Time perception: The surprising effects of surprising stimuli

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 144, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 172-197

  Matthews, William J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Coding efficiency; Predictability; Processing efficiency; Repetition suppression; Time perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AROUSAL; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; SHORT TERM MEMORY; TIME PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AROUSAL; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; TIME PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84925755745     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/xge0000041     Document Type: Article

References (139)

1. Allman, M. J., Teki, S., Griffiths, T. D., & Meck, W. H. (2014). Properties of the internal clock: First- and second-order principles of subjective time. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 743-771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115117
2. Anderson, J. R., & Milson, R. (1989). Human memory: An adaptive perspective. Psychological Review, 96, 703-719.
3. Anderson, J. R., & Schooler, L. J. (1991). Reflections of the environment in memory. Psychological Science, 2, 396-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00174.x
4. Anderson, R. B., Tweney, R. D., Rivardo, M., & Duncan, S. (1997). Need probability affects retention: A direct demonstration. Memory & Cognition, 25, 867-872.
5. Andics, A., Gál, V., Vicsi, K., Rudas, G., & Vidnyánszky, Z. (2013). FMRI repetition suppression for voices is modulated by stimulus expectations. NeuroImage, 69, 277-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.033
6. Aubry, F., Guillaume, N., Mogicato, G., Bergeret, L., & Celsis, P. (2008). Stimulus complexity and prospective timing: Clues for a parallel process model of time perception. Acta Psychologica, 128, 63-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.09.011
7. Bar, M. (2009). Predictions: A universal principle in the operation of the human brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. B: Biological Sciences, 364, 1181-1182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0321
8. Bates, D. M., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-5. Retreived from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html
9. Bausenhart, K. M., Rolke, B., & Ulrich, R. (2007). Knowing when to hear aids what to hear. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1610-1615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470210701536419
10. Birngruber, T., Schröter, H., & Ulrich, R. (2014). Duration perception of visual and auditory oddball stimuli: Does judgment task modulate the temporal oddball effect? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 814-828. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0602-2
11. Block, R. A., Hancock, P. A., & Zakay, D. (2010). How cognitive load affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Acta Psychologica, 134, 330-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.006
12. Bodner, G. E., & Dypvik, A. T. (2005). Masked priming of number judgments depends on prime validity and task. Memory & Cognition, 33, 29-47.
13. Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E. J. (2001). Prime validity affects masked repetition priming: Evidence for an episodic resource account of priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 616-647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2791
14. Bodner, G. E., & Masson, M. E. J. (2004). Beyond binary judgments: Prime validity modulates masked repetition priming in the naming task. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1-11.
15. Bruno, A., Ng, E., & Johnston, A. (2013). Motion-direction specificity for adaptation-induced duration compression depends on temporal frequency. Journal of Vision, 13, 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/13.12.19
16. Buhusi, C. V., & Meck, W. H. (2005). What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 755-765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn1764
17. Buhusi, C. V., & Meck, W. H. (2009). Relativity theory and time perception: Single or multiple clocks? PLoS ONE, 4(7), e6268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006268
18. Buonomano, D. V., & Maass, W. (2009). State-dependent computations: Spatiotemporal processing in cortical networks. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 113-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/Nrn2558
19. Burr, D., Tozzi, A., & Morrone, M. C. (2007). Neural mechanisms for timing visual events are spatially selective in real-world coordinates. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 423-425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn1874
20. Burr, D. C., Cicchini, G. M., Arrighi, R., & Morrone, M. C. (2011). Spatiotopic selectivity of adaptation-based compression of event duration. Journal of Vision, 11, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/11.2.21
21. Burton, A. M., White, D., & McNeill, A. (2010). The Glasgow face matching test. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 286-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/Brm.42.1.286
22. Carrasco, M., & McElree, B. (2001). Covert attention accelerates the rate of visual information processing. PNAS: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 5363-5367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.081074098
23. Casini, L., & Macar, F. (1997). Effects of attention manipulation on judgments of duration and of intensity in the visual modality. Memory & Cognition, 25, 812-818. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/Bf03211325
24. Chater, N., & Manning, C. D. (2006). Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 335-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.006
25. Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situation agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 181-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000477
26. Creelman, C. D. (1962). Human discrimination of auditory duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 34, 582-593.
27. Curran, W., & Benton, C. P. (2012). The many directions of time. Cognition, 122, 252-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.016
28. De Baene, W., & Vogels, R. (2010). Effects of adaptation on the stimulus selectivity of macaque inferior temporal spiking activity and local field potentials. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 2145-2165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp277
29. Desimone, R. (1996). Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. PNAS: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93, 13494-13499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.24.13494
30. Droit-Volet, S. (2010). Stop using time reproduction tasks in a comparative perspective without further analyses of the role of the motor response: The example of children. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 130-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09541440902738900
31. Droit-Volet, S., & Gil, S. (2009). The time-emotion paradox. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. B: Biological Sciences, 364, 1943-1953. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0013
32. Durso, F. T., & Johnson, M. K. (1979). Facilitation in naming and categorizing repeated pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 449-459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.5.5.449
33. Dyjas, O., Bausenhart, K. M., & Ulrich, R. (2012). Trial-by-trial updating of an internal reference in discrimination tasks: Evidence from effects of stimulus order and trial sequence. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1819-1841. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0362-4
34. Eagleman, D. M. (2008). Human time perception and its illusions. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18, 131-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2008.06.002
35. Eagleman, D. M., & Pariyadath, V. (2009). Is subjective duration a signature of coding efficiency? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. B: Biological Sciences, 364, 1841-1851. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0026
36. Ebner, N. C. (2008). Age of face matters: Age-group differences in ratings of young and old faces. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 130-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/Brm.40.1.130
37. Enns, J. T., Brehaut, J. C., & Shore, D. I. (1999). The duration of a brief event in the mind's eye. Journal of General Psychology, 126, 355-372.
38. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/Bf03195503
39. Friston, K. (2005). A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. B: Biological Sciences, 360, 815-836. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1622
40. Friston, K. (2009). The free-energy principle: A rough guide to the brain? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 293-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.005
41. Gallistel, C. R. (2009). The importance of proving the null. Psychological Review, 116, 439-453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015251
42. Gibbon, J., Church, R. M., & Meck, W. H. (1984). Scalar timing in memory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 423, 52-77: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb23417.x
43. Gil, S., & Droit-Volet, S. (2011). "Time flies in the presence of angry faces".. depending on the temporal task used! Acta Psychologica, 136, 354-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.12.010
44. Gotts, S. J., Chow, C. C., & Martin, A. (2012). Repetition priming and repetition suppression: A case for enhanced efficiency through neural synchronization. Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 227-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2012.670617
45. Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006). Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 14-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006
46. Grondin, S. (2012). Violation of the scalar property for time perception between 1 and 2 seconds: Evidence from interval discrimination, reproduction, and categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 880-890. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/A0027188
47. Grondin, S., & Rammsayer, T. (2003). Variable foreperiods and temporal discrimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 731-765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02724980244000611
48. Grotheer, M., & Kovács, G. (2014). Repetition probability effects depend on prior experiences. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 6640-6646. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5326-13.2014
49. Gu, B.-M., van Rijn, H., & Meck, W. H. (2014). Oscillatory multiplexing of population codes for interval timing and working memory. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.10.008
50. Huang, Y., & Rao, R. P. N. (2011). Predictive coding. Wires Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2, 580-593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcs.142
51. Huber, D. E. (2008). Immediate priming and cognitive aftereffects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 324-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.324
52. Ivry, R. B., & Schlerf, J. E. (2008). Dedicated and intrinsic models of time perception. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12, 273-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.002
53. Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of an experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 21-38.
54. Jacoby, L. L., & Whitehouse, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 126-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.118.2.126
55. Johnston, A., Arnold, D. H., & Nishida, S. (2006). Spatially localized distortions of event time. Current Biology, 16, 472-479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.01.032
56. Jones, L. A., Poliakoff, E., & Wells, J. (2009). Good vibrations: Human interval timing in the vibrotactile modality. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 2171-2186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470210902782200
57. Jones, M. R., & Boltz, M. (1989). Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychological Review, 96, 459-491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.96.3.459
58. Kaliukhovich, D. A., & Vogels, R. (2011). Stimulus repetition probability does not affect repetition suppression in macaque inferior temporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 1547-1558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhq207
59. Kiebel, S. J., Daunizeau, J., & Friston, K. J. (2008). A hierarchy of time-scales and the brain. PLoS Computational Biology, 4(11), e1000209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000209
60. Kim, E., & McAuley, J. D. (2013). Effects of pitch distance and likelihood on the perceived duration of deviant auditory events. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 1547-1558. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0490-5
61. Kinoshita, S., Foster, K. I., & Mozer, M. C. (2008). Unconscious cognition isn't that smart: Modulation of masked repetition priming effect in the word naming task. Cognition, 107, 623-649. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.011
62. Kononowicz, T. W., & van Rijn, H. (2014). Decoupling interval timing and climbing neural activity: A dissociation between CNV and N1P2 amplitudes. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 2931-2939. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2523-13.2014
63. Kovács, G., Iffland, L., Vidnyánszky, Z., & Greenlee, M. W. (2012). Stimulus repetition probability effects on repetition suppression are position invariant for faces. NeuroImage, 60, 2128-2135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.038
64. Kovács, G., Kaiser, D., Kaliukhovich, D. A., Vidnyánszky, Z., & Vogels, R. (2013). Repetition probability does not affect fMRI repetition suppression for objects. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 9805-9812. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3423-12.2013
65. Kristjánsson, Á., & Campana, G. (2010). Where perception meets memory: A review of repetition priming in visual search tasks. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 5-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/App.72.1.5
66. Kruschke, J. K. (2011). Bayesian assessment of null values via parameter estimation and model comparisons. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 299-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406925
67. Kuehl, L. K., Brandt, E. S. L., Hahn, E., Dettling, M., & Neuhaus, A. H. (2013). Exploring the time course of the N170 repetition suppression: A preliminary study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 87, 183-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.12.007
68. Large, E. W., & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. Psychological Review, 106, 119-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.106.1.119
69. Larsson, J., & Smith, A. T. (2012). fMRI repetition suppression: Neuronal adaptation or stimulus expectation? Cerebral Cortex, 22, 567-576. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr119
70. Lee, T. A., & Mumford, D. (2003). Hierarchical Bayesian inference in the visual cortex. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 20, 1434-1448.
71. Lustig, C., Matell, M. S., & Meck, W. H. (2005). Not "just a coincidence: Fronto-striatal interactions in working memory and interval timing. Memory, 13(3/4), 441-448.
72. Macar, F., Grondin, S., & Casini, L. (1994). Controlled attention sharing influences time estimation. Memory & Cognition, 22, 673-686. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/Bf03209252
73. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22, 657-672.
74. Matell, M. S., & Meck, W. H. (2004). Cortico-striatal circuits and interval timing: Coincidence detection of oscillatory processes. Cognitive Brain Research, 21, 139-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.06.012
75. Mattes, S., & Ulrich, R. (1998). Directed attention prolongs the perceived duration of a brief stimulus. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 1305-1317. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/Bf03207993
76. Matthews, W. J. (2011a). Can we use verbal estimation to dissect the internal clock? Differentiating the effects of pacemaker rate, switch latencies, and judgment processes. Behavioural Processes, 86, 68-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2010.09.006
77. Matthews, W. J. (2011b). How do changes in speed affect the perception of duration? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1617-1627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/A0022193
78. Matthews, W. J. (2011c). Stimulus repetition and the perception of time: The effects of prior exposure on temporal discrimination, judgment, and production. PLoS ONE, 6(5), e19815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019815
79. Matthews, W. J. (2011d). What might judgment and decision making research be like if we took a Bayesian approach to hypothesis testing? Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 843-856.
80. Matthews, W. J. (2013). How does sequence structure affect the judgment of time? Exploring a weighted sum of segments model. Cognitive Psychology, 66, 259-282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.01.001
81. Matthews, W. J., & Dylman, A. S. (2014). The language of magnitude comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 510-520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0034143
82. Matthews, W. J., & Grondin, S. (2012). On the replication of Kristofferson's (1980) quantal timing for duration discrimination: Some learning but no quanta and not much of a Weber constant. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1056-1072. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0282-3
83. Matthews, W. J., & Meck, W. H. (2014). Time perception: The bad news and the good. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 5, 429-446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1298
84. Matthews, W. J., & Stewart, N. (2009). The effect of interstimulus interval on sequential effects in absolute identification. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 2014-2029. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470210802649285
85. Matthews, W. J., Stewart, N., & Wearden, J. H. (2011). Stimulus intensity and the perception of duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 303-313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/A0019961
86. Matthews, W. J., Terhune, D. B., van Rijn, H. Eagleman, D. M., Sommer, M. A., & Meck, W. H. (in press). Subjective duration as a signature of coding efficiency: Emerging links among stimulus repetition, predictive coding, and cortical GABA levels. Timing and Time Perception Reviews.
87. Mauk, M. D., & Buonomano, D. V. (2004). The neural basis of temporal processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 307-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144247
88. Maunsell, J. H. R., & Treue, S. (2006). Feature-based attention in visual cortex. Trends in Neurosciences, 29, 317-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2006.04.001
89. Mayrhauser, L., Bergmann, J., Crone, J., & Kronbichler, M. (2014). Neural repetition suppression: Evidence for perceptual expectation in objectselective regions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 225. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00225
90. Merchant, H., Harrington, D. L., & Meck, W. H. (2013). Neural basis of the perception and estimation of time. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 36, 313-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-062012-170349
91. Merchant, H., Zarco, W., & Prado, L. (2008). Do we have a common mechanism for measuring time in the hundreds of millisecond range? Evidence from multiple-interval timing tasks. Journal of Neurophysiology, 99, 939-949. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.01225.2007
92. Minear, M., & Park, D. C. (2004). A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 630-633. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/Bf03206543
93. Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., & Jamil, T. (2014). BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes factors for common designs. R package version 0.9.8. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BayesFactor/index.html
94. Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
95. New, J. J., & Scholl, B. J. (2009). Subjective time dilation: Spatially local, object-based, or a global visual experience? Journal of Vision, 9, 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/9.2.4
96. Noguchi, Y., & Kakigi, R. (2006). Time representations can be made from nontemporal information in the brain: An MEG study. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 1797-1808. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhj117
97. Ono, F., & Kawahara, J. (2005). The effect of unconscious priming on temporal production. Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 474-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2005.02.001
98. O'Toole, A. J., Harms, J., Snow, S. L., Hurst, D. R., Pappas, M. R., Ayyad, J. H., & Abdi, H. (2005). A video database of moving faces and people. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 27, 812-816. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/Tpami.2005.90
99. Pariyadath, V., & Eagleman, D. (2007). The effect of predictability on subjective duration. PLoS ONE, 2(11), e1264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/Journal. Pone.0001264
100. Pariyadath, V., & Eagleman, D. M. (2008). Brief subjective durations contract with repetition. Journal of Vision, 8, 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/8.16.11
101. Pariyadath, V., & Eagleman, D. M. (2012). Subjective duration distortions mirror neural repetition suppression. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e49362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049362
102. Rammsayer, T., & Ulrich, R. (2001). Counting models of temporal discrimination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 270-277.
103. Rao, R. P. N., & Ballard, D. H. (1999). Predictive coding in the visual cortex: A functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 79-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/4580
104. Reynolds, J. H., Pasternak, T., & Desimone, R. (2000). Attention increases sensitivity of V4 neurons. Neuron, 26, 703-714. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81206-4
105. Rose, D., & Summers, J. (1995). Duration illusions in a train of visual stimuli. Perception, 24, 1177-1187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/P241177
106. Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
107. Sadeghi, N. G., Pariyadath, V., Apte, S., Eagleman, D. M., & Cook, E. P. (2011). Neural correlates of subsecond time distortion in the middle temporal area of visual cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 3829-3840. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00071
108. Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., & Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.3.1.1
109. Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2007). Remembering the past to imagine the future: The prospective brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 657-661. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn2213
110. Schiffman, H. R., & Bobko, D. J. (1974). Effects of stimulus complexity on the perception of brief temporal intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 156-159.
111. Schindel, R., Rowlands, J., & Arnold, D. H. (2011). The oddball effect: Perceived duration and predictive coding. Journal of Vision, 11, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/11.2.17
112. Seifried, T., & Ulrich, R. (2010). Does the asymmetry effect inflate the temporal expansion of odd stimuli? Psychological Research, 74, 90-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0187-x
113. Seifried, T., & Ulrich, R. (2011). Exogenous visual attention prolongs perceived duration. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 68-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-010-0005-6
114. Shi, Z., Church, R. M., & Meck, W. H. (2013). Bayesian optimization of time perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 556-564. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.009
115. Spratling, M. W. (2008). Predictive coding as a model of biased competition in visual attention. Vision Research, 48, 1391-1408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2008.03.009
116. Stewart, N., Brown, G. D. A., & Chater, N. (2005). Absolute identification by relative judgment. Psychological Review, 112, 881-911. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.881
117. Stewart, N., & Matthews, W. J. (2009). Relative judgment and knowledge of the category structure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 594-599. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.3.594
118. Summerfield, C., & Egner, T. (2009). Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 403-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.003
119. Summerfield, C., Trittschuh, E. H., Monti, J. M., Mesulam, M. M., & Egner, T. (2008). Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1004-1006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/Nn.2163
120. Summerfield, C., Wyart, V., Johnen, V. M., & de Gardelle, V. (2011). Human scalp electroencephalography reveals that repetition suppression varies with expectation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 67. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00067
121. Taatgen, N., & van Rijn, H. (2011). Traces of times past: Representations of temporal intervals in memory. Memory & Cognition, 39, 1546-1560. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0113-0
122. Tenenbaum, J. B., Kemp, C., Griffiths, T. L., & Goodman, N. D. (2011). How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction. Science, 331, 1279-1285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1192788
123. Todorovic, A., & de Lange, F. P. (2012). Repetition suppression and expectation suppression are dissociable in time in early auditory evoked fields. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 13389-13395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/Jneurosci.2227-12.2012
124. Todorovic, A., van Ede, F., Maris, E., & de Lange, F. P. (2011). Prior expectation mediates neural adaptation to repeated sounds in the auditory cortex: An MEG study. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 9118-9123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/Jneurosci.1425-11.2011
125. Treisman, M. (1963). Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval: Implications for a model of the "internal clock." Psychological Monographs, 77, 1-31.
126. Tse, P. U., Intriligator, J., Rivest, J., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). Attention and the subjective expansion of time. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1171-1189. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/Bf03196844
127. Ulrich, R., Nitschke, J., & Rammsayer, T. (2006). Perceived duration of expected and unexpected stimuli. Psychological Research, 70, 77-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/S00426-004-0195-4
128. van Rijn, H., Gu, B.-M., & Meck, W. H. (2014). Dedicated clock/timingcircuit theories of time perception and timed performance. In H. Merchant & V. de Lafuente (Eds.). Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology: Vol. 829. Neurobiology of interval timing (pp. 77-99). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1782-2_5
129. Varakin, D. A., Klemes, K. J., & Porter, K. A. (2013). The effect of scene structure on time perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 1639-1652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.754912.
130. Wacongne, C., Labyt, E., van Wassenhove, V., Bekinschtein, T., Naccache, L., & Dehaene, S. (2011). Evidence for a hierarchy of predictions and prediction errors in human cortex. PNAS: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 20754-20759. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117807108
131. Wearden, J. H. (1992). Temporal generalization in humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 134-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0097-7403.18.2.134
132. Wearden, J. H. (1999). "Beyond the fields we know": Exploring and developing scalar timing theory. Behavioural Processes, 45, 3-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(99)00006-6
133. Wearden, J. H., Edwards, H., Fakhri, M., & Percival, A. (1998). Why "sounds are judged longer than lights": Application of a model of the internal clock in humans. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51B(2), 97-120.
134. Witherspoon, D., & Allan, L. G. (1985). The effect of a prior presentation on temporal judgments in a perceptual identification task. Memory & Cognition, 13, 101-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/Bf03197003
135. Xuan, B., Zhang, D., He, S., & Chen, X. C. (2007). Larger stimuli are judged to last longer. Journal of Vision, 7, 1-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/7.10.2
136. Yeshurun, Y., & Marom, G. (2008). Transient spatial attention and the perceived duration of brief visual events. Visual Cognition, 16, 826-848. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506280701588022
137. Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/H0025848
138. Zakay, D., & Block, R. A. (1997). Temporal cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 12-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.Ep11512604
139. Zucker, R. S., & Regehr, W. G. (2002). Short-term synaptic plasticity. Annual Review of Physiology, 64, 355-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physiol.64.092501.114547