Inhibitory activities of short linear motifs underlie hox interactome specificity in vivo

eLife

Volumn 2015, Issue 4, 2015, Pages

  Baeëza, Manon ^a,b   Viala, Séverine ^a,b   Heim, Marjorie ^a,b   Dard, Amélie ^a,b   Hudry, Bruno ^c   Duffraisse, Marilyne ^a,b   Rogulja Ortmann, Ana ^d   Brun, Christine ^e,f   Merabet, Samir ^a,b  

^a Univ Lyon 1   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^c HAMMERSMITH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^e Aix Marseille university   (France)

^f CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA BINDING PROTEIN; HEXAPEPTIDE; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEIN; HOX PROTEIN; HYBRID PROTEIN; RED FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CELL FATE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DROSOPHILA; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC COMPLEMENTATION; GENETIC CROSS; IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; MORPHOGENESIS; NONHUMAN; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROGENY; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN MOTIF; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SHORT LINEAR MOTIF; TISSUE INTERACTION;

EID: 84928129042     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2050084X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.06034.001     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Balavoine G, de Rosa R, Adoutte A. 2002. Hox clusters and bilaterian phylogeny. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 24:366–373. doi: 10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00237-3.
2. Bassett AR, Liu JL. 2014. CRISPR/Cas9 and genome editing in Drosophila. Journal of Genetics and Genomics 41: 7–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2013.12.004.
3. Berger MF, Badis G, Gehrke AR, Talukder S, Philippakis AA, Peña-Castillo L, Alleyne TM, Mnaimneh S, Botvinnik OB, Chan ET, Khalid F, Zhang W, Newburger D, Jaeger SA, Morris QD, Bulyk ML, Hughes TR. 2008. Variation in homeodomain DNA binding revealed by high-resolution analysis of sequence preferences. Cell 133:1266–1276. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.024.
4. Bertrand N, Roux M, Ryckebüsch L, Niederreither K, Dollé P, Moon A, Capecchi M, Zaffran S. 2011. Hox genes define distinct progenitor sub-domains within the second heart field. Developmental Biology 353:266–274. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.02.029.
5. Bischof J, Björklund M, Furger E, Schertel C, Taipale J, Basler K. 2013. A versatile platform for creating a comprehensive UAS- ORFeome library in Drosophila. Development 140:2434–2442. doi: 10.1242/dev.088757.
6. Bischof J, Maeda RK, Hediger M, Karch F, Basler K. 2007. An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific phiC31 integrases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 104:3312–3317. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611511104.
7. Blaxter M. 2010. Genetics. Revealing the dark matter of the genome. Science 330:1758–1759. doi: 10.1126/science.1200700.
8. Bondos SE, Catanese DJ Jr, Tan XX, Bicknell A, Li L, Matthews KS. 2004. Hox transcription factor ultrabithorax Ib physically and genetically interacts with disconnected interacting protein 1, a double-stranded RNA-binding protein. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 279:26433–26444. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M312842200.
9. Bondos SE, Tan XX, Matthews KS. 2006. Physical and genetic interactions link hox function with diverse transcription factors and cell signaling proteins. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 5:824–834. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M500256-MCP200.
10. Boube M, Hudry B, Immarigeon C, Carrier Y, Bernat-Fabre S, Merabet S, Graba Y, Bourbon HM, Cribbs DL. 2014. Drosophila melanogaster Hox transcription factors access the RNA polymerase II machinery through direct homeodomain binding to a conserved motif of mediator subunit Med19. PLOS Genetics 10:e1004303. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004303.
11. Brayer KJ, Lynch VJ, Wagner GP. 2011. Evolution of a derived protein-protein interaction between HoxA11 and Foxo1a in mammals caused by changes in intramolecular regulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 108:E414–E420. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100990108.
12. Brodu V, Elstob PR, Gould AP. 2002. abdominal A specifies one cell type in Drosophila by regulating one principal target gene. Development 129:2957–2963.
13. Buljan M, Chalancon G, Dunker AK, Bateman A, Balaji S, Fuxreiter M, Babu MM. 2013. Alternative splicing of intrinsically disordered regions and rewiring of protein interactions. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 23: 443–450. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2013.03.006.
14. Chan SK, Pöpperl H, Krumlauf R, Mann RS. 1996. An extradenticle-induced conformational change in a HOX protein overcomes an inhibitory function of the conserved hexapeptide motif. The EMBO Journal 15: 2476–2487.
15. Coiffier D, Charroux B, Kerridge S. 2008. Common functions of central and posterior Hox genes for the repression of head in the trunk of Drosophila. Development 135:291–300. doi: 10.1242/dev.009662.
16. Cunha PM, Sandmann T, Gustafson EH, Ciglar L, Eichenlaub MP, Furlong EE. 2010. Combinatorial binding leads to diverse regulatory responses: Lmd is a tissue-specific modulator of Mef2 activity. PLOS Genetics 6:e1001014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001014.
17. de Navas L, Foronda D, Suzanne M, Sánchez-Herrero E. 2006. A simple and efficient method to identify replacements of P-lacZ by P-Gal4 lines allows obtaining Gal4 insertions in the bithorax complex of Drosophila. Mechanisms of Development 123:860–867. doi: 10.1016/j.mod.2006.07.010.
18. Dinkel H, Van Roey K, Michael S, Davey NE, Weatheritt RJ, Born D, Speck T, Krüger D, Grebnev G, Kuban M, Strumillo M, Uyar B, Budd A, Altenberg B, Seiler M, Chemes LB, Glavina J, Sánchez IE, Diella F, Gibson TJ. 2014. The eukaryotic linear motif resource ELM: 10 years and counting. Nucleic Acids Research 42:D259–D266. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1047.
19. Fasano L, Röder L, Coré N, Alexandre E, Vola C, Jacq B, Kerridge S. 1991. The gene teashirt is required for the development of Drosophila embryonic trunk segments and encodes a protein with widely spaced zinc finger motifs. Cell 64:63–79. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90209-H.
20. Finnerty JR. 2003. The origins of axial patterning in the metazoa: how old is bilateral symmetry? The International Journal of Developmental Biology 47:523–529.
21. Foos N, Maurel-Zaffran C, Maté MJ, Vincentelli R, Hainaut M, Berenger H, Pradel J, Saurin AJ, Ortiz-Lombardía M, Graba Y. 2015. A flexible extension of the Drosophila ultrabithorax homeodomain defines a novel Hox/PBC interaction mode. Structure 23:270–279. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2014.12.011.
22. Foronda D, Estrada B, de Navas L, Sánchez-Herrero E. 2005. Requirement of Abdominal-A and Abdominal-B in the developing genitalia of Drosophila breaks the posterior downregulation rule. Development 133:117–127. doi: 10.1242/dev.02173.
23. Galant R, Walsh CM, Carroll SB. 2002. Hox repression of a target gene: extradenticle-independent, additive action through multiple monomer binding sites. Development 3126:3115–3126.
24. Gebelein B, Culi J, Ryoo HD, Zhang W, Mann RS. 2002. Specificity of distalless repression and limb primordia development by abdominal hox proteins. Developmental Cell 3:487–498.
25. Ghosh I, Hamilton AD, Regan L. 2000. Antiparallel leucine zipper-directed protein reassembly: Application to the green fluorescent protein. Journal of the American Chemical Society 122:5658–5659. doi: 10.1021/ja994421w.
26. Gnerer JP, Venken KJT, Dierick HA. 2015. Gene-specific cell labeling using MiMIC transposons. Nucleic Acids Research 1–13.
27. Grienenberger A, Merabet S, Manak J, Iltis I, Fabre A, Bérenger H, Scott MP, Pradel J, Graba Y. 2003. Tgfbeta signaling acts on a Hox response element to confer specificity and diversity to Hox protein function. Development 130:5445–5455. doi: 10.1242/dev.00760.
28. Hammonds AS, Bristow CA, Fisher WW, Weiszmann R, Wu S, Hartenstein V, Kellis M, Yu B, Frise E, Celniker SE. 2013. Spatial expression of transcription factors in Drosophila embryonic organ development. Genome Biology 14:R140. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-12-r140.
29. Hsiao H-C, Gonzalez KL, Catanese DJ Jr, Jordy KE, Matthews KS, Bondos SE. 2014. The intrinsically disordered regions of the Drosophila melanogaster Hox protein ultrabithorax select interacting proteins based on partner topology. PLOS ONE 9:e108217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108217.
30. Hudry B, Remacle S, Delfini MC, Rezsohazy R, Graba Y, Merabet S. 2012. Hox proteins display a common and ancestral ability to diversify their interaction mode with the PBC class cofactors. PLOS Biology 10:e1001351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001351.
31. Hudry B, Thomas-Chollier M, Volovik Y, Duffraisse M, Dard A, Frank D, Technau U, Merabet S. 2014. Molecular insights into the origin of the Hox-TALE patterning system. eLife 3:e01939. doi: 10.7554/eLife.01939.
32. Hudry B, Viala S, Graba Y, Merabet S. 2011. Visualization of protein interactions in living Drosophila embryos by the bimolecular fluorescence complementation assay. BMC Biology 9:5. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-9-5.
33. In der Rieden PM, Mainguy G, Woltering JM, Durston AJ. 2004. Homeodomain to hexapeptide or PBC-interactiondomain distance: size apparently matters. Trends in Genetics 20:76–79. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2003.12.001.
34. Kammermeier L, Sprecher SG, Müller M, Miller DF, Kaufman TC, Reichert H, Hirth F. 2004. Hox gene crossregulatory interactions in the embryonic brain of Drosophila. Mechanisms of Development 121:527–536.
35. Kerppola TK. 2008. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) analysis as a probe of protein interactions in living cells. Annual Review of Biophysics 37:465–487. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.125842.
36. Kodama Y, Hu CD. 2012. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC): a 5-year update and future perspectives. Biotechniques 53:285–298. doi: 10.2144/000113943.
37. Kondo T, Hashimoto Y, Kato K, Inagaki S, Hayashi S, Kageyama Y. 2007. Small peptide regulators of actin-based cell morphogenesis encoded by a polycistronic mRNA. Nature Cell Biology 9:660–665. doi: 10.1038/ncb1595.
38. Kvon EZ, Stampfel G, Yáñez-Cuna JO, Dickson BJ, Stark A. 2012. HOT regions function as patterned developmental enhancers and have a distinct cis-regulatory signature. Genes & Development 26:908–913. doi: 10.1101/gad.188052.112.
39. Lambert B, Vandeputte J, Remacle S, Bergiers I, Simonis N, Twizere JC, Vidal M, Rezsohazy R. 2012. Protein interactions of the transcription factor Hoxa1. BMC Developmental Biology 12:29. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-12-29.
40. Landry CR, Levy ED, Abd Rabbo D, Tarassov K, Michnick SW. 2013. Extracting insight from noisy cellular networks. Cell 155:983–989. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.003.
41. Lee GM, Donaldson LW, Pufall MA, Kang HS, Pot I, Graves BJ, McIntosh LP. 2005. The structural and dynamic basis of Ets-1. DNA binding autoinhibition. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 280:7088–7099. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M410722200.
42. Lee OH, Kim H, He Q, Baek HJ, Yang D, Chen LY, Liang J, Chae HK, Safari A, Liu D, Songyang Z. 2011. Genomewide YFP fluorescence complementation screen identifies new regulators for telomere signaling in human cells. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 10:M110.001628. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M110.001628.
43. Li X, MacArthur S, Bourgon R, Nix D, Pollard DA, Iyer VN, Hechmer A, Simirenko L, Stapleton M, Luengo Hendriks CL, Chu HC, Ogawa N, Inwood W, Sementchenko V, Beaton A, Weiszmann R, Celniker SE, Knowles DW, Gingeras T, Speed TP, Eisen MB, Biggin MD. 2008. Transcription factors bind thousands of active and inactive regions in the Drosophila blastoderm. PLOS Biology 6:e27. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060027.
44. Li-kroeger D, Witt LM, Grimes HL, Cook TA, Gebelein B. 2008. Hox and senseless antagonism functions as a molecular switch to regulate EGF secretion in the Drosophila PNS. Developmental Cell 15:298–308. doi: 10. 1016/j.devcel.2008.06.001.
45. Lynch VJ, Tanzer A, Wang Y, Leung FC, Gellersen B, Emera D, Wagner GP. 2008. Adaptive changes in the transcription factor HoxA-11 are essential for the evolution of pregnancy in mammals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 105:14928–14933. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802355105.
46. Magny EG, Pueyo JI, Pearl FM, Cespedes MA, Niven JE, Bishop SA, Couso JP. 2013. Conserved regulation of cardiac calcium uptake by peptides encoded in small open reading frames. Science 341:1116–1120. doi: 10.1126/science.1238802.
47. Mann RS, Lelli KM, Joshi R. 2009. Hox Specificity unique roles for cofactors and collaborators. Current Topics in Developmental Biology 88:63–101. doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(09)88003-4.
48. Medina-martinez O, Ramı R. 2003. In vivo mutagenesis of the Hoxb8 hexapeptide domain leads to dominant homeotic transformations that mimic the loss-of-function mutations in genes of the Hoxb cluster. Developmental Biology 264:77–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.07.020.
49. Merabet S, Dard A. 2014. Tracking context-specific transcription factors regulating hox activity. Developmental Dynamics 243:16–23. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.24002.
50. Merabet S, Hudry B. 2011. On the border of the homeotic function: re-evaluating the controversial role of cofactor-recruiting motifs: the role of cofactor-recruiting motifs in conferring Hox evolutionary flexibility may critically depend on the protein environment. Bioessays 33:499–507. doi: 10.1002/bies.201100019.
51. Merabet S, Kambris Z, Capovilla M, Bérenger H, Pradel J, Graba Y. 2003. The hexapeptide and linker regions of the AbdA Hox protein regulate its activating and repressive functions. Developmental Cell 4:761–768. doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00126-6.
52. Merabet S, Saadaoui M, Sambrani N, Hudry B, Pradel J, Affolter M, Graba Y. 2007. A unique Extradenticle recruitment mode in the Drosophila Hox protein Ultrabithorax. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 104:16946–16951. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705832104.
53. Merabet S, Hudry B, Saadaoui M, Graba Y. 2009. Classification of sequence signatures: a guide to Hox protein function. Bioessays 31:500–511. doi: 10.1002/bies.200800229.
54. Merabet S, Litim-Mecheri I, Karlsson D, Dixit R, Saadaoui M, Monier B, Brun C, Thor S, Vijayraghavan K, Perrin L, Pradel J, Graba Y. 2011. Insights into Hox protein function from a large scale combinatorial analysis of protein domains. PLOS Genetics 7:e1002302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002302.
55. Moorman C, Sun LV, Wang J, de Wit E, Talhout W, Ward LD, Greil F, Lu XJ, White KP, Bussemaker HJ, van Steensel B. 2006. Hotspots of transcription factor colocalization in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 103:12027–12032. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605003103.
56. Morell M, Czihal P, Hoffmann R, Otvos L, Avilés FX, Ventura S. 2008. Monitoring the interference of proteinprotein interactions in vivo by bimolecular fluorescence complementation: the DnaK case. Proteomics 8: 3433–3442. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200700739.
57. Mukherjee K, Bürglin TR. 2007. Comprehensive analysis of animal TALE homeobox genes: new conserved motifs and cases of accelerated evolution. Journal of Molecular Evolution 65:137–153. doi: 10.1007/s00239-006-0023-0.
58. Neduva V, Russell RB. 2005. Linear motifs: evolutionary interaction switches. FEBS Letters 579:3342–3345. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.04.005.
59. Noyes MB, Christensen RG, Wakabayashi A, Stormo GD, Brodsky MH, Wolfe SA. 2008. Analysis of homeodomain specificities allows the family-wide prediction of preferred recognition sites. Cell 133:1277–1289. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.023.
60. Padrick SB, Rosen MK. 2010. Physical mechanisms of signal integration by WASP family proteins. Annual Review of Biochemistry 79:707–735. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.060407.135452.
61. Pawson T, Gish GD, Nash P. 2001. SH2 domains, interaction modules and cellular wiring. Trends in Cell Biology 11: 504–511. doi: 10.1016/S0962-8924(01)02154-7.
62. Prince F, Katsuyama T, Oshima Y, Plaza S, Resendez-Perez D, Berry M, Kurata S, Gehring WJ. 2008. The YPWM motif links Antennapedia to the basal transcriptional machinery. Development 135:1669–1679. doi: 10.1242/dev.018028.
63. Pufall MA, Graves BJ. 2002. Autoinhibitory domains: modular effectors of cellular regulation. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 18:421–462. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.18.031502.133614.
64. Ruiz-Orera J, Messeguer X, Subirana JA, Alba MM. 2014. Long non-coding RNAs as a source of new peptides. eLife 3:e03523. doi: 10.7554/eLife.03523.
65. Saeed AI, Bhagabati NK, Braisted JC, Liang W, Sharov V, Howe EA, Li J, Thiagarajan M, White JA, Quackenbush J. 2006. TM4 microarray software suite. Methods in Enzymology 411:134–193. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(06)11009-5.
66. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T. 2003. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Research 13:2498–2504. doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303.
67. Stein A, Aloy P. 2008. Contextual specificity in peptide-mediated protein interactions. PLOS ONE 3:e2524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002524.
68. Tawfik DS. 2010. Messy biology and the origins of evolutionary innovations. Nature Chemical Biology 6:692–696. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.441.
69. Tompa P, Davey NE, Gibson TJ, Babu MM. 2014. Million peptide motifs for the molecular biologist. Molecular Cell 55:161–169. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.05.032.
70. Trudeau T, Nassar R, Cumberworth A, Wong ET, Woollard G, Gsponer J. 2013. Structure and intrinsic disorder in protein autoinhibition. Structure 21:332–341. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2012.12.013.
71. Van Roey K, Dinkel H, Weatheritt RJ, Gibson TJ, Davey NE. 2013. The switches.ELM resource: a compendium of conditional regulatory interaction interfaces. Science Signaling 6:rs7. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2003345.
72. Van Roey K, Gibson TJ, Davey NE. 2012. Motif switches: decision-making in cell regulation. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 22:378–385. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2012.03.004.
73. Van Roey K, Uyar B, Weatheritt RJ, Dinkel H, Seiler M, Budd A, Gibson TJ, Davey NE. 2014. Short linear motifs: Ubiquitous and functionally diverse protein interaction modules directing cell regulation. Chemical Reviews 114: 6733–6778. doi: 10.1021/cr400585q.
74. Venken KJ, He Y, Hoskins RA, Bellen HJ. 2006. P[acman]: a BAC transgenic platform for targeted insertion of large DNA fragments in D. melanogaster. Science 314:1747–1751. doi: 10.1126/science.1134426.
75. Walsh CM, Carroll SB. 2007. Collaboration between Smads and a Hox protein in target gene repression. Development 134:3585–3592. doi: 10.1242/dev.009522.
76. Zakany J, Duboule D. 2007. The role of Hox genes during vertebrate limb development. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 17:359–366. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2007.05.011.