The “Representative Bureaucracy” in Education: Educator Workforce Diversity, Policy Outputs, and Outcomes for Disadvantaged Students

Educational Researcher

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 185-192

  Grissom, Jason A ^a   Kern, Emily C ^a   Rodriguez, Luis A ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

bureaucracy; descriptive analysis; equity; ethnicity; gender; race; representation; social stratification; student outcomes; teacher characteristics; teacher student relationships

Indexed keywords

EID: 84927511408     PISSN: 0013189X     EISSN: 1935102X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X15580102     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Arrow K. J.What has economics to say about racial discrimination?.Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1998;12:91-100
2. Bertrand M.,Mullainathan S.Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination.American Economic Review. 2004;94 (4): 991-1013
3. Clotfelter C.,Ladd H.,Vigdor J.How and why do teacher credentials matter for student achievement?. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2007:
4. Dee T. S.Teachers, race, and student achievement in a randomized experiment.The Review of Economics and Statistics. 2004;86 (1): 195-210
5. Dee T. S.A teacher like me: Does race, ethnicity, or gender matter?.American Economic Review. 2005;95 (2): 158-165
6. Donovan M. S.,Cross C. T.Minority students in special and gifted education. Washigton, DC: National Academy Press; 2002:
7. Ehrenberg R. G.,Brewer D. J.Did teachers’ verbal ability and race matter in the 1960s? Coleman revisited.Economics of Education Review. 1995;14 (1): 1-21
8. Elmore R. F.Backward mapping: Implementation research and policy decisions.Political Science Quarterly. 1979;94 (4): 601-616
9. Ford D. Y.Desegregating gifted education: A need unmet.Journal of Negro Education. 1995;64 (1): 52-62
10. Ford D. Y.,Grantham T. C.,Whiting G. W.Culturally and linguistically diverse students in gifted education: Recruitment and retention issues.Exceptional Children. 2008;74 (3): 289-306
11. Fraga L. R.,Meier K. J.,England R. E.Hispanic Americans and educational policy: Limits to equal access.The Journal of Politics. 1986;48 (4): 850-876
12. Grissom J. A.,Keiser L. R.A supervisor like me: Race, representation, and the satisfaction and turnover decisions of public sector employees.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 2011;30 (3): 557-580
13. Grissom J. A.,Nicholson-Crotty J.,Keiser L.Does my boss’s gender matter? Explaining job satisfaction and employee turnover in the public sector.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2012;22 (4): 649-673
14. Grissom J. A.,Nicholson-Crotty J.,Nicholson-Crotty S.Race, region, and representative bureaucracy.Public Administration Review. 2009;69 (5): 911-919
15. Grissom J. A.,Redding C.Discretion and disproportionality: Teacher race and the underrepresentation of high-achieving students of color in gifted programs. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University; 2014:
16. Grissom J. A.,Rodriguez L. A.,Kern E. C..Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association; 2015Chicago; 2015.
17. Harris J. J.,Brown E. L.,Ford D. Y.,Richardson J. W.African Americans and multicultural education: A proposed remedy for disproportionate special education placement and underinclusion in gifted education.Education and Urban Society. 2004;36 (3): 304-341
18. Hindera J. J.Representative bureaucracy: Further evidence of active representation in the EEOC district offices.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 1993a;3 (4): 415-429
19. Hindera J. J.Representative bureaucracy: Imprimis evidence of active representation in the EEOC district offices.Social Science Quarterly. 1993b;74 (1): 95-108
20. Hosp J. L.,Reschly D. J.Referral rates for intervention or assessment: A meta-analysis of racial differences.The Journal of Special Education. 2003;37 (2): 67-80
21. Joseph L. M.,Ford D. Y.Nondiscriminatory assessment: Considerations for gifted education.Gifted Child Quarterly. 2006;50 (1): 42-51
22. Keiser L. R.,Wilkins V. M.,Meier K. J.,Holland C. A.Lipstick and logarithms: Gender, institutional context, and representative bureaucracy.American Political Science Review. 2002;96 (03): 553-564
23. Kennedy B.Sorting through: The role of representation in bureaucracy.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2013;23 (4): 791-816
24. Kingsley J. D.Representative bureaucracy: An interpretation of the British civil service. Yellow Springs, OH: Antioch Press; 1944:
25. Krislov S.Representative bureaucracy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1974:
26. Leavell A. G.,Cowart M.,Wilhelm R. W.Strategies for preparing culturally responsive teachers.Equity and Excellence in Education. 1999;32:64-71
27. Lim H. H.Representative bureaucracy: Rethinking substantive effects and active representation.Public Administration Review. 2006;66 (2): 193-204
28. Lipsky M.Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1980:
29. Mansbridge J.Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent “yes”.Journal of Politics. 1999;61 (3): 628-657
30. McBee M. T.A descriptive analysis of referral sources for gifted identification screening by race and socioeconomic status.The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education. 2006;17 (2): 103-111
31. Meier K. J.Teachers, students, and discrimination: The policy impact of black representation.The Journal of Politics. 1984;46 (1): 252-263
32. Meier K. J.Latinos and representative bureaucracy testing the Thompson and Henderson hypotheses.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 1993;3 (4): 393-414
33. Meier K. J.,Bohte J.Structure and discretion: Missing links in representative bureaucracy.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2001;11 (4): 455-470
34. Meier K. J.,Nicholson-Crotty J.Gender, representative bureaucracy, and law enforcement: The case of sexual assault.Public Administration Review. 2006;66 (6): 850-860
35. Meier K. J.,Stewart J. J.The impact of representative bureaucracies: Educational systems and public policies.The American Review of Public Administration. 1992;22 (3): 157-171
36. Meier K. J.,Wrinkle R. D.,Polinard J. L.Representative bureaucracy and distributional equity: Addressing the hard question.The Journal of Politics. 1999;61 (4): 1025-1039
37. Mosher F.Democracy and the public service. New York: Oxford University Press; 1968:
38. Nichols J. D.,Ludwin W. G.,Iadicola P.A darker shade of gray: A year-end analysis of discipline and suspension data.Equity & Excellence in Education. 1999;32 (1): 43-55
39. Nicholson-Crotty J.,Grissom J. A.,Nicholson-Crotty S.Bureaucratic representation, distributional equity, and democratic values in the administration of public programs.Journal of Politics. 2011;73 (2): 582-596
40. Pitts D. W.Diversity, representation, and performance: Evidence about race and ethnicity in public organizations.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2005;15 (4): 615-631
41. Polinard J. L.,Wrinkle R. D.,Longoria T.Education and governance: Representational links to second generation discrimination.Political Research Quarterly. 1990;43 (3): 631-646
42. Renzulli J.Conceptions of giftedness. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness. In SternbergR.DavidsonJ. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 246–280). New York: Cambridge University Press.Sternberg R.Davidson J., ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005:246-280.
43. Roch C. H.,Pitts D. W.,Navarro I.Representative bureaucracy and policy tools: Ethnicity, student discipline, and representation in public schools.Administration & Society. 2010;42 (1): 38-65
44. Rocha R. R.,Hawes D. P.Racial diversity, representative bureaucracy, and equity in multiracial school districts.Social Science Quarterly. 2009;90 (2): 326-344
45. Selden S.The promise of representative bureaucracy: Diversity and responsiveness in a government agency. Armonk, NY: Simon Schuster; 1997:
46. Skiba R. J.Zero tolerance, zero evidence: A critical analysis of school disciplinary practice. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 2000:
47. Skiba R. J.,Michael R. S.,Peterson R. L.The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment.Urban Review. 2002;34:317-342
48. Skiba R. J.,Simmons A. B.,Ritter S.,Gibb A. C.,Rausch M. K.,Cuadrado J.,Chung C.- G.Achieving equity in special education: History, status, and current challenges.Exceptional Children. 2008;74 (3): 264-288
49. Steele C. M.,Aronson J.Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995;69 (5): 797-811
50. Theobald N. A.,Haider-Markel D. P.Race, bureaucracy, and symbolic representation: Interactions between citizens and police.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2009;19 (2): 409-426
51. Thielemann G. S.,Stewart J.A demand-side perspective on the importance of representative bureaucracy: AIDS, ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation.Public Administration Review. 1996;56 (2): 168-173
52. U.S Department of Justice, Civil Right Division & U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (2014, January). Dear colleague letter on the nondiscriminatory administration of school discipline. Retrieved from www2.ed.gov/ocr/letters/colleague-201104.pdf.
53. van den Bergh L.,Denessen E.,Hornstra L.,Voeten M.,Holland R. W.The implicit prejudiced attitudes of teachers relations to teacher expectations and the ethnic achievement gap.American Educational Research Journal. 2010;47 (2): 497-527
54. Villegas A. M.,Irvine J. J.Diversifying the teaching force: An examination of major arguments.Urban Review. 2010;42 (3): 175-192
55. Villegas A. M.,Lucas T. F.Diversifying the teacher workforce: A retrospective and prospective analysis.Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. 2004;103 (1): 70-104
56. Voltz D. L.,Brazil N.,Scott R.Professional development for culturally responsive instruction: A promising practice for addressing the disproportionate representation of students of color in special education.Teacher Education and Special Education. 2003;26 (1): 63-73
57. Washington E. L.Female socialization: How daughters affect their legislator fathers’ voting on women’s issues.American Economic Review. 2008;98 (1): 311-332
58. Weiher G. R.Minority student achievement: Passive representation and social context in schools.The Journal of Politics. 2000;62 (3): 886-895
59. Wilkins V. M.,Keiser L. R.Linking passive and active representation by gender: The case of child support agencies.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2006;16 (1): 87-102