Selective influence of working memory load on exceptionally slow reaction times

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 143, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1837-1860

  Shahar, Nitzan ^a   Teodorescu, Andrei R ^b   Usher, Marius ^b   Pereg, Maayan ^a   Meiran, Nachshon ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Choice reaction task; Evidence accumulation modeling; Ex Gaussian distribution; Intraindividual variability; Working memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SHORT TERM MEMORY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84925664641     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0037190     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Balota, D. A., & Spieler, D. H. (1999). Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: Beyond measures of central tendency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 32-55. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.128.1.32
2. Balota, D. A., & Yap, M. J. (2011). Moving beyond the mean in studies of mental chronometry: The power of response time distributional analyses. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 160-166. doi:10.1177/ 0963721411408885
3. Bogacz, R., Brown, E., Moehlis, J., Holmes, P., & Cohen, J. D. (2006). The physics of optimal decision making: A formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. Psychological Review, 113, 700-765. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.700
4. Bogacz, R., & Gurney, K. (2007). The basal ganglia and cortex implement optimal decision making between alternative actions. Neural Computation, 19, 442-477. doi:10.1162/neco.2007.19.2.442
5. Brown, S., & Heathcote, A. (2005). Practice increases the efficiency of evidence accumulation in perceptual choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 289-298. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.2.289
6. Buzy, W. M., Medoff, D. R., & Schweitzer, J. B. (2009). Intra-individual variability among children with ADHD on a working memory task: An ex-Gaussian approach. Child Neuropsychology, 15, 441- 459. doi: 10.1080/09297040802646991
7. Cowan, N., & Saults, J. S. (2013). When does a good working memory counteract proactive interference? Surprising evidence from a probe recognition task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 12-17. doi:10.1037/a0027804
8. Coyle, T. R. (2003). A review of the worst performance rule: Evidence, theory, and alternative hypotheses. Intelligence, 31, 567-587. doi: 10.1016/S0160-2896(03)00054-0
9. Dehaene, S. (2002). Verbal and nonverbal representations of numbers in the human brain. In A. M. Galaburda, S. M. Kosslyn, & C. Yves (Eds.), The languages of the brain (pp. 179-190). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Ditterich, J. (2010). A comparison between mechanisms of multialternative perceptual decision making: Ability to explain human behavior, predictions for neurophysiology, and relationship with decision theory. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 4, Article 184. doi:10.3389/fnins .2010.00184
11. Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19-23. doi:10.1111/ 1467-8721.00160
12. Engle, R. W., & Kane, M. J. (2003). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 44, 145-199. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(03)44005-X
13. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149. doi:10.3758/BF03203267
14. Forstmann, B. U., Brown, S., Dutilh, G., Neumann, J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2010). The neural substrate of prior information in perceptual decision making: A model-based analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, Article 40. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00040
15. Gao, J., Tortell, R., & McClelland, J. L. (2011). Dynamic integration of reward and stimulus information in perceptual decision-making. PLoS ONE, 6, e16749. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016749
16. Hale, D. (1968). The relation of correct and error responses in a serial choice reaction task. Psychonomic Science, 13, 299-300. doi:10.3758/ BF03342595
17. Heathcote, A., Popiel, S. J., & Mewhort, D. J. (1991). Analysis of response time distributions: An example using the Stroop task. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 340-347. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.340
18. Hick, W. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11-26. doi:10.1080/17470215208416600
19. Hyman, R. (1953). Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 188 -196. doi:10.1037/ h0056940
20. Jackson, J. D., Balota, D. A., Duchek, J. M., & Head, D. (2012). White matter integrity and reaction time intraindividual variability in healthy aging and early-stage Alzheimer disease. Neuropsychologia, 50, 357- 366. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.11.024
21. Jarmasz, J., & Hollands, J. G. (2009). Confidence intervals in repeatedmeasures designs: The number of observations principle. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 124 -138. doi:10.1037/ a0014164
22. Karalunas, S. L., & Huang-Pollock, C. L. (2013). Integrating impairments in reaction time and executive function using a diffusion model framework. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 837- 850. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9715-2
23. Karantinos, T., Tsoukas, E., Mantas, A., Kattoulas, E., Stefanis, N. C., Evdokimidis, I., & Smyrnis, N. (2014). Increased intra-subject reaction time variability in the volitional control of movement in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 215, 26-32. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2013.10.031
24. Karni, A., Tanne, D., Rubenstein, B. S., Askenasy, J. J., & Sagi, D. (1994, July 29). Dependence on REM sleep of overnight improvement of a perceptual skill. Science, 265, 679-682. doi:10.1126/science.8036518
25. Koch, I., Prinz, W., & Allport, A. (2005). Involuntary retrieval in alphabet- arithmetic tasks: Task-mixing and task-switching costs. Psychological Research, 69, 252-261. doi:10.1007/s00426-004-0180-y
26. Krajbich, I., & Rangel, A. (2011). Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in valuebased decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 13852-13857. doi:10.1073/pnas .1101328108
27. Lacouture, Y., & Cousineau, D. (2008). How to use MATLAB to fit the ex-Gaussian and other probability functions to a distribution of response times. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4, 35-45.
28. Leite, F. P., & Ratcliff, R. (2010). Modeling reaction time and accuracy of multiple-alternative decisions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 246-273. doi:10.3758/APP.72.1.246
29. Liu, S., Lane, S. D., Schmitz, J. M., Green, C. E., Cunningham, K. A., & Moeller, F. G. (2012). Increased intra-individual reaction time variability in cocaine-dependent subjects: Role of cocaine-related cues. Addictive Behaviors, 37, 193-197. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.10.003
30. Liu, Y., & Blostein, S. D. (1992). Optimality of the Sequential Probability Ratio Test for nonstationary observations. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 38, 177-182. doi:10.1109/18.108268
31. Longstreth, L. E., El-Zahhar, N., & Alcorn, M. B. (1985). Exceptions to Hick's law: Explorations with a response duration measure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 417-434. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.114.4.417
32. Los, S. A. (1996). On the origin of mixing costs: Exploring information processing in pure and mixed blocks of trials. Acta Psychologica, 94, 145-188. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(95)00050-X
33. Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2009). Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: A diffusion model analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 798-817. doi:10.3758/PBR .16.5.798
34. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1124-1140. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1124
35. McMillen, T., & Holmes, P. (2006). The dynamics of choice among multiple alternatives. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 50, 30-57. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2005.10.003
36. McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2012). Drifting from slow to "D'oh!": Working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 525-549. doi:10.1037/a0025896
37. Moutsopoulou, K., & Waszak, F. (2012). Across-task priming revisited: Response and task conflicts disentangled using ex-Gaussian distribution analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 367-374. doi:10.1037/a0025858
38. Munoz, D. P., & Everling, S. (2004). Look away: The anti-saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 218-228. doi:10.1038/nrn1345
39. Niwa, M., & Ditterich, J. (2008). Perceptual decisions between multiple directions of visual motion. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 4435-4445. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5564-07.2008
40. Oberauer, K. (2009). Design for a working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51, 45-100. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(09)51002-X
41. Oberauer, K., Souza, A. S., Druey, M. D., & Gade, M. (2013). Analogous mechanisms of selection and updating in declarative and procedural working memory: Experiments and a computational model. Cognitive Psychology, 66, 157-211. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.11.001
42. Oberauer, K., Süß, H.-M., Wilhelm, O., & Sander, N. (2007). Individual differences in working memory capacity and reasoning ability. In A. R. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. J. Kane, A. Miyake, & J. N. Towse (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 49-75). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195168648.003.0003
43. Philiastides, M. G., Ratcliff, R., & Sajda, P. (2006). Neural representation of task difficulty and decision making during perceptual categorization: A timing diagram. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 8965-8975. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1655-06.2006
44. Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111-163. doi:10.2307/271063
45. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-108. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.2.59
46. Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446 - 461. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.446
47. Ratcliff, R. (2002). A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: Fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 278-291. doi:10.3758/BF03196283
48. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20, 873- 922. doi:10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420
49. Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (1998). Modeling response times for twochoice decisions. Psychological Science, 9, 347-356. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00067
50. Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (2000). A diffusion model account of masking in two-choice letter identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 127-140. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.26.1.127
51. Ratcliff, R., & Smith, P. L. (2004). A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 111, 333- 367. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.333
52. Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., & McKoon, G. (2003). A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on brightness discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 523-535. doi:10.3758/BF03194580
53. Rubin, O., & Meiran, N. (2005). On the origins of the task mixing cost in the cuing task-switching paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1477-1491. doi:10.1037/ 0278-7393.31.6.1477
54. Schmiedek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Süß, H. M., & Wittmann, W. W. (2007). Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 414-429. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.414
55. Schmitz, F., & Voss, A. (2012). Decomposing task-switching costs with the diffusion model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 222-250. doi:10.1037/a0026003
56. Schneider, D. W., & Anderson, J. R. (2011). A memory-based model of Hick's law. Cognitive Psychology, 62, 193-222. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych .2010.11.001
57. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136
58. Siegel, M., Engel, A. K., & Donner, T. H. (2011). Cortical network dynamics of perceptual decision-making in the human brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, Article 21. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00021
59. Smith, P. L., & Ratcliff, R. (2009). An integrated theory of attention and decision making in visual signal detection. Psychological Review, 116, 283-317. doi:10.1037/a0015156
60. Souza, A. S., Oberauer, K., Gade, M., & Druey, M. D. (2012). Processing of representations in declarative and procedural working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1006-1033. doi:10.1080/ 17470218.2011.640403
61. Spieler, D. H., Balota, D. A., & Faust, M. E. (1996). Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 461-479. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.22 .2.461
62. Starns, J. J., Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2012). Evaluating the unequalvariance and dual-process explanations of zROC slopes with response time data and the diffusion model. Cognitive Psychology, 64, 1-34. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.10.002
63. Steinhauser, M., & Hübner, R. (2009). Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the Stroop task: Evidence from ex-Gaussian distribution analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1398-1412. doi:10.1037/a0016467
64. Stickgold, R. (1998). Sleep: Off-line memory reprocessing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 484-492. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01258-3
65. Stuss, D. T., Murphy, K. J., Binns, M. A., & Alexander, M. P. (2003). Staying on the job: The frontal lobes control individual performance variability. Brain, 126, 2363-2380. doi:10.1093/brain/awg237
66. Sui, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2013). The boundaries of self face perception: Response time distributions, perceptual categories, and decision weighting. Visual Cognition, 21, 415-445. doi:10.1080/13506285.2013 .800621
67. Teodorescu, A. R., & Usher, M. (2013). Disentangling decision models: From independence to competition. Psychological Review, 120, 1-38. doi:10.1037/a0030776
68. Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). The stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
69. Trueblood, J. S., Brown, S. D., Heathcote, A., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2013). Not just for consumers: Context effects are fundamental to decision making. Psychological Science, 24, 901-908. doi:10.1177/ 0956797612464241
70. Tse, C. S., Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Duchek, J. M., & McCabe, D. P. (2010). Effects of healthy aging and early stage dementia of the Alzheimer's type on components of response time distributions in three attention tasks. Neuropsychology, 24, 300-315. doi:10.1037/a0018274
71. Tsetsos, K., Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2011). Testing multialternative decision models with non-stationary evidence. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 5, Article 63. doi:10.3389/fnins.2011.00063
72. Unsworth, N., Redick, T. S., Lakey, C. E., & Young, D. L. (2010). Lapses in sustained attention and their relation to executive control and fluid abilities: An individual differences investigation. Intelligence, 38, 111- 122. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2009.08.002
73. Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108, 550-592. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.550
74. Usher, M., Olami, Z., & McClelland, J. L. (2002). Hick's law in a stochastic race model with speed-accuracy tradeoff. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 46, 704-715. doi:10.1006/jmps.2002.1420
75. Vickers, D. (1970). Evidence for an accumulator model of psychophysical discrimination. Ergonomics, 13, 37-58. doi:10.1080/00140137008931117
76. Vickers, D. (1979). Decision processes in visual perception. New York, NY: Academic Press.
77. Vickers, D., & Lee, M. D. (1998). Dynamic models of simple judgments: I. Properties of a self-regulating accumulator module. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 2, 169-194. doi:10.1023/A: 1022371901259
78. Wald, A., & Wolfowitz, J. (1948). Optimum character of the Sequential Probability Ratio Test. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 19, 326-339. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177730197
79. Wilhelm, O., & Oberauer, K. (2006). Why are reasoning ability and working memory capacity related to mental speed? An investigation of stimulus-response compatibility in choice reaction time tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 18 -50. doi:10.1080/ 09541440500215921
80. Wright, M. J., Jr., Vandewater, S. A., & Taffe, M. A. (2013). The influence of acute and chronic alcohol consumption on response time distribution in adolescent rhesus macaques. Neuropharmacology, 70, 12-18. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.01.003
81. Yap, M. J., Balota, D. A., & Tan, S. E. (2013). Additive and interactive effects in semantic priming: Isolating lexical and decision processes in the lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 140-158. doi:10.1037/a0028520