Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions

Psychological Science

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 347-356

  Ratcliff, Roger ^a   Rouder, Jeffrey N ^b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039052586     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00067     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Audley, R.J., & Pike, A.R. (1965). Some alternative stochastic models of choice. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 18, 207-225.
2. Busemeyer, J.R., & Townsend, J.T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100, 432-459.
3. Espinoza-Varas, B., & Watson, C. (1994). Effects of decision criterion on latencies of binary decisions. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 190-203.
4. Estes, W.K. (1995). Response processes in cognitive models. In R.F. Lorch & E.J. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in text comprehension (pp. 51-71). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Feller, W. (1968). An introduction to probability theory and its applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
6. LaBerge, D.A. (1962). A recruitment theory of simple behavior. Psychometrika, 27, 375-396.
7. Laming, D.R.J. (1968). Information theory of choice reaction time. New York: Wiley.
8. Link, S.W., & Heath, R.A. (1975). A sequential theory of psychological discrimination. Psychometrika, 40, 77-105.
9. Luce, R.D. (1986). Response times. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Maddox, W.T., & Ashby, F.G. (1993). Comparing decision bound and exemplar models of categorization. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 49-70.
11. Nosofsky, R.M., & Palmeri, T.J. (1997). An exemplar based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review, 104, 266-300.
12. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-108.
13. Ratcliff, R. (1981). A theory of order relations in perceptual matching. Psychological Review, 88, 552-572.
14. Ratcliff, R. (1985). Theoretical interpretations of speed and accuracy of positive and negative responses. Psychological Review, 92, 212-225.
15. Ralcliff, R. (1988). Continuous versus discrete information processing: Modeling the accumulation of partial information. Psychological Review, 95, 238-255.
16. Ratcliff, R., & Murdock, B.B., Jr. (1976). Retrieval processes in recognition memory. Psychological Review; 83, 190-214.
17. Ratcliff, R., Van Zandt, T., & McKoon, G. (in press). Comparing connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. Psychological Review.
18. Rouder, J.N. (1996). Premature sampling in random walks. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 40, 289-296.
19. Smith, P.L. (1995). Psychophysically principled models of visual simple reaction time. Psychological Review, 102, 567-591.
20. Smith, P.L., & Vickers, D. (1988). The accumulator model of two-choice discrimination. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 32, 135-168.
21. Stone, M. (1960). Models for choice reaction time. Psychometrika, 25, 251-260.
22. Strayer, D.L., & Kramer, A.F. (1994). Strategies and automaticity: I. Basic findings and conceptual framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 318-341.
23. Swensson, R.G. (1972). The elusive tradeoff: Speed versus accuracy in visual discrimination tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 16-32.
24. Van Zandi, T. & Ratcliff, R. (1995). Statistical mimicking of reaction time distributions: Mixtures and parameter variability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 20-54.
25. Vickers, D. (1979). Decision processes in visual perception. New York: Academic Press.
26. Vickers, D., Caudrey, D., & Willson, R.J. (1971). Discriminating between the frequency of occurrence of two alternative events. Acta Psychologica, 35, 151-172.