Proteomic analysis of four Brazilian MON810 maize varieties and their four non-genetically-modified isogenic varieties

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Volumn 59, Issue 21, 2011, Pages 11553-11559

  Balsamo, Geisi M ^a   Cangahuala Inocente, Gabriela C ^a   Bertoldo, Jean B ^a   Terenzi, Hernán ^a   Arisi, Ana C M ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

GMO; maize; profiling techniques; proteome; two dimensional gel electrophoresis

Indexed keywords

GMO; MAIZE; PROFILING TECHNIQUES; PROTEOMES; TWO-DIMENSIONAL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS;

CHLOROPHYLL; ELECTROPHORESIS; GELS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; PROTEINS; TWO DIMENSIONAL;

GENETICALLY MODIFIED PLANTS;

VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BRAZIL; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETICS; MAIZE; METABOLISM; PROTEOMICS; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

BRAZIL; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; PROTEOMICS; ZEA MAYS;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 80455134694     PISSN: 00218561     EISSN: 15205118     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jf202635r     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. CONAB, National Company of Food Supply. Brazilian Crop Assessment; /www.conab.gov.br/OlalaCMS/uploads/arquivos/11-04-20-11-27-35-boletim-ingles- abrr-2011-com-capa..pdf (accessed June 22, 2011).
2. James, C. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops; ISAAA Briefs; Ithaca, NY, 2009.
3. Brazil CNBS Resolution no. 3, March 5, 2008. Regulates the commercial release of genetically modified maize, MON810 event or Guardian maize; /www.ctnbio.gov.br/index.php/content/view/11445.htmlS (accessed June 22, 2011).
4. Hernandez, M.; Pla, M.; Esteve, T.; Prat, S.; Puigdomenech, P.; Ferrando, A. A specific real-time quantitative PCR detection system for event MON810 in maize YieldGard based on the 3′-transgene integration sequence Transgenic Res. 2003, 12, 179-189
5. Margarit, E.; Reggiardo, M. I.; Vallejos, R. H.; Permingeat, H. R. Detection of BT transgenic maize in foodstuffs Food Res. Int. 2006, 39, 250-255
6. Kuribara, H.; Shindo, Y.; Matsuoka, T.; Takubo, K.; Futo, S.; Aoki, N.; Hirao, T.; Akiyama, H.; Goda, Y.; Toyoda, M.; Hino, A. Novel reference molecules for quantitation of genetically modified maize and soybean J. AOAC Int. 2002, 85, 1077-1089
7. ANZFA. Final Risk Analysis Report, Application A346. Food produced from insect-protected corn line MON810. Canberra, Australia and Wellington, New Zeland: Australia/New Zeland Food Authority; http://cera-gmc.org/docs/decdocs/ 01-334-001.pdf (acessed Sept 18, 2011).
8. Kok, E. J.; Keijer, J.; Kleter, G. A.; Kuiper, H. A. Comparative safety assessment of plant-derived foods Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2008, 50, 98-113
9. Metzdorff, S. B.; Kok, E. J.; Knuthsen, P.; Pedersen, J. Evaluation of a non-targeted "Omic"' approach in the safety assessment of genetically modified plants Plant Biol. 2006, 8, 662-672
10. Anttonen, M. J.; Lehesranta, S.; Auriola, S.; Rohlig, R. M.; Engel, K. H.; Karenlampi, S. O. Genetic and environmental influence on maize kernel proteome J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 6160-6168
11. van Dijk, J. P.; Leifert, C.; Barros, E.; Kok, E. J. Gene expression profiling for food safety assessment: examples in potato and maize Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2010, 58, S21-S25
12. Cellini, F.; Chesson, A.; Colquhoun, I.; Constable, A.; Davies, H. V.; Engel, K. H.; Gatehouse, A. M. R.; Karenlampi, S.; Kok, E. J.; Leguay, J. J.; Lehesranta, S.; Noteborn, H.; Pedersen, J.; Smith, M. Unintended effects and their detection in genetically modified crops Food Chem. Toxicol. 2004, 42, 1089-1125
13. van Dijk, J. P.; Cankar, K.; Scheffer, S. J.; Beenen, H. G.; Shepherd, L. V. T.; Stewart, D.; Davies, H. V.; Wilkockson, S. J.; Lelfert, C.; Gruden, K.; Kok, E. J. Transcriptome analysis of potato tubers - effects of different agricultural practices J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 1612-1623
14. Kuiper, H. A.; Kok, E. J.; Engel, K. H. Exploitation of molecular profiling techniques for GM food safety assessment Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2003, 14, 238-243
15. Kok, E. J.; Kuiper, H. A. Comparative safety assessment for biotech crops Trends Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 439-444
16. Ricroch, A. E.; Berge, J. B.; Kuntz, M. Evaluation of genetically engineered crops using transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiling techniques Plant Physiol. 2011, 155, 1752-1761
17. van Wijk, K. J. Challenges and prospects of plant proteomics Plant Physiol. 2001, 126, 501-508
18. Ruebelt, M. C.; Leimgruber, N. K.; Lipp, M.; Reynolds, T. L.; Nemeth, M. A.; Astwood, J. D.; Engel, K. H.; Jany, K. D. Application of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis to interrogate alterations in the proteome of genetically modified crops. 1. Assessing analytical validation J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 2154-2161
19. Zolla, L.; Rinalducci, S.; Antonioli, P.; Righetti, P. G. Proteomics as a complementary tool for identifying unintended side effects occurring in transgenic maize seeds as a result of genetic modifications J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 1850-1861
20. Ruebelt, M. C.; Lipp, M.; Reynolds, T. L.; Astwood, J. D.; Engel, K. H.; Jany, K. D. Application of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis to interrogate alterations in the proteome of genetically modified crops. 2. Assessing natural variability J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 2162-2168
21. Ruebelt, M. C.; Lipp, M.; Reynolds, T. L.; Schmuke, J. J.; Astwood, J. D.; DellaPenna, D.; Engel, K. H.; Jany, K. D. Application of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis to interrogate alterations in the proteome of gentically modified crops. 3. Assessing unintended effects J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 2169-2177
22. Rabilloud, T.; Chevallet, M.; Luche, S.; Lelong, C. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in proteomics: past, present and future J. Proteomics 2010, 73, 2064-2077
23. Barros, E.; Lezar, S.; Anttonen, M. J.; van Dijk, J. P.; Rohlig, R. M.; Kok, E. J.; Engel, K. H. Comparison of two GM maize varieties with a near-isogenic non-GM variety using transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics Plant Biotechnol. J. 2010, 8, 436-451
24. Coll, A.; Nadal, A.; Rossignol, M.; Puigdomenech, P.; Pla, M. Proteomic analysis of MON810 and comparable non-GM maize varieties grown in agricultural fields Transgenic Res. 2011, 20, 939-949
25. Albo, A. G.; Mila, S.; Digilio, G.; Motto, M.; Aime, S.; Corpillo, D. Proteomic analysis of a genetically modified maize flour carrying Cry1Ab gene and comparison to the corresponding wild-type Maydica 2007, 52, 443-455
26. Coll, A.; Nadal, A.; Palaudelmas, M.; Messeguer, J.; Mele, E.; Puigdomenech, P.; Pla, M. Lack of repeatable differential expression patterns between MON810 and comparable commercial varieties of maize Plant Mol. Biol. 2008, 68, 105-117
27. Coll, A.; Nadal, A.; Collado, R.; Capellades, G.; Messeguer, J.; Mele, E.; Palaudelmas, M.; Pla, M. Gene expression profiles of MON810 and comparable non-GM maize varieties cultured in the field are more similar than are those of conventional lines Transgenic Res. 2009, 18, 801-808
28. Lipp, M.; Brodmann, P.; Pietsch, K.; Pauwels, J.; Anklam, E. IUPAC collaborative trial study of a method to detect genetically modified soy beans and maize in dried powder J. AOAC Int. 1999, 82, 923-928
29. Dinon, A. Z.; de Melo, J. E.; Arisi, A. C. M. Monitoring of MON810 genetically modified maize in foods in Brazil from 2005 to 2007 J. Food Compos. Anal. 2008, 21, 515-518
30. Faurobert, M.; Mihr, C.; Bertin, N.; Pawlowski, T.; Negroni, L.; Sommerer, N.; Causse, M. Major proteome variations associated with cherry tomato pericarp development and ripening Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 1327-1346
31. Mathesius, U.; Keijzers, G.; Natera, S. H. A.; Weinman, J. J.; Djordjevic, M. A.; Rolfe, B. G. Establishment of a root proteome reference map for the model legume Medicago truncatula using the expressed sequence tag database for peptide mass fingerprinting Proteomics 2001, 1, 1424-1440
32. Bradford, M. M. Rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing principle of protein-dye binding Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248-254
33. Lichtenthaler, H. K. Chlorophylls and carotenoids - pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes Methods Enzymol. 1987, 148, 350-382
34. Batista, R.; Oliveira, M. Plant natural variability may affect safety assessment data Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2010, 58, S8-S12
35. Valledor, L.; Jorrin, J. Back to the basics: maximizing the information obtained by quantitative two dimensional gel electrophoresis analyses by an appropriate experimental design and statistical analyses J. Proteomics 2011, 74 (1) 1-18
36. Molloy, M. P.; Brzezinski, E. E.; Hang, J. Q.; McDowell, M. T.; VanBogelen, R. A. Overcoming technical variation and biological variation in quantitative proteomics Proteomics 2003, 3, 1912-1919
37. Prinsi, B.; Negri, A. S.; Pesaresi, P.; Cocucci, M.; Espen, L. Evaluation of protein pattern changes in roots and leaves of Zea mays plants in response to nitrate availability by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis analysis BMC Plant Biol. 2009, 9, 113-130