Validation of a Web-based, self-administered, non-consecutive-day dietary record tool against urinary biomarkers

British Journal of Nutrition

Volumn 113, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 953-962

  Lassale, Camille ^a   Castetbon, Katia ^b,c   Laporte, François ^d   Camilleri, Géraldine M ^a   Deschamps, Valérie ^b,c   Vernay, Michel ^b,c   Faure, Patrice ^d,e   Hercberg, Serge ^a,b,c   Galan, Pilar ^a   Kesse Guyot, Emmanuelle ^a  

^a Sorbonne Paris Cité ^*  (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 13   (France)

^c French Institute for Public Health Surveillance   (France)

^d GRENOBLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^e UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

Author keywords

Dietary records; Internet; Urinary biomarkers; Validation studies

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; POTASSIUM; PROTEIN; SODIUM; NITROGEN; POTASSIUM INTAKE; PROTEIN INTAKE; SODIUM INTAKE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIETARY RECORD TOOL; DOCUMENTATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSTRUMENT VALIDATION; INTERNET; MALE; MEASUREMENT ERROR; POTASSIUM INTAKE; PROTEIN INTAKE; SELF REPORT; SEX DIFFERENCE; SODIUM INTAKE; URINARY EXCRETION; VALIDITY; ADMINISTRATION AND DOSAGE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; DIET; FRANCE; MEDICAL RECORD; MIDDLE AGED; NUTRITIONAL ASSESSMENT; URINE; VALIDATION STUDY; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; COHORT STUDIES; DIET; DIET RECORDS; DIETARY PROTEINS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NITROGEN; NUTRITION ASSESSMENT; PARIS; POTASSIUM; POTASSIUM, DIETARY; SELF REPORT; SODIUM; SODIUM, DIETARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84926976575     PISSN: 00071145     EISSN: 14752662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114515000057     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Kipnis V, Midthune D, Freedman L, et al. (2002) Bias in dietary- report instruments and its implications for nutritional epidemiology. Public Health Nutr 5, 915-923.
2. Schatzkin A, Subar AF, Moore S, et al. (2009) Observational epidemiologic studies of nutrition and cancer: the next generation (with better observation). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18, 1026-1032.
3. Kipnis V, Midthune D, Freedman LS, et al. (2001) Empirical evidence of correlated biases in dietary assessment instruments and its implications. Am J Epidemiol 153, 394-403.
4. Subar AF, Kipnis V, Troiano RP, et al. (2003) Using intake biomarkers to evaluate the extent of dietary misreporting in a large sample of adults: the OPEN study. Am J Epidemiol 158, 1-13.
5. Carroll RJ, Midthune D, Subar AF, et al. (2012) Taking advantage of the strengths of 2 different dietary assessment instruments to improve intake estimates for nutritional epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 175, 340-347.
6. Prentice RL, Mossavar-Rahmani Y, Huang Y, et al. (2011) Evaluation and comparison of food records, recalls, and frequencies for energy and protein assessment by using recovery biomarkers. Am J Epidemiol 174, 591-603.
7. Schatzkin A, Kipnis V, Carroll RJ, et al. (2003) A comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a 24-hour recall for use in an epidemiological cohort study: results from the biomarker-based Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study. Int J Epidemiol 32, 1054-1062.
8. Hercberg S (2012) Web-based studies: the future in nutritional epidemiology (and overarching epidemiology) for the benefit of public health? Prev Med 55, 544-545.
9. Illner AK, Freisling H, Boeing H, et al. (2012) Review and evaluation of innovative technologies for measuring diet in nutritional epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 41, 1187-1203.
10. Kipnis V, Subar AF, Midthune D, et al. (2003) Structure of dietary measurement error: results of the OPEN biomarker study. Am J Epidemiol 158, 14-21.
11. Freedman LS, Kipnis V, Schatzkin A, et al. (2010) Can we use biomarkers in combination with self-reports to strengthen the analysis of nutritional epidemiologic studies? Epidemiol Perspect Innov 7, 2.
12. Lissner L, Troiano RP, Midthune D, et al. (2007) OPEN about obesity: recovery biomarkers, dietary reporting errors and BMI. Int J Obes (Lond) 31, 956-961.
13. Crispim SP, de Vries JH, Geelen A, et al. (2011) Two non-consecutive 24 h recalls using EPIC-Soft software are sufficiently valid for comparing protein and potassium intake between five European centres - results from the European Food Consumption Validation (EFCOVAL) study. Br J Nutr 105, 447-458.
14. Neuhouser ML, Tinker L, Shaw PA, et al. (2008) Use of recovery biomarkers to calibrate nutrient consumption self-reports in theWomen's Health Initiative. AmJ Epidemiol 167, 1247-1259.
15. Rhodes DG, Murayi T, Clemens JC, et al. (2013) The USDA Automated Multiple-Pass Method accurately assesses population sodium intakes. Am J Clin Nutr 97, 958-964.
16. Hercberg S, Castetbon K, Czernichow S, et al. (2010) The Nutrinet-Sante Study: a web-based prospective study on the relationship between nutrition and health and determinants of dietary patterns and nutritional status. BMC Public Health 10, 242.
17. Touvier M, Kesse-Guyot E, Mejean C, et al. (2010) Comparison between an interactive web-based self-administered 24 h dietary record and an interview by a dietitian for large-scale epidemiological studies. Br J Nutr 105, 1055-1064.
18. Bingham SA (2002) Biomarkers in nutritional epidemiology. Public Health Nutr 5, 821-827.
19. Le Moullec N, Deheeger M, Preziosi P, et al. (1996) Validation of the photo manual used for the collection of dietary data in the SU.VI.MAX. study. Cah Nutr Diet 31, 158-164.
20. NutriNet-Santé Coordination (2013) Table de composition des aliments - Etude NutriNet-Santé (Food Composition Table - NutriNet-Santé Study). Paris: Economica.
21. Willett WC (1998) Nutritional Epidemiology, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Subar AF, Midthune D, Tasevska N, et al. (2013) Checking for completeness of 24-h urine collection using para-amino benzoic acid not necessary in the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition study. Eur J Clin Nutr 67, 863-867.
23. Neveux N, David P & Cynober L (2004) Measurement of amino acid concentrations in biological fluids and tissues using ion exchange chromatography. In Metabolic and Therapeutic Aspects of Amino Acids in Clinical Nutrition, pp. 17-28 [L Cynober, editor]. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
24. Lohman T, Roche A & Martorell R (1988) Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Books.
25. Bingham SA (2003) Urine nitrogen as a biomarker for the validation of dietary protein intake. J Nutr 133, Suppl. 3, 921S-924S.
26. Tasevska N, Runswick SA & Bingham SA (2006) Urinary potassium is as reliable as urinary nitrogen for use as a recovery biomarker in dietary studies of free living individuals. J Nutr 136, 1334-1340.
27. Stein J (1998) Internal Medicine. St Louis, MO: Elsevier Health Sciences.
28. Spiegelman D (2014) %icc9 SAS Program. Intraclass correlation coefficients and their 95 percent confidence intervals. http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/donna-spiegelman/software/icc9/ (accessed May 2014).
29. Arab L, Tseng CH, Ang A, et al. (2011) Validity of a multipass, web-based, 24-hour self-administered recall for assessment of total energy intake in blacks and whites. Am J Epidemiol 174, 1256-1265.
30. Freedman LS, Commins JM, Moler JE, et al. (2014) Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for energy and protein intake. Am J Epidemiol 180, 172-188.
31. Bingham SA, Gill C, Welch A, et al. (1997) Validation of dietary assessment methods in the UK arm of EPIC using weighed records, and 24-hour urinary nitrogen and potassium and serum vitamin C and carotenoids as biomarkers. Int J Epidemiol 26, Suppl. 1, S137-S151.
32. Kahn HA, Whelton PK, Appel LJ, et al. (1995) Validity of 24-hour dietary recall interviews conducted among volunteers in an adult working community. Ann Epidemiol 5, 484-489.
33. Moshfegh AJ, Rhodes DG, Baer DJ, et al. (2008) The US Department of Agriculture Automated Multiple-Pass Method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes. Am J Clin Nutr 88, 324-332.
34. Shai I, Rosner BA, Shahar DR, et al. (2005) Dietary evaluation and attenuation of relative risk: multiple comparisons between blood and urinary biomarkers, food frequency, and 24-hour recall questionnaires: the DEARR study. J Nutr 135, 573-579.
35. Slimani N, Bingham S, Runswick S, et al. (2003) Group level validation of protein intakes estimated by 24-hour diet recall and dietary questionnaires against 24-hour urinary nitrogen in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) calibration study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12, 784-795.
36. Freedman LS, Commins JM, Moler JE, et al. (2014) Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for energy and protein intake. Am J Epidemiol 180, 172-188.
37. Novotny JA, Rumpler WV, Riddick H, et al. (2003) Personality characteristics as predictors of underreporting of energy intake on 24-hour dietary recall interviews. J Am Diet Assoc 103, 1146-1151.
38. Johnson RK, Goran MI & Poehlman ET (1994) Correlates of over- and underreporting of energy intake in healthy older men and women. Am J Clin Nutr 59, 1286-1290.
39. Klovning A, Sandvik H & Hunskaar S (2009) Web-based survey attracted age-biased sample with more severe illness than paper-based survey. J Clin Epidemiol 62, 1068-1074.
40. Bazelmans C, Matthys C, De HS, et al. (2007) Predictors of misreporting in an elderly population: the 'Quality of life after 65' study. Public Health Nutr 10, 185-191.
41. Yannakoulia M, Tyrovolas S, Pounis G, et al. (2011) Correlates of low dietary energy reporting in free-living elderly: the MEDIS study. Maturitas 69, 63-68.
42. Beckmann M, Lloyd AJ, Haldar S, et al. (2013) Dietary exposure biomarker-lead discovery based on metabolomics analysis of urine samples. Proc Nutr Soc 72, 352-361.