Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for energy and protein intake

American Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 180, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 172-188

  Freedman, Laurence S ^a   Commins, John M ^a   Moler, James E ^a   Arab, Lenore ^a   Baer, David J ^a   Kipnis, Victor ^a   Midthune, Douglas ^a   Moshfegh, Alanna J ^a   Neuhouser, Marian L ^a   Prentice, Ross L ^a   Schatzkin, Arthur ^a   Spiegelman, Donna ^a   Subar, Amy F ^a   Tinker, Lesley F ^a   Willett, Walter ^a  

^a GERTNER INSTITUTE FOR EPIDEMIOLOGY AND HEALTH POLICY RESEARCH   (Israel)

Author keywords

24 hour recall; attenuation factors; calibration equations; dietary measurement error; food frequency questionnaire; under reporting

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

BIOMARKER; BODY MASS; CALIBRATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; FOOD INTAKE; INSTRUMENTATION; NUTRIENT CYCLING; PROTEIN; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY;

ADULT; AGE; BODY MASS; CALORIC INTAKE; DIETARY INTAKE; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; FOOD FREQUENCY QUESTIONNAIRE; HUMAN; MALE; PROTEIN INTAKE; REVIEW; SELF REPORT; VALIDATION STUDY;

UNITED STATES;

24-HOUR RECALL; ATTENUATION FACTORS; CALIBRATION EQUATIONS; DIETARY MEASUREMENT ERROR; FOOD FREQUENCY QUESTIONNAIRE; UNDER-REPORTING;

ADULT; AGED; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CALIBRATION; DIET; DIET RECORDS; DIETARY PROTEINS; ENERGY INTAKE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; NITROGEN; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF REPORT; VALIDATION STUDIES AS TOPIC;

EID: 84903988059     PISSN: 00029262     EISSN: 14766256     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwu116     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Willett WC. Nutritional Epidemiology. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013.
2. Thompson FE, Subar AF. Dietary assessment methodology. In: Coulston AM, Boushey CJ, Ferruzzi MG, eds, Nutrition in the Prevention and Treatment of Disease. 3rd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2013:3-40.
3. Willett WC, Sampson L, Stampfer MJ, et al. Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;122(1):51-65.
4. Slimani N, Kaaks R, Ferrari P, et al. European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Calibration Study: rationale, design and population characteristics. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5(6B):1125-1145.
5. Kaaks R, Ferrari P, Ciampi A, et al. Uses and limitations of statistical accounting for random error correlations, in the validation of dietary questionnaire assessments. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5(6A):969-976.
6. Subar AF, Kipnis V, Troiano RP, et al. Using intake biomarkers to evaluate the extent of dietary misreporting in a large sample of adults: the OPEN Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2003; 158(1):1-13.
7. Arab L, Wesseling-Perry K, Jardack P, et al. Eight selfadministered 24-hour dietary recalls using the internet are feasible in African Americans and Whites: The Energetics Study. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110(6):857-864.
8. Moshfegh AJ, Rhodes DG, Baer DJ, et al. The US Department of Agriculture Automated Multiple-Pass Method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;88(2): 324-332.
9. Neuhouser ML, Tinker L, Shaw PA, et al. Use of recovery biomarkers to calibrate nutrient consumption self-reports in the Women's Health Initiative. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167(10): 1247-1259.
10. Prentice RL, Mossavar-Rahmani Y, Huang Y, et al. Evaluation and comparison of food records, recalls, and frequencies for energy and protein assessment by using recovery biomarkers. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174(5):591-603.
11. Subar AF, Thompson FE, Kipnis V, et al. Comparative validation of the Block, Willett, and National Cancer Institute food frequency questionnaires: the Eating at America's Table Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154(12): 1089-1099.
12. Patterson RE, Kristal AR, Tinker LF, et al. Measurement characteristics of the Women's Health Initiative food frequency questionnaire. Ann Epidemiol. 1999;9(3): 178-187.
13. Women's Health Initiative. Food questionnaire. https://www. whi.org/studydoc/WHI%20Forms/F060%20v1.6.pdf. Published 1993. Updated 2003. Accessed April 14, 2014.
14. United States Department of Agriculture. Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies: Foods, Portions/Weights, Nutrients for Analyzing Dietary Data. http://www.ars.usda.gov/services/docs.htm?docID=12089. Accessed June 2004. Updated October 23, 2013.
15. Women's Health Initiative. Section 10: Dietary Assessment. In: WHI Procedure Manual. Vol. 2. (https://www.whi.org/studydoc/ WHI%20and%20ES1%20Manual%20of% 20Operations/1993-2005%20WHI%20CT%20and%20OS/ Vol%202,%2010%20-%20Dietary%20Assessment.pdf). Published 1993. Updated 1997. Accessed April 11, 2014.
16. Schoeller DA, Hnilicka JM. Reliability of the doubly labeled water method for the measurement of total daily energy expenditure in free-living subjects. J Nutr. 1996;126(1): 348S-354S.
17. Bingham SA, Cummings JH. Urine nitrogen as an independent validatory measure of dietary intake: a study of nitrogen balance in individuals consuming their normal diet. Am J Clin Nutr. 1985;42(6):1276-1289.
18. Subar AF, Midthune D, Tasevska N, et al. Checking for completeness of 24-h urine collection using para-amino benzoic acid not necessary in the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67(8):863-867.
19. Verbeke G, Molenberghs G. Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2000.
20. Kaaks R, Riboli E, van Staveren W. Calibration of dietary intake measurements in prospective cohort studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142(5):548-556.
21. Kipnis V, Izmirlian G. The impact of categorization of continuous exposure measured with error [abstract]. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:S28.
22. Rosner B, Willett WC. Interval estimates for correlation coefficients corrected for within-person variation: implications for study design and hypothesis testing. Am J Epidemiol. 1988; 127(2):377-386.
23. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539-1558.
24. SAS Institute Inc. Statistical Analysis System (SAS) Software, Version 9.2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 2008.
25. Block G, Subar AF. Estimates of nutrient intake from a food frequency questionnaire: the 1987 National Health Interview Survey. J Am Diet Assoc. 1992;92(8):969-977.
26. Burke LE, Dunbar-Jacob J, Orchard TJ, et al. Improving adherence to a cholesterol-lowering diet: a behavioral intervention study. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57(1): 134-142.
27. Fraser GE, Yan R. A multivariate method for measurement error correction using pairs of concentration biomarkers. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17(1):64-73.
28. Carroll RJ, Midthune D, Subar AF, et al. Taking advantage of the strengths of 2 different dietary assessment instruments to improve intake estimates for nutritional epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;175(4):340-347.
29. Prentice RL. Measurement error and results from analytic epidemiology: dietary fat and breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996;88(23):1738-1747.
30. Xie SX, Wang CY, Prentice RL. A risk set calibration method for failure time regression by using a covariate reliability sample. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2001;63(4): 855-870.
31. Liao X, Zucker DM, Li Y, et al. Survival analysis with error-prone time-varying covariates: a risk set calibration approach. Biometrics. 2011;67(1):50-58.
32. Tinker LF, Sarto GE, Howard BV, et al. Biomarker-calibrated dietary energy and protein intake associations with diabetes risk among postmenopausal women from the Women's Health Initiative. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(6): 1600-1606.
33. Prentice RL. Covariate measurement errors and parameter estimation in a failure time regression model. Biometrika. 1982; 69(2):331-342.
34. Carroll RJ, Ruppert D, Stefanski LA, et al. Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models: A Modern Perspective. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall; 2006.