Longer mean colonoscopy withdrawal time is associated with increased adenoma detection: Eevidence from the Bowel cancer screening programme in England

Endoscopy

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 20-26

  Lee, T J W ^a,b   Blanks, R G ^c   Rees, C J ^d,e   Wright, K C ^f   Nickerson, C ^g   Moss, S M ^h   Chilton, A ⁱ   Goddard, A F ^j   Patnick, J ^g   McNally, R J Q ^b   Rutter, M D ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NORTH TEES   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^d SOUTH TYNESIDE DISTRICT HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^f ICON CLINICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^g NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE   (United Kingdom)

^h QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ KETTERING GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^j DERBY CITY GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED CANCER; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPIST; COLONOSCOPY; COLONOSCOPY WITHDRAWAL TIME; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADENOMA; AGED; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DEVICE REMOVAL; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84871207922     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1325803     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ferlay J., Shin H. R., Bray F. et al. GLOBOCAN 2008, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10. Lyon, France International Agency for Research on Cancer Press: 2010; Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr
2. NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Available from: http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/bowel/index.html Accessed February 2010
3. Lee T. JW, Clifford G. M., Rajasekhar P. et al. High yield of colorectal neoplasia detected by colonoscopy following a positive faecal occult blood test in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. J Med Screen: 2011; 18 82 86
4. Barton J. R., Corbett S., van der Vleuten C. P. et al. The validity and reliability of a Direct Observation of Procedural Skills assessment tool: assessing colonoscopic skills of senior endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc: 2012; 75 591 597
5. Winawer S. J., Zauber A. G., Ho M. N. et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med: 1993; 329 1977 1981 (Pubitemid 24015040)
6. Atkin W. S., Edwards R., Kralj-Hans I. et al. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet: 2010; 375 1624 1633
7. Kaminski M. F., Regula J., Krasewska E. et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med: 2010; 362 1795 1803
8. Rex D. K. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc: 2000; 51 33 36 (Pubitemid 30051607)
9. Barclay R. L., Vicari J. J., Doughty A. S. et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med: 2006; 355 2533 2541 (Pubitemid 44917501)
10. Rex D. K., Bond J. H., Winawer S. et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol: 2002; 97 1296 1308 (Pubitemid 34664769)
11. Chilton A., Rutter M. D. Quality assurance guidelines for colonoscopy. NHS BCSP publication No. 6. 2010; Available from: http://www.cancerscreening. nhs.uk/bowel/publications/index.html
12. Moritz V., Bretthauer M., Ruud H. K. et al. Withdrawal time as a quality indicator for colonoscopy - a nationwide analysis. Endoscopy: 2012; 44 476 481
13. Baxter N. N., Goldwasser M. A., Paszat M. F. et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer: a population based case-controlled study. Ann Intern Med: 2009; 150 1 8
14. Brenner H., Hoffmeister M., Arndt V. et al. Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population based study. J Natl Cancer Inst: 2010; 102 89 95
15. Lee T. JW, Rutter M. D., Blanks R. G. et al. Colonoscopy quality measures: Experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. 2012; 61 1050 1057
16. Clayton D., Hills M. Statistical models in epidemiology. Oxford Oxford University Press: 1993
17. Lieberman D. A., Weiss D. G., Lin C. et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veteran Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med: 2000; 343 169 174
18. Anderson J. C., Attam R., Alpern Z. et al. Prevalence of colorectal neoplasia in smokers. Am J Gastroenterol: 2003; 98 2777 2783 (Pubitemid 38020123)
19. Martinez M. E., MacPherson R. S., Annegers J. F. et al. Cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption as risk factors for colorectal adenomatous polyps. J Natl Cancer Inst: 1995; 87 274 279
20. Barclay R. L., Vicari J. J., Greenlaw R. L. Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2008; 6 1091 1098
21. Simmons D. T., Harewood G. C., Baron T. H. et al. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther: 2006; 24 965 971 (Pubitemid 44326377)
22. Tabar A., Romagnuolo J. Effect of simply recording colonoscopy withdrawal time on polyp and adenoma detection rates. Gastrointest Endosc: 2010; 71 782 786
23. Vicari J. Performing a quality colonoscopy: Just slow down. Gastrointest Endosc: 2010; 71 787 788
24. Scholefield J. H., Moss S., Sufi F. et al. Effect of faecal occult blood screening on mortality from colorectal cancer: results from a randomised controlled trial. Gut: 2002; 50 840 844 (Pubitemid 34539047)
25. Kronborg O., Jorgensen O. D., Fenger C. et al. Randomised study of biennial screening with a faecal occult blood test: results after nine screening rounds. Scand J Gastroenterol: 2004; 39 846 851 (Pubitemid 39215455)
26. UK Colorectal Cancer Screening Group Results of the first round of a demonstration of a pilot of screening for colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom. BMJ: 2004; 329 133 135
27. Atkin W. S., Saunders B. P. Surveillance guidelines after removal of colorectal adenomatous polyps. Gut: 2002; 51 v6 v9 (Pubitemid 35222897)
28. Zauber A. G., Winawer S. J., OBrien M. J. et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med: 2012; 366 687 696
29. Heldwein W., Dollhopf M., Rösch T. et al. The Munich Polypectomy Study (MUPS): prospective analysis of complications and risk factors in 4000 colonic snare polypectomies. Endoscopy: 2005; 37 1116 1122 (Pubitemid 41576669)
30. Singh H., Turner D., Xue L. et al. Risk of developing colorectal cancer following a negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year interval between colonoscopies. JAMA: 2006; 295 2366 2373 (Pubitemid 43788104)
31. Nawa T., Kato J., Kawamoto H. et al. Differences between right- and left-sided colon cancer in patient characteristics, cancer morphology and histology. J Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2008; 23 418 423 (Pubitemid 351342058)
32. Arain M. A., Sawhney M., Sheikh S. et al. CIMP status of interval colon cancers: another piece to the puzzle. Am J Gastroenterol: 2010; 105 1189 1195
33. Gellad Z. F., Weiss D. G., Ahnen D. J. et al. Colonoscopy withdrawal time and risk of neoplasia at 5 years: Results from VA Cooperative studies Program 380. Am J Gastroenterol: 2010; 105 1746 1752
34. Sawhney M. S., Cury M. S., Neeman N. et al. Effect of institution wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time 7 minutes on polyp detection. Gastroenterology: 2008; 135 1892 1898