A Descriptive Analysis of Referral Sources for Gifted Identification Screening by Race and Socioeconomic Status

Journal of Advanced Academics

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 103-111

  McBee, Matthew T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85056790162     PISSN: 1932202X     EISSN: 21629536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4219/jsge-2006-686     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Agresti A., (1996). An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons
2. Davidson Institute. (2006). Genius denied: How to stop wasting our brightest young minds—Gifted education policies. Retrieved March 2, 2006, from http://www.geniusdenied.com/Policies/StatePolicy.aspx?NavID=6_0
3. Feldman D. H., (2003). A developmental, evolutionary perspective on giftedness. In Borland J., (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 9–33). New York: Teachers College Press
4. Ford D. Y., (1998). The underrepresentation of minority students in gifted education: Problems and promises in recruitment and retention. Journal of Special Education, 32, 4–14
5. Frasier M. M., Garcia J. H., Passow A. H., (1995). A review of assessment issues in gifted education and their implications for identifying gifted minority students (No. RM95204). Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented
6. Frasier M. M., Hunsaker S. L., Lee J., Finley V. S., Garcia J. H., Martin D., et al. (1995). An exploratory study of the effectiveness of the Staff Development Model and the Research-based Assessment Plan in improving the identification of gifted economically disadvantaged students. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented
7. Gagné F., (1994). Are teachers really poor talent detectors? Comments on Pegnato and Birch's (1959) study of the effectiveness and efficiency of various identification techniques. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 124–126
8. Gardner H., (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books
9. Gear G. H., (1976). Accuracy of teacher judgment in identifying intellectually gifted children: A review of the literature. Gifted Child Quarterly, 20, 478–489
10. Hunsaker S. L., (1994). Adjustments to traditional procedures for identifying underserved students: Successes and failures. Exceptional Children, 61(1), 72–76
11. Hunsaker S. L., Finley V. S., Frank E. L., (1997). An analysis of teacher nominations and student performance in gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 19–24
12. Kirschenbaum R. J., (2004). Dynamic assessment and its use with underserved gifted and talented populations. In Baldwin A. Y., Reis S. M., (Eds.), Culturally diverse and underserved populations of gifted students (pp. 49–62). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press
13. Masten W. G., Plata M., Wenglar K., Thedford J., (1999). Acculturation and teacher ratings of Hispanic and Anglo-American students. Roeper Review, 22, 64–65
14. Naglieri J. A., Ford D. Y., (2003). Addressing underrepresentation of gifted minority children using the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT). Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 155–160
15. Pegnato C. W., Birch J. W., (1959). Locating gifted children in junior high schools: A comparison of methods. Exceptional Children, 48, 300–304
16. Plata M., Masten W. G., (1998). Teacher ratings of Hispanic and Anglo students on a behavior rating scale. Roeper Review, 21, 139–144
17. Renzulli J. S., Delcourt M., (1986). The legacy and logic of research on the identification of gifted persons. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 20–33
18. Renzulli J. S., Smith L. H., White A. J., Callahan C. M., Hartman R. K., (1976). Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
19. Renzulli J. S., Westberg K., (1991). Scale for Rating Students' Participation in the Local Gifted Education Program. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut
20. Sarouphim K. M., (1999). DISCOVER: A promising alternative assessment for the identification of gifted minorities. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 244–251
21. VanTassel-Baska J., Johnson D., Avery L. D., (2002). Using performance tasks in the identification of economically disadvantaged and minority gifted learners: Findings from Project STAR. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 110–123
22. Waters T. J., Clausen S., (1983). Effectiveness of parent versus teacher nomination of gifted children. Southern Psychologist, 1, 189–191