Staying on the job: The frontal lobes control individual performance variability

Brain

Volumn 126, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 2363-2380

  Stuss, Donald T ^a,d   Murphy, Kelly J ^a,c   Binns, Malcolm A ^a   Alexander, Michael P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c BAYCREST CENTRE FOR GERIATRIC CARE   (Canada)

^d ROTMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Attention; Frontal lobes; Individual differences; Intra individual variability; Reaction time

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY; BRAIN INJURY; BRAIN TUMOR; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL LOBECTOMY;

EID: 0142153176     PISSN: 00068950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awg237     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Alexander MP, Stuss DT, Fansabedian N. California verbal learning test: performance by patients with focal frontal and non-frontal lesions. Brain 2003; 126: 1493-1503.
2. Alivisatos B, Milner B. Effects of frontal or temporal lobectomy on the use of advance information in a choice reaction time task. Neuropsychologia 1989; 27: 495-503.
3. Anderson B, Mennemeier M, Chatterjee A. Variability not ability: another basis for performance decrements in neglect. Neuropsychologia 2000; 38: 785-96.
4. Anstey KJ. Sensorimotor variables and forced expiratory volume as correlates of speed, accuracy, and variability in reaction time performance in late adulthood. Aging Neuropsychol C 1999; 6: 84-95.
5. Ballard C, Walker M, O'Brien J, Rowan E, McKeith I. The characterization and impact of 'fluctuating' cognition in dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer's disease, Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2001; 16: 494-98.
6. Barratt ES. Intra-individual variability of performance: ANS and psychometric correlates. Tex Rep Biol Med 1963; 21: 496-504.
7. Bastian AJ, Martin TA, Keating JG, Thach WT. Cerebellar ataxia: abnormal control of interaction torques across multiple joints. J Neurophysiol 1996; 76: 492-509.
8. Benton AL, Blackburn HL. Practice effects in reaction-time tasks in brain-injured patients. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 1957; 54: 109-13.
9. Bernstein LJ, Robertson LC. Illusory conjunctions of color and motion with shape following bilateral parietal lesions. Psychol Sci 1998; 9: 167-75.
10. Bleiberg J, Garmoe W, Cederquist J, Reeves D, Lux W. Effects of dexedrine on performance consistency following brain injury. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 1993; 6: 245-248.
11. Bleiberg J, Garmoe WS, Halpern EL, Reeves DL, Nadler JD. Consistency of within-day and across-day performance after mild brain injury. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 1997; 10: 247-53.
12. Bleiberg J, Halpern EL, Reeves D, Daniel JC. Future directions for the neuropsychological assessment of sports concussion. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1998; 13: 36-44.
13. Bruhn P, Parsons OA. Continuous reaction time in brain damage. Cortex 1971; 7: 278-91.
14. Burgess PW, Shallice T. Response suppression, initiation and strategy use following frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia 1996; 34: 263-72.
15. Collins LF, Long CJ. Visual reaction time and its relationship to neuropsychological test performance. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1996; 11: 613-23.
16. Cronbach LJ. The two disciplines of scientific psychology. Am Psychol 1957; 12: 671-84.
17. Cummings JL. Fronto-subcortical circuits and human behavior. Arch Neurol 1993; 50: 873-80.
18. Deutsch G, Papanicolaou AC, Bourbon WT, Eisenberg HM. Cerebral blood flow evidence of right frontal activation in attention demanding tasks, Int J Neurosci 1987; 36: 23-8.
19. Donders FC. On the speed of mental processes. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1969; 30: 412-31.
20. Elsass P, Hartelius H. Reaction time and brain disease: relations to location, aetiology and progression of cerebral dysfunction. Acta Neurol Scand 1985; 71: 11-19.
21. Fink GR, Halligan PW, Marshall JC, Frith CD, Frackowiak RSJ, Dolan RJ. Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli. Brain 1997; 120: 1779-91.
22. Fiske DW, Rice L. Intra-individual response variability. Psychol Bull 1955; 52: 217-50.
23. Flugel JC. Practice, fatigue and oscillation. Br J Psychol Mono Suppl 1928; 4: 1-92.
24. Foster JK, Behrmann M, Stuss DT. Aging and visual search: generalized cognitive slowing or selective deficit in attention? Aging Cogn 1995; 2: 279-99.
25. Fozard JL, Vercruyssen M, Reynolds SL, Hancock PA, Quilter RE. Age differences and changes in reaction time: The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. J Gerontol Psychol Sci 1994; 49: 179-89.
26. Glosser G, Goodglass H. Disorders in executive control functions among aphasic and other brain-damaged patients. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1990; 12: 485-501.
27. Goldstein K. After effects of brain injuries in war. New York: Grune and Stratton; 1942.
28. Hale S, Myerson J, Smith GA, Poon LW. Age, variability, and speed: between-subjects diversity. Psychol Aging 1988; 3: 407-10.
29. Head H. Aphasia and kindred disorders of speech. Cambridge: University Press; 1926.
30. Hetherington CR, Stuss DT, Finlayson MAJ. Reaction time and variability 5 and 10 years after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 1996; 10: 473-86.
31. Holmes G. The cerebellum of man. The Hughlings Jackson memorial lecture. Brain 1939; 62: 1-30.
32. Hultsch DF, MacDonald SWS, Hunter MA, Levy-Bencheton J, Strauss E. Intraindividual variability in cognitive performance in older adults: comparison of adults with mild dementia, adults with arthritis, and healthy adults. Neuropsychology 2000; 14: 588-98.
33. Kelly A, Heathcote A, Heath R, Longstaff M. Response-time dynamics: evidence for linear and low-dimensional nonlinear structure in human choice sequences. Q J Exp Psychol A 2001; 54: 805-40.
34. Knight RT, Hillyard SA, Woods DL, Neville HJ. The effects of frontal cortex lesions on event-related potentials during auditory selective attention. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1981; 52: 571-82.
35. Konow A, Pribram KH. Error recognition and utilization produced by injury to the frontal cortex in man. Neuropsychologia 1970; 8: 489-91.
36. Leth-Steensen C, Elbaz ZK, Douglas VI. Mean response times, variability, and skew in the responding of ADHD children: a response time distributional approach. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2000; 104: 167-90.
37. Lindenberger U, Baltes PB. Intellectual functioning in old and very old age: cross-sectional results from the Berlin Aging Study. Psychol Aging 1997; 12: 410-32.
38. Luria AR. Higher cortical functions in man. New York: Basic Books; 1966.
39. Milberg WM, Blumstein S, Giovanello KS, Misiurski C. Summation priming in aphasia: Evidence for alterations in semantic integration and activation. Brain Cogn 2003; 51: 31-47.
40. Murtha S, Cismaru R, Waechter R, Chertkow H. Increased variability accompanies frontal lobe damage in dementia. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2002; 8: 360-72.
41. Nauta WJH. The problem of the frontal lobe: a reinterpretation. J Psychiatr Res 1971; 8: 167-87.
42. Nauta WJH. Connections of the frontal lobe with the limbic system. In: Laitinen LV, Livingston KE, editors. Surgical approaches in psychiatry. Baltimore: University Park Press; 1973. p. 303-14.
43. Norman DA, Shallice T. Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behaviour. In: Davidson RJ, Schwartz GE, Shapiro D, editors. Consciousness and self-regulation: advances in research and theory, Vol. 4. New York: Plenum; 1986. p. 1-18.
44. Petrides M, Pandya DN. Comparative architectonic analysis of the human and macaque frontal cortex. In: Boller F, Grafman J, editors. Handbook of neuropsychology, Vol. 9. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1994. p. 17-58.
45. Petrides M, Pandya DN. Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: comparative cytoarchitectonic analysis in the human and the macaque brain and corticocortical connection pattterns. Eur J Neurosci 1999; 11: 1011-36.
46. Philpott SJF. Fluctuations in human output. Br J Psyhol Mono Suppl 1933; 17: 6.
47. Rabbitt P, Rodgers B. What does a man do after he makes an error? An analysis of response programming. Q J Exp Psychol 1977; 29: 727-43.
48. Rabbitt PMA, Vyas SM. An elementary preliminary taxonomy for some errors in laboratory choice RT tasks. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1970; 33: 56-76.
49. Salthouse TA. Attentional blocks are not responsible for age-related slowing. J Gerontol 1993; 48: 263-70.
50. Salthouse TA. The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychol Rev 1996; 103: 403-28.
51. Schwartz F, Carr AC, Munich RL, Glauber S, Lesser B, Murray J. Reaction-time impairment in schizophrenia and affective illness: the role of attention. Biol Psychiatry 1989; 25: 540-8.
52. Segalowitz SJ, Dywan J, Unsal A. Attentional factors in response time variability after traumatic brain injury: an ERP study. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1997; 3: 95-107.
53. Shammi P, Bosman E, Stuss DT. Aging and variability in performance. Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 1998; 5: 1-13.
54. Spikman JM, van Zomeren AH, Deelman BG. Deficits of attention after closed-head injury: slowness only? J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1996; 18: 755-67.
55. Sternberg S. Memory scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. Am Sci 1969; 57: 421-57.
56. Stuss DT. Interference effects on memory functions in postleukotomy patients: an attentional perspective. In: Levin HS, Eisenberg HM, Benton AL, editors. Frontal lobe function and dysfunction. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991. p. 157-72.
57. Stuss DT, Benson DF. The frontal lobes. New York: Raven Press; 1986.
58. Stuss DT, Levine B. Adult clinical neuropsychology: lessons from studies of the frontal lobes. Annu Rev Psychol 2002; 53: 401-33.
59. Stuss DT, Delgado M, Guzman DA. Verbal regulation in the control of motor impersistence: a proposed rehabilitation procedure. J Neurol Rehabil 1987; 1: 19-24.
60. Stuss DT, Stethem LL, Hugenholtz H, Picton T, Pivik J, Richard MT. Reaction time after head injury: fatigue, divided and focused attention, and consistency of performance. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1989; 52: 742-8.
61. Stuss DT, Alexander MP, Palumbo CL, Buckle L, Sayer L, Pogue J. Organizational strategies of patients with unilateral or bilateral frontal lobe injury in word list learning tasks. Neuropsychology 1994a; 8: 355-73,
62. Stuss DT, Pogue J, Buckle L, Bondar J. Characterization of stability of performance in patients with traumatic brain injury: variability and consistency on reaction time tests. Neuropsychology 1994b; 8: 316-24.
63. Stuss DT, Shallice T, Alexander MP, Picton TW. A multidisciplinary approach to anterior attentional functions. Ann NY Acad Sci 1995; 769: 191-211.
64. Stuss DT, Alexander MP, Hamer L, Palumbo C, Dempster R, Binns M, et al. The effects of focal anterior and posterior brain lesions on verbal fluency. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1998; 4: 265-78.
65. Stuss DT, Murphy KJ, Binns MA. The frontal lobes and performance variability: evidence from reaction time. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1999; 5: 123.
66. Stuss DT, Levine B, Alexander MP, Hong J, Palumbo C, Hamer L, et al. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance in patients with focal frontal and posterior brain damage: effects of lesion location and test structure on separable cognitive processes. Neuropsychologia 2000; 38: 388-402.
67. Stuss DT, Floden D, Alexander MP, Levine B, Katz D. Stroop performance in focal lesion patients: dissociation of processes and frontal lobe lesion location. Neuropsychologia 2001; 39: 771-86.
68. Stuss DT, Alexander MP, Floden D, Binns MA, Levine B, McIntosh AR, et al. Fractionation and localization of distinct frontal lobe processes: Evidence from focal lesions in humans. In: Stuss DT, Knight RT, editors. Principles of frontal lobe function. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002a. p. 392-407.
69. Stuss DT, Binns MA, Murphy KJ, Alexander MP. Dissociations within the anterior attentional system: effects of task complexity and irrelevant information on reaction time speed and accuracy. Neuropsychology 2002b; 16: 500-13.
70. van Zomeren AH, Brouwer WH. Clinical neuropsychology of attention, New York: Oxford University Press; 1994.
71. Walker MP, Ayre GA, Cummings JL, Wesnes K, McKeith IG, O'Brien JT, et al. The Clinician Assessment of Fluctuation and the One Day Fluctuation Assessment Scale. Two methods to assess fluctuating confusion in dementia. Br J Psychiatry 2000; 177: 252-6.
72. Wei WW. Time series analysis. Redwood City (CA): Addison-Wesley; 1990.
73. West R. Age differences in lapses of intention in the Stroop task. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1999a; 54: 34-43.
74. West R. Visual distraction, working memory, and aging. Mem Cognit 1999b; 27: 1064-72.
75. West R, Murphy KJ, Armilio ML, Craik FIM, Stuss DT. Effects of time of day on age differences in working memory. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2002a; 57, 3-10.
76. West R, Murphy KJ, Armillio ML, Craik FIM, Stuss DT. Lapses of intention and performance variability reveal age-related increases in fluctuations of executive control. Brain Cogn 2002b; 49: 402-19.
77. Whyte J, Polansky M, Fleming M, Coslett HB, Cavallucci C. Sustained arousal and attention after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia 1995; 33: 797-813.
78. Wiesendanger M, Wise SP. Current issues concerning the functional organization of motor cortical areas in nonhuman primates. Adv Neurol 1992; 57: 117-34.
79. Wilkins AJ, Shallice T, McCarthy R. Frontal lesions and sustained attention. Neuropsychologia 1987; 25: 359-65.
80. Woods DL, Knight RT. Electrophysiologic evidence of increased distractibility after dorsolateral prefrontal lesions. Neurology 1986; 36: 212-16.
81. Zahn TP, Mirsky AF. Reaction time indicators of attention deficits in closed head injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1999; 21: 352-67.
82. Zahn TP, Kruesi MJP, Rapoport JL. Reaction time indices of attention deficits in boys with disruptive behavior disorders. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1991; 19: 233-52.