Comparison of two GM maize varieties with a near-isogenic non-GM variety using transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics

Plant Biotechnology Journal

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 436-451

  Barros, Eugenia ^a   Lezar, Sabine ^a   Anttonen, Mikko J ^b   Van Dijk, Jeroen P ^c   Röhlig, Richard M ^d   Kok, Esther J ^c   Engel, Karl Heinz ^d  

^a DSI CSIR Nanotechnology Innovation Centre   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^c WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Food safety; GM; Maize; Metabolomics; Proteomics; Transcritpomics

Indexed keywords

VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA MICROARRAY; ENVIRONMENT; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MAIZE; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METABOLISM; METABOLOME; METABOLOMICS; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROTEOMICS; SEASON; TRANSGENIC PLANT; TWO DIMENSIONAL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS;

CHROMATOGRAPHY, GAS; ELECTROPHORESIS, GEL, TWO-DIMENSIONAL; ENVIRONMENT; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENOTYPE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METABOLOME; METABOLOMICS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROTEOMICS; SEASONS; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 77955390164     PISSN: 14677644     EISSN: 14677652     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00487.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Batista, R., Saibo, N., Lourenco, T. and Oliveira, M.M. (2008) Microarray analyses reveal that plant mutagenesis may induce more transcriptomic changes than transgene insertion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 3640-3645.
2. Baudo, M.M., Lyons, R., Powers, S., Pastori, G.M., Edwards, K.J., Holdsworth, M.J. and Shewry, P.R. (2006) Transgenesis has less impact on the transcriptome of wheat grain than conventional breeding. Plant Biotechnol. J. 4, 369-380.
3. Bino, R.J., Hall, R.D., Fiehn, O., Kopka, J., Saito, K., Draper, J., Nikolau, B.J., Mendes, P., Roessner-Tunali, U., Beale, M.H., Trethewey, R.N., Lange, B.M., Wurtele, E.S. and Sumner, L.W. (2004) Potential of metabolomics as a functional genomics tool. Trends Plant Sci. 9, 418-425.
4. Boeuf, S., Klingenspor, M., Van Hal, N.L., Schneider, T., Keijer, J. and Klaus, S. (2001) Differential gene expression in white and brown preadipocytes. Physiol. Genomics, 7, 15-25.
5. Cellini, F., Chesson, A., Colquhoun, I., Constable, A., Davies, H.V., Engel, K.-H., Gatehouse, A.M.R., Kärenlampi, S., Kok, E.J., Leguay, J.-J., Lehesranta, S., Noteborn, H.P.J.M., Pedersen, A.J. and Smith, M. (2004) Unintended effects and their detection in genetically modified crops. Food Chem. Toxicol. 42, 1089-1125.
6. Chang, S., Puryear, J. and Cairney, J. (1993) A simple and efficient method for isolating RNA from pine trees. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 11, 113-116.
7. Cheng, K.C., Beaulieu, J., Iquira, E., Belzile, F.J., Fortin, M.G. and Strömvik, M.V. (2008) Effect of transgenes on global gene expression in soybean is within the natural range of variation of conventional cultivars. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 56, 3057-3067.
8. Edgar, R., Domrachev, M. and Lash, A.E. (2002) Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 207-210.
9. 31P NMR investigation of the effect of nitrate on hypoxic metabolism in maize roots. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 266, 592-606.
10. FAO/WHO (2000a) Report of the First Session of the Codex ad hoc Intergovernmental Task Force on Foods Derived from Biotechnology (ALINORM 01/34). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, http://www.fao.org/es/esn/gm/biotc-e.htm .
11. FAO/WHO (2000b) Safety Aspects of Genetically Modified Foods of Plant Origin. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Foods Derived from Biotechnology, Geneva, Switzerland, 29 May - 2 June 2000. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, http://www.fao.org/es/esn/gm/biotec-e.htm .
12. FAO/WHO (Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization) (1996) Biotechnology and Food Safety. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO consultation, Rome, Italy. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 61. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, ftp://ftp.fao.org/es/esn/food/biotechnology.pdf .
13. Frank, T., Meuleye, B.S., Miller, A., Shu, Q.-Y. and Engel, K.-H. (2007) Metabolite profiling of two low phytic acid (lpa) rice mutants. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 55, 11011-11019.
14. Frank, T., Nörenberg, S. and Engel, K.-H. (2009) Metabolite profiling of two novel low phytic acid (lpa) soybean mutants. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 57, 6408-6416.
15. Franssen-van Hal, N.L., Vorst, O., Kramer, E., Hall, R.D. and Keijer, J. (2002) Factors influencing cDNA microarray hybridization on silylated glass slides. Anal. Biochem. 308, 5-17.
16. Gardiner, J.M., Buell, C.R., Elumalai, R., Galbraith, D.W., Henderson, D.A., Iniguez, A.L., Kaeppler, S.M., Kim, J.J., Liu, J., Zheng, L. and Chandler, V.L. (2005) Design, production, and utilization of long oligonucleotide microarrays for expression analysis in maize. Maydica, 50, 425-435.
17. Hazebroek, J., Harp, T., Shi, J. and Wang, H. (2007) Metabolomic analysis of low phytic acid maize kernels. In Concepts in Plant Metabolomics (Nikolau, B.J. and Wurtele, E.S., eds), pp. 221-238, Netherlands: Springer.
18. Hedge, P., Qi, R., Abernathy, K., Gay, C., Dharap, S., Gaspard, R., Hughes, J.E., Snesrud, E., Lee, N. and Quackenbush, J. (2000) A concise guide to cDNA microarray analysis. BioTechniques, 29, 548-562.
19. Kleter, G.A. and Kuiper, H.A. (2002) Considerations for the assessment of the safety of genetically modified animals used for human food or animal feed. Livest. Prod. Sci. 74, 275-285.
20. Koistinen, K.M., Hassinen, V.H., Gynther, P.A.M., Lehesranta, S.J., Keinänen, S.I., Kokko, H.I., Oksanen, E.J., Tervahuta, A.I., Auriola, S. and Kärenlmapi, S.O. (2002) Birch PR-10c is induced by factors causing oxidative stress but appears not to confer tolerance to these agents. New Phytol. 155, 381-391.
21. Kok, E.J. and Kuiper, H.A. (2003) Comparative safety assessment for biotech crops. Trends Biotechnol. 21, 439-444.
22. Kok, E.J., Franssen-van Hal, N.L.W., Winnubst, E.N.W., Kramer, E.H.M., Dijksma, W.T.P., Kuiper, H.A. and Keijer, J. (2007) Assessment of representational difference analysis (RDA) to construct informative cDNA microarrays for gene expression analysis of species with limited transcriptome information, using red and green tomatoes as a model. J. Plant Physiol. 164, 337-349.
23. Krishnan, P., Kruger, N.J. and Ratcliffe, R.G. (2004) Metabolite fingerprinting and profiling in plants using NMR. J. Exp. Bot. 56, 255-265.
24. Kuiper, H.A., Kleter, G.A., Notenorn, H.O.J.M. and Kok, E.J. (2001) Assessment of the food safety issues related to genetically modified foods. Plant J. 27, 503-528.
25. 1H NMR spectroscopy as a tool to detect potential unintended effects following a genetic modification. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 51, 2447-2456.
26. 1H NMR spectroscopy for quality assessment of green tea, Camellia sinensis (L.). J. Agric. Food. Chem. 52, 692-700.
27. Lehesranta, S.J., Davies, H.V., Sheperd, L.V.T., Nunan, N., McNicol, J., Auriola, S., Koistinen, K.M., Suomalainen, S., Kokko, H.I. and Kärenlampi, S. (2005) Comparison of tuber proteomes of potato varieties, landraces, and genetically modified lines. Plant Physiol. 138, 1690-1699.
28. Lehesranta, S.J., Davies, H.V., Shepherd, L.V.T., Koistinen, K.M., Massat, N., Nunan, N., McNicol, J.W. and Kärenlampi, S.O. (2006) Proteomic analysis of the potato tuber life cycle. Proteomics 6, 6042-6052.
29. Lehesranta, S.J., Koistinen, K.M., Massat, N., Davies, H.V., Sheperd, L.V.T., McNicol, J., Cakmak, I., Cooper, J., Lück, L., Kärenlampi, S. and Leifert, C. (2007) Effects of agricultural production systems and their components on protein profiles of potato tubers. Proteomics 7, 507-604.
30. Metzdorff, S.B., Kok, E.J., Knuthsen, O. and Pedersen, J. (2006) Evaluation of a nontargeted 'omic' approach in the safety assessment of genetically modified plants. Plant Biol. 8, 662-672.
31. OECD (2002) Consensus Document on Compositional Considerations for New Varieties of Maize (Zea mays): Key Food and Feed Nutrients, Anti-Nutrients and Secondary Plant Metabolites, http://www.dis.oecd.org/ollis.2002doc.nsf .
32. OECD (2006) An introduction to the food/feed safety consensus documents of the Task Force. Series on the Safety of Novel Foods and Feeds, http://appli1.oecd.org/olis/2006doc.nsf/43bb6130e5e86e5fc12569fa005d004c/f6714efc9beea840c1257156005638c2/$FILE/JT03207766.PDF .
33. OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) (1993) Safety Evaluation of Foods Derived by Modern Biotechnology: Concept and Principles, http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/57/3/1946129.pdf .
34. Pastorello, E.A., Farioli, L., Pravettoni, V., Ispano, M., Scibola, E., Trambaioli, C., Giuffrida, M.G., Ansaloni, R., Godovac-Zimmermann, J., Conti, A., Fortunato, D. and Ortolani, C. (2000) The maize major allergen, which is responsible for food-induced allergic reactions, is a lipid transfer protein. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 106, 744-751.
35. Röhlig, R.M., Eder, J. and Engel, K.-H. (2009) Metabolite profiling of maize grain: differentiation due to genetics and environment. Metabolomics, 5, 459-477.
36. Sobolev, A.P., Segre, A. and Lamanna, R. (2003) Proton high-field NMR study of tomato juice. Magn. Reson. Chem. 41, 237-245.
37. Tukey, J.W. (1953) The problem of multiple comparisons. Unpublished manuscript. In The Collected Works of John Tukey VIII. Multiple comparisons (Henry and Braun, eds), pp. 1-300, New York: Chapman and Hall.
38. USDA (2009) The Foreign Agricultural Service Report for Current World Production, Market and Trade, http://www.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/psdreport .
39. Zolla, L., Rinalducci, S., Antonioli, P. and Righetti, P.G. (2008) Proteomics as a complementary tool for identifying unintended side effects occurring in transgenic maize seeds as a result of genetic modifications. J. Proteome Res. 7, 1850-1861.