Gender, representative bureaucracy, and law enforcement: The case of sexual assault

Public Administration Review

Volumn 66, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 850-860

  Meier, Kenneth J ^a,c,d   Nicholson Crotty, Jill ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^c Department of Liberal Arts ^*  (United States)

^d CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750972563     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: 15406210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00653.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Andrews, David F. 1974. A Robust Method for Multiple Linear Regression. Technometrics 16(4): 523-31.
2. Baron, Larry, and Murray A. Straus. 1989. Four Theories of Rape in American Society: A State-Level Analysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3. Bevacqua, Maria. 2000. Rape on the Public Agenda: Feminism and the Politics of Sexual Assault. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
4. Bohte, John, and Kenneth J. Meier. 2000. Goal Displacement: Assessing the Motivation for Organizational Cheating. Public Administration Review 60(3): 173-82.
5. Brown, Deryck R. 1999. Ethnic Politics and Public Sector Management in Trinidad and Guyana. Public Administration and Development 19(4): 367-79.
6. Brownmiller, Susan. 1975. Against Our Will: Men, Women, and Rape. New York: Ballantine Books.
7. Buchwald, Emilie, Pamela Fletcher, and Martha Roth. 1993. Transforming a Rape Culture. Minneapolis, MN: Milkweed Editions.
8. Chancy, Carole Kennedy, and Grace Hall Saltzstein. 1998. Democratic and Bureaucratic Responsiveness: The Police and Domestic Violence. American Journal of Political Science 42(3): 745-68.
9. Dolan, Julie. 2000. The Senior Executive Service: Gender, Attitudes and Representative Bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10(3): 513-29.
10. _. 2002. The Budget-Minimizing Bureaucrat? Empirical Evidence from the Senior Executive Service. Public Administration Review 62(1): 42-50.
11. Esman, Milton J. 1999. Public Administration and Conflict Management in Plural Societies: The Case for Representative Bureaucracy. Public Administration and Development 19(4): 353-66.
12. Fazlollah, Mark. 2001. City, National Rape Statistics Highly Suspect. Women's eNews, January 8. http:// www.womensenews.org/article.cfm?aid =398 [accessed August 7, 2006].
13. Gregory, Jeanne, and Sue Lees. 1999. Policing Sexual Assault. London: Routledge.
14. Guy, Mary Ellen, and Meredith A. Newman. 2004. Women's Jobs, Men's Jobs: Sex Segregation and Emotional Labor. Public Administration Review 63(3): 289-98.
15. Hale, Mary M., and Frances M. Branch. 1992. Policy Preferences on Workplace Reform. In Women and Men of the States: Public Administrators at the State Level, edited by Mary E. Guy, 189-204. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
16. Hale, Mary M, Rita Mae Kelly, and Jayne Burgess. 1989. Women in the Arizona Executive Branch of Government. In Gender, Bureaucracy, and Democracy: Careers and Opportunity in the Public Sector, edited by Mary M. Hale and Rita Mae Kelly, 41-63. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
17. Hindera, John J. 1993. Representative Bureaucracy: Imprimis Evidence of Active Representation in the EEOC District Offices. Social Science Quarterly 74(1): 95-108.
18. Johnson, Cathy Marie, and Georgia Duerst-Lahti. 1992. Public Work, Private Lives. In Women and Men of the States: Public Administrators at the State Level, edited by Mary E. Guy, 61-88. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
19. Kawar, Amal. 1989. Women in the Utah Executive Branch. In Gender, Bureaucracy, and Democracy: Careers and Opportunity in the Public Sector, edited by Mary M. Hale and Rita Mae Kelly, 83-102. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
20. Keiser, Lael R., Vicky M. Wilkins, Kenneth J. Meier, and Catherine Holland. 2002. Lipstick and Logarithms: Gender, Institutional Context, and Representative Bureaucracy. American Political Science Review 96(3): 553-64.
21. Kellough, J. Edward, and David H. Rosenbloom. 1992. Representative Bureaucracy and the EEOC: Did Civil Service Reform Make a Difference? In The Promise and Paradox of Civil Service Reform, edited by Patricia W. Ingraham and David H. Rosenbloom, 245-66. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
22. Kelly, Rita Mae, and Meredith Newman. 2001. The Gendered Bureaucracy: Agency Mission, Equality of Opportunity, and Representative Bureaucracies. Women and Politics 22(3): 1-34.
23. Krasker, William K. 1998. Robust Regression. In Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, 2nd ed., vol. 8, edited by Samuel Kotz, 166-69. New York: Wiley.
24. Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
25. Long, Norton. 1952. Bureaucracy and Constitutionalism. American Political Science Review 46(3): 808-18.
26. Meier, Kenneth J. 1993. Representative Bureaucracy: A Theoretical and Empirical Exposition. In Research in Public Administration, edited by James Perry, 1-35. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
27. Meier, Kenneth J., and Joseph Stewart. 1992. Active Representation in Educational Bureaucracies: Policy Impacts. American Review of Public Administration 22(3): 157-71.
28. Meier, Kenneth J., Robert D. Wrinkle, and J. L. Polinard. 1999. Representative Bureaucracy and Distributional Equity: Addressing the Hard Question. Journal of Politics 61 (4): 1025-39.
29. Miller, Peggy, and Nancy Biele. 1993. Twenty Years Later: The Unfinished Revolution. In Transforming a Rape Culture, edited by Emilie Buchwald, Pamela Fletcher, and Martha Roth, 47-54. Minneapolis, MN: Milkweed Editions.
30. Mosher, Frederick. 1982. Democracy and the Public Service. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Naff, Katherine C. 2001. To Look Like America: Dismantling Barriers for Women and Minorities in Government. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
32. Naff, Katherine C., and John Crum. 2000. The President and Representative Bureaucracy: Rhetoric and Reality. Public Administration Review 60(3): 98-109.
33. National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). 2000. Criminal Victimization 1999, Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
34. _. 2001. Criminal Victimization 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
35. Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
36. Rape, Abuse, and Incest National Network (RAINN). 2006. RAINN Statistics, www.rainn.org/statistics/index.html [accessed August 9, 2006].
37. Riccucci, Norma M. 1986. Female and Minority Employment in City Government: The Role of Unions. Policy Studies Journal 15(2): 3-15.
38. _. 2002. Managing Diversity in Public Sector Workforces. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
39. Riccucci, Norma M., and Judith R. Saidel. 1997. The Representativeness of State-Level Bureaucratic Leaders. Public Administration Review 57(5): 423-30.
40. _. 2001. The Demographics of Gubernatorial Appointees. Policy Studies Journal 29(1): 11-22.
41. Rubin, Donald B. 1983. Iteratively Reweighted Least Squares. In Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, vol. 4, edited by Samuel Kotz and Norman L. Johnson, 272-75. New York: Wiley.
42. Selden, Sally Coleman. 1997. The Promise of Representative Bureaucracy: Diversity and Responsiveness in a Government Agency. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
43. Thielemann, Gregory S., and Joseph Stewart, Jr. 1996. A Demand-Side Perspective on the Importance of Representative Bureaucracy. Public Administration Review 56(3): 168-73.
44. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). 1997. Sex Offenses and Offenders. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
45. _. 2000. Criminal Victimization 2000: Changes 1999-2000 with Trends 1993-2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
46. Western, Bruce. 1995. Concepts and Suggestions for Robust Regression Analysis. American Journal of Political Science 39 (3) : 786-817.
47. Wilkins, Vicky M., and Lael R. Keiser. 2001. Linking Passive and Active Representation by Gender: The Case of Child Support Agencies. Paper presented at the Sixth National Public Management Research Conference, Bloomington, IN, October 20-21.