Repetition suppression versus enhancement - It's quantity that matters

Cerebral Cortex

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 315-322

  Müller, Notger G ^a,b,c   Strumpf, H ^a   Scholz, M ^a   Baier, B ^d   Melloni, L ^c,e,f  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b GERMAN CENTER FOR NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES DZNE   (Germany)

^c Brain Imaging Center Frankfurt   (Germany)

^d JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^e MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN RESEARCH   (Germany)

^f ERNST STRÜNGMANN INSTITUTE ESI FOR NEUROSCIENCE IN COOPERATION WITH MAX PLANCK SOCIETY   (Germany)

Author keywords

fMRI; novelty detection; priming; repetition suppression

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BOLD SIGNAL; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN FUNCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; INTERLOBAR SULCUS; MALE; NERVE POTENTIAL; NEUROMODULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; REPETITION ENHANCEMENT; REPETITION SUPPRESSION; RETROSPENIAL CORTEX; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSVERSE OCCIPITAL SULCUS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84872350898     PISSN: 10473211     EISSN: 14602199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs009     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Axmacher N, Cohen MX, Fell J, Haupt S, Dumpelmann M, Elger CE, Schlaepfer TE, Lenartz D, Sturm V, Ranganath C. 2010. Intracranial EEG correlates of expectancy and memory formation in the human hippocampus and nucleus accumbens. Neuron. 65:541-549.
2. Cousineau D. 2005. Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method. Tutorials Quant Methods Psychol. 1:42-45.
3. Dale AM. 1999. Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp. 8:109-114.
4. Desimone R. 1996. Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 93:13494-13499.
5. Dolan RJ, Fink GR, Rolls E, Booth M, Holmes A, Frackowiak RS, Friston KJ. 1997. How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context. Nature. 389:596-599.
6. Eger E, Henson RN, Driver J, Dolan RJ. 2004. BOLD repetition decreases in object-responsive ventral visual areas depend on spatial attention. J Neurophysiol. 92:1241-1247.
7. Epstein R, Graham KS, Downing PE. 2003. Viewpoint-specific scene representations in human parahippocampal cortex. Neuron. 37:865-876.
8. Epstein RA, Higgins JS, Jablonski K, Feiler AM. 2007. Visual scene processing in familiar and unfamiliar environments. J Neurophysiol. 97:3670-3683.
9. Grill-Spector K, Henson R, Martin A. 2006. Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cogn Sci. 10:14-23.
10. Grill-Spector K, Kushnir T, Hendler T, Malach R. 2000. The dynamics of object-selective activation correlate with recognition performance in humans. Nat Neurosci. 3:837-843.
11. Gur RC, Turetsky BI, Loughead J, Waxman J, Snyder W, Ragland JD, Elliott MA, Bilker WB, Arnold SE, Gur RE. 2007. Hemodynamic responses in neural circuitries for detection of visual target and novelty: An event-related fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 28: 263-274.
12. Henson R, Shallice T, Dolan R. 2000. Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming. Science. 287:1269-1272.
13. Hinrichs H, Scholz M, Tempelmann C, Woldorff MG, Dale AM, Heinze HJ. 2000. Deconvolution of event-related fMRI responses in fast-rate experimental designs: Tracking amplitude variations. J Cogn Neurosci. 12(Suppl 2):76-89.
14. James TW, Gauthier I. 2006. Repetition-induced changes in BOLD response reflect accumulation of neural activity. Hum Brain Mapp. 27:37-46.
15. James TW, Humphrey GK, Gati JS, Menon RS, Goodale MA. 2000. The effects of visual object priming on brain activation before and after recognition. Curr Biol. 10:1017-1024.
16. Kleinschmidt A, Buchel C, Hutton C, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RS. 2002. The neural structures expressing perceptual hysteresis in visual letter recognition. Neuron. 34:659-666.
17. Kourtzi Z, Betts LR, Sarkheil P, Welchman AE. 2005. Distributed neural plasticity for shape learning in the human visual cortex. PLoS Biol. 3:e204.
18. Melloni L, Schwiedrzik CM, Muller N, Rodriguez E, Singer W. 2011. Expectations change the signatures and timing of electrophysiological correlates of perceptual awareness. J Neurosci. 31: 1386-1396.
19. Morey R. 2008. Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorials Quant Methods Psychol. 4:61-64.
20. Rainer G, Lee H, Logothetis NK. 2004. The effect of learning on the function of monkey extrastriate visual cortex. PLoS Biol. 2:E44.
21. Ranganath C, Rainer G. 2003. Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events. Nat Rev Neurosci. 4:193-202.
22. Sayres R, Grill-Spector K. 2006. Object-selective cortex exhibits performance-independent repetition suppression. J Neurophysiol. 95:995-1007.
23. Stoppel CM, Boehler CN, Strumpf H, Heinze HJ, Hopf JM, Duzel E, Schoenfeld MA. 2009. Neural correlates of exemplar novelty processing under different spatial attention conditions. Hum Brain Mapp. 30:3759-3771.
24. Summerfield C, Trittschuh EH, Monti JM, Mesulam MM, Egner T. 2008. Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations. Nat Neurosci. 11:1004-1006.
25. Turk-Browne NB, Scholl BJ, Chun MM. 2008. Babies and brains: Habituation in infant cognition and functional neuroimaging. Front Hum Neurosci. 2:16.
26. Turk-Browne NB, Yi DJ, Leber AB, Chun MM. 2007. Visual quality determines the direction of neural repetition effects. Cereb Cortex. 17:425-433.
27. Yamaguchi S. 2004. Neural network for novelty processing. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol. 57:635-641.
28. Yi DJ, Chun MM. 2005. Attentional modulation of learning-related repetition attenuation effects in human parahippocampal cortex. J Neurosci. 25:3593-3600.