Temporally distinct neural coding of perceptual similarity and prototype bias

Journal of Vision

Volumn 10, Issue 10, 2010, Pages

  Kahn, David Alexander ^a   Harris, Alison M ^b   Wolk, David A ^a   Aguirre, Geoffrey Karl ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Event related potentials; N170; Neural adaptation; Perceptual similarity; Prototype effect

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NERVE CELL; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; STATISTICAL BIAS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEURONS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79955127058     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/10.10.12     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aguirre, G. K. (2007). Continuous carry-over designs for fMRI. Neuroimage, 35, 1480-1494.
2. Bentin, S., Allison, T., Puce, A., & Perez, E. (1996). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 551-565.
3. Brainard, D. H. (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
4. DeCarlo, L. T., & Cross, D. V. (1990). Sequential effects in magnitude scaling: Models and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 375-396.
5. Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9-21.
6. Di Russo, F., Martínez, A., Sereno, M. I., Pitzalis, S., & Hillyard, S. A. (2001). The cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential. Human Brain Mapping, 15, 95-111.
7. Drucker, D., & Aguirre, G. (2009). Different spatial scales of shape similarity representation in lateral and ventral LOC. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2269-2280.
8. Drucker, D. M., Kerr, W. T., & Aguirre, G. K. (2009). Distinguishing conjoint and independent neural tuning for stimulus features with fMRI adaptation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 101, 3310-3324.
9. Furl, N., van Rijsbergen, N. J., Treves, A., Friston, K. J., & Dolan, R. J. (2007). Experience-dependent coding of facial expression in superior temporal sulcus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 13485-13489.
10. Grill-Spector, K., & Malach, R. (2001). fMR-adaptation: A tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. Acta Psychologica, 107, 293-321.
11. Harris, A., & Nakayama, K. (2007). Rapid face-selective adaptation of an early extrastriate component in MEG. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 63-70.
12. Harris, A., & Nakayama, K. (2008). Rapid adaptation of theM170 response: Importance of face parts. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 467-476.
13. Henson, R. N. A., & Rugg, M. D. (2003). Neural response suppression, haemodynamic repetition effects, and behavioural priming. Neuropsychologia, 41, 263-270.
14. Holman, E. W. (1979). Monotonic models for asymmetric proximities. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 20, 1-15.
15. Itier, R. J., & Taylor, M. J. (2002). Inversion and contrast polarity reversal affect both encoding and recognition processes of unfamiliar faces: A repetition study using ERPs. Neuroimage, 15, 353-372.
16. Itier, R. J., & Taylor, M. J. (2004). N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 132-142.
17. Jacques, C., & Rossion, B. (2006). The speed of individual face categorization. Psychological Science, 17, 485-492.
18. Jiang, X., Rosen, E., Zefro, T., Vanmeter, J., Blanz, V., & Riesenhuber, M. (2006). Evaluation of a shape-based model of human face discrimination using fMRI and behavioral techniques. Neuron, 50, 159-172.
19. Johannesson, M. (2000). Modelling asymmetric similarity with prominence. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 53, 121-139.
20. Kloth, N., Schweinberger, S., & Kovács, G. (2009). Neural correlates of generic versus gender-specic face adaptation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2345-2356.
21. Kotsoni, E., Csibra, G., Mareschal, D., & Johnson, M. H. (2007). Electrophysiological correlates of common-onset visual masking. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2285-2293.
22. Kovács, G., Zimmer, M., Bankó, E., Harza, I., Antal, A., & Vidnyánszky, Z. (2006). Electrophysiological correlates of visual adaptation to faces and body parts in humans. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 742-753.
23. Krumhansel, C. L. (1978). Concerning the applicability of geometric models to similarity data: The interrela-tionship between similarity and spatial density. Psychological Review, 85, 445-463.
24. Kruskal, J. B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling quantitative applications in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Leopold, D. A., O'Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., & Blanz, V. (2001). Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 89-94.
26. Liu, J., Harris, A., & Kanwisher, N. (2002). Stages of processing in face perception: An MEG study. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 910-916.
27. Liu, J., Higuchi, M., Marantz, A., & Kanwisher, N. (2000). The selectivity of the occipitotemporal M170 for faces. NeuroReport, 11, 337-341.
28. Lofer, G., Yourganov, G., Wilkinson, F., & Wilson, H. R. (2005). fMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1386-1390.
29. Nosofsky, R. (1991). Stimulus bias, asymmetric similarity, and classication. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 94-140.
30. Op de Beeck, H., Wagemans, J., & Vogels, R. (2001). Inferotemporal neurons represent low-dimensional congurations of parameterized shapes. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 1244-1252.
31. Op de Beeck, H., Wagemans, J., & Vogels, R. (2003). Asymmetries in stimulus comparisons by monkey and man. Current Biology, 13, 1803-1808.
32. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
33. Polk, T. A., Behensky, C., Gonzalez, R., & Smith, E. E. (2002). Rating the similarity of simple perceptual stimuli: Asymmetries induced by manipulating exposure frequency. Cognition, 82, B75-B88.
34. Renninger, L. W., & Malik, J. (2004). When is scene identication just texture recognition? Vision Research, 44, 2301-2311.
35. Rhodes, G., Jeffery, L., Watson, T. L., Clifford, C. W. G., & Nakayama, K. (2003). Fitting the mind to the world: Face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science, 14, 558-566.
36. Rossion, B., Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Despland, P., Bruyer, R., Linotte, S., et al. (2000). The N170 occipito-temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: An electrophysiological account of face-specic pro-cesses in the human brain. NeuroReport, 11, 69-74.
37. Sams, M., Hietanen, J. K., Hari, R., Ilmoniemi, R. J., & Lounasmaa, O. V. (1997). Face-specic responses from the human inferior occipito-temporal cortex. Neuroscience, 77, 49-55.
38. Schweinberger, S. R., Kloth, N., & Jenkins, R. (2007). Are you looking at me? Neural correlates of gaze adaptation. NeuroReport, 18, 693-696.
39. Schweinberger, S. R., Pickering, E. C., Jentzsch, I., Burton, A. M., & Kaufmann, J. M. (2002). Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 398-409.
40. Shepard, R. (1964). Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 54-87.
41. Tanaka, J. W., Curran, T., Portereld, A. L., & Collins, D. (2006). Activation of preexisting and acquired face representations: The N250 event-related potential as an index of face familiarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1488-1497.
42. Torgerson, W. S. (1965). Multidimensional scaling of similarity. Psychometrika, 30, 379-393.
43. Tottenham, N., Tanaka, J. W., Leon, A. C., McCarry, T., Nurse, M., Hare, T. A., et al. (2009). The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research, 168, 242-249.
44. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.
45. Webster, M. A., Kaping, D., Mizokami, Y., & Duhamel, P. (2004). Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature, 428, 557-561.