A comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a 24-hour recall for use in an epidemiological cohort study: Results from the biomarker-based Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study

International Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 1054-1062

  Schatzkin, Arthur ^a   Kipnis, Victor ^a   Carroll, Raymond J ^b   Midthune, Douglas ^a   Subar, Amy F ^a   Bingham, Sheila ^c   Schoeller, Dale A ^d   Troiano, Richard P ^a   Freedman, Laurence S ^e,f  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^e BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^f GERTNER INSTITUTE FOR EPIDEMIOLOGY AND HEALTH POLICY RESEARCH   (Israel)

Author keywords

24 hour recall; Attenuation factor; Cohort study; Dietary measurement error; Doubly labelled water; Energy intake; Food frequency questionnaire; Nutritional epidemiology; Protein intake; Urinary nitrogen

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; PROTEIN; WATER;

FOOD INTAKE;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CALORIC INTAKE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENSITY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; EATING HABIT; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN INTAKE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECALL; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME; UNITED STATES; URINALYSIS; VOLUNTEER;

ADULT; AGED; COHORT STUDIES; DEUTERIUM; DIET SURVEYS; DIETARY PROTEINS; ENERGY INTAKE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; NITROGEN; OXYGEN ISOTOPES; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; STATISTICS;

EID: 0347985261     PISSN: 03005771     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyg264     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Willett WC. Nutritional Epidemiology. 2nd Edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
2. Day NE, McKeown N, Wong MY, Welch A, Bingham S. Epidemiological assessment of diet: a comparison of a 7-day diary with a food frequency questionnaire using urinary markers of nitrogen, potassium and sodium. Int J Epidemiol 2001;30:309-17.
3. Willett WC. Commentary: Dietary diaries versus food frequency questionnaires - a case of undigestible data. Int J Epidemiol 2001; 30:317-19.
4. Bingham S, Gill C, Welch A et al. Validation of dietary assessment methods in the UK arm of EPIC. Int J Epidemiol 1997;26:S137-51.
5. Subar AF, Kipnis V, Troiano RP et al. Using intake biomarkers to evaluate the extent of dietary misreporting in a large sample of adults: the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study. Am J Epidemiol 2003;158:1-13.
6. Schoeller DA. Measurement error of energy expenditure in free-living humans by using doubly labeled water. J Nutr 1988;118:1278-89.
7. Bingham SA, Cummings JH. Urine nitrogen as an independent validatory measure of dietary intake: a study of nitrogen balance in individuals consuming their normal diet. Am J Clin Nutr 1985; 42:1276-89.
8. Kipnis V, Midthune D, Freedman LS, Bingham S, Schatzkin A, Carroll RJ. Empirical evidence of correlated biases in dietary assessment instruments and its implications. Am J Epidemiol 2001;153:394-403.
9. Subar AF, Thompson FE, Smith AF et al. Improving food frequency questionnaires: a qualitative approach using cognitive interviewing. J Am Dietet Assoc 1995;95:781-88.
10. Subar AF, Midthune D, Kulldorff M et al. An evaluation of alternative approaches to assigning nutrient values to food groups in food frequency questionnaires. Am J Epidemiol 2000;152:279-86.
11. Subar AF, Ziegler RG, Thompson FE et al. Is shorter always better? Relative importance of dietary questionnaire length and cognitive ease on response rates and data quality. Am J Epidemiol 2001; 153:404-09.
12. Subar AF, Thompson FE, Kipnis V et al. Comparative validation of the Block, Willett, and National Cancer Institute food frequency questionnaires: The Eating at America's Table Study (EATS). Am J Epidemiol 2001;154:1089-99.
13. Thompson FE, Subar AF, Brown CC et al. Cognitive research enhances accuracy of food frequency questionnaire reports: results of an experimental validation study. J Am Dietet Assoc 2002;102:212-25.
14. Moshfegh AJ, Goldman J, LaComb R, Perloff P, Cleveland L. Research results using the new USDA automated multiple-pass method. FASEB Journal 2001;15(4):Part I.
15. Tippett KS, Cypel YS (eds). Design and Operation: The Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and the Diet and Health Knowledge Survey, 1994-96. Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals 1994-96. Nationwide Food Surveys Rep. No. 96-1. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 1997.
16. 8O-labeled water in humans. Am J Physiol 1994;267:E585-E590.
17. Schoeller DA, Colligan AS, Shriver T, Avak H, Bartok-Olson C. Use of an automated chromium reduction system for hydrogen isotope ratio analysis of physiological fluids applied to doubly labeled water analysis. J Mass Spectrom 2000;35:1128-32,
18. 2 samples by continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry. J Mass Spectrom 1997;32:1332-36.
19. Berg JD, Chesner I, Lawson N. Practical Assessment of the NBT-PABA pancreatic function test using HPLC determination of p-aminobenzoic acid in urine. Ann Clin Biochem 1985;22:586-90.
20. Jakobsen J, Ovesen L, Fagt S, Pederson AN. Para-aminobenzoic acid used as a marker for completeness of 24 hour urine: assessment of control limits for a specific HPLC method. Eur J Clin Nutr 1997; 51:514-19.
21. Plummer M, Clayton D. Measurement error in dietary assessment an investigation using covariance structure models, Parts I and II. Stat Med 1993;12:925-48.
22. Kipnis V, Carroll RJ, Freedman LS, Li L. Implications of a new dietary measurement error model for estimation of relative risk: application to four calibration studies. Am J Epidemiol 1999;150:642-51.
23. Kaaks R, Riboli E, van Staveren W. Calibration of dietary intake measurements in prospective cohort studies. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 142:548-56.
24. Kroke A, Klipstein-Grobusch K, Voss S et al. Validation of a self-administered food frequency questionnaire administered in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study: comparison of energy, protein and macronutrient intakes estimated with doubly labeled water, urinary nitrogen, and repeated 24-h dietary recall methods. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;70:439-47.
25. Kipnis V, Subar AF, Midthiune D et al. The structure of dietary measurement error: results of the OPEN biomarker study. Am J Epidemiol 2003;158:14-21.
26. Kipnis V, Midthune D, Freedman L et al. New statistical approaches to dealing with bias associated with dietary data. Public Health Nutr 2002;5:915-23.
27. Willett W. Invited Commentary: OPEN questions. Am J Epidemiol 2003;158:22-24.
28. Kipnis V, Subar AF, Schatzkin A et al. Reply to 'OPEN questions'. Am J Epidemiol 2003;158:25-26.