The representation of temporal information in perception and motor control

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 851-857

  Ivry, Richard B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BASAL GANGLION; BODY MOVEMENT; CEREBELLUM; HUMAN; MOTOR CONTROL; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

EID: 0030464024     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4388(96)80037-7     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ivry RB, Hazeltine RE: The perception and production of temporal intervals across a range of durations: evidence for a common timing mechanism. J Exp Psychol [Hum Percept Perform; 1995, 21:1-12. A new method was used to examine the relationship between temporal acuity in motor and perception tasks. Variability on timing tasks is partitioned into two sources: time-dependent and time-independent. The Weber fraction (time-dependent variability divided by duration) is shown to be similar in production and perception tasks when the tasks afford similar representations of temporal information.
2. Ivry R: Cerebellar involvement in the explicit representation of temporal information. In Temporal Information Processing in the Nervous System: Special Reference to Dyslexia and Dysphasia, vol 682. Edited by Tallal P, Galaburda A, Llinas RR, Von Euler C. New York: Annals New York Academy of Sciences; 1993:214-230.
3. Ivry R: The many manifestations of a cerebellar timing system. In The Cerebellum and Cognition. Edited by Schmahmann J. San Diego: Academic Press; 1997, in press. Reviews evidence demonstrating a general timing function of the cerebellum in movement, perception, and learning. The review also provides a skeptical evaluation of neuroimaging evidence that suggests a more general role of the cerebellum in cognition, pointing out a serious problem in interpreting these data
4. Höre J, Wild B, Diener HC: Cerebellar dysmetria at the elbow, wrist, and fingers. J Neurophysiol 1991, 65:563-571.
5. Ivry R, Keele S, Diener HC: Dissociation of the lateral and medial cerebellum in movement timing and movement execution. Exp Brain Res 1988, 73:167-180.
6. Ivry R, Keele S: Timing functions of the cerebellum. J Cogn A/eurosc/1989, 1:136-152.
7. Ivry R, Diener HC: Impaired velocity perception in patients with lesions of the cerebellum. J Cogn Neurosci 1991, 3:355-366.
8. Nawrot M, Rizzo M: Motion perception deficits from midline cerebellar lesions in human. Vision Res 1995, 35:723-731. Patients with lesions in the midline regions of the cerebellum are shown to be impaired in judging the direction of motion, defined by the global flow of random dot stimuli. Extends earlier work on velocity perception in patients with cerebellar lesions [7], implicating another perceptual domain in which this structure is essential for processing information that unfolds over time.
9. Jeuptner M, Rijntjes M, Weiller C, Faiss JH, Timmann D, Mueller S, Diener HC: Localization of a cerebellar timing process using PET. Neurology 1995, 45:1540-1545. In the experimental condition, subjects made a two-alternative forced choice judgment, indicating if a second interval was longer or shorter than a comparison interval. In the control condition, the intervals were of equal duration, and subjects simply alternated between the two responses, thus equating the actual movements required for the two tasks. In addition to the cerebellar foci emphasized by the authors, rCBF increases were also observed in the basal ganglia, temporal lobe, prefrontal cortex, and cingulate cortex.
10. Thompson R: Neural mechanisms of classical conditioning in mammals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond [Biol] 1990, 329:161 -170.
11. Daum l, Schugens M, Ackermann H, Lutzenberger W, Dichgans J, Birbaumer N: Classical conditioning after cerebellar lesions in humans. Behav Neurosci 1993, 107:748-756.
12. Topka H, Valls-Sole J, Massaquoi S, Hallett M: Deficit in classical conditioning in patients with cerebellar degeneration. Brain 1993, 116:961-969.
13. Woodruff-Pak DS, Papka M, Ivry RB: Cerebellar involvement in eyeblink classical conditioning in humans. Neuropsycho/ogy 1996, 10:443-458.
14. Logan CG, Grafton ST: Functional anatomy of human eyeblink conditioning determined with regional cerebral glucose metabolism and positron-emission tomography. Proc Nat/ Acad Sei USA 1995, 92:7500-7504. Two measurements of cerebral glucose metabolism using PET were obtained. First, during a session in which the CS and US were unpaired (control). Second, during paired presentations following training in which subjects had undergone eyeblink conditioning. Learning-related activity was observed bilaterally in cerebellar cortex and nuclei, as well as brainstem structures, thalamus, temporal cortex, hippocampus, and striatum.
15. Perrett S, Ruiz B, Mauk M: Cerebellar cortex lesions disrupt learning-dependent timing of conditioned eyelid responses. J Neurosci 1993, 13:1708-1718.
16. O'Boyle DJ, Freeman JS, Cody FWJ: The accuracy and precision of timing of self-paced, repetitive movements in subjects with Parkinson's disease. Brain 1996, 119:51-70. Contrary to an earlier report [6], patients with Parkinson's disease were found to be more variable in their performance on a repetitive tapping task. In addition to the 'on' and 'off' medication manipulation, increased variability was also observed when patients with asymmetric symptoms tapped with their more impaired effector. The report confirms that problems in producing periodic movements are not restricted to patients with cerebellar lesions, and underscores the need for more analytic tools in analyzing the data from these types of tasks.
17. Wing A, Knstofferson A: Response delays and the timing of discrete motor responses. Percept Psychophys 1973, 14:5-12.
18. Pastor MA, Jahanshahi M, Artieda J, Obeso JA: Performance of repetitive wrist movements in Parkinson's disease. Brain 1992, 115:875-891.
19. Freeman JS, Cody FWJ, O'Boyle DJ, Crauford D, Neary D, Snowden JS: Abnormalities of motor timing in Huntington's disease. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders 1997, in press.
20. Pastor MA, Artieda J, Jahanshahi M, Obeso JA: Time estimation and reproduction is abnormal in Parkinson's disease. Brain 1992, 115:211-225.
21. Meek WH: Neuropharmacology of timing and time perception. Cogn Brain Res 1996, 3:227-242. An excellent review of an extensive literature addressing the neuropharmacology of timing and time perception. Focuses on an information processing model in which performance entails the operation of timing and memory processes. Lesion and pharmacological studies indicate that the dopaminergic pathways of the basal ganglia are a critical part of the timing mechanism, whereas acetylcholine function in the frontal cortex is linked to attentional and memory processes.
22. Maricq AV, Church RM: The differential effects of haloperidol and methamphetamine on time estimation in the rat. Psychopharmacol 1983, 79:10-15.
23. Von Steinbuchel N, Wittmann M, Poeppel E: Timing in perceptual and motor tasks after disturbances of the brain. In Time, Internal Clocks, and Movement. Edited by Pastor MA, Artieda J. New York: Elsevier; 1996:281-304.
24. Halsband U, Ito N, Tanji J, Freund HJ: The role of premotor and the supplementary motor area in the temporal control of movement in man. Brain 1993, 116:243-266.
25. Shaw C, Aggleton JP: The ability of amnesic subjects to estimate time intervals. Neuropsychologia 1994, 32:857-873.
26. Gibbon J, Church RM: Representation of time. Cognition 1990, 37:23-54.
27. Meek WH, Church RM, Wenk GL, Olton DS: Nucleus basalis magnocellularis and medial septal lesions differentially impair temporal memory. J Neurosci 1987, 7:3505-3511.
28. Zakay D, Block RA: The role of attention in time estimation processes. In Time, Internal Clocks, and Movement. Edited by Pastor MA, Artieda J. New York: Elsevier; 1996:143-164. Approaches time perception from a cognitive perspective, articulating the importance of attention in tasks requiring the estimation of intervals spanning at least several seconds. When subjects know that they will be required to estimate time (prospective judgments), perceived duration is inversely related to processing load. In contrast, under retrospective conditions, perceived duration is directly related to processing load.
29. Clarke S, Ivry R, Grinband J, Roberts S, Shimizu N: Exploring the domain of the cerebellar timing system. In Time, Internal Clocks, and Movement. Edited by Pastor MA, Artieda J. New York: Elsevier; 1996:257-280. Psychophysical functions in a duration discrimination task were measured in rats, using intervals centered around either 500 ms or 30 s. Bilateral lesions of the lateral cerebellar nuclei led to increased variability on the task with shorter intervals, with inconsistent changes in bias. In a second experiment, cerebellar lesions produced no changes in performance when the animals made an intensity discrimination, implicating a specific role of the cerebellum in representing the duration of short intervals.
30. Rusak B, Zucker I: Neural regulation of circadian rhythms. Physiol Rev 1979, 59:449-526.
31. Grillner S, Wallen P, Brodin L, Lansner A: Neuronal network generating locomotor behavior in lamprey. Annu Rev Neurosci 1991, 14:169-199.
32. Treisman M: Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval: implications for a model of the 'internal clock'. Psychol Monographs 1963, 77:1-31.
33. Treisman M, Faulkner A, Naish PLN, Brogan D: The internal clock: evidence for a temporal oscillator underlying time perception with some estimates of its characteristic frequency. Perception 1990, 19:705-743.
34. Treisman M, Faulkner A, Naish PLN: On the relation between time perception and the timing of motor action: evidence for a temporal oscillator controlling the timing of movement Q J Exp Psycho/1992, 45:235-263.
35. Gray CM, Singer W: Stimulus-specific neuronal oscillations in orientation columns of cat visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sei USA 1989, 86:1698-1702.
36. Joliot M, Ribary U, Llinas R: Human oscillatory brain activity near 40 Hz coexists with cognitive temporal binding. Proc Natl Acad Sei USA 1994, 91:11748-11751.
37. Poeppel E: Reconstruction of subjective time on the basis of hierarchically organized processing system. In Time, Internal Clocks, and Movement. Edited by Pastor MA, Artieda J. New York: Elsevier; 1996:165-185. This review indicates that the subjective experience of time in humans is constrained by at least two distinct mechanisms. First, a high-frequency mechanism, based on oscillations of approximately 34 Hz, underlies the integration of sensory information. Subjects can detect the presence of stimuli falling within a single period of this oscillatory, but are unable to identify the order of these stimuli, suggesting that they are linked into a unit. Second, a low-frequency mechanism operating over a duration of approximately 3 s defines subjective states of consciousness or 'islands' of mental activity.
38. Viviani P, Laissard G: Motor templates in typing. J Exp Psychol [Hum Percept Perform] 1996, 22:417-445. Investigates a long-running debate in the motor control literature regarding how the representation of action sequences incorporate temporal information. Skilled typists were required to repeatedly type a set of words, thus ensuring a range of overall durations. Interstroke intervals were constrained by biomechanical and linguistic factors, but also demonstrated proportional scaling. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that central representations of actions include the relative timing of the component movements.
39. Collier GL, Wright CE: Temporal rescaling of simple and complex ratios in rhythmic tapping. J Exp Psychol [Hum Percept PerfoW 1995, 21:602-627. Human subjects were trained to produce simple or complex ratios in rhythmic tapping and then asked to re-scale their performance by tapping at a slower tempo. Proportional scaling was only observed for simple ratios, and even here may not be related to the training, but rather the subjects' ability to produce simple ratios across a range of rates. These results challenge the assumption of abstract temporal representations in situations in which timing is controlled rather than an emergent property of performance.
40. Church RM, Broadbent HA: Alternative representations of time, number, and rate. Cognition 1990, 37:55-81.
41. Miall C: Models of neural timing. In Time, Internal Clocks, and Movement. Edited by Pastor MA, Artieda J. New York: Elsevier; 1996:69-94.
42. Buonomano D, Mauk M: Neural network model of the cerebellum: temporal discrimination and the timing of motor responses. Neural Computation 1994, 6:38-55.
43. Fiala JC, Grossberg S, Bullock D: Metabotropic glutamate receptor activation in cerebellar Purkinje cells as substrate for adaptive timing of the Classically conditioned eye-blink response. J Neurosci 1996, 16:3760-3774. Computational model based on biochemical data to demonstrate how the cerebellar cortex adaptively times the eyeblink response following classical conditioning. A glutamate receptor second-messenger system is hypothesized to produce slow responses in Purkinje cells, allowing information processing within these cells to bridge the interstimulus interval between the onset of CS-related activity relayed by parallel fibers and the US-related activity carried by climbing fibers. Variation in the number of glutamate receptors produces a population of Purkinje cells that respond with different latencies to the same input.
44. Buonomano DV, Merzenich MM: Temporal information transformed into a spatial code by a neural network with realistic properties. Science 1995, 267:1028-1030. Rather than focus on a specific neural system, this computational study addresses the more general question of how physiological processes can transform temporal information into a spatial code. A neural network is developed incorporating neuronal properties of paired pulse facilitation and slow inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs), two mechanisms which provide information about recent neural activity. Assuming the timecourse of these mechanisms span a range of latencies due to stochastic properties, the state of different elements within a network will vary when processing successive stimuli. Simulations are used to show that a single network can be trained on a variety of tasks with time-varying stimuli, including duration discrimination, temporal pattern recognition, and certain types of phoneme discrimination.
45. Getty DJ: Discrimination of short temporal intervals: a comparison of two models. Percept Psychophys 1975, 18:1-8.
46. Smith MC: CS-US interval and US intensity in classical conditioning of the rabbif s nictitating membrane response. J Comp Physiol Psychol 1968, 66:679-687.
47. Keele S, Nicoletti R, Ivry R, Pokorny R: Mechanisms of perceptual timing: beat-based or interval-based judgments? Psychol Res 1989, 50:251-256.
48. Schoener G, Kelso JAS: Dynamic pattern generation in behavioral and neural systems. Science 1988, 239:1513-1520.
49. Stucchi N, Vivian! P: Cerebral dominance and asynchrony between bimanual two-dimensional movements. J Exp Psychol [Hum Percept Perform] 1993, 19:1200-1220.
50. Helmuth LL, Ivry RB: When two hands are better than one: reduced timing variability during bimanual movements. J Exp Psychol iHum Percept Perform] 1996, 22:278-293. Subjects were asked to tap with the right or left hand, or both hands. Tapping with either hand was more consistent during the bimanual condition in comparison to when either hand tapped alone. The magnitude of the reduction was consistent with a model in which two independent timing signals were generated during bimanual tapping, one associated with each effector. It was hypothesized that these timing signals are 'averaged' by a simple summation mechanism associated with constraining when motor commands can be implemented. The results argue against single-timer models and suggest that timing and temporal coupling reflect separable mechanisms.
51. Franz EA, Ivry RB, Helmuth LL: Reduced timing variability in patients with unilateral cerebellar lesions during bimanual movements. J Cogn Neurosci 1996, 8:107-118.