercerized cotton cellulose. Polymer 1978; 19 (2): 132-135.
39. Kolpak FJ, Weih M, Blackwell J,. Mercerization of cellulose: 1. Determination of the structure of mercerized cotton. Polymer 1978; 19 (2): 123-131.
40. Kolpak FJ, Blackwell J,. The structure of regenerated cellulose. Macromolecules 1975; 8 (4): 563-564. DOI: 10.1021/ma60046a037.
41. Langan P, Nishiyama Y, Chanzy H,. A revised structure and hydrogen-bonding system in cellulose II from a neutron fiber diffraction analysis. Journal of the American Chemical Society 1999; 121 (43): 9940-9946.
42. Langan P, Nishiyama Y, Chanzy H,. X-ray structure of mercerized cellulose II at 1 Å resolution. Biomacromolecules 2001; 2 (2): 410-416. DOI: 10.1021/bm005612q.
43. Šturcová A, His I, Wess TJ, Cameron G, Jarvis MC,. Polarized vibrational spectroscopy of fiber polymers: hydrogen bonding in cellulose II. Biomacromolecules 2003; 4 (6): 1589-1595.
44. Osullivan AC,. Cellulose: the structure slowly unravels. Cellulose 1997; 4 (3): 173-207. DOI: 10.1023/a:1018431705579.
45. II Canadian Journal of Chemistry 1985; 63 (1): 173-180. DOI: 10.1139/v85-027.
46. Wada M, Heux L, Nishiyama Y, Langan P,. X-ray crystallographic, scanning microprobe X-ray diffraction, and cross-polarized/magic angle spinning 13C NMR studies of the structure of cellulose IIIII. Biomacromolecules 2008; 10 (2): 302-309. DOI: 10.1021/bm8010227.
47. Chanzy H, Imada K, Mollard A, Vuong R, Barnoud F,. Crystallographic aspects of sub-elementary cellulose fibrils occurring in the wall of rose cells cultured in vitro. Protoplasma 1979; 100 (3-4): 303-316. DOI: 10.1007/BF01279318.
48. Helbert W, Sugiyama J, Ishihara M, Yamanaka S,. Characterization of native crystalline cellulose in the cell walls of Oomycota. Journal of Biotechnology 1997; 57 (1-3): 29-37. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1656(97)00084-9.
49. Zhang L, Ruan D, Zhou J,. Structure and properties of regenerated cellulose films prepared from cotton linters in NaOH/urea aqueous solution. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 2001; 40 (25): 5923-5928.
50. Bartell FE, Cowling H,. Depolymermiation of cellulose in viscose production. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry 1942; 34 (5): 607-612. DOI: 10.1021/ie50389a017.
51. Yamashiki T, Matsui T, Kowsaka K, Saitoh M, Okajima, K, Kamide K,. New class of cellulose fiber spun from the novel solution of cellulose by wet spinning method. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 1992; 44 (4): 691-698. DOI: 10.1002/app.1992.070440416.
52. Terbojevich M, Cosani A, Conio G, Ciferri A, Bianchi E,. Mesophase formation and chain rigidity in cellulose and derivatives. 3. Aggregation of cellulose in N,N-dimethylacetamide-lithium chloride. Macromolecules 1985; 18 (4): 640-646. DOI: 10.1021/ma00146a011.
53. Graenacher C, Sallman R,. Organic N-oxides for dissolving cellulose. U.S. Patent 1939
54. Hudson SM, Cuculo JA,. The solubility of cellulose in liquid ammonia/salt solutions. Journal of Polymer Science, Polymer Chemistry Edition 1980; 18 (12): 3469-3481. DOI: 10.1002/pol.1980.170181214.
55. Coma V, Couturier Y, Pascat B, Bureau G, Guilbert S, Cuq JL,. Biodegradability of packaging materials using a respirometric method. Packaging Technology and Science 1994; 7 (2): 87-98. DOI: 10.1002/pts.2770070206.
56. Coma V, Couturier Y, Pascat B, Bureau G, Guilbert S, Cuq JL,. Estimation of the biodegradability of packaging materials by a screening test and a weight-loss method. Packaging Technology and Science 1994; 7 (1): 27-37. DOI: 10.1002/pts.2770070106.
57. Eichhorn SJ, Dufresne A, Aranguren M, Marcovich E, Capadona JR, Rowan SJ, Weder C, Thielemans W, Roman M, Renneckar S, Gindl W, Veigel S, Keckes J, Yano H, Abe K, Nogi M, Nakagaito AN, Mangalam A, Simonsen J, Benight AS, Bismarck A, Berglund LA, Peijs T,. Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. Journal of Materials Science 2010; 45 (1): 1-33. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-009-3874-0.
58. Rånby BG, Noe RW,. Crystallization of cellulose and cellulose derivatives from dilute solution. I. Growth of single crystals. Journal of Polymer Science 1961; 51 (155): 337-347. DOI: 10.1002/pol.1961.1205115520.
59. Revol JF, Bradford H, Giasson J, Marchessault RH, Gray DG,. Helicoidal self-ordering of cellulose microfibrils in aqueous suspension. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 1992; 14 (3): 170-172. DOI: 10.1016/S0141-8130(05)80008-X.
60. Favier V, Canova GR, Cavaillé JY, Chanzy H, Dufresne A, Gauthier C,. Nanocomposite materials from latex and cellulose whiskers. Polymers for Advanced Technologies 1995; 6 (5): 351-355. DOI: 10.1002/pat.1995.220060514.
61. Favier V, Chanzy H, Cavaille JY,. Polymer nanocomposites reinforced by cellulose whiskers. Macromolecules 1995; 28 (18): 6365-6367. DOI: 10.1021/ma00122a053.
62. Li F, Biagioni P, Finazzi M, Tavazzi S, Piergiovanni L,. Tunable green oxygen barrier through layer-by-layer self-assembly of chitosan and cellulose nanocrystals. Carbohydrate Polymers 2013; 92 (2): 2128-2134. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.091.
63. Commission E,. Commission Recommendation of 18 October 2011 on the definition of nanomaterial Text with EEA relevance. 2011 [cited 2013 July 18]; Research and technological development]. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32011H0696:EN:NOT.
64. Reig CS, Lopez AD, Ramos MH, Ballester VAC,. Nanomaterials: a map for their selection in food packaging applications. Packaging Technology and Science 2014. DOI: 10.1002/pts.2076.
65. Commission E,. REGULATION No 1282/2011 of 28 November 2011 amending and correcting Commission Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 on plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with food. Official Journal of the European Union: Brussels 2011; L 328/22.
66. Commission E,. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee-Second Regulatory Review on Nanomaterials. Brussels, 2012.
67. Rebouillat S, Pla F,. State of the Art manufacturing and engineering of nanocellulose: a review of available data and industrial applications. Journal of Biomaterials and Nanobiotechnology 2013; 4 (2): 165-188. DOI: 10.4236/jbnb.2013.42022.
68. Chen WS, Yu H, Liu Yi, Hai Y, Zhang M, Chen P,. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from four plant cellulose fibers using a chemical-ultrasonic process. Cellulose 2011; 18 (2): 433-442. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-011-9497-z.
69. Meyabadi TF, Dadashian F,. Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of waste cotton fibers for nanoparticles production using response surface methodology. Fibers and Polymers 2012; 13 (3): 313-321. DOI: 10.1007/s12221-012-0313-7.
70. Siqueira G, Tapin-Lingua S, Bras J, Perez DD, Dufresne A,. Morphological investigation of nanoparticles obtained from combined mechanical shearing, and enzymatic and acid hydrolysis of sisal fibers. Cellulose 2010; 17 (6): 1147-1158. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-010-9449-z.
71. Imai T, Boisset C, Samejima M, Igarashi K, Sugiyama J,. Unidirectional processive action of cellobiohydrolase Cel7A on Valonia cellulose microcrystals. FEBS Letters 1998; 432 (3): 113-116. DOI: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)00845-x.
72. Pandey JK, Lee JW, Chu WS, Kim CS, Ahn SH,. Cellulose nano whiskers from grass of Korea. Macromolecular Research 2008; 16 (5): 396-398.
73. Pandey JK, Chu WS, Kim CS, Lee CS, Ahn SH,. Bio-nano reinforcement of environmentally degradable polymer matrix by cellulose whiskers from grass. Composites Part B-Engineering 2009; 40 (7): 676-680. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.013.
74. Nickerson RF, Habrle JA,. Cellulose intercrystalline structure. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry 1947; 39 (11): 1507-1512. DOI: 10.1021/ie50455a024.
75. Marchessault RH, Morehead FF, Koch MJ,. Some hydrodynamic properties of neutral suspensions of cellulose crystallites as related to size and shape. Journal of Colloid Science 1961; 16 (4): 327-344. DOI: 10.1016/0095-8522(61)90033-2.
76. Araki J, Wada M, Kuga S, Okano T,. Flow properties of microcrystalline cellulose suspension prepared by acid treatment of native cellulose. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 1998; 142 (1): 75-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0927-7757(98)00404-x.
77. Dong XM, Revol J-F, Gray DG,. Effect of microcrystallite preparation conditions on the formation of colloid crystals of cellulose. Cellulose 1998; 5 (1): 19-32. DOI: 10.1023/a:1009260511939.
78. de Souza Lima MM, Borsali R,. Static and dynamic light scattering from polyelectrolyte microcrystal cellulose. Langmuir 2002; 18 (4): 992-996. DOI: 10.1021/la0105127.
79. Roman M, Winter WT,. Effect of sulfate groups from sulfuric acid hydrolysis on the thermal degradation behavior of bacterial cellulose. Biomacromolecules 2004; 5 (5): 1671-1677. DOI: 10.1021/bm034519+.
80. Håkansson H, Ahlgren P,. Acid hydrolysis of some industrial pulps: effect of hydrolysis conditions and raw material. Cellulose 2005; 12 (2): 177-183. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-004-1038-6.
81. Bondeson D, Mathew A, Oksman K,. Optimization of the isolation of nanocrystals from microcrystalline cellulose by acid hydrolysis. Cellulose 2006; 13 (2): 171-180. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-006-9061-4.
82. Elazzouzi-Hafraoui S, Nishiyama Y, Putaux JL, Heux L, Dubreuil F, Rochas C,. The shape and size distribution of crystalline nanoparticles prepared by acid hydrolysis of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 2008; 9 (1): 57-65. DOI: 10.1021/Bm700769p.
83. Bendahou AHY, Kaddami H, Dufresne A,. Physicochemical characterization of palm from Phoenix dactylifera- L, preparation of cellulose whiskers and natural rubber based nanocomposites. Journal of Biobased Materials and Bioenergy 2009; 3 (1): 81-90. DOI: 10.1166/jbmb.2009.1011.
84. Rosa MF, Medeiros ES, Malmonge JA, Gregorski KS, Wood DF, Mattoso LHC, Glenn G, Orts WJ, Imam SH,. Cellulose nanowhiskers from coconut husk fibers: effect of preparation conditions on their thermal and morphological behavior. Carbohydrate Polymers 2010; 81 (1): 83-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.01.059.
85. Taipina F, Iwamoto S, Hori N, Iwata T, Takemura A,. Effect of pre-acid-hydrolysis treatment on morphology and properties of cellulose nanowhiskers from coconut husk. Cellulose 2011; 18 (2): 443-450. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-010-9480-0.
86. Okano T, Kuga S, Wada M, Araki J, Ikuina J,. Nisshin Oil Mills Ltd. 98-151052. J. Patent 1999
87. Filpponen I,. The Synthetic Strategies for Unique Properties in Cellulose Nanocrystal Materials. Department of Forest Biomaterials 2009; Ph.D. Thesis, 202.
88. Filson PB, Dawson-Andoh BE,. Sono-chemical preparation of cellulose nanocrystals from lignocellulose derived materials. Bioresource Technology 2009; 100 (7): 2259-2264. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.09.062.
89. Leung AC, Hrapovic S, Lam E, Liu Y, Male KB, Mahmoud KA, Luong JH,. Characteristics and properties of carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals prepared from a novel one-step procedure. Small 2011; 7 (3): 302-305. DOI: 10.1002/smll.201001715.
90. Salame M,. The use of barrier polymers in food and beverage packaging. Technologic Publishing Co. Inc.: Lancaster USA, 1989.
91. Sangaj NS, Malshe VC,. Permeability of polymers in protective organic coatings. Progress in Organic Coatings 2004; 50 (1): 28-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2003.09.015.
92. Li F, Biagioni P, Bollani M, Maccagnan A, Piergiovanni L,. Multi-functional coating of cellulose nanocrystals for flexible packaging applications. Cellulose 2013; 20 (5): 2491-2504. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-013-0015-3.
93. Iwamoto S, Abe K, Yano H,. The effect of hemi- celluloses on wood pulp nanofibrillation and nanofiber network characteristics. Biomacromolecules 2008; 9 (3): 1022-1026. DOI: 10.1021/bm701157n.
94. Spence KL, Venditti RA, Habibi Y, Rojas OJ, Pawlak JJ,. The effect of chemical composition on microfibrillar cellulose films from wood pulps: mechanical processing and physical properties. Bioresource Technology 2010; 101 (15): 5961-5968. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.104.
95. Spence KL, Venditti RA, Rojas OJ, Habibi Y, Pawlak JJ,. The effect of chemical composition on microfibrillar cellulose films from wood pulps: water interactions and physical properties for packaging applications. Cellulose 2010; 17 (4): 835-848. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-010-9424-8.
96. Spence K, Venditti R, Rojas O, Pawlak J,. Effects of lignin on processing and properties of microfibrillated cellulose. Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society 2011; 241.
97. Nakagaito A, Yano H,. The effect of morphological changes from pulp fiber towards nano-scale fibrillated cellulose on the mechanical properties of high-strength plant fiber based composites. Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing 2004; 78 (4): 547-552. DOI: 10.1007/s00339-003-2453-5.
98. Pääkkö M, Ankerfors M, Kosonen H, Nykänen A, Ahola S, Österberg M, Ruokolainen J, Laine J, Larsson PT, Ikkala O, Lindström T,. Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules 2007; 8 (6): 1934-1941. DOI: 10.1021/Bm061215p.
99. Berglund LA,. Cellulose-based nanocomposites. In Natural Fibers, Biopolymers, and Biocomposites, AK Mohanty, M Misra, LT Drzal, (eds.), CRC Press: London, 2005.
100. Nakagaito AN, Yano H,. Novel high-strength biocomposites based on microfibrillated cellulose having nano-order-unit web-like network structure. Applied Physics a-Materials Science & Processing 2005; 80 (1): 155-159. DOI: 10.1007/s00339-003-2225-2.
101. Nakagaito AN, Iwamoto S, Yano H,. Bacterial cellulose: the ultimate nano-scalar cellulose morphology for the production of high-strength composites. Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing 2005; 80 (1): 93-97. DOI: 10.1007/s00339-004-2932-3.
102. Saito T, Nishiyama Y, Putaux J-L, Vignon M, Isogai A,. Homogeneous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 2006; 7 (6): 1687-1691. DOI: 10.1021/bm060154s.
103. Liimatainen H, Visanko M, Sirvio JA, Hormi OEO, Niinimaki J,. Enhancement of the nanofibrillation of wood cellulose through sequential periodate-chlorite oxidation. Biomacromolecules 2012; 13 (5): 1592-1597. DOI: 10.1021/Bm300319m.
104. Peng C, Wenshuai C, Yunfei H,. Preparation Method of Homogenized Fine Nano-Cellulose Fiber. CN 101851295A. S.I.P.O. (SIPO), 2010.
105. Peng C, Wenshuai C, Yixing L,. Method for Preparing Nanometer Cellulose Fiber through Combining Ultrasound and Highpressure Homogenization Treatment. CN101851801A. S.I.P.O. (SIPO), 2010.
106. Saito T, Okita Y, Nge TT, Sugiyama J, Isogai A,. TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose: microscopic analysis of fibrous fractions in the oxidized products. Carbohydrate Polymers 2006; 65 (4): 435-440. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.01.034.
107. Saito T, Kimura S, Nishiyama Y, Isogai A,. Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 2007; 8 (8): 2485-2491. DOI: 10.1021/Bm0703970.
108. Araki J, Wada M, Kuga S,. Steric stabilization of a cellulose microcrystal suspension by poly(ethylene glycol) grafting. Langmuir 2000; 17 (1): 21-27. DOI: 10.1021/la001070m.
109. Habibi Y, Chanzy H, Vignon MR,. TEMPO-mediated surface oxidation of cellulose whiskers. Cellulose 2006; 13 (6): 679-687.
110. Zhu JY, Sabo R, Luo XL,. Integrated production of nano-fibrillated cellulose and cellulosic biofuel (ethanol) by enzymatic fractionation of wood fibers. Green Chemistry 2011; 13 (5): 1339-1344. DOI: 10.1039/C1gc15103g.
111. Iwamoto S, Nakagaito AN, Yano H,. Nano-fibrillation of pulp fibers for the processing of transparent nanocomposites. Applied Physics A: Materials Science & Processing 2007; 89 (2): 461-466. DOI: 10.1007/s00339-007-4175-6.
112. Isogai A, Saito T, Fukuzumi H,. TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale 2011; 3 (1): 71-85. DOI: 10.1039/C0nr00583e.
113. Zoppe JO, Venditti RA, Rojas OJ,. Pickering emulsions stabilized by cellulose nanocrystals grafted with thermo-responsive polymer brushes. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2012; 369 (1): 202-209. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.12.011.
114. Zoppe JO, Peresin MS, Habibi Y, Venditti RA, Rojas OJ,. Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) brushes grafted from cellulose nanocrystals via surface-initiated single-electron transfer living radical polymerization. Biomacromolecules 2010; 11 (10): 2683-2691. DOI: 10.1021/Bm100719d.
115. Alloin F, D'Aprea A, El Kissi N, Dufresne A, Bossard F,. Nanocomposite polymer electrolyte based on whisker or microfibrils polyoxyethylene nanocomposites. Electrochimica Acta 2010; 55 (18): 5186-5194. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.04.034.
116. Zoppe JO, Peresin MS, Habibi Y, Venditti RA, Rojas OJ,. Reinforcing poly(epsilon-caprolactone) nanofibers with cellulose nanocrystals. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2009; 1 (9): 1996-2004. DOI: 10.1021/Am9003705.
117. de Menezes AJ, Siqueira G, Curvelo AAS, Dufresne A,. Extrusion and characterization of functionalized cellulose whiskers reinforced polyethylene nanocomposites. Polymer 2009; 50 (19): 4552-4563. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2009.07.038.
118. Csoka L, Hoeger IC, Rojas OJ, Peszlen I, Pawlak JJ, Peralta PN,. Piezoelectric effect of cellulose nanocrystals thin films. ACS Macro Letters 2012; 1 (7): 867-870. DOI: 10.1021/Mz300234a.
119. Fox J, Wie JJ, Greenland BW, Burattini S, Hayes W, Colquhoun HM, Mackay ME, Rowan SJ,. High-strength, healable, supramolecular polymer nanocomposites. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2012; 134 (11): 5362-5368. DOI: 10.1021/Ja300050x.
120. Tang LM, Weder C,. Cellulose whisker/epoxy resin nanocomposites. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2010; 2 (4): 1073-1080. DOI: 10.1021/Am900830h.
121. Azizi Samir MAS, Alloin F, Dufresne A,. High performance nanocomposite polymer electrolytes. Composite Interfaces 2006; 13 (4-6): 545-559.
122. Azizi Samir MAS, Alloin F, Sanchez JY, Dufresne A,. Cellulose nanocrystals reinforced poly(oxyethylene). Polymer 2004; 45 (12): 4149-4157. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.03.094.
123. Elanthikkal S, Gopalakrishnapanicker U, Varghese S, Guthrie JT,. Cellulose microfibres produced from banana plant wastes: isolation and characterization. Carbohydrate Polymers 2010; 80 (3): 852-859. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.12.043.
124. Zuluaga R, Putaux JL, Cruz J, Velez J, Mondragon I, Ganan P,. Cellulose microfibrils from banana rachis: effect of alkaline treatments on structural and morphological features. Carbohydrate Polymers 2009; 76 (1): 51-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.09.024.
125. Liu DY, Yuan XW, Bhattacharyya D,. The effects of cellulose nanowhiskers on electrospun poly(lactic acid) nanofibres. Journal of Materials Science 2012; 47 (7): 3159-3165. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-011-6150-z.
126. Lee KY, Tammelin T, Schulfter K, Kiiskinen H, Samela J, Bismarck A,. High performance cellulose nanocomposites: comparing the reinforcing ability of bacterial cellulose and nanofibrillated cellulose. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2012; 4 (8): 4078-4086. DOI: 10.1021/am300852a.
127. Kalashnikova I, Bizot H, Cathala B, Capron I,. Modulation of cellulose nanocrystals amphiphilic properties to stabilize oil/water interface. Biomacromolecules 2012; 13 (1): 267-275. DOI: 10.1021/Bm201599j.
128. Johnsy G, Siddaramaiah H,. High performance edible nanocomposite films containing bacterial cellulose nanocrystals. Carbohydrate Polymers 2012; 87 (3): 2031-2037. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.10.019.
129. Lavoine N, Desloges I, Dufresne A, Bras J,. Microfibrillated cellulose-its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review. Carbohydrate Polymers 2012; 90 (2): 735-764. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.026.
130. Siro I, Plackett D,. Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 2010; 17 (3): 459-494. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-010-9405-y.
131. Hermans PH,. Physics and chemistry of cellulose fibers: with particular reference to rayon. Elsevier Pub: Amsterdam, 1949.
132. Nevell TP, Zeronian SH,. Cellulose chemistry and its application. E. Horwood Ltd: Chichester UK, 1985.
133. Heinze U, Wagenknecht W,. Comprehensive cellulose chemistry: functionalisation of cellulose. Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 1998.
134. Peng BL, Dhar N, Liu HL, Tam KC,. Chemistry and applications of nanocrystalline cellulose and its derivatives: a nanotechnology perspective. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 2011; 89 (5): 1191-1206. DOI: 10.1002/Cjce.20554.
135. Havimo M, Jalomaki J, Granstrom M, Rissanen A, Iivanainen T, Kemell M, Heikkila M, Sipi M, Kilpelainen I,. Mechanical strength and water resistance of paperboard coated with long chain cellulose esters. Packaging Technology and Science 2011; 24 (4): 249-258. DOI: Doi 10.1002/Pts.932.
136. Habibi Y, Dufresne A,. Highly filled bionanocomposites from functionalized polysaccharide nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules 2008; 9 (7): 1974-1980. DOI: 10.1021/Bm8001717.
137. Mangalam AP, Simonsen J, Benight AS,. Cellulose/DNA hybrid nanomaterials. Biomacromolecules 2009; 10 (3): 497-504. DOI: 10.1021/Bm800925x.
138. Cao XD, Habibi Y, Lucia LA,. One-pot polymerization, surface grafting, and processing of waterborne polyurethane-cellulose nanocrystal nanocomposites. Journal of Materials Chemistry 2009; 19 (38): 7137-7145. DOI: 10.1039/B910517d.
139. Ljungberg N, Bonini C, Bortolussi F, Boisson C, Heux L, Cavaillé JY,. New nanocomposite materials reinforced with cellulose whiskers in atactic polypropylene: effect of surface and dispersion characteristics. Biomacromolecules 2005; 6 (5): 2732-2739. DOI: 10.1021/bm050222v.
140. Siqueira G, Bras J, Dufresne A,. New process of chemical grafting of cellulose nanoparticles with a long chain isocyanate. Langmuir 2010; 26 (1): 402-411. DOI: 10.1021/La9028595.
141. Wang J-S, Matyjaszewski K,. Controlled/«living» radical polymerization. Atom transfer radical polymerization in the presence of transition-metal complexes. Journal of the American Chemical Society 1995; 117 (20): 5614-5615.
142. Morandi G, Heath L, Thielemans W,. Cellulose nanocrystals grafted with polystyrene chains through surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization (SI-ATRP). Langmuir 2009; 25 (14): 8280-8286. DOI: 10.1021/La900452a.
143. Yi J, Xu QX, Zhang XF, Zhang HL,. Chiral-nematic self-ordering of rodlike cellulose nanocrystals grafted with poly(styrene) in both thermotropic and lyotropic states. Polymer 2008; 49 (20): 4406-4412. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.08.008.
144. Yi J, Xu QX, Zhang XF, Zhang HL,. Temperature-induced chiral nematic phase changes of suspensions of poly(N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate)-grafted cellulose nanocrystals. Cellulose 2009; 16 (6): 989-997. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-009-9350-9.
145. Habibi Y, Goffin AL, Schiltz N, Duquesne E, Dubois P, Dufresne A,. Bionanocomposites based on poly(epsilon-caprolactone)-grafted cellulose nanocrystals by ring-opening polymerization. Journal of Materials Chemistry 2008; 18 (41): 5002-5010. DOI: 10.1039/B809212e.
146. Goussé C, Chanzy H, Excoffier G, Soubeyrand L, Fleury E,. Stable suspensions of partially silylated cellulose whiskers dispersed in organic solvents. Polymer 2002; 43 (9): 2645-2651. DOI: 10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00051-4.
147. Grunert M, Winter WT,. Nanocomposites of cellulose acetate butyrate reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals. Journal of Polymers and the Environment 2002; 10 (1-2): 27-30.
148. Hasani M, Cranston ED, Westman G, Gray DG,. Cationic surface functionalization of cellulose nanocrystals. Soft Matter 2008; 4 (11): 2238-2244. DOI: 10.1039/B806789a.
149. Dong SP, Roman M,. Fluorescently labeled cellulose nanocrystals for bioimaging applications. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2007; 129 (45): 13810. DOI: 10.1021/Ja076196l.
150. Kim J, Montero G, Habibi Y, Hinestroza JP, Genzer J, Argyropoulos DS, Rojas OJ,. Dispersion of cellulose crystallites by nonionic surfactants in a hydrophobic polymer matrix. Polymer Engineering and Science 2009; 49 (10): 2054-2061. DOI: 10.1002/Pen.21417.
151. Padalkar S, Capadona JR, Rowan SJ, Weder C, Won YH, Stanciu LA, Moon RJ,. Natural biopolymers: novel templates for the synthesis of nanostructures. Langmuir 2010; 26 (11): 8497-8502. DOI: 10.1021/La904439p.
152. Zhou Q, Brumer H, Teeri TT,. Self-organization of cellulose nanocrystals adsorbed with xyloglucan oligosaccharide-poly(ethylene glycol)-polystyrene triblock copolymer. Macromolecules 2009; 42 (15): 5430-5432. DOI: 10.1021/Ma901175j.
153. Heux L, Chauve G, Bonini C,. Nonflocculating and chiral-nematic self-ordering of cellulose microcrystals suspensions in nonpolar solvents. Langmuir 2000; 16 (21): 8210-8212. DOI: 10.1021/la9913957.
154. Cao XD, Habibi Y, Magalhaes WLE, Rojas OJ, Lucia LA,. Cellulose nanocrystals-based nanocomposites: fruits of a novel biomass research and teaching platform. Current Science 2011; 100 (8): 1172-1176.
155. Decher G,. Fuzzy nanoassemblies: toward layered polymeric multicomposites. Science 1997; 277 (5330): 1232-1237.
156. Jang WS, Rawson I, Grunlan JC,. Layer-by-layer assembly of thin film oxygen barrier. Thin Solid Films 2008; 516 (15): 4819-4825.
157. Priolo MA, Gamboa D, Holder KM, Grunlan JC,. Super gas barrier of transparent polymer-clay multilayer ultrathin films. Nano Letters 2010; 10 (12): 4970-4974.
158. Svagan AJ, Åkesson A, Cárdenas M, Bulut S, Knudsen JC, Risbo J, Plackett D,. Transparent films based on PLA and montmorillonite with tunable oxygen barrier properties. Biomacromolecules 2012; 13 (2): 397-405.
159. Yang YH, Haile M, Park YT, Malek FA, Grunlan JC,. Super gas barrier of all-polymer multilayer thin films. Macromolecules 2011; 44 (6): 1450-1459.
160. Nuraje N, Asmatulu R, Cohen RE, Rubner MF,. Durable antifog films from layer-by-layer molecularly blended hydrophilic polysaccharides. Langmuir 2010; 27 (2): 782-791.
161. Zhai L, Cebeci FÇ, Cohen RE, Rubner MF,. Stable superhydrophobic coatings from polyelectrolyte multilayers. Nano Letters 2004; 4 (7): 1349-1353.
162. Zhang L, Sun J,. Layer-by-layer codeposition of polyelectrolyte complexes and free polyelectrolytes for the fabrication of polymeric coatings. Macromolecules 2010; 43 (5): 2413-2420.
163. Dvoracek CM, Sukhonosova G, Benedik MJ, Grunlan JC,. Antimicrobial behavior of polyelectrolyte - surfactant thin film assemblies. Langmuir 2009; 25 (17): 10322-10328.
164. Etienne O, Gasnier C, Taddei C, Voegel JC, Aunis D, Schaaf P, Metz-Boutigue MH, Bolcato-Bellemin AL, Egles C,. Antifungal coating by biofunctionalized polyelectrolyte multilayered films. Biomaterials 2005; 26 (33): 6704-6712.
165. Chung AJ, Rubner MF,. Methods of loading and releasing Low molecular weight cationic molecules in weak polyelectrolyte multilayer films. Langmuir 2002; 18 (4): 1176-1183.
166. Kim BS, Park SW, Hammond PT,. Hydrogen-bonding layer-by-layer-assembled biodegradable polymeric micelles as drug delivery vehicles from surfaces. ACS Nano 2008; 2 (2): 386-392.
167. Jean B, Heux L, Dubreuil F, Chambat G, Cousin F,. Non-electrostatic building of biomimetic cellulose-xyloglucan multilayers. Langmuir 2009; 25 (7): 3920-3923. DOI: 10.1021/La802801q.
168. Podsiadlo P, Choi SY, Shim B, Lee J, Cuddihy M, Kotov NA,. Molecularly engineered nanocomposites: Layer-by-layer assembly of cellulose nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules 2005; 6 (6): 2914-2918. DOI: 10.1021/Bm050333u.
169. Aulin C, Johansson E, Wagberg L, Lindstrom T,. Self-organized films from cellulose I nanofibrils using the layer-by-layer technique. Biomacromolecules 2010; 11 (4): 872-882. DOI: 10.1021/Bm100075e.
170. de Mesquita JP, Donnici CL, Pereira FV,. Biobased nanocomposites from layer-by-layer assembly of cellulose nanowhiskers with chitosan. Biomacromolecules 2010; 11 (2): 473-480. DOI: 10.1021/Bm9011985.
171. Nakajima T,. Advanced fiber spinning technology. Woodhead Publishing Limited: Japan, 1994.
172. Bhardwaj N, Kundu SC,. Electrospinning: a fascinating fiber fabrication technique. Biotechnology Advances 2010; 28 (3): 325-347. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.01.004.
173. Frenot A, Chronakis IS,. Polymer nanofibers assembled by electrospinning. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 2003; 8 (1): 64-75.
174. Park WI, Kang M, Kim HS, Jin HJ,. Electro-spinning of poly(ethylene oxide) with bacterial cellulose whiskers. Macromolecular Symposia 2007; 249-250 (1): 289-294. DOI: 10.1002/masy.200750347.
175. Park DJ, Choi Y, Heo S, Cho SY, Jin HJ,. Bacterial cellulose nanocrystals-embedded silk nanofibers. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 2012; 12 (7): 6139-6144.
176. Magalhaes WL, Cao X, Lucia LA,. Cellulose nanocrystals/cellulose core-in-shell nanocomposite assemblies. Langmuir 2009; 25 (22): 13250-13257. DOI: 10.1021/la901928j.
177. Magalhaes WLE, Cao XD, Ramires MA, Lucia LA,. Novel all-cellulose composite displaying aligned cellulose nanofibers reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals. Tappi Journal 2011; 10 (4): 19-25.
178. Ago M, Okajima K, Jakes JE, Park S, Rojas OJ,. Lignin-based electrospun nanofibers reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules 2012; 13 (3): 918-926. DOI: 10.1021/Bm201828g.
179. Fortunato G, Zimmermann T, Lubben J, Bordeanu N, Hufenus R,. Reinforcement of polymeric submicrometer-sized fibers by microfibrillated cellulose. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 2012; 297 (6): 576-584. DOI: 10.1002/mame.201100408.
180. Martinez-Sanz M, Lopez Rubio A, Lagaron JM,. On the optimization of the dispersion of unmodified bacterial cellulose nanowhiskers into polylactide Via melt compounding to significantly enhance barrier and mechanical properties. Biomacromolecules 2012; 13 (11): 3887-3899. DOI: 10.1021/bm301430j.
181. Peresin MS, Habibi Y, Vesterinen AH, Rojas OJ, Pawlak JJ, Seppala JV,. Effect of moisture on electrospun nanofiber composites of poly(vinyl alcohol) and cellulose nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules 2010; 11 (9): 2471-2477. DOI: 10.1021/Bm1006689.
182. Peresin MS, Habibi Y, Zoppe JO, Pawlak JJ, Rojas OJ,. Nanofiber composites of polyvinyl alcohol and cellulose nanocrystals: manufacture and characterization. Biomacromolecules 2010; 11 (3): 674-681. DOI: 10.1021/Bm901254n.
183. Rojas OJ, Montero GA, Habibi Y,. Electrospun nanocomposites from polystyrene loaded with cellulose nanowhiskers. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2009; 113: 927-935.
184. Xiang CH, Joo YL, Frey MW,. Nanocomposite fibers electrospun from poly(lactic acid)/cellulose nanocrystals. Journal of Biobased Materials and Bioenergy 2009; 3 (2): 147-155. DOI: 10.1166/jbmb.2009.1016.
185. Medeiros ES, Mattoso LHC, Ito EN, Gregorski KS, Robertson GH, Offeman RD, Wood DF, Orts WJ, Imam SH,. Electrospun nanofibers of poly(vinyl alcohol) reinforced with cellulose nanofibrils. Journal of Biobased Materials and Bioenergy 2008; 2 (3): 231-242. DOI: 10.1166/jbmb.2009.411.
186. Miao C, Hamad W,. Cellulose reinforced polymer composites and nanocomposites: a critical review. Cellulose 2013; 20 (5): 2221-2262. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-013-0007-3.
187. Bondeson D, Oksman K,. Dispersion and characteristics of surfactant modified cellulose whiskers nanocomposites. Composite Interfaces 2007; 14 (7-9): 617-630.
188. Alloin F, D'Aprea A, Dufresne A, El Kissi N, Bossard F,. Poly(oxyethylene) and ramie whiskers based nanocomposites: influence of processing: extrusion and casting/evaporation. Cellulose 2011; 18 (4): 957-973. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-011-9543-x.
189. Lemahieu L, Bras J, Tiquet P, Augier S, Dufresne A,. Extrusion of nanocellulose-reinforced nanocomposites using the dispersed nano-objects protective encapsulation (DOPE) process. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 2011; 296 (11): 984-991. DOI: 10.1002/mame.201100015.
190. Chen G, Dufresne A, Huang J, Chang PR,. A novel thermoformable bionanocomposite based on cellulose nanocrystal-graft-poly(ε-caprolactone). Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 2009; 294 (1): 59-67. DOI: 10.1002/mame.200800261.
191. Okubo K, Fujii T, Thostenson ET,. Multi-scale hybrid biocomposite: processing and mechanical characterization of bamboo fiber reinforced PLA with microfibrillated cellulose. Composites Part a Applied Science and Manufacturing 2009; 40 (4): 469-475. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.01.012.
192. Svagan AJ, Azizi Samir MAS, Berglund LA,. Biomimetic polysaccharide nanocomposites of high cellulose content and high toughness. Biomacromolecules 2007; 8 (8): 2556-2563. DOI: 10.1021/Bm0703160.
193. Svagan AJ, Hedenqvist MS, Berglund LA,. Reduced water vapour sorption in cellulose nanocomposites with starch matrix. Composites Science and Technology 2009; 69 (3-4): 500-506. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.11.016.
194. van den Berg O, Schroeter M, Capadona JR, Weder C,. Nanocomposites based on cellulose whiskers and (semi)conducting conjugated polymers. Journal of Materials Chemistry 2007; 17 (26): 2746-2753. DOI: 10.1039/B700878C.
195. Farris S, Piergiovanni L,. Emerging coating technologies for food and beverage packaging materials. In Emerging food packaging technologies: principles and practice, KL Yam, DS Lee, (eds.), Woodhead Publishing Ltd: Oxford UK, 2012; 274-302.
196. Piergiovanni L, Li F, Farris S,. Coatings of bio-based materials on flexible food packaging: opportunities for problem solving and innovations. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 2013; 51 (11): 867-1048.
197. Aulin C, Gallstedt M, Lindstrom T,. Oxygen and oil barrier properties of microfibrillated cellulose films and coatings. Cellulose 2010; 17 (3): 559-574. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-009-9393-y.
198. Hult EL, Iotti M, Lenes M,. Efficient approach to high barrier packaging using microfibrillar cellulose and shellac. Cellulose 2010; 17 (3): 575-586. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-010-9408-8.
199. Sanchez-Garcia MD, Hilliou L, Lagaron JM,. Morphology and water barrier properties of nanobiocomposites of k/i-hybrid Carrageenan and cellulose nanowhiskers. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2010; 58 (24): 12847-12857. DOI: 10.1021/Jf102764e.
200. da Silva JBA, Pereira FV, Druzian JI,. Cassava starch-based films plasticized with sucrose and inverted sugar and reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals. Journal of Food Science 2012; 77 (6): N14-N19. DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02710.x.
201. Spence KL, Venditti RA, Rojas OJ, Pawlak JJ, Hubbe MA,. Water vapor barrier properties of coated and filled microfibrillated cellulose composite films. Bioresources 2011; 6 (4): 4370-4388.
202. Matthews B, Mangalasary S, Darby D, Cooksey K,. Effectiveness of barrier film with a cellulose coating that carries nisin blends for the inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes. Packaging Technology and Science 2010; 23 (5): 267-273. DOI: 10.1002/Pts.894.
203. Nishino T, Matsuda I, Hirao K,. All-cellulose composite. Macromolecules 2004; 37 (20): 7683-7687. DOI: 10.1021/Ma049300h.
204. Ward IM, Hine PJ,. Novel composites by hot compaction of fibers. Polymer Engineering and Science 1997; 37 (11): 1809-1814. DOI: 10.1002/Pen.11830.
205. Chaffey CE, Taraiya AK, Ward IM,. Orientation in polypropylene sheets produced by die-drawing and rolling. Polymer Engineering and Science 1997; 37 (11): 1774-1784. DOI: 10.1002/Pen.11826.
206. Huber T, Müssig J, Curnow O, Pang S, Bickerton S, Staiger M,. A critical review of all-cellulose composites. Journal of Materials Science 2012; 47 (3): 1171-1186. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-011-5774-3.
207. Gindl W, Keckes J,. All-cellulose nanocomposite. Polymer 2005; 46 (23): 10221-10225. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.08.040.
208. Lu X, Zhang MQ, Rong MZ, Shi G, Yang GC,. Self-reinforced melt processable composites of sisal. Composites Science and Technology 2003; 63 (2): 177-186. DOI: 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00204-X.
209. Nishino T, Arimoto N,. All-cellulose composite prepared by selective dissolving of fiber surface. Biomacromolecules 2007; 8 (9): 2712-2716. DOI: 10.1021/bm0703416.
210. Soykeabkaew N, Arimoto N, Nishino T, Peijs T,. All-cellulose composites by surface selective dissolution of aligned ligno-cellulosic fibres. Composites Science and Technology 2008; 68 (10-11): 2201-2207. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.03.023.
211. Yousefi H, Nishino T, Faezipour M, Ebrahimi G, Shakeri A,. Direct fabrication of all-cellulose nanocomposite from cellulose microfibers using ionic liquid-based nanowelding. Biomacromolecules 2011; 12 (11): 4080-4085. DOI: 10.1021/bm201147a.
212. Qi H, Cai J, Zhang L, Kuga S,. Properties of films composed of cellulose nanowhiskers and a cellulose matrix regenerated from alkali/urea solution. Biomacromolecules 2009; 10 (6): 1597-1602. DOI: 10.1021/bm9001975.
213. Pullawan T, Wilkinson AN, Eichhorn SJ,. Influence of magnetic field alignment of cellulose whiskers on the mechanics of All-cellulose nanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 2012; 13 (8): 2528-2536. DOI: 10.1021/bm300746r.
214. Yano H, Sugiyama J, Nakagaito AN, Nogi M, Matsuura T, Hikita M, Handa K,. Optically transparent composites reinforced with networks of bacterial nanofibers. Advanced Materials 2005; 17 (2): 153-155. DOI: 10.1002/adma.200400597.
215. Soykeabkaew N, Sian C, Gea S, Nishino T, Peijs T,. All-cellulose nanocomposites by surface selective dissolution of bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 2009; 16 (3): 435-444. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-009-9285-1.
216. Pommet M, Juntaro J, Heng JYY, Mantalaris A, Lee AF, Wilson K, Kalinka G, Shaffer MSP, Bismarck A,. Surface modification of natural fibers using bacteria: depositing bacterial cellulose onto natural fibers to create hierarchical fiber reinforced nanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 2008; 9 (6): 1643-1651. DOI: 10.1021/Bm800169g.
217. Kummerer K, Menz J, Schubert T, Thielemans W,. Biodegradability of organic nanoparticles in the aqueous environment. Chemosphere 2011; 82 (10): 1387-1392. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.069.
218. Bras J, Hassan ML, Bruzesse C, Hassan EA, El-Wakil NA, Dufresne A,. Mechanical, barrier, and biodegradability properties of bagasse cellulose whiskers reinforced natural rubber nanocomposites. Industrial Crops and Products 2010; 32 (3): 627-633. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.07.018.
219. Homma I, Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Isogai A,. Effects of carboxyl-group counter-ions on biodegradation behaviors of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose fibers and nanofibril films. Cellulose 2013; 20 (5): 2505-2515. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-013-0020-6.
220. Ni H, Zeng SQ, Wu J, Cheng XR, Luo T, Wang WY, Zeng WJ, Chen Y,. Cellulose nanowhiskers: preparation, characterization and cytotoxicity evaluation. Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering 2012; 22 (1-3): 121-127. DOI: 10.3233/Bme-2012-0697.
221. Moreira S, Silva NB, Almeida-Lima J, Rocha HA, Medeiros SR, Alves C Jr, Gama FM,. BC nanofibres: in vitro study of genotoxicity and cell proliferation. Toxicology Letters 2009; 189 (3): 235-241. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.06.849.
222. Hannukainen K-S, Suhonen S, Savolainen K, Norppa H,. Genotoxicity of nanofibrillated cellulose in vitro as measured by enzyme comet assay. Toxicology Letters 2012; 211 (Supplement 0): S71. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.03.276.
223. Vartiainen J, Pohler T, Sirola K, Pylkkanen L, Alenius H, Hokkinen J, Tapper U, Lahtinen P, Kapanen A, Putkisto K, Hiekkataipale P, Eronen P, Ruokolainen J, Laukkanen A,. Health and environmental safety aspects of friction grinding and spray drying of microfibrillated cellulose. Cellulose 2011; 18 (3): 775-786. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-011-9501-7.
224. Male KB, Leung AC, Montes J, Kamen A, Luong JH,. Probing inhibitory effects of nanocrystalline cellulose: inhibition versus surface charge. Nanoscale 2012; 4 (4): 1373-1379. DOI: 10.1039/c2nr11886f.
225. Mahmoud KA, Mena JA, Male KB, Hrapovic S, Kamen A, Luong JHT,. Effect of surface charge on the cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of fluorescent labeled cellulose nanocrystals. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2010; 2 (10): 2924-2932. DOI: 10.1021/Am1006222.
226. Kovacs T, Naish V, O'Connor B, Blaise C, Gagné F, Hall L, Trudeau V, Martel P,. An ecotoxicological characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC). Nanotoxicology 2010; 4 (3): 255-270. DOI: 10.3109/17435391003628713.
227. Hu Z,. Utilization of switchgrass as a biofuel feedstock. Chemical Department, Phd Dissertation, January, 18 2012; 21-25.
228. Urena-Benavides EE, Kitchens CL,. Static light scattering of triaxial nanoparticle suspensions in the Rayleigh-Gans-Debye regime: application to cellulose nanocrystals. RSC Advances 2012; 2 (3): 1096-1105. DOI: 10.1039/C1ra00391g.
229. Urena-Benavides EE, Kitchens CL,. Cellulose nanocrystal reinforced alginate fibers- biomimicry meets polymer processing. Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals 2012; 556: 275-287. DOI: 10.1080/15421406.2012.635977.
230. Tatsumi M, Teramoto Y, Nishio Y,. Polymer composites reinforced by locking-in a liquid- crystalline assembly of cellulose nanocrystallites. Biomacromolecules 2012; 13 (5): 1584-1591. DOI: 10.1021/bm300310f.
231. Ramanen P, Penttila PA, Svedstrom K, Maunu SL, Serimaa R,. The effect of drying method on the properties and nanoscale structure of cellulose whiskers. Cellulose 2012; 19 (3): 901-912. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-012-9695-3.
232. Lu P, Hsieh YL,. Preparation and properties of cellulose nanocrystals: rods, spheres, and network. Carbohydrate Polymers 2010; 82 (2): 329-336. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.073.
233. Lahiji RR, Boluk Y, McDermott M,. Adhesive surface interactions of cellulose nanocrystals from different sources. Journal of Materials Science 2012; 47 (9): 3961-3970. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-012-6247-z.
234. Shanmuganathan K, Capadona JR, Rowan SJ, Weder C,. Bio-inspired mechanically-adaptive nanocomposites derived from cotton cellulose whiskers. Journal of Materials Chemistry 2010; 20 (1): 180-186. DOI: 10.1039/B916130a.
235. Li Q, Zhou JP, Zhang LN,. Structure and properties of the nanocomposite films of chitosan reinforced with cellulose whiskers. Journal of Polymer Science Part B-Polymer Physics 2009; 47 (11): 1069-1077. DOI: 10.1002/Polb.21711.
236. Ahmad EEM, Luyt AS,. Morphology, thermal, and dynamic mechanical properties of poly(lactic acid)/sisal whisker nanocomposites. Polymer Composites 2012; 33 (6): 1025-1032. DOI: 10.1002/Pc.22236.
237. Belbekhouche S, Bras J, Siqueira G, Chappey C, Lebrun L, Khelifi B, Marais S, Dufresne A,. Water sorption behavior and gas barrier properties of cellulose whiskers and microfibrils films. Carbohydrate Polymers 2011; 83 (4): 1740-1748. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.036.
238. Siqueira G, Bras J, Dufresne A,. Cellulose whiskers versus microfibrils: influence of the nature of the nanoparticle and its surface functionalization on the thermal and mechanical properties of nanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 2009; 10 (2): 425-432. DOI: 10.1021/Bm801193d.
239. Gao ZZ, Peng J, Zhong TH, Sun J, Wang XB, Yue C,. Biocompatible elastomer of waterborne polyurethane based on castor oil and polyethylene glycol with cellulose nanocrystals. Carbohydrate Polymers 2012; 87 (3): 2068-2075. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.10.027.
240. Tonoli GHD, Teixeira EM, Correa AC, Marconcini JM, Caixeta LA, Pereira-da-Silva MA, Mattoso LHC,. Cellulose micro/nanofibres from eucalyptus kraft pulp: preparation and properties. Carbohydrate Polymers 2012; 89 (1): 80-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.02.052.
241. Zhang J, Elder TJ, Pu Y, Ragauskas AJ,. Facile synthesis of spherical cellulose nanoparticles. Carbohydrate Polymers 2007; 69 (3): 607-611. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.01.019.
242. Mandal A, Chakrabarty D,. Isolation of nanocellulose from waste sugarcane bagasse (SCB) and its characterization. Carbohydrate Polymers 2011; 86 (3): 1291-1299. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.030.
243. Pasquini D, Teixeira ED, Curvelo AAD, Belgacem MN, Dufresne A,. Extraction of cellulose whiskers from cassava bagasse and their applications as reinforcing agent in natural rubber. Industrial Crops and Products 2010; 32 (3): 486-490. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.06.022.
244. Chen Y, Liu CH, Chang PR, Anderson DP, Huneault MA,. Pea starch-based composite films with pea hull fibers and pea hull fiber-derived nanowhiskers. Polymer Engineering and Science 2009; 49 (2): 369-378. DOI: 10.1002/Pen.21290.
245. Yu MJ, Yang RD, Huang LH, Cao XD, Yang F, Liu DT,. Preparation and characterization of bamboo nanocrystalline cellulose. Bioresources 2012; 7 (2): 1802-1812.
246. Visakh PM, Thomas S, Oksman K, Mathew AP,. Crosslinked natural rubber nanocomposites reinforced with cellulose whiskers isolated from bamboo waste: processing and mechanical/thermal properties. Composites Part A-Applied Science and Manufacturing 2012; 43 (4): 735-741. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.12.015.
247. Visakh PM, Thomas S, Oksman K, Mathew AP,. Cellulose nanofibres and cellulose nanowhiskers based natural rubber composites: diffusion, sorption, and permeation of aromatic organic solvents. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2012; 124 (2): 1614-1623. DOI: 10.1002/App.35176.
248. Taipina MD, Ferrarezi MMF, Goncalves MD,. Morphological evolution of curaua fibers under acid hydrolysis. Cellulose 2012; 19 (4): 1199-1207. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-012-9715-3.
249. Lu P, Hsieh YL,. Cellulose isolation and core-shell nanostructures of cellulose nanocrystals from chardonnay grape skins. Carbohydrate Polymers 2012; 87 (4): 2546-2553. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.11.023.
250. Cao XW, Ding B, Yu JY, Al-Deyab SS,. Cellulose nanowhiskers extracted from TEMPO-oxidized jute fibers. Carbohydrate Polymers 2012; 90 (2): 1075-1080. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.06.046.
251. Kargarzadeh H, Ahmad I, Abdullah I, Dufresne A, Zainudin SY, Sheltami RM,. Effects of hydrolysis conditions on the morphology, crystallinity, and thermal stability of cellulose nanocrystals extracted from kenaf bast fibers. Cellulose 2012; 19 (3): 855-866.
252. Sheltami RM, Abdullah I, Ahmad I, Dufresne A, Kargarzadeh H,. Extraction of cellulose nanocrystals from mengkuang leaves (Pandanus tectorius). Carbohydrate Polymers 2012; 88 (2): 772-779. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.062.
253. Li R, Fei J, Cai Y, Li Y, Feng J, Yao J,. Cellulose whiskers extracted from mulberry: a novel biomass production. Carbohydrate Polymers 2009; 76 (1): 94-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.09.034.
254. Ardanuy M, Claramunt J, Arevalo R, Pares F, Aracri E, Vidal T,. Nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) as a potential reinforcement for high performance cement mortar composites. Bioresources 2012; 7 (3): 3883-3894.
255. Bulota M, Kreitsmann K, Hughes M, Paltakari J,. Acetylated microfibrillated cellulose as a toughening agent in poly(lactic acid). Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2012; 126: E448-E457. DOI: 10.1002/App.36787.
256. Hassan ML, Mathew AP, Hassan EA, El-Wakil NA, Oksman K,. Nanofibers from bagasse and rice straw: process optimization and properties. Wood Science and Technology 2012; 46 (1-3): 193-205. DOI: 10.1007/s00226-010-0373-z.
257. Hassan ML, Bras J, Hassan EA, Fadel SM, Dufresne A,. Polycaprolactone/modified bagasse whisker nanocomposites with improved moisture-barrier and biodegradability properties. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 2012; 125: E10-E19. DOI: 10.1002/App.36373.
258. Hassan ML, Hassan EA, Oksman KN,. Effect of pretreatment of bagasse fibers on the properties of chitosan/microfibrillated cellulose nanocomposites. Journal of Materials Science 2011; 46 (6): 1732-1740. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-010-4992-4.
259. Sharma HSS, Carmichael E, Muhamad M, McCall D, Andrews F, Lyons G, McRoberts WC, Hornsby PR,. Biorefining of perennial ryegrass for the production of nanofibrillated cellulose. RSC Advances 2012; 2 (16): 6424-6437. DOI: 10.1039/C2ra20716h.
260. Habibi Y, Mahrouz M, Vignon MR,. Microfibrillated cellulose from the peel of prickly pear fruits. Food Chemistry 2009; 115 (2): 423-429. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.12.034
261. Kaushik A, Singh M,. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibrils from wheat straw using steam explosion coupled with high shear homogenization. Carbohydrate Research 2011; 346 (1): 76-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2010.10.020.
262. Kaushik A, Singh M, Verma G,. Green nanocomposites based on thermoplastic starch and steam exploded cellulose nanofibrils from wheat straw. Carbohydrate Polymers 2010; 82 (2): 337-345. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.063.
263. Mishra SP, Manent AS, Chabot B, Daneault C,. Production of nanocellulose from native cellulose various options utilizing ultrasound. Bioresources 2012; 7 (1): 422-436.
264. Jradi K, Bideau B, Chabot B, Daneault C,. Characterization of conductive composite films based on TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers and polypyrrole. Journal of Materials Science 2012; 47 (8): 3752-3762. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-011-6226-9.
265. Hirota M, Tamura N, Saito T, Isogai A,. Cellulose II nanoelements prepared from fully mercerized, partially mercerized and regenerated celluloses by 4-acetamido-TEMPO/NaClO/NaClO2 oxidation. Cellulose 2012; 19 (2): 435-442. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-011-9642-8.
266. Iwamoto S, Isogai A, Iwata T,. Structure and mechanical properties of wet-spun fibers made from natural cellulose nanofibers. Biomacromolecules 2011; 12 (3): 831-836. DOI: 10.1021/Bm101510r.
267. Habibi Y, Vignon MR,. Optimization of cellouronic acid synthesis by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of cellulose III from sugar beet pulp. Cellulose 2008; 15 (1): 177-185. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-007-9179-z.