Comparative proteomics of Bt-transgenic and non-transgenic cotton leaves

Proteome Science

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Wang, Limin ^a,b   Wang, Xuchu ^a   Jin, Xiang ^a   Jia, Ruizong ^a   Huang, Qixing ^a   Tan, Yanhua ^a   Guo, Anping ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF TROPICAL BIOSCIENCE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF PLANT PROTECTION   (China)

Author keywords

Bacillus thuringiensis; Comparative proteomics; Cotton leaf; Cry1Ac gene; Toxin protein; Transgenic plant

Indexed keywords

BETAINE ALDEHYDE DEHYDROGENASE; CHAPERONE; CHLOROPHYLL BINDING PROTEIN; CRY1AC TOXIN; DICARBOXYLIC ACID; DNA FRAGMENT; FERREDOXIN; GLYOXYLIC ACID; NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE PHOSPHATE; OXIDOREDUCTASE; PORPHOBILINOGEN DEAMINASE; RIBULOSEBISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE; TRANSKETOLASE;

AMINO ACID METABOLISM; AMINO ACID TRANSPORT; ARTICLE; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; CARBOHYDRATE TRANSPORT; CARBON FIXATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; COTTON; ENERGY YIELD; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; GOSSYPIUM; IMMUNOBLOTTING; ISOELECTRIC POINT; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NONHUMAN; OXIDATIVE PHOSPHORYLATION; PENTOSE PHOSPHATE CYCLE; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHOTOSYNTHETIC RATE; PLANT GROWTH; PLANT HEIGHT; PLANT LEAF; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEOMICS; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RICINUS COMMUNIS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; UPREGULATION; VITIS; WATER CONTENT; WESTERN BLOTTING;

BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS; GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM;

EID: 84928799256     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14775956     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12953-015-0071-8     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. James C. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops. ISAAA Brief NO. 46. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA; 2013.
2. Conner AJ, Jacobs JME. Food risks from transgenic crops in perspective. Nutrition. 2000;16:709-11.
3. Ren Y, Lv J, Wang H, Li L, Peng Y, Qu LJ. A comparative proteomics approach to detect unintended effects in transgenic Arabidopsis. J Genet Genomics. 2009;36:629-39.
4. Conner AJ, Jacobs JME. Genetic engineering of crops as potential source of genetic hazard in the human diet. Mutat Res-Gen Tox En. 1999;443:223-34.
5. Gong C, Wang T. Proteomic evaluation of genetically modified crops: current status and challenges. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4:1-8.
6. Cellini F, Chesson A, Colquhoun I, Constable A, Davies HV, Engel KH, et al. Unintended effects and their detection in genetically modified crops. Food Chem Toxicol. 2004;42:1089-125.
7. Ruebelt MC, Leimgruber NK, Lipp M, Reynolds TL, Nemeth MA, Astwood JD. Application of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis to interrogate alterations in the proteome of genetically modified crops. 1. Assessing analytical validation. J Agric Food Chem. 2006;54:2154-61.
8. Albo AG, Mila S, Digilio G, Motto M, Aime S, Corpillo D. Proteomic analysis of a genetically modified maize flour carrying CRY1AB gene and comparison to the corresponding wild-type. Maydica. 2007;52:443-55.
9. Ricroch AE, Bergé JB, Kuntz M. Evaluation of genetically engineered crops using transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiling techniques. Plant Physio. 2011;155:1752-61.
10. Gong C, Li Q, Yu H, Wang Z, Wang T. Proteomics insight into the biological safety of transgenic modification of rice as compared with conventional genetic breeding and spontaneous genotypic variation. J Proteome Res. 2012;11:3019-29.
11. Kuiper HA, Kok EJ, Engel KH. Exploitation of molecular profiling techniques for GM food safety assessment. Curr Opin Biotech. 2003;14:238-43.
12. Baudo MM, Lyons R, Powers S, Pastori GM, Edwards KJ, Holdsworth MJ, et al. Transgenesis has less impact on the transcriptome of wheat grain than conventional breeding. Plant Biotechnol J. 2006;4:369-80.
13. Barros E, Lezar S, Anttonen MJ, Van Dijk JP, Röhlig RM, Kok EJ, et al. Comparison of two GM maize varieties with a near-isogenic non-GM variety using transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics. Plant Biotechnol J. 2010;8:436-51.
14. Kok EJ, Kuiper HA. Comparative safety assessment for biotech crops. Trends Biotechnol. 2003;21:439-44.
15. Jelenie S. Food safety evaluation of crops produced through genetic engineering-how to reduce unintended effects. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2005;56:185-93.
16. Brandao AR, Barbosa HS, Arruda MAZ. Image analysis of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis for comparative proteomics of transgenic and non-transgenic soybean seeds. J Proteomics. 2010;73:1433-40.
17. Salekdeh GH, Komatsu S. Crop proteomics: aim at sustainable agriculture of tomorrow. Proteomics. 2007;7:2976-96.
18. Batista R, Martins I, Jenö P, Ricardo CP, Oliveira MM. A proteomic study to identify soya allergens-the human response to transgenic versus non-transgenic soya samples. Int Arch Allergy Imm. 2007;144:29-38.
19. Barbosa HS, Arruda SCC, Azevedo RA, Arruda MA. New insights on proteomics of transgenic soybean seeds: evaluation of differential expressions of enzymes and proteins. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2012;402:99-314.
20. Luo J, Ning T, Sun Y, Zhu J, Zhu Y, Lin Q, et al. Proteomic analysis of rice endosperm cells in response to expression of hGM-CSF. J Proteome Res. 2008;8:829-37.
21. Balsamo GM, Cangahuala-Inocente GC, Bertoldo JB, Terenzi H, Arisi AC. Proteomic analysis of four Brazilian MON810 maize varieties and their four non-genetically-modified isogenic varieties. J Agr Food Chem. 2011;59:11553-9.
22. Coll A, Nadal A, Rossignol M, Puigdomènech P, Pla M. Proteomic analysis of MON810 and comparable non-GM maize varieties grown in agricultural fields. Transgenic Res. 2011;20:939-49.
23. Zolla L, Rinalducci S, Antonioli P, Righetti PG. Proteomics as a complementary tool for identifying unintended side effects occurring in transgenic maize seeds as a result of genetic modifications. J Proteome Res. 2008;7:1850-61.
24. Careri M, Elviri L, Mangia A, Zagnoni I, Agrimonti C, Visioli G, et al. Analysis of protein profiles of genetically modified potato tubers by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Sp. 2003;17:479-83.
25. Goulet C, Benchabane M, Anguenot R, Brunelle F, Khalf M, Michaud D. A companion protease inhibitor for the protection of cytosol targeted recombinant proteins in plants. Plant Biotechnol J. 2010;8:142-54.
26. Corpillo D, Gardini G, Vaira AM, Basso M, Aime S, Accotto GP, et al. Proteomics as a tool to improve investigation of substantial equivalence in genetically modified organisms: the case of a virus-resistant tomato. Proteomics. 2004;4:193-200.
27. Dicarli M, Villani ME, Bianco L, Lombardi R, Perrotta G, Benvenuto E, et al. Proteomic analysis of the plant- virus interaction in cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) resistant transgenic tomato. J Proteome Res. 2010;9:5684-97.
28. Horvath-Szanics E, Szabo Z, Janaky T, Pauk J, Hajós G. Proteomics as an emergent tool for identification of stress-induced proteins in control and genetically modified wheat lines. Chromatographia. 2006;63:S143-7.
29. Scossa F, Laudencia-Chingcuanco D, Anderson OD, Vensel WH, Lafiandra D, D'Ovidio R, et al. Comparative proteomic and transcriptional profiling of a bread wheat cultivar and its derived transgenic line overexpressing a low molecular weight glutenin subunit gene in the endosperm. Proteomics. 2008;8:2948-66.
30. Gao W, Long L, Zhu LF, Xu L, Gao WH, Sun LQ, et al. Proteomic and virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) analyses reveal that gossypol, brassinosteroids, and jasmonic acid contribute to the resistance of cotton to verticillium dahliae. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2013;12:3690-703.
31. An J, Gao Y, Lei C, Gould F, Wu K. Monitoring cotton bollworm resistance to Cry1Ac in two counties of northern China during 2009-2013. Pest Manag Sci 2014, Publish online. doi:10.1002/ps.3807.
32. Modirroosta BH, Tohidfar M, Saba J, Moradi F. The substantive equivalence of transgenic (Bt and Chi) and non-transgenic cotton based on metabolite profiles. Funct Integr Genomic. 2014;14:237-44.
33. Sun C, Wu X, Wang L, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Chen L, et al. Comparison of chemical composition of different transgenic insect-resistant cotton seeds using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Afr J Agr Res. 2012;7:2918-25.
34. Baerenfaller K, Massonnet C, Walsh S, Baginsky S, Bühlmann P, Hennig L, et al. Systems-based analysis of Arabidopsis leaf growth reveals adaptation to water deficit. Mol Syst Biol. 2012;8:1-18.
35. Kuiper HA, Kleter GA, Noteborn HP, Kok EJ. Assessment of the food safety issues related to genetically modified foods. Plant J. 2001;27:503-28.
36. Ducat DC, Silver PA. Improving carbon fixation pathways. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2012;16:337-44.
37. Gatenby AA, van der Vies SM, Bradley D. Assembly in E coli of a functional multi-subunit ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase from a blue-green alga. Nature. 1985;314:617-20.
38. Andersson I, Knight S, Schneider G, Lindqvist Y, Lundqvist T, Brändén CI, et al. Crystal structure of the active site of ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase. Nature. 1989;337:229-34.
39. Henkes S, Sonnewald U, Badur R, Stitt M. A small decrease of plastid transketolase activity in antisense tobacco transformants has dramatic effects on photosynthesis and phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant Cell. 2001;13:535-51.
40. Xu YH, Liu R, Yan L, Liu ZQ, Jiang SC, Shen YY, et al. Light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins are required for stomatal response to abscisic acid in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 2012;63:1095-106.
41. Xia Y, Ning Z, Bai G, Li R, Yan G, Siddique KH, et al. Allelic variations of a light harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding protein gene (Lhcb1) associated with agronomic traits in barley. PLos One. 2012;7:1-9.
42. Paulsen H, Dockter C, Volkov A, Jeschke G. Folding and pigment binding of light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b protein (LHCIIb). The Chloroplast: Springer Netherlands. 2010;31:231-44.
43. Song Y, Luo Q, Long H, Hu Z, Que T, Zhang XA, et al. Alpha-enolase as a potential cancer prognostic marker promotes cell growth, migration, and invasion in glioma. Mol Cancer. 2014;13:1-12.
44. Guo SD, Cui HZ, Xia LQ, Wu DL, Ni WC, Zhang ZL, et al. The research of Transgenic bivalent insect-resistant cotton. Sci Agricult Sinica. 1999;32:1-7.
45. Sui SX, Zhao GZ, Li AG, Zhu QZ, Zhao LF, Li ZS. Analysis on the features of Transgenic (Bt + CpTI) insect-resistant cotton variety SGK321 and their application in germplasm. Sci Technol Rev. 2008;26:42-5.
46. Huang QX, Wang XC, Kong H, Guo YL, Guo AP. An efficient DNA isolation method for tropical plants. Afr J Biotechnol. 2013;12:2727-32.
47. Han JC, Cui H, Shi P, Zhu SJ, Ye ZH, Yu XP. Development of two-dimensional electrophoresis protocol suitable for proteomic analysis of cotton leaves. Cotton Science. 2012;24:27-34.
48. Wang XC, Chang LL, Wang BC, Wang D, Li P, Wang L, et al. Comparative proteomics of Thellungiella halophila leaves from plants subjected to salinity reveals the importance of chloroplastic starch and soluble sugars in halophyte salt tolerance. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2013;12:2174-95.
49. Wang XC, Fan PX, Song HM, Chen XY, Li XF, Li YX. Comparative proteomic analysis of differentially expressed proteins in shoots of Salicornia europaea under different salinity. J Proteome Res. 2009;8:3331-45.
50. Wang XC, Wang D, Wang DY, Wang HY, Chang LL, Yi XP, et al. Systematic comparison of technical details in CBB methods and development of a sensitive GAP stain for comparative proteomic analysis. Electrophoresis. 2012;33:296-306.
51. Wang DZ, Li C, Xie ZX, Dong HP, Lin L, Hong HS. Homology-driven proteomics of dinoflagellates with unsequenced genomes using MALDI-TOF/TOF and automated de novo sequencing. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:1-16.
52. Yi XP, Sun Y, Yang Q, Guo AP, Chang LL, Wang D, et al. Quantitative proteomics of Sesuvium portulacastrum leaves revealed that ion transportation by V-ATPase and sugar accumulation in chloroplast played crucial roles in halophyte salt tolerance. J Proteomics. 2014;99:84-100.
53. Ye J, Fang L, Zheng H, Zhang Y, Chen J, Zhang Z, et al. WEGO: a web tool for plotting GO annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:W293-7.
54. Ang CS, Binos S, Knight MI, Moate PJ, Cocks BG, McDonagh MB. Global survey of the bovine salivary proteome: integrating multidimensional prefractionation, targeted, and glycocapture strategies. J Proteome Res. 2011;10:5059-69.
55. Neilson KA, Mariani M, Haynes PA. Quantitative proteomic analysis of cold-responsive proteins in rice. Proteomics. 2011;11:1696-706.
56. Yu M, Ren C, Qiu J, Luo P, Zhu R, Zhao Z, et al. Draft genome sequence of the opportunistic marine pathogen Vibrio harveyi strain E385. Genome Announcements. 2013;1:1-2.
57. Gotz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Williams TD, Nagaraj SH, Nueda MJ, et al. High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:3420-35.
58. Conesa A, Gotz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Talón M, Robles M. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:3674-6.
59. Zhou Z, Yang H, Chen M, Lou CF, Zhang YZ, Chen KP. Comparative proteomic analysis between the domesticated silkworm (Bombyx mori) reared on fresh mulberry leaves and on artificial diet. J Proteome Res. 2008;7:5103-11.
60. Zhang A, Sun H, Wu G, Sun W, Yuan Y, Wang X. Proteomics analysis of hepatoprotective effects for scoparone using MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometry with bioinformatics. Omics. 2013;17:224-9.
61. Guo BJ, Chen YH, Li C, Wang TY, Wang R, Wang B, et al. Maize (Zea mays L.) seeding leaf nuclear proteome and differentially expressed proteins between a hybrid and its parental lines. Proteomics. 2014;14:1071-87.