Dynamic integration of reward and stimulus information in perceptual decision-making

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2011, Pages

  Gao, Juan ^a   Tortell, Rebecca ^a   McClelland, James L ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; AUDITORY FEEDBACK; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NEUROMODULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; RESPONSE TIME; REWARD; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL DETECTION; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STEADY STATE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL FEEDBACK; VISUAL STIMULATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EPIDEMIOLOGY; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PERCEPTION; STIMULATION; TIME;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PERCEPTION; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; REWARD; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79952291641     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016749     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Usher M, McClelland JL, (2001) The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychol Rev 108: 550-592.
2. Ratcliff R, (1978) A theory of memory retrieval. Psychol Rev 85: 59-108.
3. Shadlen MN, Newsome WT, (2001) Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. J Neurophysio 86: 1916-1936.
4. Bogacz R, Brown E, Moehlis J, Holmes P, Cohen JD, (2006) The physics of optimal decision making: A formal analysis of models of performance in two alternative forced choice tasks. Psychol Rev 113 (4): 700-765.
5. Ratcliff R, Van Zandt T, McKoon G, (1999) Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. Psychol Rev 106 (2): 261-300.
6. Mazurek ME, Roitman JD, Ditterich J, Shadlen MN, (2003) A role for neural integrators in perceptual decision-making. Cereb Cortex 13: 1257C1269.
7. Wong KF, Wang XJ, (2006) A recurrent network mechanism of time integration in perceptual decisions. J Neurosci 26: 1314-1328.
8. Alsop B, (1998) Receiver operating characteristics from nonhuman animals: Some implications and directions for research with humans. Psychon Bull Rev 2: 239-252.
9. Dusoir TAE, (1983) Isobias curves in some detection tasks. Percept and Psychophys 33: 403-412.
10. Macmillan NA, Creelman CD, (1990) Response bias: Characteristics of detection theory, threshold theory, and "non-parametric" indexes. Psychol Bull 107: 401-413.
11. Edwards W, (1965) Optimal strategies for seeking information: Models for statistics, choice reaction times, and human information processing. J Math Psychol 2: 312-329.
12. Diederich A, Busemeyer JR, (2006) Modeling the effects of payoff on response bias in a perceptual discrimination task: Bound-change, drift-rate-change, or two-stage-processing hypothesis. Percept and Psychophys 68 (2): 194-207.
13. Diederich A, (2008) A further test on sequential sampling models accounting for payoff effects on response bias in perceptual decision tasks. Percept and Psychophys 70 (2): 229 C 256.
14. Feng S, Holmes P, Rorie A, Newsome WT, (2009) Can monkeys choose optimally when faced with noisy stimuli and unequal rewards? PLoS Comput Biol 5 (2): e1000284 doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000284.
15. Rorie A, Gao J, McClelland JL, Newsome WT, (2010) Integration of sensory and reward information during perceptual decision-making in lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP). PLoS One 5 (2): e9308 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009308.
16. Roitman JD, Shadlen MN, (2002) Response of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area during a combined visual discrimination reaction time task. Nat Neurosci 22: 9475-9489.
17. Green DM, Swets JA, (1966) Signal detection theory and psychophysics New York Wiley.
18. Wood CC, (1976) Discriminability, response bias and phoneme categories in discrimination of voice onset time. J Acoust Soc USA 60: 1381-1389.
19. Townsend JT, (1981) Some characteristics of visual whole-report behavior. Acta Psychol(Amst) 47: 149-173.
20. Busey TA, Loftus GR, (1994) Sensory and cognitive components of visual information acquisition. Psychol Rev 101: 446-469.
21. Brown E, Gao J, Holmes P, Bogacz R, Gilzenrat M, et al. (2005) Simple neural networks that optimize decisions. Int J Bifurcat Chaos 15: 803-826.
22. Kiani R, Hanks TD, Shadlen MN, (2008) Bounded integration in parietal cortex underlies decisions even when viewing duration is dictated by the environment. J Neurosci 19: 3017-3029.
23. Usher M, Gao J, Tortell R, McClelland JL, (2009) Using time-varying motion stimuli to explore decision dynamics. Psychonom.
24. Ratcliff R, (2006) Modeling response signal and response time data. Cogn Psychol 53: 195-237.
25. Dayan P, Abbott LF, (2001) Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems Cambridge, MA MIT Press.
26. Busemeyer JR, (1985) Decision making under uncertainty: Simple scalability, fixed sample, and sequential sampling models. J of Exp Psychol: Learn, Mem, and Cogn 11: 538-564.
27. Busemeyer JR, Rapoport A, (1988) Psychological models of deferred decision making. J of Math Psychol 32: 1-44.
28. Eckhoff P, Holmes P, Law C, Connolly PM, Gold JI, (2008) On diffusion processes with variable drift rates as models for decision making during learning. New J of Physics 10: 1367-2630.
29. Gao J, Wong-Lin KF, Holmes P, Simen P, Cohen JD, (2009) Integrated models for sequential effects in two-choice forced-choice tasks serial reaction-time tasks. Neural Comput 21: 2407-2436.
30. Glimcher PW, Rustichini A, (2004) Neuroeconomics: The concilience of brain and decision science. Psychol Rev 306: 447-452.
31. Kacelnik A, Bateson M, (1997) Risk-sensitivity: crossroads for theories of decision-making. Trends Cogn Sci 1 (8): 304-309.
32. Maddox WT, Bohil CJ, (2003) A theoretical framework for understanding the simultaneous base-rate and payoff manipulations on decision criterion learning in perceptual categorization. J of Exp Psychol: Learn, Mem and Cogn 29: 307-320.
33. Simen P, Contreras D, Buck C, Hu P, Holmes P, et al. (2009) Reward rate optimization in two-alternative decision making: Empirical tests of theoretical predictions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 35: 1865-1897.
34. Shadlen MN, Hanks TD, Mazurek ME, Kiani R, Yang T, et al. (2006) The brain uses elapsed time to convert spike rate to probability. Abstract for poster presentation 605.6 at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience.