The boundaries of self face perception: Response time distributions, perceptual categories, and decision weighting

Visual Cognition

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 415-445

  Sui, Jie ^a,b   Humphreys, Glyn W ^b  

^a Tsinghua University   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Face categorization; Reaction time distribution; Self perception

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SELF CONCEPT;

EID: 84880044575     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2013.800621     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Alicke, M. D., Klotz, M. L., Breitenbecher, D. L., Yurak, T. J., & Vredenbury, D. S. 1995. Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than average effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 804 - 825. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.804
2. Balota, D. A., & Spieler, D. H. 1999. Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: Beyond measures of central tendency. Journal of Experimental Psychological: General, 128, 32 - 55. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.128.1.32
3. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., & Watson, J. M. 2008. Beyond mean response latency: Response time distributional analyses of semantic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 495 - 523. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.10.004
4. Brown, S., & Heathcote, A. 2003. QMLE: Fast, robust, and efficient estimation of distribution functions based on quantiles. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 485 - 492. doi: 10.3758/BF03195527
5. Caharel, S., Poiroux, S., Bernard, C., Thibaut, F., Lalonde, R., & Rebai, M. 2002. ERPs associated with familiarity and degrees of familiarity during face recognition. International Journal of Neuroscience, 112, 1499 - 1512. doi: 10.1080/00207450290158368
6. Cleveland, W. S. 1985. The elements of graphing data. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth.
7. Clutterbuck, R., & Johnston, R. A. 2002. Exploring levels of face familiarity by using an indirect face matching measure. Perception, 31, 985 - 994. doi: 10.1068/p3335
8. Conway, M. A., Collins, A. F., Gathercole, S. E., & Anderson, S. J. 1996. Recollections of true and false autobiographical memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 69 - 95. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.125.1.69
9. Cousineau, D., Brown, S., & Heathcote, A. 2004. Fitting distributions using maximum likelihood: Methods and packages. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 742 - 756. doi: 10.3758/BF03206555
10. Decety, J., & Sommerville, J. A. 2003. Shared representations between self and other: A social cognitive neuroscience view. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 527 - 533. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.004
11. D'Lauro, C., Tanaka, J. W., & Curran, T. 2008. The preferred level of face categorization depends on discriminability. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 623 - 629.
12. Fink, G. R., Markowitsch, H. J., Reinkemeier, M., Bruckbauer, T., Kessler, J., & Heiss, W. D. 1996. Cerebral representation of one's own past: Neural networks involved in autobiographical memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 4275 - 4282.
13. Gallup, G. G. 1970. Chimpanzees: Self-recognition. Science, 167, 86 - 87. doi: 10.1126/science.167.3914.86
14. Han, S., & Northoff, G. 2008. Culture-sensitive neural substrates of human cognition: A transcultural neuroimaging approach. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 1 - 9.
15. Heathcote, A., Brown, S., & Cousineau, D. 2004. QMPE: Estimating lognormal, Wald, and Weibull RT distributions with a parameter-dependent low bound. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 277 - 290. doi: 10.3758/BF03195574
16. Heathcote, A., Brown, S., & Mewhort, D. J. K. 2002. Quantile maximum likelihood estimation of response time distribution. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 394 - 401. doi: 10.3758/BF03196299
17. Heathcote, A., Popiel, S. J., & Mewhort D. J. K. 1991. Analysis of response time distributions: An example using the Stroop task. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 340 - 347. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.340
18. Heatherton, T. F., Wyland, C. L., Macrae, C. N., Demos, K. E., Denny, B. T., & Keley, W. M. 2006. Medial prefrontal activity differentiates self from close others. Social and Cognitive Affective Neuroscience, 1, 18 - 25. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsl001
19. Hohle, R. H. 1965. Inferred components of reaction times as functions of foreperiod duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 382 - 386. doi: 10.1037/h0021740
20. Keenan, J. P., Gallup, G. G., & Falk, D. 2003. The face in the mirror: The search for the origins of consciousness. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
21. Keenan, J. P., McCutcheon, B., Sanders, G., Freund, S., Gallup, G. G., & Pascual-Leone, A. 1999. Left hand advantage in a self-face recognition task. Neuropsychologia, 37, 1421 - 1425. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00025-1
22. Keenan, J. P., Wheeler, M. A., Gallup, G. G., & Pascual-Leone, A. 2000. Self-recognition and the right prefrontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 338 - 344. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01521-7
23. Kelley, W. M., Macrae, C. N., Wyland, C. L., Caglar, S., Inati, S., & Heatherton, T. F. 2002. Finding the self? An event-related fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 785 - 794.
24. Keyes, H. 2012. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: The role of configural and featural information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 760 - 720. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.636822
25. Keyes, H., & Brady, N. 2010. Self-face recognition is characterized by "bilateral gain" and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 840 - 847. doi: 10.1080/17470211003611264
26. Keyes, H., Brady, N., Reilly, R. B., & Foxe, J. J. 2010. My face or yours? Event-related potential correlates of self-face processing. Brain and Cognition, 72, 244 - 254. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.09.006
27. Kircher, T., Senior, C., Phillips, M., Rabe-Hesketh, S., Benson, P., Bullmore, E., David, A. 2001. Recognizing one's own face. Cognition, 78, B1 - B15. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00104-9
28. Klein, S. B., Loftus, J., & Burton, H. A. 1989. Two self-reference effects: The importance of distinguishing between self-descriptiveness judgments and autobiographical retrieval in self-referent encoding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 853 - 865. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.6.853
29. Luce, R. D. 1986. Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30. Ma, Y., & Han, S. 2010. Why respond faster to the self than others? An implicit positive association theory of self advantage during implicit face recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 619 - 633. doi: 10.1037/a0015797
31. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. 1991. Culture and the self: implication for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224 - 253. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
32. Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. 2009. Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: A diffusion model analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 798 - 817. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.798
33. McConnell, A. R., Rydell, R. J., & Leibold, J. M. 2002. Expectations of consistency about the self: Consequences for self-concept formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 509 - 585. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00504-8
34. Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. 1975. Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213 - 225. doi: 10.1037/h0076486
35. Moutsopoulou, K., & Waszak, F. 2012. Across-task priming revisited: Response and task conflicts disentangled using Ex-Gaussian distribution analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 367 - 374. doi: 10.1037/a0025858
36. Myung, J. I. 2000. The importance of complexity in model selection. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 190 - 204. doi: 10.1006/jmps.1999.1283
37. Northoff, G., & Bermpohl, F. 2004. Cortical midline structures and the self. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 102 - 107.
38. Platek, S. M., Loughead, J. W., Gur, R. C., Busch, S., Ruparel, K., Phend, N., Langleben, D. D. 2006. Neural substrates for functionally discriminating self-face from personally familiar faces. Human Brain Mapping, 27, 91 - 98.
39. Platek, S. M., Wathne, K., Tierney, N. G., & Thomson, J. W. 2008. Neural correlates of self-face recognition: An effect-location meta-analysis. Brain Research, 1232, 173 - 184.
40. Qin, P., Liu, Y., Wang, Y, Duncan, N., Gong, Q., Weng, X., & Northoff, G. 2012. Dissociation between anterior and posterior cortical regions during self-specificity and familiarity: A combined fMRI-meta-analytic study. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 154 - 164.
41. Ratcliff, R. 1979. Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446 - 461.
42. Rohrer, D. 2002. The breadth of memory search. Memory, 10, 291 - 301.
43. Rooney, B., Keyes, H., & Brady, N. 2012. Shared or separate mechanisms for self-face and other-face processing? Evidence from adaptation. Frontiers in Perception Science, 3, 66. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00066
44. Rouder, J. N., Lu, J., Speckman, P., Sun, D., & Jiang, Y. 2005. A hierarchical model for estimating response time distributions. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 195 - 223.
45. Schmiedek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Süβ, H.-M., & Wittmann, W. W. 2007. Individual differences in components of response time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 414 - 429.
46. Spieler, D. H., Balota, D. A., & Faust, M. E. 1996. Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 461 - 479.
47. Sugiura, M., Watanabe, J., Maeda, Y., Matsue, Y., Fukuda, H., & Kawashima, R. 2005. Cortical mechanisms of visual self-recognition. Neuroimage, 24, 143 - 149.
48. Staub, A. 2010. Response time distributional evidence for distinct varieties of number attraction. Cognition, 114, 447 - 454.
49. Sui, J., & Han, S. 2007. Self-construal priming modulates neural substrates of self-awareness. Psychological Science, 18, 861 - 866.
50. Sui, J., He, X., & Humphreys, G. W. 2012. Perceptual effects of social salience: Evidence from self-prioritization effects on perceptual matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1105 - 1117.
51. Sui, J., Liu, C. H., & Han, S. 2009. Cultural difference in neural mechanisms of self-recognition. Social Neuroscience, 4, 402 - 411.
52. Sui, J., Zhu, Y., & Han, S. 2006. Self-face recognition in attended and unattended condition: An event-related brain potential study. Neuroreport, 17, 423 - 427.
53. Tamir, D. I., & Mitchell, J. P. 2012. Disclosing information about the self is intrinsically rewarding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 8038 - 8043.
54. Tanaka, J. W. 2001. The entry point of face recognition: Evidence for face expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 534 - 543.
55. Tong, F., & Nakayama, K. 1999. Robust representations for faces: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1016 - 1035.
56. Tse, C., & Altarriba, J. 2012. The effects of first- and second-language proficiency on conflict resolution and goal maintenance in bilinguals: Evidence from reaction time distributional analyses in a Stroop task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 663 - 676.
57. Turk, D. J., van Bussel, K., Waiter, G. D., & Macrae, C. N. 2011. Mine and me: Exploring the neural basis of object ownership. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 3657 - 3668.
58. Uddin, L. Q., Kaplan, J. T., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Zaidel, E., & Iacoboni, M. 2005. Self-face recognition activates a frontoparietal "mirror" network in the right hemisphere: An event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage, 25, 926 - 935.
59. Van Zandt, T. 2002. Analysis of response time distributions. In J. T. Wixted (Vol. Ed.) & H. Pashler (Series Ed.), Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology: Vol. 4. Methodology in experimental psychology (3rd ed., 461 - 516). New York, NY: Wiley.
60. Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. 1993. Proactive interference and the dynamics of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1024 - 1039.
61. Yap, M. J., Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., & Watson, J. M. 2006. Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: Insights from response time distributional analysis. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1324 - 1344.
62. Zhu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, J., & Han, S. 2007. Neural basis of cultural influence on self-representation. Neuroimage, 34, 1310 - 1316.