Repetition enhancement and memory effects for duration

NeuroImage

Volumn 113, Issue , 2015, Pages 268-278

  Wiener, Martin ^a   Thompson, James C ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Carryover effects; Decision making; EEG; Repetition enhancement; Time perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATE POSITIVE COMPONENT OF TIMING; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; MENTAL TASK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; REPETITION PRIMING; RESPONSE TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME PERCEPTION; ADOLESCENT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EVOKED RESPONSE; HEARING; LEARNING; MEMORY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TIME PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84926461963     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.054     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Aguirre G.K. Continuous carry-over designs for fMRI. NeuroImage 2007, 35(4):1480-1494.
2. Aguirre G.K., Mattar M.G., Magis-Weinberg L. de Bruijn cycles for neural decoding. NeuroImage 2011, 56(3):1293-1300.
3. Balci F., Simen P. Decision processes in temporal discrimination. Acta Psychol. 2014, 149:157-168.
4. Boehm U., van Maanen L., Forstmann B., van Rijn H. Trial-by-trial fluctuations in CNV amplitude reflect anticipatory adjustment of response caution. Neuroimage 2014, 96:95-105.
5. Brunia C.H., van Boxtel G.J., Bocker K.B.E. Negative slow waves as indices of anticipation: the bereitschaftspotential, the contingent negative variation, and the stimulus-preceding negativity. The Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components 2011, Oxford University Press. S.A. Luck, E. Kappenman (Eds.).
6. Casini L., Vidal F. The SMAs: neural substrate of the temporal accumulator?. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2011, 5:35.
7. Cohen M.X., Gulbinaite R. Five methodological challenges in cognitive electrophysiology. NeuroImage 2014, 85(2):702-710.
8. Cui X., Stetson C., Montague P.R., Eagleman D.M. Ready...go: amplitude of the FMRI signal encodes expectation of cue arrival time. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7(8):e1000167.
9. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 2004, 134(1):9-21.
10. Dyjas O., Bausenhart K.M., Ulrich R. Trial-by-trial updating of an interval reference in discrimination tasks: evidence from effects of stimulus order and trial sequence. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2012, 74(8):1819-1841.
11. Fan J., Kolster R., Ghajar J., Suh M., Knight R.T., et al. Response anticipation and response conflict: an event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27(9):2272-2282.
12. Friston K. A theory of cortical responses. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2005, 360(1456):815-836.
13. Gibbon J., Church R.M., Meck W.H. Scalar timing in memory. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1984, 423:52-77.
14. Gibbons H., Stahl J. ERP predictors of individual performance on a prospective temporal reproduction task. Psychol. Res. 2008, 72(3):311-320.
15. Gontier E., Paul I., Le Dantec C., Pouthas V., Jean-Marie G., et al. ERPs in anterior and posterior regions associated with duration and size discriminations. Neuropsychology 2009, 23(5):668-678.
16. Grill-Spector K., Henson R., Martin A. Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2006, 10(1):14-23.
17. Gu B.-M., Meck W.H. New perspectives on Vierordt's Law: memory-mixing in ordinal temporal comparison tasks. Multidisciplinary Aspects of Time Perception 2011, Springer. A. Vatakis, A. Esposito, M. Giagkou, F. Cummins, G. Papadelis (Eds.).
18. Hellström A. The time-order error and its relatives: mirrors of cognitive processes in comparing. Psychol. Bull. 1985, 97(1):35-61.
19. Heron J., Aaen-Stockdale C., Hotchkiss J., Roach N.W., McGraw P.V., et al. Duration channels mediate human time perception. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2012, 279(1729):690-698.
20. Hilyard S.A., Squires K.C., Bauer J.W., Lindsay P.H. Evoked potential correlates of auditory signal detection. Science 1971, 172(3990):1357-1360.
21. Itthipuripat S., Ester E.F., Deering S., Serences J.T. Sensory gain outperforms efficient readout mechanisms in predicting attention-related improvements in behavior. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34(40):13384-13398.
22. Ivry R.B. The representation of temporal information in perception and motor control. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 1996, 6(6):851-857.
23. Ivry R.B., Hazeltine R.E. Perception and production of temporal intervals across a range of durations: evidence for a common timing mechanism. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1995, 21(1):3-18.
24. James W. Principles of Psychology 1890, Dover Publications, New York.
25. Jaramillo M., Paavilainen P., Naatanen R. Mismatch negativity and behavioural discrimination in humans as a function of the magnitude of change in sound duration. Neurosci. Lett. 2000, 290(2):101-104.
26. Jazayeri M., Shadlen M.N. Temporal context calibrates interval timing. Nat. Neurosci. 2010, 13(8):1020-1026.
27. Jones M.R., McAuley J.D. Time judgments in global temporal contexts. Percept. Psychophys. 2005, 67(3):398-417.
28. Kahn D.A., Harris A.M., Wolk D.A., Aguirre G.K. Temporally distinct neural coding of perceptual similarity and prototype bias. J. Vis. 2010, 10(10):1-12.
29. Kareev Y. Positive bias in the perception of covariation. Psych. Rev. 1995, 102(3):490-502.
30. Kelly S.P., O'Connell R.G. Internal and external influences on the rate of sensory evidence accumulation in the human brain. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33(50):19434-19441.
31. Kiebel S.J., Daunizeau J., Friston K.J. A hierarchy of time-scales and the brain. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2008, 4(11). e1000209.
32. Knill D.C., Richards W. Perception as a Bayesian Inference 1996, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
33. Kononowicz T.W., van Rijn H. Decoupling interval timing and climbing neural activity: a dissociation between CNV and N1P2 amplitudes. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34(8):2931-2939.
34. Kopec C.D., Brody C.D. Human performance on the temporal bisection task. Brain Cogn. 2010, 74(3):262-272.
35. Kriegeskorte N., Mur M., Bandettini P. Representational similarity analysis - connecting the branches of systems neuroscience. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2008, 2:4.
36. Lieving L.M., Lane S.D., Cherek D.R., Tcheremissine O.V. Effects of delays on human performance on a temporal discrimination procedure: evidence of a choose-short effect. Behav. Process. 2006, 71(2-3):135-143.
37. Lindbergh C.A., Kieffaber P.D. The neural correlates of temporal judgments in the duration bisection task. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51(2):191-196.
38. Luck S.J., Hillyard S.A. Electrophysiological evidence for parallel and serial processing during visual search. Percept. Psychophys. 1990, 48(6):603-617.
39. Macar F., Vidal F. The CNV peak: an index of decision making and temporal memory. Psychophysiology 2003, 40(6):950-954.
40. Macar F., Vidal F. Event-related potentials as indices of time processing: a review. J. Psychophysiol. 2004, 18:89-104.
41. Matthews W.J. Time. Perception: the surprising effects of surprising stimuli 2015, 144(1):172-197.
42. Mento G., Tarantino V., Sarlo M., Bisiacchi P.S. Automatic temporal expectancy: a high-density event-related potential study. PLoS One 2013, 8(5):e62896.
43. Merchant H., Perez O., Zarco W., Gamez J. Interval tuning in the primate medial premotor cortex as a general timing mechanism. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33(21):9082-9096.
44. Merchant H., Harrington D.L., Meck W.H. Neural basis of the perception and estimation of time. Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 2013, 36:313-336.
45. Michaelis K., Wiener M., Thompson J.C. Passive listening to preferred motor tempo modules corticospinal excitability. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2014, 8:252.
46. Mita A., Mushiake H., Shima K., Matsuzaka Y., Tanji J. Interval time coding by neurons in the presupplementary and supplementary motor areas. Nat. Neurosci. 2009, 12(4):502-507.
47. Muller N.G., Strumpf G., Scholz M., Baier B., Melloni L. Repetition suppression versus enhancement-it's quantity that matters. Cereb. Cortex 2013, 23(2):315-322.
48. Nagai Y., Critchley H.D., Featherstone E., Fenwick P.B., Trimble M.R., et al. Brain activity relating to the contingent negative variation: an fMRI investigation. NeuroImage 2004, 21(4):1232-1241.
49. Ng K.K., Tobin S., Penney T.B. Temporal accumulation and decision processes in the duration bisection task revealed by contingent negative variation. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2011, 5:77.
50. O'Connell R.G., Dockree P.M., Kelly S.P. A supramodal accumulation-to-bound signal that determines perceptual decisions in humans. Nat. Neurosci. 2012, 15(12):1729-1735.
51. Ossmy O., Moran R., Pfeffer T., Tsetsos K., Usher M., Donner T.H. The timescale of perceptual evidence integration can be adapted to the environment. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23(11):981-986.
52. Palmer J., Huk A.C., Shadlen M.N. The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. J. Vis. 2005, 5(5):376-404.
53. Paul I., Le Dantec C., Bernard C., Lalonde R., Rebai M. Event-related potentials in the frontal lobe during performance of a visual duration discrimination task. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2003, 20(5):351-360.
54. Paul I., Wearden J., Bannier D., Gontier E., Le Dantec C., et al. Making decisions about time: event-related potentials and judgements about the equality of durations. Biol. Psychol. 2011, 88(1):94-103.
55. Peirce J.W. Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPy. Front. Neuroinform. 2008, 2:10. 10.3389/neuro.11.010.2008.
56. Pfeuty M., Ragot R., Pouthas V. When time is up: CNV time course differentiates the roles of the hemispheres in the discrimination of short tone durations. Exp. Brain Res. 2003, 151(3):372-379.
57. Philiastides M.G., Heekeren H.R., Sajda Human scalp potentials reflect a mixture of decision-related signals during perceptual choices. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34(50):16877-16889.
58. Polich Neuropsychology of the P300. The Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components 2011, Oxford University Press. S.A. Luck, E. Kappenman (Eds.).
59. Pöppel E. A hierarchical model of temporal perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1997, 1(2):56-61.
60. Pouthas V., Garnero L., Ferrandez A.M., Ranault B. ERPs and PET analysis of time perception: spatial and temporal brain mapping during visual discrimination tasks. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2000, 10(2):49-60.
61. Praamstra P., Kourtis D., Kwok H.F., Oostenveld R. Neurophysiology of implicit timing in serial choice reaction-time performance. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26(20):5448-5455.
62. Rohenkohl G., Cravo A.M., Wyart V., Nobre A.C. Temporal expectation improves the quality of sensory information. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32(24):8424-8428.
63. San Martin R., Applebaum L.G., Pearson J.M., Huettel S.A., Woldorff M.G. Rapid brain responses independently predict gain maximization and loss minimization during economic decision making. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33(16):7011-7019.
64. Scheibe C., Ullsperger M., Sommer W., Heekeren H.R. Effects of parametrical and trial-to-trial variation in prior probability processing revealed by simultaneous electroencephalogram/functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30(49):16709-16717.
65. Segaert K., Weber K., de Lange F.P., Petersson K.M., Hagoort P. The suppression of repetition enhancement: a review of fMRI studies. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51(1):59-66.
66. Shi Z., Church R.M., Meck W.H. Bayesian optimization of time perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2013, 17(11):556-564.
67. Sieroka N., Dosch H.G., Specht H.J., Rupp A. Additional neuromagnetic source activity outside the auditory cortex in duration discrimination correlates with behavioral ability. NeuroImage 2003, 20(3):1697-1703.
68. Summerfield C., Trittschuh E.H., Monti J.M., Mesulam M.M., Egner T. Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11(9):1004-1006.
69. Taatgen N., van Rijn H. Traces of times past: representations of temporal intervals in memory. Mem. Cognit. 2011, 39(8):1546-1560.
70. Tarantino V., Ehles A.C., Baehne C., Boreatti-Huemmer A., et al. The time course of temporal discrimination: an ERP study. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2010, 121(1):43-52.
71. Todorovic A., van Ede F., Maris E., de Lange F.P. Prior expectation mediates neural adaptation to repeated sounds in the auditory cortex: an MEG study. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31(25):9118-9123.
72. van Rijn H., Kononowicz T.W., Meck W.H., Ng K.K., Penney T.B. Contingent negative variation and its relation to time estimation: a theoretical evaluation. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2011, 5:91.
73. van Wassenhove V., Lectoure L. Duration estimation entails predicting when. Neuroimage 2015, 106:272-283.
74. Wearden J.H. Human performance on an analogue of an interval bisection task. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. B 1991, 43(1):59-81.
75. Wearden J.H., Ferrara A. Stimulus spacing effects in temporal bisection by humans. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. B 1995, 48(4):289-310.
76. Wichmann F.A., Hill N.J. The psychometric function: I fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Percept. Psychophys. 2001, 63:1293-1313.
77. Wichmann F.A., Hill N.J. The psychometric function: II bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling. Percept. Psychophys. 2001, 63:1314-1329.
78. Wiener M., Turkeltaub P.E., Coslett H.B. The image of time: a voxel-wise meta-analysis. NeuroImage 2010, 49:1728-1740.
79. Wiener M., Matell M.S., Coslett H.B. Multiple mechanisms for temporal processing. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2011, 5:31.
80. Wiener M., Kliot D., Turkeltaub P.E., Hamilton R.H., Wolk D.A., et al. Parietal influence on temporal encoding indexed by simultaneous transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32(35):12258-12267.
81. Wiener M., Thompson J., Coslett H.B. Continuous carryover of temporal context dissociates response bias from perceptual influence for duration. PLoS One 2014, 6:e100803.
82. Zhao J., Al-Aidroos N., Turk-Browne N.B. Attention is spontaneously biased toward regularities. Psychol. Sci. 2013, 24(5):667-677.