The association between group procedural MOPs and group discussion procedure

Small Group Research

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 595-624

  Pavitt, Charles ^a   Johnson, Kelly Kline ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035471078     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104649640103200505     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Auld, F., Jr., & White, A. M. (1956). Rules for dividing interviews into sentences. Journal of Psychology, 42, 273-281.
2. Bales, R. F., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1951). Phases in group problem-solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 485-495.
3. Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., & Turner, T. J. (1979). Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 177-220.
4. Brilhart, J. K., & Jochem, L. M. (1964). Effects of different patterns on outcomes of problem-solving discussions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 48, 175-179.
5. Crowell, L., & Scheidel, T. M. (1961). Categories for analysis of idea development in discussion groups. Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 155-168.
6. Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: Heath.
7. Ellis, D. G., & Fisher, A. B. (1994). Small group decision making (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. Fisher, A. B. (1970a). Decision emergence: Phases in group decision-making. Speech Monographs, 37, 53-66.
9. Fisher, A. B. (1970b). The process of decision modification in small discussion groups. Journal of Communication, 20, 51-64.
10. Fisher, B. A. (1974). Small group decision making: Communication and the group process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
11. Folger, J. P., Hewes, D. E., & Poole, M. S. (1984). Coding social interaction. In B. Dervin & M. J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences (pp. 115-161). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
12. Guetzkow, H. (1950). Unitizing and categorizing problems in coding qualitative data. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 6, 47-58.
13. Hirokawa, R. Y. (1982). Group communication and problem-solving effectiveness 1: A critical review of inconsistent findings. Communication Quarterly, 30, 134-141.
14. Hirokawa, R. Y. (1983). Group communication and problem-solving effectiveness: An investigation of group phases. Human Communication Research, 9, 291-305.
15. Hoffman, L. R. (1979). The group problem-solving process: Studies of a valence model. New York: Praeger.
16. Honeycutt, J. M., Cantrill, J. G., & Allen, T. (1992). Memory structures for relational decay: A cognitive test of the sequencing of de-escalating actions and stages. Human Communication Research, 18, 528-562.
17. Honeycutt, J. M., Cantrill, J. G., & Greene, R. W. (1989). Memory structures for relational escalation: A cognitive test of the sequencing of relational actions and stages. Human Communication Research, 16, 62-90.
18. Kellermann, K. (1995). The conversation MOP: A model of patterned and pliable behavior. In D. E. Hewes (Ed.), The cognitive bases of interpersonal communication (pp. 181-221). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Kellermann, K., Broetzmann, S., Lim, T.-S., & Kitao, K. (1989). The conversation MOP: Scenes in the stream of discourse. Discourse Processes, 12, 27-61.
20. Mabry, E. A. (1975). Exploratory analysis of developmental methods for task-oriented small groups. Human Communication Research, 2, 66-74.
21. McBurney, J. H., & Hance, K. G. (1939). The principles of methods of discussion. New York: Harper.
22. Pavitt, C. (1992). Describing know-how about group discussion procedure: Must the representation be recursive? Communication Studies, 43, 150-170.
23. Pavitt, C. (1993). What (little) we know about formal group discussion procedures: A review of relevant research. Small Group Research, 24, 217-235.
24. Pavitt, C. (1999). Theorizing about the group communication-leadership relationship: Input-process-output and functional models. In L. R. Frey, D. S. Gouran, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 313-334). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Pavitt, C., & Curtis, E. (1998). Small group discussion: A theoretical approach (3rd ed.). Available: http://www.udel.edu/communication/COMM356/pavitt
26. Pavitt, C., Whitchurch, G. G., Siple, H., & Petersen, N. (1997). Communication and emergent group leadership: Does content count? Communication Research Reports, 14, 470-480.
27. Poole, M. S. (1981). Decision development in small groups I: A comparison of two models. Communication Monographs, 48, 1-24.
28. Poole, M. S., & Doelger, J. A. (1986). Developmental processes in group decision-making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (pp. 35-62). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29. Poole, M. S., & Roth, J. (1989a). Decision development in small groups IV: A typology of group decision paths. Human Communication Research, 15, 323-356.
30. Poole, M. S., & Roth, J. (1989b). Decision development in small groups V: Test of a contingency model. Human Communication Research, 15, 549-589.
31. Poole, M. S., Seibold, D. R., & McPhee, R. D. (1985). Group decision making as a structurational process. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 71, 74-102.
32. Putnam, L. L., & Stohl, C. (1990). Bona fide groups: A reconceptualization of groups in context. Communication Studies, 41, 248-265.
33. Schank, R. C. (1982). Dynamic memory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. Scheidel, T. M., & Crowell, L. (1964). Idea development in small discussion groups. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 50, 140-145.
35. Scheidel, T. M., & Crowell, L. (1979). Discussing and deciding. New York: Macmillan.
36. Whitchurch, G. G., & Pavitt, C. (1990). Auld and White revisited: Expanded and updated rules for unitizing verbal interaction. Unpublished manuscript, Indiana University-Indianapolis.