Trial-by-trial fluctuations in CNV amplitude reflect anticipatory adjustment of response caution

NeuroImage

Volumn 96, Issue , 2014, Pages 95-105

  Boehm, Udo ^a   Van Maanen, Leendert ^b   Forstmann, Birte ^b   Van Rijn, Hedderik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

CNV; EEG; Linear ballistic accumulation; Response caution; Slow wave potentials; Speed accuracy tradeoff

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANTICIPATION; ARTICLE; BASAL GANGLION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NERVE EXCITABILITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; ADAPTATION; ASSOCIATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); NERVE CELL INHIBITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANTICIPATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; CUES; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURAL INHIBITION; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84899933640     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.063     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Bates D., Maechler M., Bolker B. Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package Version 0.999999-2 2013.
2. Bender S., Resch F., Weisbrod M., Oelkers-Ax R. Specific task anticipation versus unspecific orienting reaction during early contingent negative variation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 115(8):1836-1845.
3. Birbaumer N., Elbert T., Canavan A.G.M., Rockstroh B. Slow potentials of the cerebral cortex and behavior. Physiol. Rev. 1990, 70(1):1-41.
4. Bogacz R., Hu P.T., Holmes P.J., Cohen J.D. Do humans produce the speed-accuracy trade-off that maximizes reward rate?. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2010, 63(5):863-891.
5. Britten K.H., Shadlen M.N., Newsome W.T., Movshon A.J. The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance. J. Neurosci. 1992, 12(12):4745-4765.
6. Brown S.D., Heathcote A. The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation. Cogn. Psychol. 2008, 57(3):153-178.
7. Buckner R.L. Event-related fMRI and the hemodynamic response. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1998, 6(5-6):373-377.
8. Coles M.G.H. Modern mind-reading: psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology 1989, 26(3):251-269.
9. Cui R.Q., Egkher A., Huter D., Lang W., Lindinger G., Deecke L. High resolution spatiotemporal analysis of the contingent negative variation in simple or complex motor tasks and a non-motor task. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2000, 111(10):1847-1859.
10. De Jong R., Wierda M., Mulder G., Mulder L.J. Use of partial stimulus information in response processing. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1988, 14(4):682-692.
11. Donkin C., Brown S., Heathcote A. Drawing conclusions from choice response time models: a tutorial using the linear ballistic accumulator. J. Math. Psychol. 2011, 55(2):140-151.
12. Elbert T. Slow cortical potentials reflect the regulation of cortical excitability. Proceedings of a NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Slow Potential Changes in the Human Brain 1990, vol. 65390:235-251. New York, Plenum Press. W.C. McCallum (Ed.).
13. Forstmann B.U., Dutilh G., Brown S., Neumann J., von Cramon D.Y., Ridderinkhof K.R., Wagenmakers E.-J. Striatum and pre-SMA facilitate decision-making under time pressure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2008, 105(45):17538-17542.
14. Forstmann B.U., Anwander A., Schäfer A., Neumann J., Brown S., Wagenmakers E.-J., Turner R. Cortico-striatal connections predict control over speed and accuracy in perceptual decision making. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010, 107(36):15916-15920.
15. Forstmann B.U., Wagenmakers E.-J., Eichele T., Brown S., Serences J.T. Reciprocal relations between cognitive neuroscience and formal cognitive models: opposites attract?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2011, 15:272-279.
16. Gaillard A.W., Näätänen R. Slow potential changes and choice reaction time as a function of interstimulus interval. Acta Psychol. 1973, 37:173-186.
17. Grünewald G., Grünewald-Zuberbier E., Netz J., Homberg V., Sander G. Relationships between the late component of the contingent negative variation and the Bereitschaftspotential. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1979, 46(5):538-545.
18. Haider M., Spong P., Lindsley D.B. Attention, vigilance, and cortical evoked-potentials in humans. Science 1964, 145(3628):180-182.
19. Hillyard Steven A. Relationships between the contingent negative variation (CNV) and reaction time. Physiol. Behav. 1969, 4:351-357.
20. Hillyard S.A., Münte T.F. Selective attention to color and location: an analysis with event-related brain potentials. Percept. Psychophys. 1984, 36(2):185-198.
21. Ho T., Brown S., Van Maanen L., Forstmann B.U., Wagenmakers E.-J., Serences J.T. The optimality of sensory processing during the speed-accuracy tradeoff. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32(23):7992-8003.
22. Ivanoff J., Branning P., Marois R. fMRI Evidence for a dual process account of the speed-accuracy tradeoff in decision-making. PLoS ONE 2008, 3(7):e2635.
23. Jung T.-P., Makeig S., Humphries C., Lee T. Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology 2000, 37:163-178.
24. Kononowicz T.W., Van Rijn H. Slow potentials in time estimation: the role of temporal accumulation and habituation. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2011, 5(48). 10.3389/fnint.2011.00048.
25. Kononowicz T.W., Van Rijn H. Decoupling interval timing and climbing neural activity: a dissociation between CNV and N1P2 amplitudes. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34(8):2931-2939.
26. Kutas M., Donchin E. Preparation to respond as manifested by motor-related brain potentials. Brain Res. 1980, 202:95-115.
27. Leuthold H., Sommer W., Ulrich R. Partial advance information and response preparation: inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 1996, 125(3):307-323.
28. Leuthold Hartmut, Sommer W., Ulrich R. Preparing for action: inferences from CNV and LRP. J. Psychophysiol. 2004, 18:77-88.
29. Loftus G.R., Masson M.E.J. Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 1994, 1(4):476-490.
30. Loveless N.E., Sanford A.J. The contingent negative variation related to preparatory set in a reaction time situation with variable foreperiod. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1973, 35(4):369-374.
31. Loveless N.E., Sanford A.J. Slow potential correlates of preparatory set. Biol. Psychol. 1974, 1(4):303-314.
32. Luck S.J. An introduction to the event-related potential technique 2005, MIT Press, Cambridge.
33. MacKay W.A., Bonnet M. CNV, stretch reflex and reaction time correlates of preparation for movement direction and force. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1990, 76(1):47-62.
34. McAdam D.W., Knott J.R., Rebert C.S. Cortical slow potential changes in man related to interstimulus interval and to pre-trial prediction of interstimulus interval. Psychophysiology 1969, 5:349-358.
35. Miller J., Patterson T., Ulrich R. Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. Psychophysiology 1998, 35:99-115.
36. Mulckhuyse M., Theeuwes J. Unconscious attentional orienting to exogenous cues: a review of the literature. Acta Psychol. 2010, 134(3):299-309.
37. Mulder M.J., Keuken M.C., Van Maanen L., Boekel W., Forstmann B.U., Wagenmakers E.-J. The speed and accuracy of perceptual decisions in a random-tone pitch task. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2013, 75:1048-1058.
38. Müller-Gethmann H., Ulrich R., Rinkenauer G. Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology 2003, 40:597-611.
39. Näätänen R. Evoked potential, EEG, and slow potential correlates of selective attention. Acta Psychol. 1970, 33:178-192.
40. Oostenveld R., Fries P., Maris E., Schoffelen J. FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 201. 10.1155/2011/156869.
41. Osman A., Moore C.M., Ulrich R. Bisecting RT with lateralized readiness potentials: precue effects after LRP onset. Acta Psychol. 1995, 90:111-127.
42. Palmer J., Huk A.C., Shadlen M.N. The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. J. Vis. 2005, 5:376-404.
43. Pinheiro C.J., Bates D.M. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus 2000, Springer, New York.
44. Plichta M.M., Zangl M., Meyer-Lindenberg A., Wolf I., Hohmann S., Baumeister S., Yordanova J. Simultaneous EEG and fMRI Reveals a Causally Connected Subcortical-Cortical Network during Reward Anticipation. J. Neurosci. 2013, 33(36):14526-14533.
45. Praamstra P. Prior information of stimulus location: effects on ERP measures of visual selection and response selection. Brain Res. 2006, 1072(1):153-160.
46. Raftery A. Approximate Bayes factors and accounting for model uncertainty in generalised linear models. Biometrika 1996, 83(2):251-266.
47. Rohrbaugh J.W., Gaillard A.W.K. Sensory and motor aspects of the contingent negative variation. Tutorials in Event-related Potential Research: Endogenous Components 1983, 269-310. Elsevier, Amsterdam. A.W.K. Gaillard, W. Ritter (Eds.).
48. Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 1978, 6(2):461-464.
49. Ulrich Rolf, Miller J. Using the jackknife-based scoring method for measuring LRP onset effects in factorial designs. Psychophysiology 2001, 38:816-827.
50. Ulrich R., Leuthold H., Sommer W. Motor programming of response force and movement direction. Psychophysiology 1998, 35(6):721-728.
51. Van Boxtel G.J.M., Böcker K.B.E. Cortical measures of anticipation. J. Psychophysiol. 2004, 18(2-3):61-76.
52. Van Maanen L., Brown S.D., Eichele T., Wagenmakers E.-J., Ho T., Serences J., Forstmann B.U. Neural correlates of trial-to-trial fluctuations in response caution. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31(48):17488-17495.
53. Van Rijn H., Kononowicz T.W., Meck W.H., Ng K.K., Penney T.B. Contingent negative variation and its relation to time estimation: a theoretical evaluation. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2011, 5(91). 10.3389/fnint.2011.00091.
54. Van Veen V., Krug M.K., Carter C.S. The neural and computational basis of controlled speed-accuracy tradeoff during task performance. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20(11):1952-1965.
55. Wagenmakers E.-J., Grasman R.P.P.P., Molenaar P.C.M. On the relation between the mean and the variance of a diffusion model response time distribution. J. Math. Psychol. 2005, 49(3):195-204.
56. Walter W.G., Cooper R., Aldridge V.J., McCallum W.C., Winter A.L. Contingent negative variation: an electric sign of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature 1964, 203(4943):380-384.
57. Wickelgren W.A. Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychol. 1977, 41:67-85.
58. Winkel J., Van Maanen L., Ratcliff R., Van der Schaaf M.E., Van Schouwenburg M.R., Cools R., Forstmann B.U. Bromocriptine does not alter speed-accuracy tradeoff. Front. Neurosci. 2012, 6(126). 10.3389/fnins.2012.00126.
59. Wood S.N. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R 2006, Chapman & Hall, London.
60. Wood S. Mixed GAM computation vehicle with GCV/AIC/REML smoothness estimation. R package Version 1.7-26 2013.
61. Wühr P., Kunde W. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2008, 34(4):872-883.