When teams shift among processes: Insights from simulation and optimization

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 99, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 784-815

  Kennedy, Deanna M ^a   McComb, Sara A ^b  

^a School of Business University of Washington Bothell   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Genetic algorithm; Interventions; Simulation; Team; Transition process

Indexed keywords

ADULT; COOPERATION; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; TASK PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; COMMUNICATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84925856719     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0037339     Document Type: Article

References (114)

1. Ait Gougam, L., Tribeche, M., & Mekideche-Chafa, F. (2008). A systematic investigation of a neural network for function approximation. Neural Networks, 21, 1311-1317. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2008.06.015
2. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716-723. doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
3. Ancona, D. G., & Chong, C. (1996). Entrainment: Pace, cycle, and rhythm in organizational behavior. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 251-284). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
4. Ancona, D., & Chong, C. L. (1999). Cycles and synchrony: The temporal role of context in team behavior. In R. Wageman (Ed.), Groups in context (Vol. 2, pp. 33-48). Stamford, CT: Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
5. Anderson, J. (1995). An introduction to neural networks. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Bachrach, D. G., Bendoly, E., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2001). Attributions of the "causes" of group performance as an alternative explanation of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and organizational performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1285-1293. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1285
8. Ballard, D. I., Tschan, F., & Waller, M. J. (2008). All in the timing: Considering time at multiple stages of group research. Small Group Research, 39, 328-351. doi:10.1177/1046496408317036
9. Bloun, S., & Janicik, G. A. (2002). Getting and staying in-pace: The "in-synch" preference and its implications for work groups. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 4, 235-266.
10. Bohm, A. (2004). Theoretical coding: Text analysis in grounded theory. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, & I. Steinki (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 270-275). London, England: Sage.
11. Bradley, J., White, B. J., & Mennecke, B. E. (2003). Teams and tasks: A temporal framework for the effects of interpersonal interventions on team performance. Small Group Research, 34, 353-387. doi:10.1177/ 1046496403034003004
12. Buller, P. F. (1986). The team building-task performance relation: Some conceptual and methodological refinements. Group & Organization Studies, 11, 147-168. doi:10.1177/105960118601100303
13. Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004). Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33, 261-304. doi:10.1177/0049124104268644
14. Cannon-Bowers, J., Salas, E., & Converse, S. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In N. Castellan, Jr. (Ed.), Individual and group decision making (pp. 221-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Carley, K., & Prietula, M. (Eds.). (1994). Computational organization theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271-315. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1
17. Chu, Y., & Huang, J. (1999). A neural-network method for the nonlinear servomechanism problem. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 10, 1412-1423. doi:10.1109/72.809086
18. Cohen, L., & Holliday, M. (1996). Practical statistics for students. London, England: Chapman.
19. Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290. doi:10.1177/014920639702300303
20. Cooke, N. J., Duchon, A., Gorman, J. C., Keyton, J., & Miller, A. (2012). Preface to the special section on methods for the analysis of communication. Human Factors, 54, 485-488. doi:10.1177/0018720812448673
21. Cooke, N. J., Salas, E., Kiekel, P. A., & Bell, B. (2004). Advances in measuring team cognition. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 83-106). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10690-005
22. Cramton, C. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12, 346-371. doi: 10.1287/orsc.12.3.346.10098
23. Cronin, M. A., Weingart, L. R., & Todorova, G. (2011). Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet? The Academy of Management Annals, 5, 571-612. doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.590297
24. Davis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. (2007). Developing theory through simulation methods. The Academy of Management Review, 32, 480-499. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.24351453
25. DeChurch, L. A., & Haas, C. D. (2008). Examining team planning through an episodic lens: Effects of deliberate, contingency, and reactive planning on team effectiveness. Small Group Research, 39, 542-568. doi: 10.1177/1046496408320048
26. de Meuse, K. P., & Liebowitz, S. J. (1981). An empirical analysis of team building research. Group & Organization Studies, 6, 357-378. doi: 10.1177/105960118100600311
27. Dutton, J. E. (1993). Interpretations on automatic: A different view of strategic issue diagnosis. Journal of Management Studies, 30, 339-357. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00308.x
28. Earley, C. (1994). Self or group? Cultural effects of training on selfefficacy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 89- 108. doi:10.2307/2393495
29. Ericksen, J., & Dyer, L. (2004). Right from the start: Exploring the effects of early team events on subsequent project team development and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 438-471.
30. Futoran, G. C., Kelly, J. R., & McGrath, J. E. (1989). TEMPO: A time-based system for analysis of group interaction process. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 211-232. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1003_2
31. Georgieva, A., & Jordanov, I. (2009). Global optimization based on novel heuristics, low-discrepancy sequences and genetic algorithms. European Journal of Operational Research, 196, 413-422. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.03.019
32. Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41. doi:10.2307/256496
33. Gersick, C. J. G. (1989). Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 274-309. doi:10.2307/ 256363
34. Ginnett, R. (1993). Crews as groups: Their formation and their leadership. In E. Weiner, B. Kanki, & R. Helmreich (Eds.), Cockpit resource management (pp. 71-98). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
35. Goh, K. T., Goodman, P. S., & Weingart, L. R. (2013). Team innovation process: An examination of activity cycles in creative project teams. Small Group Research, 44, 159-194. doi:10.1177/1046496413483326
36. Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
37. Goodman, R. A., & Goodman, L. P. (1976). Some management issues in temporary systems: A study of professional development and manpower- the theater case. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 494-501. doi:10.2307/2391857
38. Gully, S. M. (2000). Work teams research: Recent findings and future trends. In M. M. Beyerlein (Ed.), Work teams: Past, present and future (pp. 25- 44). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-9492-9_2
39. Hackman, J. R. (1976). Group influences on individuals. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 315- 342). Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally.
40. Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
41. Hackman, J. R. (Ed.). (1990). Groups that work (and those that don't). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
42. Hackman, J. R. (2002). Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
43. Hackman, J., Brousseau, K. R., & Weiss, J. A. (1976). The interaction of task design and group performance strategies in determining group effectiveness. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 350- 365. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90021-0
44. Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction processes, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 45-99). New York, NY: Academic Press.
45. Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). A theory of team coaching. The Academy of Management Review, 30, 269-287. doi:10.5465/AMR.2005.16387885
46. Hamamoto, Y., Uchimura, S., Kanaoka, T., & Tomita, S. (1993). Evaluation of artificial neural network classifiers in small sample size situations. Proceedings of 1993 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 1731-1735.
47. Harrison, J. R., Lin, Z., Carroll, G. R., & Carley, K. M. (2007). Simulation modeling in organizational and management research. The Academy of Management Review, 32, 1229 -1245. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.26586485
48. Herold, D. M. (1978). Improve the performance effectiveness of groups through a task-contingent selection of intervention strategies. The Academy of Management Review, 3, 315-325.
49. Hewes, D. E., & Poole, M. S. (2012). The analysis of group interaction processes. In A. B. Hollingshead & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Research methods for studying groups and teams (pp. 329-357). New York, NY: Routledge.
50. Holland, J. (1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
51. Hulin, C. L., & Ilgen, D. R. (2000). Introduction to computational modeling in organizations: The good that modeling does. In D. R. Ilgen & C. L. Hulin (Eds.), Computational modeling of behavior in organizations: The third scientific discipline (pp. 3-18). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10375-001
52. Hurvich, C. M., & Tsai, C.-L. (1989). Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika, 76, 297-307. doi:10.1093/ biomet/76.2.297
53. Hurvich, C. M., & Tsai, C.-L. (1995). Model selection for extended quasi-likelihood models in small samples. Biometrics, 51, 1077-1084. doi:10.2307/2533006
54. Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-543. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250
55. Janicik, G. A., & Bartel, C. A. (2003). Talking about time: Effects of temporal planning and time awareness norms on group coordination and performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7, 122-134. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.7.2.122
56. Katzenbach, J., & Smith, D. (1999). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
57. Kennedy, D. M., & McComb, S. A. (2010). Merging internal and external processes: Examining the mental model convergence process through team communication. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 11, 340-358. doi:10.1080/14639221003729193
58. Kennedy, D. M., Vozdolska, R. R., & McComb, S. A. (2010). Team decision making in computer-supported cooperative work: How initial computer-mediated or face-to-face meetings set the stage for later outcomes. Decision Sciences, 41, 933-954. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00293.x
59. Kernaghan, J., & Cooke, R. (1990). Teamwork in planning innovative projects: Improving group performance by rational and interpersonal interventions in group process. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 37, 109-116. doi:10.1109/17.53713
60. Kiekel, P. A., Cooke, N. J., Foltz, P. W., Gorman, J. C., & Martin, M. J. (2002). Some promising results of communication-based automatic measures of team cognition. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 46, 298-302.
61. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Bormand, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 333-375). London, England: Wiley. doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei1214
62. Kozlowski, S. W., Chao, G. T., Grand, J. A., Braun, M. T., & Kuljanin, G. (2013). Advancing multilevel research design capturing the dynamics of emergence. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 581- 615. doi: 10.1177/1094428113493119
63. Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Nason, E., & Smith, E. (1999). Developing adaptive teams: A theory of compilation and performance across levels and time. In D. Ilgen & E. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance, implications for staffing, motivation, and development (pp. 240-292). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
64. Larson, J. R., Jr. (2012). Computer simulation methods for groups. In A. B. Hollingshead & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Research methods for studying groups and teams (pp. 329-357). New York, NY: Routledge.
65. Law, A. M., & Kelton, W. D. (2000). Simulation modeling and analysis (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
66. LePine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Jackson, C. L., Mathieu, J. E., & Saul, J. R. (2008). A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61, 273-307. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00114.x
67. Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zacarro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356-376.
68. Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410-476. doi: 10.1177/0149206308316061
69. Mathieu, J. E., & Rapp, T. L. (2009). Laying the foundation for successful team performance trajectories: The roles of team charters and performance strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 90-103. doi: 10.1037/a0013257
70. Mathieu, J. E., & Shulze, W. (2006). The influence of team knowledge and formal plans on episodic team process-performance relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 605-619. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.21794678
71. McComb, S. (2007). Mental model convergence: The shift from being an individual to being a team member. In F. Dansereau & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Multi-level issues in organizations and time (pp. 95-147). Oxford, England: Elsevier Science. doi:10.1016/S1475-9144(07)06005-5
72. McComb, S. A., & Kennedy, D. M. (2011). Facilitating effective mental model convergence: The interplay among the team's task, mental model content, communication flow, and media. In E. Salas, S. Fiore, & M. Letsky (Eds.), Theories of team cognition: Cross-disciplinary perspectives (pp. 549-568). New York, NY: Routledge.
73. McComb, S. A., Kennedy, D. M., Perryman, R., Warner, N., & Letsky, M. (2010). Examining temporal patterns of mental model convergence: Implications for distributed teams interacting in an electronic collaboration space. Human Factors, 52, 264-281. doi:10.1177/0018720810370458
74. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
75. McGrath, J. E. (1990). Time matters in groups. In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 23-61). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
76. McGrath, J. E., Arrow, H., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). The study of groups: Past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 95-105. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_8
77. Mehta, A., Feild, H., Armenakis, A., & Mehta, N. (2009). Team goal orientation and team performance: The mediating role of team planning. Journal of Management, 35, 1026-1046. doi:10.1177/0149206308326773
78. Meyers, R. A., & Seibold, D. R. (2012). Coding group interaction. In A. B. Hollingshead & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Research methods for studying groups and teams (pp. 329-357). New York, NY: Routledge.
79. Meyers, R. A., Seibold, D. R., & Brashers, D. E. (1991). Argument in initial group decision making discussions: Refinement of a coding scheme and a descriptive quantitative analysis. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 55, 47-68. doi:10.1080/10570319109374370
80. Michalewicz, Z. (1996). Genetic algorithms + data structures = evolution programs (3rd rev. and extended ed.). New York, NY: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-03315-9
81. Mohammed, S., Ferzandi, L., & Hamilton, K. (2010). Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. Journal of Management, 36, 876-910. doi:10.1177/0149206309356804
82. Mohammed, S., & Nadkarni, S. (2011). Temporal diversity and team performance: The moderating role of team temporal leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 489-508. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2011.61967991
83. Nystrand, M., Wu, L. L., Gamoran, A., Zeiser, S., & Long, D. A. (2003). Questions in time: Investigating the structure and dynamics of unfolding classroom discourse. Discourse Processes, 35, 135-198. doi:10.1207/ S15326950DP3502_3
84. Okhuysen, G. A. (2001). Structuring change: Familiarity and formal interventions in problem-solving groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 794-808. doi:10.2307/3069416
85. Okhuysen, G. A., & Eisenhardt, K. E. (2002). Integrating knowledge in groups: How formal interventions enable flexibility. Organization Science, 13, 370-386. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.4.370.2947
86. Okhuysen, G. A., & Waller, M. J. (2002). Focusing on midpoint transitions: An analysis of boundary conditions. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1056-1065. doi:10.2307/3069330
87. Patrashkova, R., & McComb, S. (2004). Exploring why more communication is not better: Insights from a computational model of crossfunctional teams. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21, 83-114. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.005
88. Pavitt, C. (1992). Describing know-how about group discussion procedure: Must the representation be recursive? Communication Studies, 43, 150- 170. doi:10.1080/10510979209368368
89. Pavitt, C., & Johnson, K. K. (2001). The association between group procedural MOPs and group discussion procedure. Small Group Research, 32, 595-624. doi:10.1177/104649640103200505
90. Porras, J., & Silvers, R. (1991). Organization development and transformation. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 51-78. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.42.020191.000411
91. Prietula, M., Carley, K., & Gasser, L. (Eds.). (1998). Simulating organizations: Computational models of institutions and groups. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
92. Reeves, C. (1993). Modern heuristic techniques for combinatorial problems. London, England: Blackwell Scientific.
93. Reeves, C., & Rowe, J. (2002). Genetic algorithms-Principles and perspectives: A guide to GA theory. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
94. Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471-499. doi:10.1146/ annurev.psych.52.1.471
95. Salas, E., Dickinson, T., Converse, S., & Tannenbaum, S. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In R. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: their training and performance (pp. 3-30). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
96. Salas, E., Rozell, D., Mullen, B., & Driskell, J. E. (1999). The effect of team building on performance: An integration. Small Group Research, 30, 309-329. doi:10.1177/104649649903000303
97. Scandura, T. A., & Williams, E. A. (2000). Research methodology in management: Current practices, trends, and implications for future research. The Academy of Management Journal, 43, 1248-1264. doi: 10.2307/1556348
98. Shalley, C. E. (2008). Team cognition: The importance of team process and composition for the creative problem-solving process. In M. Mumford, S. Hunter, & K. Bedell-Avers (Eds.), Research in multilevel issues, Vol. 7: Multilevel issues in creativity and innovation (pp. 289-304). Oxford, United Kingdom: JAI Press.
99. Shipp, A. J., Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2009). Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110, 1-22. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.001
100. Shuffler, M. L., DiazGranados, D., & Salas, E. (2011). There's a science for that: Team development interventions in organizations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 365-372. doi:10.1177/ 0963721411422054
101. Simoes, M. G., & Bose, B. K. (1995). Neural network based estimation of feedback signals for a vector controlled induction motor drive. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 31, 620-629. doi:10.1109/28.382124
102. Smircich, L. (1983). Implications for management theory. In L. Putnam & M. Pacanowsky (Eds.), Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach (pp. 221-241). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
103. Sonnentag, S. (2012). Time in organizational research: Catching up on a long neglected topic in order to improve theory. Organizational Psychology Review, 2, 361-368. doi:10.1177/2041386612442079
104. Steele-Johnson, D., Beauregard, R. S., Hoover, P., & Schmidt, A. M. (2000). Goal orientation and task complexity effects on motivation, affect, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 724-738. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.724
105. Stout, R. J., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Milanovich, D. M. (1999). Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. Human Factors, 41, 61-71. doi:10.1518/ 001872099779577273
106. Tschan, F. (1995). Communication enhances small group performance if it conforms to task requirements: The concept of ideal communication cycles. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 371-393. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp1703_6
107. van der Kleij, R., Schraagen, J. M., Werkhoven, P., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2009). How conversations change over time in face-to-face and videomediated communication. Small Group Research, 40, 355-381. doi: 10.1177/1046496409333724
108. von Cranach, M., Kalbermatten, U., Indermuehle, K., & Gugler, B. (1982). Goal-directed action. London, England: Academic Press.
109. Weingart, L. (1992). Impact of group goals, task component complexity, effort, and planning on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 682-693. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.77.5.682
110. Wheelan, S. A., Davidson, B., & Tilin, F. (2003). Group development across time: Reality or illusion? Small Group Research, 34, 223-245. doi:10.1177/1046496403251608
111. Woolley, A. (1998). Effects of intervention content and timing on group task performance. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 34, 30-46. doi:10.1177/0021886398341002
112. Woolley, A. (2009). Putting first things first: Task focus and team performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 427-452. doi:10.1002/ job.578
113. Yoo, Y., & Kanawattanachai, P. (2001). Developments of transactive memory systems and collective mind in virtual teams. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9, 187-208. doi:10.1108/ eb028933
114. Zeitz, C. M., & Spoehr, K. T. (1989). Knowledge organization and the acquisition of procedural expertise. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3, 313-336. doi:10.1002/acp.2350030404